P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
LIGO-G D Suspensions Update: the View from Caltech Phil Willems LIGO/Caltech Livingston LSC Meeting March 17-20, 2003.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
G D Interferometer Status LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor, June 4, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
LIGO-G M Status of LIGO Barry Barish PAC Meeting Caltech 3-June-04 Upper limits on known pulsar ellipticities.
Current Noise at LHO Worst wire loss inferred from in situ violin mode measurements:  =
LIGO-G L Peter Fritschel & Michael Zucker PAC18 meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 18 May 2005 S5 Run Performance Goals.
G M LIGO Laboratory1 Overview of Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker PAC meeting, NSF Review 5 June 2003, 11 June 2003.
G D Tasks After S3 Commissioning Meeting, Oct 6., 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
G D Initial LIGO improvements & Advanced LIGO P Fritschel PAC Meeting LLO, 18 May 2005.
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
Status of Virgo Gabriele Vajente INFN Pisa and Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration 11 th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
March 17, 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1/12 Virgo Status B. Mours.
Advanced VIRGO WG1: Status VIRGO, Cascina Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
LISA October 3, 2005 LISA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna Gravitational Physics Program Technical implications Jo van.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
January 12, 2006ILIAS-WG3 Frascati1 Virgo+ & Advanced Virgo B. Mours With material from G. Losurdo, M. Punturo, A. Viceré and others.
1 Virgo Commissioning Status WG1 meeting Potsdam, 21 st July 2006.
TCS and IFO Properties Dave Ottaway For a lot of people !!!!!! LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Status of LIGO Andri M. Gretarsson Livingston Observatory LIGO-G L.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
G I Interferometer Improvements after S5 Rana Adhikari.
The Status of Advanced LIGO: Light at the end of the Tunnels Jeffrey S. Kissel, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April APS Meeting, Savannah, GA April.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
Advanced Detector Status Report and Future Scenarios
A look at interferometer topologies that use reflection gratings
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
Quantum noise reduction using squeezed states in LIGO
Prospects and plans : LIGO interferometers Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory LSC meeting, MIT Nov 4-5, 2006.
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
THE NEXT GENERATION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
BSC HEPI Pier Amplification
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Evolution of the Virgo detector: The Virgo+ plans
Commissioning Progress and Plans
Advanced VIRGO Experiment
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Commissioning Update PAC 15, Dec. 11, 2003 Daniel Sigg.
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Status of the LIGO Detectors
Jim Hough for the GEO collaboration
R&D Highlights Seismic Isolation Suspensions ISC/40m
M. Benacquista Montana State University-Billings
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Hanford 15 August 2005
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Advanced Optical Sensing
Presentation transcript:

P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005 Initial LIGO Upgrades P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005

The Next 5-6 Years S5 ~2 years S? 4Q ‘05 4Q ‘06 4Q ‘07 4Q ‘08 4Q ‘09 4Q ‘10 S5 ~2 years S? Decomm IFO1 Certainly enough time for one significant upgrade Possibly time for 2 upgrade steps, with a short run in-between Or limit to 1 step, and increase run time LIGO I

General considerations Any upgrade must account for time to install and fully commission it, plus time for running! Plan should favor technologies, techniques, subsystems that are part of Advanced LIGO Plan should consider contingency options for potential AdLIGO delays Initial LIGO components/features that are not candidates for upgrade Core Optics (except possible spare replacements) Isolation stacks IFO beam path (e.g., no suspension change that moves the optic) LIGO I

Resource constraints Equipment funds Schedule Manpower Budget has tightened up Stan: maybe $1-1.5M, over a couple of years, available for Detector upgrades Ideas for other sources of $$ are welcome! Schedule Plan must not delay Advanced LIGO implementation Manpower AdLIGO development program must not be short-changed Unclear (to me, at least) what this means for available upgrade manpower LIGO I

Initial LIGO fundamental noises SRD, 14 Mpc 8 W into MC 5x10-4 + beam offset 2x10-3 See also Rana Adhikari’s thesis LIGO I

Where to set the upgrade goal? Astrophysical impact How does the number of surveyed galaxies increase as the sensitivity is improved? From astro-ph/0402091, Nutzman et al., “Gravitational Waves from Extragalactic Inspiraling Binaries: Selection Effects and Expected Detection Rates” For NS-NS binaries Power law: 2.7 Factor of 2-2.5 reduction in strain noise, factor of 6.5-12 increase in MWEG Prop. to inspiral range LIGO I

Sensitivity to Virgo cluster Effect of reducing noise floor: Effect of reducing min freq: Upgrade? Factor of 1.8 in noise min SRD f_min = 225Hz f_min = 150Hz S4 f_min = 100Hz NS-NS (same shape as SRD) Data courtesy of Philip Nutzman LIGO I

Detection rate estimates Assuming factor of 10 increase in surveyed volume: Source Initial LIGO Upgrade NS-NS ~1 / 3000 yrs to ~1 / 3 yrs ~1 / 300 yrs to ~3 / yr NS-BH ~1 / 5000 yrs to ~1 / 500 yrs to BH-BH ~1 / 250 yrs to ~2 / yr ~1 / 25 yrs to ~20 / yr LIGO I

Suspension options Find that current wire suspensions operate at wire-loss limit Optimize with beam position shift (1 cm down from center) Find that current wire suspensions have excess loss Design new clamping systems for the ends Factor of 2-3 lower noise than SRD at 100 Hz Beyond current wire suspensions: more than 3x below SRD Two wire loops Low-loss flexures Cradle for optic, suspended by silica fibers See G020241 & G020242 Research needed: In-vacuum test suspension, to investigate violin mode Q’s of current wire suspension, and potential variants LIGO I

Power increase: 4-5x more laser power Higher power laser Amplify current LWE laser (being pursued, see T040063) 50W laser from LZH, a la AdLIGO: Lutz Winkelmann talk Input Optics to handle it at the input Dave Reitze talk Output mode cleaner to handle it at the output Talks by Daniel and Rana Thermal compensation to handle it inside Current system compensates 100 mW of absorbed power (H1) If optics absorb at their expected level: Initial LIGO estimate: P_bs = 8W*0.65*40 = 200 W: factor of 6 headroom Opportunity to try ring heater? LIGO I

5x more power* & good wire suspensions + beam offset 14 Mpc 34 Mpc *Doesn’t include increased detection efficiency due to output mode cleaner LIGO I

Other possibilities Add PEPI to the LHO test masses Sensors (large part of cost) would be useable in AdLIGO Dealing with wind noise (both sites) Adding good tilt sensing to HEPI Miscellaneous Lower noise ADCs Active beam stabilization for detection tables Detection table seismic isolation Acoustic mitigation at LHO Test mass double suspension ? Signal recycling ? LIGO I

Next steps Power upgrade Suspension upgrade Ingredients are clear, many are components of AdLIGO Budget and implementation schedule needs to be fleshed out Suspension upgrade Establish a suspension test setup to research what we have and potential modifications More interferometer in-situ tests ? Produce a white paper on initial LIGO upgrades Input from LSC is hereby solicited Time scale, ~6 months LIGO I