Investigational Device Exemptions 21 CFR Part 812

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

What FDA Looks for When Inspecting IRBs and Sponsors Marian J. Serge Nurse Consultant Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for.
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
The HRPP FYI Process and the UPIRSO/SAE Review Sheet An IRB Infoshort February 2014.
Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Overview for IRBs
MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICAL RESEARCH AND REIMBURSEMENT CONFERENCE
Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) CFR Title 21, Part 812
IRB Process & Medical Devices
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Overview of FDA Device Regulations
The Radioactive Drug Research Committee Approval Process for Tracer Use Anthony F. Shields, M.D., Ph.D. Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State University.
Carole C. Carey, BSEE, M.Engineering Director, International Staff
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one? Presented by Office of Human Research Protection.
What is involved? What are your responsibilities? May 2013: Research Institute, Clinical Research Administration Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Protocol Deviations : Identification, Responses and Solutions The Office of Human Subjects Research’s Compliance Monitoring Program Educational Seminars:
Humanitarian Device Exemptions (HDE) 101 Elizabeth Hillebrenner, MSE Biomedical Engineer IDE and HDE Program Staff Center for Devices and Radiological.
IRB Review of Device Research and Other Clinical Uses of Devices
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
Good Clinical Practice in Research
510k Submission Overview Myraqa, Inc. August 22, 2012.
Single Use Expanded Access IND/IDE: FDA and IRB Requirements Before and After Use IRB Webinar October 9,2014.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
Medical Device Submissions
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Special IND/IDE Considerations: Emergency Use of Investigational Product Compassionate Use & Emergency Research July 21,
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Clinical Pharmacy’s Role in Research Trials Sheree Miller Pharm.D. Investigational Drug Service University of Washington Medical Center.
Investigational New Drug Application 21 CFR Part 312 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)
1 THE UNIQUE ROLES OF IRB IN MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICALL TRIAL Chiu Lin, Ph.D. CITI, May, 2009 CITI, May, 2009.
Device Research Presented by Marian Serge, R.N.. Goals Identify devices Recognize difference between significant risk (SR) and non- significant risk (NSR)
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Regulatory Considerations for Investigational Assays: Planning for Success Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD OIVD/FDA “Next-Generation DNA Sequencing as a Tool.
The Medical Device Pathway as a Legal Onramp for Futuristic Persons THE FUTURE T HE M EDICAL D EVICE P ATHWAY AS A L EGAL.
Device Clinical Trials and More… Michael E. Marcarelli, PharmD Director, Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for Devices and.
Good Laboratory Practice CFR 21 Part 58 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 19-20, 2007 Cincinnati, Ohio.
Medical Devices IRB Determination IRB Member Continuing Education.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Good Clinical Practice A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
PATRICIA KERBY, MPA HUMAN SUBJECTIONS PROTECTION COMPLIANCE OFFICER OFFICE OF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE What are the FDA’s expectations in 2010?
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
Overview of Gene Therapy Surveillance Inspections Joseph P Salewski, Chief Bioresearch Monitoring Branch CBER.
Copyright FDA Inspections: Where Do Things Go Wrong? Diana Naser RN, MS, CCRP Executive Director Clinical Research Administration Clinical Research.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
1 BIORESEARCH MONITORING AND IN VITRO DIAGNOSTICS SYBIL WELLSTOOD, PH.D. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE DIVISION OF BIORESEARCH MONITORING.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
What Are the FDA Requirements for Submitting an IDE?
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
How to Put Together an IDE Application
The Current PMA Requirements
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Streamlining IRB Procedures for Expanded Access
Investigator of Record – Definition
Good Laboratory Practice CFR 21 Part 58
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Investigational Device Exemptions 21 CFR Part 812 A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International gclasby@promedica-intl.com 714-799-1617 x 25

IDE About the Regulation Provides procedures for conduct of clinical studies for unapproved devices Exempts products from 510(k) or PMA approval requirements: Registration, listing, interstate distribution Labeling GMPs Applies to most studies to determine device safety & effectiveness

When IDE Application Not Required Clinical Study Situations Device legally marketed for indicated use Marketing preference studies Market seeding studies Device is substantially equivalent to pre 1976 commercially distributed device Device is non-significant risk & IRB has approved study Many diagnostic devices Veterinary devices Custom device

Defining Device Types Significant or Non-Significant Risk? Significant Risk: device has potential for serious risk to patient health, safety or welfare Implants Products supporting/sustaining life Products with substantial role in diagnosing, curing mitigating or treating disease (or preventing impairment of human health) Non-Significant Risk: all other devices

Defining Device Types Significant or Non-significant Risk? How to decide? Sponsor makes initial determination; IRB makes final call

Regulatory Differences Significant vs. Non-significant Risk Significant Risk Devices require FDA (IDE) & IRB approval prior to clinical study initiation Non-Significant Risk Devices require only IRB approval prior to clinical study initiation IDE presumed, unless FDA notified Sponsor that application is required

IDE Application Contents Administrative Details Sponsor responsibility 3 copies of submission required All correspondence related to IDE sent by registered mail or by hand IDE approval required prior to study initiation

