The efficacy of salvage interventions on threatened distal bypass grafts Sanjay Dhanji Patel, FRCS, Vassilios Zymvragoudakis, MD, Lisa Sheehan, MRCS, Talia Lea, BA (Hons), Soundrie Padayachee, PhD, Tommaso Donati, MD, Konstantinos Katsanos, PhD, Hany Zayed, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 126-132 (January 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.093 Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 A, Primary patency. B, Assisted primary patency. C, Secondary patency by Kaplan-Meier analysis. SE, Standard error. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2016 63, 126-132DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.093) Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Fate of the 114 distal bypass grafts by the end of the study period (21 ± 14 months). Journal of Vascular Surgery 2016 63, 126-132DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.093) Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Amputation-free survival (AFS) in nonthreatened (NT), threatened (T), and acutely occluded (AO) grafts (log-rank test). SE, Standard error. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2016 63, 126-132DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.093) Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Amputation-free survival (AFS) in patients with early intervention (<6 months) compared with late intervention (≥6 months). SE, Standard error. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2016 63, 126-132DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.093) Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions