Can I have your attention please?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quadrant D Middle School Classroom
Advertisements

Welcome to: The Power of Assessment in Guiding Student Learning Warm up: In groups of 3 or 4, please use the blank chart paper to brainstorm these questions:
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 June 12, 2012 Welcome BT BOCES, SV, ME, Chenango Forks, Newark Valley, Windsor, Tioga and Vestal.
Session Two Review SEF analysis –Benefits –Issues.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
5D+ Teacher Evaluation Model Professional Learning Phase 1
November 1, 2011 with Dawn Shannon and Barb Phillips.
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING October 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome Back! Have you signed the roster?
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome Back!
STEM Leadership Welcome! As you arrive, please form groups of 6 people. Help yourself to snacks and drinks. Sign in and grab your name tent or.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Day 3 Welcome Back!
Checking for Understanding: Are You With Me So Far? Presented by Peer Observers Karen Buelow Jennifer Fuerman Marianne Kenney Joe Ladow.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
© TNTP 2014 March Principal Training. / 2 Do Now Reflect on your progress from the last session: How successful were you in supporting a teacher to identify.
Targets, Tasks and Texts Across the Day (Grades 3-5) Experienced with NTI Teachers/ Coaches Session 5.
Developing High Quality Student Learning Objectives
C CC Checking For Understanding & Guided Practice Amanda Conklin Domonique Ragni Rene Milano Samantha Fulin Amy Moeller.
Long and Short Term Goals To develop a responsible and positive attitude we chose Respect for Self, Others and Learning for the long term goal. Our students.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
A brief introduction to
Mosai c Of Teaching The STARR Artwork by Katie Brown (Grade 11) & Sarah Carpenter (Grade 10). Seeing the Whole Picture.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training February 27, 2012 Part 1 – Welcome Back!
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back!
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back!
Hosted by Julie Milder Unpacking the Classroom Environment and Culture and Professional Collaboration and Communication Dimensions of 5D+
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
QUADRANT PARTNERS VIDEO SUCCESSFUL COACHING Know contemporary views & standards Model & demonstrate effective instructional behaviors Provide.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
Teaching for Deep Learning in an active and engaging way Session 9.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Session 1 November 14 th, 2012 Welcome!
Math 6-8: The Standards in Practice: A Common Core Lesson
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Lead Evaluator Training
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Before we get started You will need the following apps downloaded to your mobile device: Microsoft Translator Office Lens  This matches with Engage section.
Classroom Items Directions Take out a piece of paper.
Lead Evaluator Training
The Framework for Teaching
Lead Evaluator Training
Lead Evaluator Training
Lead Evaluator Training
HANDOUT Page for facilitators that lists all the hand outs needed for the workshop and the meanings of icons used on the slides in this workshop. SLIDE.
Corning-Painted Post School District November 2013
Lead Evaluator Training Part 1
Thurmont Middle School,
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Lead Evaluator Training
Creating a Vision for a Caring School Community
Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Using Games in Math Workshop, Grades 3-5
Corning-Painted Post School District November 2013
Lead Evaluator Training
Checking For Understanding & Guided Practice
Pair and Group Work – Introduction
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
Presentation transcript:

Can I have your attention please? Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Welcome back—remind of protocol for getting attention. Locate bathrooms and exits. Can I have your attention please?

Feedback…reoccurring themes More practice and discussion Ask participants to bring observation documents they’ve written Less mixing up districts—let teams work together After school sessions?

Feedback…reoccurring themes Define “multiple observations”—are these formal, informal goal conferences, etc.? How do we get the videos? New Teacher Center: Experienced Teacher—Module 1 New Teacher Center: Beginning Teacher—Module 1 Youtube.com— “Whole Brain” videos

“Homeplay” Continue to practice collecting evidence of “check for understanding” Bring an observation that you have completed Identify the presence or absence of “check for understanding” in one of the NYSED approved rubrics How did you do? What were you able to find out? What did you notice as you were observing instruction?

Let’s debrief… How did you do? What were you able to find out? What did you notice as you were observing instruction? Talk at tables—find someone from another district to talk to.

Today’s Outcomes: Explain the difference between current practice and evidence based observation Identify and define criteria for one area of effective instruction around which evidence collection will be focused Define the differences between the definitions of “student engagement” in the rubrics approved by SED.

Today’s Outcomes: Explain the impact of confusing and/or ambiguous language on the process of teacher evaluation.   Describe strategies that a district could employ to increase the quality of evaluations and the agreement of evaluators.

Rewind… How did we define evidence based observation? (3 things…)

What is Evidence Based Observation? Collection of factual information Free of bias or opinion Based on specific criteria Used to provide feedback for reflection and improvement of teacher practice

What does it mean when we say “student engagement”? Transition—from “Check for Understanding” to “Student Engagement” Explain that there are several versions of what this means—use rubrics to show evidence this—then provide your definition. How is it described? How would you evidence this?

Rubric Work… Pink: Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (ASCD) Orange: Danielson (2011 Revised Edition) Tan: Marshall’s Teacher Evaluation Rubric Green: Marzano’s Causal Teacher Evaluation Blue: NYSTCE Framework for the Observation of Effective Teaching (Pearson) Purple: Thoughtful Classroom Teacher Effectiveness (Silver Strong & Associates)

What does it mean when we say “student engagement”? All students are visibly participating in activities/learning that is relevant to the objective.

What would “student engagement” look like/sound like? All students used the response clickers to answer the question the teacher posed, “How many sides does a square have?” The teacher stated to the class, “Using the index cards on your desk, write three pieces of information you must include in your resume.” All of the students wrote their answers on the index cards.

What would “student engagement” look like/sound like? Envelopes (with “cut up” sentences enclosed) were placed on the table. All students took an envelope from the table, returned to their desks, and put the cut up sentences in order. The teacher stated, “Write 6X4= on your white board and then solve.” All students wrote the equation on their boards and solved. When the teacher said, “Show!” all the students held up their boards for the teacher to see.

Video –Student Engagement Watch Kristin DeWit, veteran Whole Brain Teacher, guide her class through a lively algebra lesson. Outcome: Identify the four types of slopes of lines—negative, positive, no slope, undefined.

Collection of Evidence What did you collect? All students mirrored the teacher’s physical actions when she stated, “Mirror me please.” The teacher clapped and said, “Teach.” Students clapped and said, “Ok.” Then, all students faced one another (in pairs) to mirror their partner’s physical actions. The 4 types of slopes of lines were stated by the student labeled “North” in each pairing. Outcome: Identify the four types of slopes of lines—negative, positive, no slope, undefined.

Collection of Evidence What did you collect? During the “quiz,” the teacher pointed to lines posted on the board in the front of the room. All students faced Ms. Dewit and used hand gestures to represent negative, positive, undefined or no slope.

Ready for more practice?

Video –Student Engagement Dennis Taylor—6th grade science—Outcome: Identify what students currently know about plants.

Collection of Evidence What did you collect? Mr. Taylor stated to the class, “When you have a picture of a vegetable in your mind, please stand up.” All students stood up. Mr. Taylor projected photos of vegetables on the screen in the front of the room. Students sat down if the vegetable on the screen matched the vegetable they “had in their head.”

Collection of Evidence What did you collect? 6 students were still standing after the photos were shown. Mr. Taylor called on the students individually to share the vegetable they “had in their heads.” Mr. Taylor stated, “Can you please write 3 things you know about plants?” All students wrote on the small pieces of paper provided at the start of class.

Next Training Sessions:

“Homeplay” Practice collecting evidence of “check for understanding” and “student engagement” Examine an observation that you have completed, looking for evidence and bias/opinion Identify the presence or absence of “check for understanding” in one of the NYSED approved rubrics

Thank you!