Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bram-Ernst Verhoef, Rufin Vogels, Peter Janssen  Neuron 
Advertisements

Davide Nardo, Valerio Santangelo, Emiliano Macaluso  Neuron 
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Bram-Ernst Verhoef, Rufin Vogels, Peter Janssen  Neuron 
Shih-Pi Ku, Andreas S. Tolias, Nikos K. Logothetis, Jozien Goense 
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2002)
Linking Electrical Stimulation of Human Primary Visual Cortex, Size of Affected Cortical Area, Neuronal Responses, and Subjective Experience  Jonathan.
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Ian M. Finn, Nicholas J. Priebe, David Ferster  Neuron 
Christian Grefkes, Peter H. Weiss, Karl Zilles, Gereon R. Fink  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Direct Activation of Sparse, Distributed Populations of Cortical Neurons by Electrical Microstimulation  Mark H. Histed, Vincent Bonin, R. Clay Reid 
Inducing Gamma Oscillations and Precise Spike Synchrony by Operant Conditioning via Brain-Machine Interface  Ben Engelhard, Nofar Ozeri, Zvi Israel, Hagai.
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Roman F. Loonis, Scott L. Brincat, Evan G. Antzoulatos, Earl K. Miller 
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Attentional Modulations Related to Spatial Gating but Not to Allocation of Limited Resources in Primate V1  Yuzhi Chen, Eyal Seidemann  Neuron  Volume.
Responses of Collicular Fixation Neurons to Gaze Shift Perturbations in Head- Unrestrained Monkey Reveal Gaze Feedback Control  Woo Young Choi, Daniel.
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Selective Entrainment of Theta Oscillations in the Dorsal Stream Causally Enhances Auditory Working Memory Performance  Philippe Albouy, Aurélien Weiss,
FMRI Activation in Response to Illusory Contours and Salient Regions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex  Damian A. Stanley, Nava Rubin  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Integration of Touch and Sound in Auditory Cortex
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Huihui Zhou, Robert Desimone  Neuron 
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Attention Governs Action in the Primate Frontal Eye Field
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin 
Anubhuti Goel, Dean V. Buonomano  Neuron 
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages (September 2012)
The Future of Memory: Remembering, Imagining, and the Brain
How Local Is the Local Field Potential?
fMRI of Monkey Visual Cortex
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Masayuki Matsumoto, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Feng Han, Natalia Caporale, Yang Dan  Neuron 
Integration of Local Features into Global Shapes
Segregation of Object and Background Motion in Visual Area MT
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Receptive-Field Modification in Rat Visual Cortex Induced by Paired Visual Stimulation and Single-Cell Spiking  C. Daniel Meliza, Yang Dan  Neuron  Volume.
Xiaomo Chen, Marc Zirnsak, Tirin Moore  Cell Reports 
Timing, Timing, Timing: Fast Decoding of Object Information from Intracranial Field Potentials in Human Visual Cortex  Hesheng Liu, Yigal Agam, Joseph.
Social Signals in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Daniel E. Winkowski, Eric I. Knudsen  Neuron 
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Michael A. Silver, Amitai Shenhav, Mark D'Esposito  Neuron 
Sara E. Morrison, Alexandre Saez, Brian Lau, C. Daniel Salzman  Neuron 
Posterior Parietal Cortex Encodes Autonomously Selected Motor Plans
Vahe Poghosyan, Andreas A. Ioannides  Neuron 
John T. Serences, Geoffrey M. Boynton  Neuron 
Encoding of Oscillations by Axonal Bursts in Inferior Olive Neurons
Functional MRI Evidence for LTP-Induced Neural Network Reorganization
Social Information Signaling by Neurons in Primate Striatum
Population Responses to Contour Integration: Early Encoding of Discrete Elements and Late Perceptual Grouping  Ariel Gilad, Elhanan Meirovithz, Hamutal.
Honghui Zhang, Andrew J. Watrous, Ansh Patel, Joshua Jacobs  Neuron 
Anubhuti Goel, Dean V. Buonomano  Neuron 
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages (November 2001)
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Neurophysiology of the BOLD fMRI Signal in Awake Monkeys
Michael A. Silver, Amitai Shenhav, Mark D'Esposito  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 901-911 (December 2005) Mapping Cortical Activity Elicited with Electrical Microstimulation Using fMRI in the Macaque  Andreas S. Tolias, Fahad Sultan, Mark Augath, Axel Oeltermann, Edward J. Tehovnik, Peter H. Schiller, Nikos K. Logothetis  Neuron  Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 901-911 (December 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.034 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Combined Electrical Microstimulation and MRI in Primates (A) Drawing of anesthetized monkey preparation with MRI-compatible electrode microdrive. (B) Time-course of event-related microstimulation paradigm. Microstimulation period (ON), No microstimulation period (OFF). Train duration (TD), Current amplitude (Ia), Stimulation frequency (fr), Pulse duration (Pd). Typically, train duration was 4 s (ON) interleaved with 12 s of no microstimulation (OFF). Neuron 2005 48, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.034) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 BOLD Activity Induced by Electrical Microstimulation (A) Five horizontal brain slices acquired within 1 s covering much of the visual cortex of the macaque overlaid on a three-dimensional reconstructed cortical surface. (B) Anatomical image of a horizontal brain slice. Internal calcarine sulcus (ic), lunate sulcus (ls), superior-temporal sulcus (sts), and inferior occipital sulcus (ios) are marked. The yellow arrow points to the location of the electrode tip (E) that caused a small susceptibility artifact around it. (C) Functional map of the BOLD signal for a single brain slice computed by cross-correlating the time course of the BOLD signal for each individual voxel with a temporally shifted boxcar model of the event-related electrical microstimulation protocol (see Experimental Procedures). Electrical microstimulation parameters were as follows: current amplitude of 1400 μA, frequency of 100 Hz, pulse duration of 200 μs, and train duration of 4 s. (D) Statistically thresholded functional map is superimposed on the anatomical image (see Experimental Procedures). Significant activation is seen on the operculum of area V1, the posterior bank of the lunate sulcus of area V2/V3, and the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of area MT/V5. Neuron 2005 48, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.034) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Time Course of BOLD Activity Induced by Electrical Microstimulation (A) Raw functional map (left) and statistically thresholded functional map is superimposed on the anatomical image (right) of the BOLD signal for a single brain slice computed by cross-correlating the time course of the BOLD signal for each individual voxel with a temporally shifted boxcar model of the event-related electrical microstimulation protocol (see Experimental Procedures). Electrical microstimulation parameters were as follows: current amplitude of 800 μA, frequency of 100 Hz, pulse duration of 400 μs, and train duration of 4 s. Data are from same experimental section as in Figure 2. (B) Mean time course across event-related trials and standard error of the mean (SEM) of the BOLD signal in area V1 from same experiment as in (A). In the left panel, average signal across all activated voxels in area V1 is normalized for each event-related trial by subtracting the mean of a 6 s baseline preceding the onset of the microstimulation and dividing by the standard deviation of this 6 s baseline (converted to z-score). In the right panel, average signal across all activated voxels in area V1 is normalized for each event-related trial by dividing by the mean of the 6 s baseline preceding the onset of the microstimulation (converted to normalized BOLD response). The shaded area indicates the onset and duration of the microstimulation applied (train duration was 4 s). (C) Same as (B) but for area V2/V3 (posterior bank and fundus of the lunate sulcus [LS]). (D) Same as (B) but for area MT/V5. Neuron 2005 48, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.034) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 BOLD Activity Induced by Electrical Microstimulation with 200 ms Train Duration (A) Statistically thresholded functional map (for monkey i04) is superimposed on the anatomical image (see Experimental Procedures). Electrical microstimulation parameters were as follows: current amplitude of 750 μA, frequency of 400 Hz, pulse duration of 200 μs. Train duration of the left panel was 4 s. Train duration in the three rightmost panels was 200 ms with pauses of 200 ms, 400 ms, and 600 ms (activity shown in panels from left to right, respectively). Total stimulation time during each event-related trial lasted for 4 s for all four conditions. (B) Mean time course across event-related trials and standard error of the mean (SEM) of the BOLD signal in area V1 from the same experiment as in corresponding panels above in (A). The average signal across all activated voxels in area V1 is normalized for each event-related trial by subtracting the mean of a 6 s baseline preceding the onset of the microstimulation and dividing by the standard deviation of this 6 s baseline (converted to z-score). The shaded area indicates the onset and duration of the microstimulation applied (4 s). (C) Same as in (B) but the average signal across all activated voxels in area V1 is normalized for each event-related trial by dividing by the mean of the 6 s baseline preceding the onset of the microstimulation (converted to normalized BOLD response). Neuron 2005 48, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.034) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Chronaxie of the BOLD Signal (A) Dots show the current threshold as a function of pulse duration required to activate 40% of the maximum gray matter activated on the operculum. The line is fit to I = Io + (IoC)/t, where I is the threshold current, Io is the rheobase (349 μA) value, and C is the chronaxie (178 μs). Data were collected from five monkeys corresponding to five different experimental sessions, which resulted in the testing of five V1 sites. (B) Dots show the current threshold required to activate 40% of the maximum of gray matter activated on the operculum, as a function of the inverse of different pulse durations. The regression line is fitted to I = Io + B, where Io is the rheobase value and B is the chronaxie times the rheobase current. The chronaxie is 178 μs with a 95% confidence interval between 145 and 508 μs (shaded region) and the rheobase, Io, is 349 μA. Neuron 2005 48, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.034) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effective Spread of Current around the Electrode on the Operculum in Area V1 (A) Relationship between radius of functional activation spread and current amplitude plotted using the convention of Ranck (1975). The relationship between the passive spread of current and radius of directly activated tissue, I = Kr2 (where I is the current amplitude in μA, and r is the radius of activated tissue in mm), is shown by the solid diagonal line K = 1292 μA/mm2 (Stoney et al., 1968). K is the current-distance constant, which indicates the amount of current required to directly activate neural tissue 1 mm away from the electrode tip. The greater the current-distance constant the less the conduction velocity (and hence the less the excitability) of a directly stimulated axonal element (Jankowska and Roberts, 1972; Roberts and Smith, 1973; Hentall et al., 1984). Dots show functional spread measurements using BOLD for different current amplitudes, with the remaining parameters fixed at a 200 μs pulse duration, a 100 Hz pulse stimulation frequency, and a 4 s train duration (see Experimental Procedures for details). Data were collected from six monkeys corresponding to 16 different experimental sessions yielding data on a total of 16 V1 sites. The currents used ranged from 10 to 1800 μA. Based on these data, we calculated that the activated cortical region is 2.65 mm in radius (SEM 0.2 mm) beyond what one would have expected from direct activation of pyramidal neurons. These calculations are based on the formula r = (I/K)1/2, where r is the distance of effective current spread from the electrode tip in mm, I is the current used in μA, and K is the current-distance constant with an average of 1292 μA/mm2 for cortical pyramidal cells when using 200 μs duration pulses (Stoney et al., 1968). The spread of activation beyond the bounds expected from passive current spread was not simply the result of a bias introduced by our clustering algorithm for detecting significantly activated voxels (see Experimental Procedures). We also calculated the spread across all experiments by assigning a value of zero spread for any cases that did not produce statistically significant activity. This underestimated the measurement of activity spread, but still yields that the activated cortical region is 1.5 mm in radius (SEM 0.19 mm) beyond what one would have expected from direct activation of pyramidal neurons. (B) Histogram of radius of activated cortex on the operculum plotted as a function of current amplitude (same data as in [A]). There is a statistically significant correlation between current amplitude and radius (R2 = 0.06, F = 4.5, p < 0.05, linear regression). In some of these experiments, we found activity in either the last or the first brain slice, which raised the possibility that the spread of functional activity was being underestimated. To exclude this possibility, we analyzed only the experimental sessions for which we had no significant activation in both the first and the last brain slice and found very similar results to those presented in (A) and (B). Specifically, the radius of current spread for these data is 1.8 mm in radius (SEM 0.27 mm) beyond what one would have expected from direct activation of pyramidal neurons. Neuron 2005 48, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.034) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 In Vivo Functional Connectivity between V1 and MT/V5 (A) Functional map of the BOLD signal for a single brain slice from monkey D04 computed by cross-correlating the time course of the BOLD signal for each individual voxel with a temporally shifted boxcar model of the event-related electrical microstimulation protocol (see Experimental Procedures). Electrical microstimulation parameters were as follows: current amplitude of 1600 μA, frequency of 100 Hz, pulse duration of 200 μs, and train duration of 4 s. The tip of the electrode was located on the operculum on this horizontal brain slice. (B) Statistically thresholded functional map from (A) is superimposed on the anatomical image (see Experimental Procedures). Significant activation is seen on the operculum of area V1, in the lunate sulcus, and the superior temporal sulcus (MT/V5). (C) Statistically thresholded functional map of monkey K02 is superimposed on the anatomical image (see Experimental Procedures). Significant activation is seen on the operculum of area V1, in the lunate sulcus, and the superior temporal sulcus (MT/V5). Electrical microstimulation parameters were as follows: current amplitude of 1400 μA, frequency of 100 Hz, pulse duration of 200 μs, and train duration of 4 s. The tip of the electrode was located on the operculum three horizontal brain slices below the one shown here. (D) Statistically thresholded functional map of monkey M02 (different experimental session from data presented in Figures 2 and 3) is superimposed on the anatomical image (see Experimental Procedures). Significant activation is seen on the operculum of area V1, in the lunate sulcus, and the superior temporal sulcus. Electrical microstimulation parameters were as follows: current amplitude of 1550 μA, frequency of 100 Hz, pulse duration of 200 μs, and train duration of 4 s. The tip of the electrode was located on the operculum two horizontal brain slices below the one shown here. (E) Histogram of radius of activated MT/V5 plotted as a function of current amplitude. There is a statistically significant increase of the radius of activation as a function of current amplitude (R2 = 0.37, F = 12.9, p < 0.01, linear regression). There is also a significant increase in the probability of getting activity transynaptically in area MT/V5 as a function of increasing current amplitude (not illustrated). When the amplitude of the current was less than 600 μA, only 1 of 52 current conditions (see Experimental Procedures) elicited significant activation in area MT. When the current was greater or equal to 1200 and less than 1800 μA, 10 of 25 current conditions (see Experimental Procedures) elicited significant activation in area MT/V5. Accordingly, the probability of transynaptically induced activity in area MT/V5 increased significantly from 2% to 40% (p < 0.001 χ2 test). Apart from the current amplitude, the remaining parameters were fixed at a 200 μs pulse duration, a 100 Hz pulse stimulation frequency, and a 4 s train duration. Neuron 2005 48, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.034) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions