Instabilities in the Transient Response of Muscle

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sliding Filament Theory How do muscles work…... Muscle Cell Structure n Muscles are broken into smaller muscle fibers n muscle fibers are broken into.
Advertisements

Topic 15: Muscle Mechanics
Volume 75, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Mark Ospeck, Kuni H. Iwasa  Biophysical Journal 
Structural Changes of Cross-Bridges on Transition from Isometric to Shortening State in Frog Skeletal Muscle  Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Katsuaki Inoue 
Maryline Beurg, Jong-Hoon Nam, Andrew Crawford, Robert Fettiplace 
Volume 96, Issue 9, Pages (May 2009)
Motor Force Homeostasis in Skeletal Muscle Contraction
Bipedal Locomotion in Crawling Cells
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Regular Gaits and Optimal Velocities for Motor Proteins
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Calcium Regulation of Myosin-I Tension Sensing
Tensile Properties of Single Desmin Intermediate Filaments
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
Dietmar B. Oelz, Boris Y. Rubinstein, Alex Mogilner 
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Perturbed Equilibria of Myosin Binding in Airway Smooth Muscle: Bond-Length Distributions, Mechanics, and ATP Metabolism  Srboljub M. Mijailovich, James.
The “Roll and Lock” Mechanism of Force Generation in Muscle
Volume 98, Issue 8, Pages (April 2010)
The “Roll and Lock” Mechanism of Force Generation in Muscle
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Regulation of Contraction by the Thick Filaments in Skeletal Muscle
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Kelly E. Caputo, Dooyoung Lee, Michael R. King, Daniel A. Hammer 
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Gerald Offer, K.W. Ranatunga  Biophysical Journal 
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Alexander Sobolevsky, Sergey Koshelev  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Colocalization of Multiple DNA Loci: A Physical Mechanism
Adaptive Response of Actin Bundles under Mechanical Stress
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 109, Issue 10, Pages (November 2015)
Ca-Activation and Stretch-Activation in Insect Flight Muscle
The Motility of Mollicutes
A Chemically Reversible Brownian Motor: Application to Kinesin and Ncd
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Thomas L. Daniel, Alan C. Trimble, P. Bryant Chase  Biophysical Journal 
Michael Schlierf, Felix Berkemeier, Matthias Rief  Biophysical Journal 
Rheological Analysis and Measurement of Neutrophil Indentation
Jonathan E. Hiorns, Oliver E. Jensen, Bindi S. Brook 
Thermodynamics and Kinetics of a Molecular Motor Ensemble
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Dynamics of Myosin-V Processivity
Jing Chen, John Neu, Makoto Miyata, George Oster  Biophysical Journal 
The Role of Stretching in Slow Axonal Transport
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Role of Ca2+ and Cross-Bridges in Skeletal Muscle Thin Filament Activation Probed with Ca2+ Sensitizers  Philip A. Wahr, Joseph M. Metzger  Biophysical.
Christina Karatzaferi, Marc K. Chinn, Roger Cooke  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Mechanical Coupling between Myosin Molecules Causes Differences between Ensemble and Single-Molecule Measurements  Sam Walcott, David M. Warshaw, Edward P.
Inherent Force-Dependent Properties of β-Cardiac Myosin Contribute to the Force- Velocity Relationship of Cardiac Muscle  Michael J. Greenberg, Henry Shuman,
Actin-Myosin Viscoelastic Flow in the Keratocyte Lamellipod
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Nicholas C. Darnton, Howard C. Berg  Biophysical Journal 
Enrique M. De La Cruz, Jean-Louis Martiel, Laurent Blanchoin 
Mechanotransduction Dynamics at the Cell-Matrix Interface
Single-Molecule Measurement of the Stiffness of the Rigor Myosin Head
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Contractile Fibers and Catch-Bond Clusters: a Biological Force Sensor?
