Volume 94, Issue 10, Pages (May 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Eric M. Jones, Thomas C. Squier, Colette A. Sacksteder 
Proton Pathways in Green Fluorescence Protein
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Crystal Structure of Chicken γS-Crystallin Reveals Lattice Contacts with Implications for Function in the Lens and the Evolution of the βγ-Crystallins 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Structure and Dynamics of the Membrane-Bound Form of Pf1 Coat Protein: Implications of Structural Rearrangement for Virus Assembly  Sang Ho Park, Francesca.
HOPX: The Unusual Homeodomain-Containing Protein
Time-Resolved FTIR Difference Spectroscopy in Combination with Specific Isotope Labeling for the Study of A1, the Secondary Electron Acceptor in Photosystem.
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Evaluation of the Information Content in Infrared Spectra for Protein Secondary Structure Determination  Erik Goormaghtigh, Jean-Marie Ruysschaert, Vincent.
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Amy Y. Shih, Stephen G. Sligar, Klaus Schulten  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Regulation of AMPA Receptor Gating by Ligand Binding Core Dimers
Prp40 Homolog A Is a Novel Centrin Target
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Tae-Joon Park, Ji-Sun Kim, Hee-Chul Ahn, Yongae Kim 
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Onset of Anthrax Toxin Pore Formation
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Dynamic Response of the C2 Domain of Protein Kinase Cα to Ca2+ Binding
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Heleen Meuzelaar, Jocelyne Vreede, Sander Woutersen 
Sandeep Kumar, Yuk Yin Sham, Chung-Jung Tsai, Ruth Nussinov 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Evaluation of the Information Content in Infrared Spectra for Protein Secondary Structure Determination  Erik Goormaghtigh, Jean-Marie Ruysschaert, Vincent.
Modeling the Alzheimer Aβ17-42 Fibril Architecture: Tight Intermolecular Sheet-Sheet Association and Intramolecular Hydrated Cavities  Jie Zheng, Hyunbum.
Haden L. Scott, Justin M. Westerfield, Francisco N. Barrera 
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Karina Kubiak, Wieslaw Nowak  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 102, Issue 12, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 93, Issue 10, Pages (November 2007)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Presentation transcript:

Volume 94, Issue 10, Pages 4041-4055 (May 2008) The Kinetics of the Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ligands  Ibon Iloro, Daniel Narváez, Nancy Guillén, Carlos M. Camacho, Lalisse Guillén, Elsa Cora, Belinda Pastrana-Ríos  Biophysical Journal  Volume 94, Issue 10, Pages 4041-4055 (May 2008) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.125856 Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Solid surface Connolly models were generated for these ligands using their corresponding PDBs. (A) EGF (PDB:1EPJ), (C) TGF-α (PDB:1YUG), (E) HB-EGF (modified from PDB:1XDT, HB-EGF peptide composed of 79 residues), and (G) epiregulin (PDB:1K37, ER peptide composed of 46 residues). In white are the hydrophobic regions of the ligand with IR active side chains: red, negatively charged (aspartates and glutamates); blue, positive charged (arginine); and green for the tyrosine side chains. (A) The Kabash and Sander (34) rendition of these ligands is also shown to highlight the secondary structure differences (B) EGF, (D) TGF-α, (F) HB-EGF, and (H) ER, although they all contain the EGF-like domain with the characteristic two β-strands and three loops. In blue are the amino and in red are the carboxy terminal ends. (I) Sequence alignment: based on National Center for Biotechnology Information database sequences corresponding to accession numbers AAS83395, NP_003227, BAA22146 or 1K37, NP_001936, AAA51773, for human EGF, TGF-α, ER, HB-EGF, and AR, respectively. Highlighted are the conserved and class-specific residues in light gray and orange, respectively. Conserved disulfide bridges are shown as solid gray lines. Conserved secondary structure motif β-strands are shown as arrows (same colors as β-sheets). (J) Dendogram for the EGF-like family of ligands. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MS analysis: TOF-ES MS spectra of (A) EGF, (B) TGF-α and MALDI, (C) AR, (D) HB-EGF, and (E) ER. EGF and HB-EGF are in dimer states, whereas TGF-α, AR, and ER are in their monomeric state. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Overlaid spectra of EGFR ligands corresponding to initial and final spectra collected during the H/D exchange experiment within the spectral region of 3600–1400cm−1 for (A) EGF, (B) TGF-α, (C) AR, (D) HB-EGF, and (E) ER. The spectra demonstrate the extent of hydration of the protein film and the overall band shifts and intensity changes for all five ligands. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Overlaid difference spectra of the EGFR ligands. (A) EGF, (B) TGF-α, (C) AR, (D) HB- EGF, and (E) ER within the spectral region 1725–1400cm−1. The difference spectra were generated by subtraction of the first spectrum from all subsequent spectra. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The kinetics of exchange for EGF is summarized in three plots. (A) Initial times of exchange. (B) Percent of unexchanged protein versus time. EGF was observed to exchange 40% after 80min. A straight line shown at the bottom of each multiexponential decay plot (A and B) is the residual of the fit with the resulting standard deviation 0.039. (C) Evolution of the absorbance at selected wavenumbers versus time, which includes a summary of the kinetic components assigned to Tyr, Arg, and the different structural motifs. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The kinetics of H/D exchange for TGF-α is summarized in three plots. (A) Initial times of exchange. (B) Percent of unexchanged protein versus time. TGF-α was observed to exchange 65% after 15min. A straight line shown at the bottom of each multiexponential decay plot (A and B) is the residual of the fit with the resulting standard deviation 0.071. (C) Evolution of the absorbance at selected wavenumbers versus time, which includes the kinetics assigned for Tyr, Arg, and the different structural motifs. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The kinetics of exchange for AR is summarized in three plots. (A) Initial times of exchange. (B) Percent of unexchanged protein versus time. AR was observed to exchange 55% after 80min. A straight line shown at the bottom of each multiexponential decay plot (A and B) is the residual of the fit with the resulting standard deviation 0.083. (C) Evolution of the absorbance at selected wavenumbers versus time, which includes a summary of the kinetic components assigned to Tyr, Arg, and the different structural motifs. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 The kinetics of exchange for HB-EGF is summarized in three plots. (A) initial times of exchange. (B) Percent of unexchanged protein versus time. HB-EGF was observed to exchange 65% after 20min. A straight line shown at the bottom of each multiexponential decay plot (A and B) is the residual of the fit with the resulting standard deviation 0.127. (C) Evolution of the absorbance at selected wavenumbers versus time, which includes a summary of the kinetic components assigned to Tyr, Arg, and the different structural motifs. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 The kinetics of exchange for ER is summarized in three plots. (A) Initial times of exchange. (B) Percent of unexchanged protein versus time. ER was observed to exchange 98% after 150min. A straight line shown at the bottom of each multiexponential decay plot (A and B) is the residual of the fit with the resulting standard deviation 0.650. (C) Evolution of the absorbance at selected wavenumbers versus time, which includes a summary of the kinetic components assigned to Tyr, Arg, and the different structural motifs. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 2DCOS obtained from the baseline-corrected spectra corresponding to EGF and TGF-α (A and C) synchronous and (B and D) asynchronous plots, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 2DCOS corresponding to AR, HB-EGF, and ER obtained from the baseline corrected spectra (A, C, and E) synchronous plots and (B, D, and F) asynchronous plots, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 4041-4055DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.125856) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions