Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e2 (November 2017)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Crystal Structure of Full-Length Apaf-1: How the Death Signal Is Relayed in the Mitochondrial Pathway of Apoptosis  Thomas Frank Reubold, Sabine Wohlgemuth,
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Mark S. Dunstan, Debraj GuhaThakurta, David. E. Draper, Graeme L. Conn 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Conformational Flexibility in the Multidrug Efflux System Protein AcrA
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
The Human Cytomegalovirus UL44 C Clamp Wraps around DNA
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 611-621 (March 2006) Structural Insight into Interactions between Dihydrolipoamide Dehydrogenase (E3) and E3 Binding Protein of Human Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex  Chad A. Brautigam, R. Max Wynn, Jacinta L. Chuang, Mischa Machius, Diana R. Tomchick, David T. Chuang  Structure  Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 611-621 (March 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2006.01.001 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Crystal Structure of E3BD and Comparison to SBD Structures (A) The domain structure of human E3BD. The single lipoyl domain (LBD, gray), the E3 binding domain (E3BD, green), and the inner core domain (orange) are connected by flexible linkers (solid lines). The boxes depict individual domains with numbers of the first and last residues for each domain indicated. (B) Ribbon drawing of the crystal structure of E3BD, with helices in green and areas without regular secondary structure in purple. Parts of the structure mentioned in the text are labeled. (C) A stereo diagram of the comparison of the structures of SBDs to E3BD. Each tube represents a trace through the Cαs of the respective structure. Shown are human E3BD (green), human E3BD from the E3BD/E3 structure (yellow), the NMR structure of the SBDp from the E2p of Geobacillus PDC (orange; 1W3D; Allen et al., 2005), and the NMR structure of the SBDk from the E2k of E. coli KGDC (blue; 1BBL; Robien et al., 1992). (D) Sequence alignment of the three structures. The names of the sequences retain the color of the structure shown in part (C). The numbering is that of human E3BD. Abbreviations: hE3BD, human E3BD; GsSBDp, Geobacillus SBD from the PDC; EcSBDk, E. coli SBDk from the E2k of KGDC; hE3, human E3; GsE3, Geobacillus E3; GsE1p; E1 of the Geobacillus PDC. The residues boxed in purple are identical in all three structures; regions of similarity identified by CLUSTALW are boxed in yellow. Above the alignment is a cartoon representation of the secondary structure of E3BD. Below are marked the positions of side chains of the binding proteins that contact hE3 (arrowheads), GsE3 (circumflexes), or GsE1p (stars). The color of the symbols matches the color of the name of the protein to which the E3 or E1p binds. Structure 2006 14, 611-621DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.01.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Binding of E3BD and SBDp to Human E3 Measured by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry The upper panel shows raw data of heat changes for the titration of LBD-E3BD (blue tracing) or LBD-SBDp (red tracing) into E3 in the cell in the presence and absence of a competitor ligand LBD-SBDb (from human BCKDC), respectively. The lower panel represents the binding isotherms for each injection versus the molar ratio of the LBD-E3BD monomer (blue circles) or the LBD-SBDp monomer (red circles) to the E3 dimer. The solid line in the lower panel depicts the fitting of the binding isotherms for LBD-E3BD and LBD-SBDp, based on a single-site binding model using the ORIGIN v. 7.0 software package. A dissociation constant (Kd) of 7.8 × 10−10 M is obtained for E3BD binding to E3 as derived from the competitive binding data (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). The absence of heat changes with LBD-SBDp is consistent with the inability of SBDp to bind E3. Structure 2006 14, 611-621DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.01.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Crystal Structure of the E3BD/E3 Complex (A) Ribbon representation of the structure. Shown are the monomers of E3 (blue, tan), E3BD (green), and FAD (black sticks). (B) Electron density for E3BD. A close-up of the structure in the same orientation as in part (A) is shown. The ball-and-stick model represents the refined coordinates of E3BD. Superposed on this is a 2Fo-Fc electron-density map contoured at the 1-σ level. (C) A closer, stereo view of the map shown in part (B). (D) The overlap of the two E3BD binding sites. A surface representation of E3 is shown in an orientation rotated 90° around the horizontal axis with respect to that of part (A). A ribbon diagram of E3BD (green) is shown, and a second theoretical molecule (E3BD∗), generated by rotating the green monomer about the dyad axis of E3, is shown in yellow. The surface is colored as above, except for the surface in contact with the green E3BD (purple), that contacting the yellow E3BD (blue), and that contacting both (orange). Structure 2006 14, 611-621DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.01.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interactions between E3 and E3BD (A) Stereo diagram of selected interactions. Carbons from E3 are colored tan or light blue, depending on their monomer of origin. Secondary structure is shown semitransparently. The local 2-fold axis of E3 is shown as a black cylinder. (B) The interactions of residues in helix H2 of E3BD (numbers with bd) with those from E3. (C) Dissociation constants (Kd) for the binding of wild-type and mutant E3BD to E3 determined by ITC. ΔΔGA is also shown. NM, not measurable. (D) Location of site-directed mutations in E3BD. A surface representation of E3BD with residues color-coded according to the magnitude of ΔΔGA (in units of kcal/mol) caused by their mutations to alanine (or methionine, in the case of A134bd). Red, ΔΔGA > 4.6; yellow, 4.6 > ΔΔGA > 4.0; green, 4.0 > ΔΔGA > 3.0; blue, 3.0 > ΔΔGA > 2.0. The total surface for E3 binding is outlined in orange. Locations of residues are labeled on the surface. Structure 2006 14, 611-621DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.01.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of the Geobacillus SBDp/E3 and E3BD/E3 Structures The Cα atoms of Geobacillus E3 and human E3 (not the binding domains) were used for this superposition. The coloration is that of Figure 3, and the Geobacillus SBDp is orange. Structure 2006 14, 611-621DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.01.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Human Mutations Causing E3 Deficiency (A) The surface of the human E3 homodimer is shown as in Figure 3. One of the E3BD binding sites is outlined in orange. Disease-causing mutations are colored dark blue (E340), red (D444), yellow (447), and magenta (R460). (B) Enzyme activities of wild-type and mutant human E3s. The black bars represent E3 activity, the speckled bars show PDC activity reconstituted with wild-type and mutant E3. The identities of the E3s used are shown on the x axis. Activities are normalized to that of the wild-type enzymes, which at 100% are 314 s-1 for human E3 and 401 min-1 for the overall activity of the reconstituted PDC. (C) Dissociation constants (Kd) for the binding of wild-type and mutant E3 to LBD-E3BD as determined by ITC. NM, not measurable. Structure 2006 14, 611-621DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.01.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions