The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Mark E. Zweifel, Daniel J. Leahy, Doug Barrick  Structure 
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the Carboxyltransferase Domain of Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase in Complex with CP   Hailong Zhang, Benjamin Tweel, Jiang Li,
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Structure of E. coli 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine Nucleosidase Reveals Similarity to the Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylases  Jeffrey E.
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Qing Yao, Sara J. Weaver, Jee-Young Mock, Grant J. Jensen  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory D. Van Duyne  Structure  Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 883-892 (June 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.03.014 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Domain Structure and Electron Density for the Gemin6/7 Complex at the β4-β5 Interface (A) Schematic of domain organization in Gemin6 and Gemin7. The region on Gemin7 required for interaction with SMN and the domains that interact with one another in Gemin6 and Gemin7 are indicated. (B) Experimental electron density map for crystal form II from Solve/Resolve phasing at 2.8 Å resolution, contoured at 1.5 σ. Gemin6 is colored green (right half) and Gemin7 is orange (left half). (C) σA-weighted 2Fo − Fc electron density for the final refined structure in crystal form I at 2 Å resolution, contoured at 1.5 σ. The orientation and coloring of the indicated β strands is the same as that shown in (A). Structure 2005 13, 883-892DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of the Gemin6/7 Complex (A) Ribbon diagram of the Gemin6/7 complex, with Gemin6 and Gemin7 colored green and orange, respectively. Residues forming polar interactions between Gemin7-α1 and Gemin6 are drawn as sticks. The N-terminal 30 residues of Gemin7 are shown schematically as a dashed orange line. (B) Orthogonal view to that shown in (A), but with residues forming hydrophobic interactions between Gemin7-α1 and Gemin6 drawn as sticks. (C) Closeup of the β4-β5 interface between Gemin6 and Gemin7 that forms an extended β sheet. (D) The Gemin6/7 heterotetramer present in both crystal forms of the Gemin6/7 complex. The dimerization interface involves the β3-β4 region and the symmetry dyad is indicated. Structure 2005 13, 883-892DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sequence Alignment of Gemin6, Gemin7, and the Human Sm Proteins The seven human Sm proteins are aligned based on sequence homology, with shaded regions indicating ≥57% identity among the sequences shown. Strictly conserved Gly and Asn are indicated with arrowheads. Sm1 and Sm2 motifs are boxed. Gemin6 and Gemin7 sequences are aligned with the human Sm protein sequences based on structural similarity. Secondary structure elements of Gemin6 and Gemin7 are shown above the sequences. Structure 2005 13, 883-892DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Superposition of Gemin6, Gemin7, and the Human Sm Proteins (A) Superposition of Cα backbones of human SmD3 (black), Gemin6 (green), and Gemin7 (orange). The variable β3-β4 regions are indicated. (B) Superposition of the Gemin6/7 complex (green and orange) with the human SmD3/B complex (black). Structure 2005 13, 883-892DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Speculative Model for Gemin6/7 Complex Interactions with Sm Proteins SmD3 (yellow) was docked to either end of the Gemin6/7 complex (green and gold), assuming that the SmD3/Gemin6 and SmD3/Gemin7 interfaces would be similar to those observed in SmD3/SmB and SmD1/SmD2. No significant steric clashes are present in the modeled interfaces. Three additional Sm proteins can be readily added to the model to form a closed heptameric ring, as previously shown for the Sm proteins (Kambach et al., 1999). Structure 2005 13, 883-892DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Gemin6/7 Complex Binds Sm Proteins The indicated Sm proteins were produced individually by in vitro transcription and translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysates in the presence of [35S]Methionine. In vitro-translated proteins were incubated with 2 μg of purified recombinant GST-Gemin6 (middle panel) or with GST-Gemin6/Gemin7 complex (right panel) coupled to glutathione beads. After extensive washing, bound proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography. Input (left panel) represents 5% of the labeled protein used for binding. Positions of molecular weight markers are indicated and proteolysis products that we believe to be Sm core domains are indicated by asterisks. The fragments of SmD2, SmD3, and SmE also bind to Gemin6 and Gemin6/7 and may be present at higher concentrations in the middle and right panels relative to the input panel because of continued proteolysis during binding and washing. In some cases, the fragments may also bind with enhanced affinity to Gemin6 or Gemin6/7. Structure 2005 13, 883-892DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.03.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions