A Clean Hand Device for Manual Wheelchairs March 4, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Your business pitching templates MedVentures A N INITIATIVE BY ANIMA I NVESTMENT N ETWORK & THEIR PARTNERS.
Advertisements

TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Delta Confidential 1 5/29 – 6/6, 2001 SAP R/3 V4.6c PP Module Order Change Management(OCM)
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Planning Reports and Proposals
Integrating SHE Management Systems in Organizations: A case for Business Sustainability Presentation by A. Chimutanda SHAW 7-9 October 2009.
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
© Copyright Gazelles Systems, Inc Release: Annual Execution Planning Team Planning Execute For Growth.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Organizational Behavior
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Your business pitching templates MedVentures Awards 2010 A N INITIATIVE BY ANIMA I NVESTMENT N ETWORK & THEIR PARTNERS.
MedVentures Your business pitching templates
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Determine Eligibility Chapter 4. Determine Eligibility 4-2 Objectives Search for Customer on database Enter application signed date and eligibility determination.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
1 Learning Touchmath *Graphics taken from
1 Interprocess Communication 1. Ways of passing information 2. Guarded critical activities (e.g. updating shared data) 3. Proper sequencing in case of.
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
ZMQS ZMQS
Micro Focus Research 1 As far as youre aware, how does your organization plan to drive business growth over the next three years? (Respondents' first choices)
nationalheirloombuildings.com National Heirloom Buildings Of Steel Welcome to the National Heirloom Buildings Of Steel Construction Process.
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Solve Both Sides Day 1 Teacher Notes
ABC Technology Project
KYMV060C4 2 BY 2 MPDP INSTALLATION GUIDE KINGYOO Electronics., LTD.
©2004 Brooks/Cole FIGURES FOR CHAPTER 7 MULTI-LEVEL GATE CIRCUITS NAND AND NOR GATES Click the mouse to move to the next page. Use the ESC key to exit.
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
© S Haughton more than 3?
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
4 Square Questions Are you ready? B A
1 4 Square Questions B A D C Look carefully to the diagram Now I will ask you 4 questions about this square. Are you ready?
Identifying Our Own Style Extended DISC ® Personal Analysis.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
David Walker Ottawa TMG Users Group 15 March 2014.
Traditional IR models Jian-Yun Nie.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
SituationGantt Chart Brainstorm:Design Brief Page 1 GCSE Product DesignYour NameCandidate Number.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
OHT 5.1 © Marketing Insights Limited 2004 Chapter 5 E-business Strategy.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Three wheel cargo bike assembly manual
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
Organization, Implementation, and Control
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
Protection notice / Copyright notice Topic 1: The Inspired Bus Company © Siemens AG All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

A Clean Hand Device for Manual Wheelchairs March 4, 2004

2 Team Members Fannie Black Peter Pipchenko Jeff Dahlgren Mitsunori Kaibara

3 Presentation Scope To review the history of the project and our four step process work. To summarize what we have done and plan to do in the areas of: –Design –Analysis –Verification

4 Original Proposal Change Sponsor requested us design of a complete clean hand wheelchair. After consideration of the market niche, we successfully pitched designing an add-on alternative propulsion clean hand device.

5 Mission Statement We will design an alternative propulsion clean hand device for manual wheelchairs that will be inexpensive and fit the most popular wheelchairs in use today. (Rev. 1)

6 PDS Criteria Selection Biomechanical Efficiency Fits Popular Chairs Adjustability & Comfort Controllability – Braking, Turning Environmental Survivability Impact Strength Size & Weight Device Attachment Point Customer Installation Safety Company Cost Appearance (Rev. 2)

7 External Search - 1 GlovesWijit Handcycle Motorized Competing Solutions Comparison

8 External Search - 2 Analysis Methods Wheelchair User StatisticsAlternative Propulsion Test

9 Internal Search - 1

10 Internal Search - 2

11 1 st Critical Step We realized designing this device required personal experience with a wheelchair. We rented a wheelchair and rode it around.

12 Wheelchair Use Learnings Your hand really does get filthy! Controllability is the highest priority. Side space is incredibly limited. Adaptability will be key. We dont really have a clue what its like, so we must get wheelchair user input.

13 Final Concept Selection +

14 Hybrid Concept

15 2 nd Critical Step We had two meetings with actual wheelchair users. We wanted to get their input on our design criteria. We wanted to see if they would buy and use our final concepts.

16 Wheelchair User Learnings They substantially shot down all ideas, because of four main factors: –The motion was too complicated and required too much relearning. –The devices stood out too much. Disabled people want to minimize their disabilities. –No propulsion method gives better control to actual manual wheelchair users than the traditional hand to rim method. –All they and the sponsor really want is a clean hand guard, without the alternative propulsion aspect. Back to the drawing board.

17 Human Element Theres a strong human element in this project. Were designing a device that will literally become a part of a persons body. Theres nothing more personal than that, and thus the most important factor in designing this device has to be how the user feels. We had completely ignored this before. The user must be consulted as early as possible in the design of any product with a strong human element.

18 Revised Mission Statement We will design an alternative propulsion clean hand device for manual wheelchairs that will be inexpensive and fit the most popular wheelchairs in use today. (Rev. 2)

19 Revised PDS Criteria Biomechanical Efficiency Fits Popular Chairs Adjustability & Comfort Controllability – Braking, Turning Environmental Survivability Impact Strength Size & Weight Device Attachment Point Customer Installation Safety Company Cost Appearance (Rev. 3)

20 Revised Concept Counterbalanced Squeezable Hand Rim Extender & Guard + Without the lever arm

21 Revised Concept Wheel Spider Attachment Point Adjustable Default Counterbalance Position Palm Guard Rim Extender Squeezable Grip (Contd)

22 What Weve Done Design –Concept Brainstorming –9 Different Concept Models –A Complete Wheelchair Model from Actual Dimensions Analysis –Zero Verification –Rode a Wheelchair to Consider Our Concepts –Got Input from Wheelchair Users about Our Designs

23 What We Plan To Do Design –Material Selection & Part Sourcing –Nuts & Bolts Model (Add Fasteners, Bearings) –Dimension Drawing (Piece Part, Assy) –Plastic Part Mold Model & Drawings (Parting Line, Draft Angles) –Final Concept Refinement Analysis –Strengths Analysis of All Components –Machine Design Fatigue Analysis of Bearings, etc. Verification –Simple Cardboard Prototypes –Tougher Metal or Wood Prototypes for Actual Use –Testing of Prototypes by Wheelchair Users

Please ask questions. Thank you.