Regular Gaits and Optimal Velocities for Motor Proteins
Naoto Yagi, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Jun’ichi Wakayama, Katsuaki Inoue 
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Jérémie Barral, Frank Jülicher, Pascal Martin  Biophysical Journal 
Kenneth S. Campbell, Jitandrakumar R. Patel, Richard L. Moss 
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Instabilities in the Transient Response of Muscle Andrej Vilfan, Thomas Duke  Biophysical Journal  Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages 818-827 (August 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6 Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Reaction scheme for a myosin head. The dashed lines represent transitions which are considered sufficiently slow to be neglected in the calculation. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The T2 transient response to a sudden extension Δx for a group of 300 motors in the isometric state for two different values of the parameter ɛ1. The dotted and the dashed-dotted lines shows the response of a group of motors which are pulling against an elastic element instead of being completely isometric before the length step (although the length step is then imposed on the motors alone, without the elastic element). For each value of ɛ1, values of the other parameters are listed in Table 1. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 (A) A group of motors pulling against a spring. The curve shows the spring extension y as a function of time t. When the motors reach stall the average velocity is zero, but fast oscillations occur on the length scale of the power stroke. The observed oscillations are characteristic of the case where the criterion in Eq. 7 is fulfilled. The simulation involved 300 motors pulling on an elastic element with spring constant Kext=10pN/nm, using the alternative parameter set listed in Table 1. (B and C) The mechanism of oscillations: (1) When the majority of bound motors are in state A2, the average detachment rate is higher than the attachment rate, which leads to a fall in the number of attached motors (2). The force per bound motor, shown in B, therefore increases. When the upper limit of the hysteresis is reached, the system abruptly jumps to the other fixed point in which most bound motors are in the state A1 (3). Because the detachment rate is low in the state A1, the number of bound motors increases again (4) whereby the average force per bound motor drops. This eventually leads to a transition back to the fixed point in which most motors are in state A2 (1), at which point the oscillation cycle repeats. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 T2 curves for a stiff (solid line) and an elastic (dashed line) filament. The simulations were performed with a group of N=150 myosin heads, attached to a filament of a total length 1000nm and elasticity γ=44,000pN. The dotted line was obtained when an additional segment of length 500nm of free actin between the clamp and the active part was taken into account. The dot-dashed line shows the same situation, but additionally taking into account discrete binding sites on actin. In the latter case the binding rate kbind=100s−1 was adjusted to give a realistic fraction of attached heads in the isometric state, therefore γ1=0.8 and γ2=0.125. All these effects together are still not able to completely cancel the negative slope. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The binding rate kbind(x)/kbind of a myosin head as a function of its position along the actin filament. The longitudinal spring constant was K=2.5pN/nm and the lateral spring constant was KA=15pNnm. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 (A) A single actin filament interacting with a single myosin filament. (B) A pair of actin filaments, interacting with a myosin filament. (C) n=3 pairs of actin filaments, connected in series. (D) A musclelike structure with n=3 sarcomeres connected in series and each sarcomere containing p=3 thick filaments, connected in parallel via the Z-discs. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The force-displacement relations of the left and the right half of a myosin filament before (A) and after (B) a length step. The sum of their displacements must equal the total sarcomere stretch, Δx1+Δx2=2Δx. This condition is imposed by plotting the force-displacement relation of one set of motors as a function of Δx1 (x axis) and that of the other set as a function of Δx2=2Δx−Δx1 (upper x axis). The forces on the myosin filament are in equilibrium if the forces produced on both sides (T2(Δx1) and T2(Δx2)) are equal, which is given by the intersection of both curves. The equilibrium is stable if the first curve crosses the second from below and unstable if it crosses it from above. If there are three stationary points (B), the central one is always unstable and those to either side stable. The force-displacement relation of the two-filament unit is given by the force at the stable intersection as a function of the mean displacement Δx. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 The T2 response of a single actin-myosin filament pair, compared with 2, 4, 8, and 16 filament pairs in series. Each myosin filament contains 300 heads. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Plot showing the probability density of transient stretches of individual half sarcomeres (y axis) against the total stretch per half sarcomere. The three plots were obtained for (A) 2, (B) 4 and (C) 32 filament pairs in series, each containing N=300 motors. (D) shows a simulation with 32 filament pairs and ɛ1=0.8, in which spontaneous oscillations of individual filaments take place, thereby blurring the individual shifts. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 T2 curves with filament redistribution. The simulations were performed with n=16 filament pairs in series, each containing N=300 myosin motors. Different curves show data for different values of the cross-bridge elasticity K, corresponding to values of ɛ1 between 0.8 and 1.6, and ɛ0 between 11.6 and 23.2. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 The isotonic transient response of a sarcomeric structure to: (A) a small drop, (B) a large drop, and (C) a rise in the load, when the initial value of the load is chosen precisely to stall the contraction. The upper graph shows the force per myosin filament as a function of time. The lower graph displays the length change per half sarcomere and the number of attached myosin heads per myosin filament, which is a measure of the fiber stiffness. The data were computed with N=300, ɛ1=0.8 and with 50 myosin filaments acting in parallel. The results were averaged over 125 events (which has the same effect as simulating that number of sarcomeres in series). A small drop in the load synchronizes the cross-bridges and therefore causes observable macroscopic oscillations (A). The oscillations are less pronounced, but still visible after a small increase in the load (C). Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 818-827DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74522-6) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions