Deductive Arguments: More Truth Tables

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRUTH TABLES Section 1.3.
Advertisements

Truth Tables The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to construct truth tables and use them to test the validity of arguments. Go To Next Slide.
Truth Functional Logic
Chapter 21: Truth Tables.
Truth Tables How to Make and Use. Making a Truth Table To determine the number of rows other than the heading row. To determine the number of rows other.
Logic & Critical Reasoning
Valid arguments A valid argument has the following property:
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Copyright © Curt Hill Truth Tables A way to show Boolean Operations.
Computer Science 210 Computer Organization Introduction to Boolean Algebra.
Logic Disjunction A disjunction is a compound statement formed by combining two simple sentences using the word “OR”. A disjunction is true when at.
Conjunction A conjunction is a compound statement formed by combining two simple sentences using the word “AND”. A conjunction is only true when both.
Combination of logic gates  Logic gates can be combined to produce more complex functions.  They can also be combined to substitute one type of gate.
Section 2-2: Conditional Statements. Conditional A statement that can be written in If-then form symbol: If p —>, then q.
Unit 01 – Lesson 07 – Conditional Statements
Thinking Mathematically
Thinking Mathematically Arguments and Truth Tables.
What is a Biconditional Students will be able to: 1.Rewrite compound sentences in conditional form 2.Find the biconditional of a conditional 3.Tell when/why.
Analyzing Arguments Section 1.5. Valid arguments An argument consists of two parts: the hypotheses (premises) and the conclusion. An argument is valid.
Thinking Mathematically Logic 3.4 Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional.
If-then statements April 4, What is an if-then statement? One of the postulates we looked at earlier stated: If B is between A and C, then AB +
Activity 1 Research / Revise how RAM stores DATA 5 minutes 1 0.
Section 3.2: Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
Truth Tables, Continued 6.3 and 6.4 March 14th. 6.3 Truth tables for propositions Remember: a truth table gives the truth value of a compound proposition.
Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
Presented by: Tutorial Services The Math Center
Logic.
Computer Science 210 Computer Organization
AND.
Properties of Operations for Real Numbers
DISCRETE MATHEMATICS CHAPTER I.
Truth Tables and Equivalent Statements
CHAPTER 3 Logic.
Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
Converting Statements to Symbols
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic
How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent?
3.4 Truth Tables for the Conditional and the Biconditional
Chapter 2.3 Binary Logic.
Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13
Truth Tables – Logic (Continued)
Truth Tables How to build them
Evaluating truth tables
3.4 Computer systems Boolean logic Lesson 2.
Special Graphs of Inequalities.
Computer Science 210 Computer Organization
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
TRUTH TABLES.
TRUTH TABLES continued.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
Truth tables 3.2 and 3.3 Constructing Truth tables
Deductive Arguments: Checking for Validity
6.3 Truth Tables for Propositions
Lecture 5 Binary Operation Boolean Logic. Binary Operations Addition Subtraction Multiplication Division.
Statements of Symbolic Logic
Section 3.3 Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional
Section 3.2 Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
Converting from Base-n to Base-10
Converting to Base-n from Base-10
CHAPTER 3 Logic.
2-2 Logic Part 2 Truth Tables.
Philosophical Methods
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
CHAPTER 3 Logic.
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Truth Tables for Conditional and Biconditional Statements
boolean Expressions Relational, Equality, and Logical Operators
Presentation transcript:

Deductive Arguments: More Truth Tables ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

Basic Truth Tables Here is a combined truth table for the three binary logical operators AND, OR, and IF..THEN... AND is only True if both of its simple statements are True. OR is only False if both of its simple statements are False. IF..THEN.. is only False for row p=T, q=F. Here is the truth table for unary logical operator NOT. The NOT operator switches True to False and False to True. p q p ∩ q p ∪ q p → q T F p ∼p T F

p q p ∩ q p ∪ q p → q T F ∼p More Truth Tables Using the basic truth tables, we can now build truth tables for more complicated statements. The letters p and q are placeholders. We will be using different letters for our examples. We’ll start with statements based on two simple statements that we’ll call a and b. That means we’ll have four rows, representing the four permutations of our simple statements being T or F. We will include some space for ‘helper columns’ if we need them. Helper columns a b T F

p q p ∩ q p ∪ q p → q T F ∼p Example 1 Let’s try the compound statement: “I’ll eat apples and I won’t eat bananas”, or a ∩ (∼b) Our final column will hold the truth table for our target statement. To answer the ( ) ∩ ( ) part of the question, we need a truth table column for the statement before the ∩ and a column for the statement after the ∩. We have a column for the statement before, which is a. We don’t have a column with ∼b in it, so let’s put this in one of our helper columns. Now we fill in the ∼b column. Each entry is just the opposite of the value in the b column. Helper columns a b a ∩ ∼b T F a b ∼b a ∩ ∼b T F a b T F

Example 1 (continued) [ Our compound statement is a ∩ (∼b). ] q p ∩ q p ∪ q p → q T F ∼p Example 1 (continued) [ Our compound statement is a ∩ (∼b). ] To answer the ( ) ∩ ( ) part of the question, we take the values of what is before and after the ∩ for each row and check our basic truth tables for the answer in the ∩ column. Row 1: a is T and ∼b is F. Our table says T ∩ F is F. Row 2: a is T and ∼b is T. Our table says T ∩ T is T. Row 3: a is F and ∼b is F. Our table says F ∩ F is F. Row 4: a is F and ∼b is T. Our table says F ∩ T is F. Our truth table for a ∩ (∼b) is now completed. a b ∼b a ∩ ∼b T F a b ∼b a ∩ ∼b T F a b ∼b a ∩ ∼b T F a b ∼b a ∩ ∼b T F a b ∼b a ∩ ∼b T F

p q p ∩ q p ∪ q p → q T F ∼p Example 2 The compound statement: “If I don’t eat apples then I’ll eat bananas”, or (∼a) → b To answer the ( ) → ( ) part of the question, we need a helper column for ∼a. Since order is important for the IF…THEN.., a helper column with b in it would be useful. Now fill in the target column: Row 1: ∼a is F and b is T. Our table says F → T is T. Row 2: ∼a is F and b is F. Our table says F → F is T. Row 3: ∼a is T and b is T. Our table says T→ T is T. Row 4: ∼a is T and b is F. Our table says T → F is F. a b ∼a ∼a → b T F a b ∼a ∼a → b T F a b ∼a ∼a → b T F a b ∼a ∼a → b T F a b ∼a ∼a → b T F a b ∼a → b T F a b ∼a → b T F a b ∼a ∼a → b T F

p q p ∩ q p ∪ q p → q T F ∼p Example 3 The compound statement: “It is not the case that I will eat apples or bananas”, or ∼ (a ∪ b) To answer the ∼ ( ) part of the question, we need a helper column for a ∪ b. Now fill in the helper column a ∪ b : Row 1: a is T and b is T. Our table says T ∪ T is T. Row 2: a is T and b is F. Our table says T ∪ F is T. Row 3: a is F and b is T. Our table says F ∪ T is T. Row 4: a is F and b is F. Our table says F ∪ F is F. Finally, fill in the target column ∼ (a ∪ b) : Row 1: a ∪ b is T. Our table says ∼T is F. Row 2: a ∪ b is T. Our table says ∼T is F. Row 3: a ∪ b is T. Our table says ∼T is F. Row 4: a ∪ b is F. Our table says ∼F is T. a b a ∪ b ∼(a ∪ b) T F a b a ∪ b ∼(a ∪ b) T F a b a ∪ b ∼(a ∪ b) T F a b a ∪ b ∼(a ∪ b) T F a b a ∪ b ∼(a ∪ b) T F a b a ∪ b ∼(a ∪ b) T F a b ∼(a ∪ b) T F a b a ∪ b ∼(a ∪ b) T F a b a ∪ b ∼(a ∪ b) T F a b a ∪ b ∼(a ∪ b) T F

Example 4 – Try it on your own q p ∩ q p ∪ q p → q T F ∼p Example 4 – Try it on your own Predict the answers below: The compound statement is: “If I don’t eat apples, then I won’t eat bananas” What is this symbolically? Answer: (∼a) → (∼b) What helper columns will you need? Answer: ∼a and ∼b Fill in the helper column for ∼a. Fill in the helper column for ∼b. Fill in the target column (∼a) → (∼b). a b ∼a ∼b (∼a) → (∼b) T F a b ∼a ∼b (∼a) → (∼b) T F a b ∼a ∼b (∼a) → (∼b) T F a b (∼a) → (∼b) T F a b ∼a ∼b (∼a) → (∼b) T F

Conclusion We can form the truth table for a complicated logical statement by using the basic truth tables. Helper columns can be useful for intermediate results. The resulting truth table shows the truth or falseness of the logical statement for each combination of its constituent simple statements being True or False.