IDE Application Contents An Overview Sponsor name & address Report of prior investigations & investigational plan Description of methods, facilities, controls used for device manufacture, processing, packaging, storage & use Names of proposed investigators & example of proposed investigator agreements Certification that all investigators will sign agreement prior to study participation

IDE Application Contents An Overview List of name, address & chairperson of each IRB reviewing study If device will be “sold”, amount to be charged and rationale for why sale does not constitute commercialization Environmental exemption/assessment Proposed device labeling “Caution – Investigational Device Limited by Federal (or US) Law to Investigational Use” Copies of all informed consent documents

IDE Contents Report of Prior Investigations Reports of all prior clinical, animal & lab testing of device – should be adequate to justify proposed study Bibliography of related publications Summary of unpublished info Non-clinical lab studies (in compliance with GLP)

IDE Contents Investigational Plan Study purpose Proposed protocol Risk analysis Device description Monitoring procedures Labeling Consent materials

IDE Contents Investigational Plan IRB info Info on core labs, reading centers, etc. Add’l records & reports

IDE Review/Approval FDA’s Considerations Approval/disapproval decision Rendered in writing Rendered  30 days of FDA receipt Approval may be denied/rescinded if: Sponsor fails to comply with applicable regulations Sponsor is non-responsive to requests for add’l info Subject risks outweigh benefits Unreasonable to proceed due to inadequacy of investigational plan, manufacturing or monitoring

Prohibited Practices Under IDE Sponsors & Investigators Promotion of investigational product Representing device as safe or effective for use in the study Commercializing device by charging more than cost-recovery Unduly prolonging study Enrolling more subjects than necessary

IDE Supplements Necessary When: Changes made to investigational plan that may affect: Scientific soundness of study Rights, safety or welfare of study subjects Changes in device design Changes in device manufacturing Addition of study investigators

“Treatment” IDE Appropriate When: Device intended to treat or diagnose serious or life-threatening condition No satisfactory alternative available Controlled clinical trials in progress under IDE Or when trials completed & FDA review of request to market is pending Sponsor actively pursuing device marketing approval with FDA

Sponsor Responsibilities Subpart C Selection of qualified investigators & maintenance of ongoing communications Appropriate monitoring of study Special emphasis on device-related adverse events Confirmation of IRB review/approval Submission of IDE application to FDA Prompt notification of significant new information to FDA, IRB

Sponsor Responsibilities Subpart G – Records Maintenance of records: Study-related correspondence Device shipment/disposition Signed investigator agreements & financial disclosure info Non-significant risk justification (if applicable) Adverse device effects & complaints Record retention ≥ 2 yr after study completion or date no longer required for PMA application Record custody transferable with notice to FDA

Sponsor Responsibilities Subpart G – Inspections Must permit access by FDA employees to inspect facility where devices are held Must permit access by FDA employees to inspect & copy study-related records

Sponsor Responsibilities Subpart G – Reports Unanticipated adverse device effects – 10 working days Withdrawal of IRB approval – 5 working days Withdrawal of FDA approval – 5 working days Current investigator list – every 6 months Progress reports – at least yearly Device recalls & disposition – 30 working days

Sponsor Responsibilities Subpart G – Reports Study completion (significant risk) - 30 working days Final report - 6 months Use of device without written consent – 5 working days Significant risk determination – 5 working days

IRB Responsibilities Subpart D Membership, duties & functions in accordance with 21 CFR 56 Review of research Initial review prior to study initiation Significant risk determination, if necessary Continuing review throughout study

IRB Responsibilities Subpart G – Records & Reports Records maintained in accordance with 21 CFR 56

IRB Responsibilities Subpart G – Inspections Must permit access by FDA employees to inspect & copy study-related records

Investigator Responsibilities Subpart E Compliance with: Investigational plan Investigator agreement(s) Applicable FDA regulations Protection of subject rights & welfare Control of investigational devices Obtaining consent in accordance with 21 CFR part 50 Repeated noncompliance with assigned responsibilities may result in investigator disqualification by FDA

Investigator Responsibilities Subpart G – Records Maintenance of records: Study-related correspondence Product receipt, use, or disposition Subject case records Protocol & amendments Record retention ≥ 2 yr after study completion or date no longer required for PMA application Record custody transferable with notice to Sponsor, FDA

Investigator Responsibilities Subpart G – Inspections Must permit access by FDA employees to inspect facility where devices are held Must permit access by FDA employees to inspect & copy study-related records Must permit access by FDA employees to inspect & copy records identifying subjects, if: Suspicion that adequate consent was not obtained Required investigator reports incomplete, inadequate, false

Investigator Responsibilities Subpart G - Reports Unanticipated adverse device effects – 10 working days Withdrawal of IRB approval – 5 working days Progress reports – at least yearly Deviations from investigational plan – 5 working days Device use without documentation of consent – 5 working days Final report - 3 months

IDE Regulation Reference Documents & Links (www.fda.gov/cdrh) Guidance on IDE Policies & Procedures (1/1998) Early Collaboration Meetings Under FDA Modernization Act (FDAMA), Final Guidance for Industry & CDRH Staff (2/2001) Guidance on Significant & Non-Significant Risk Device Studies 7/25/86 (D86-1) The Least Burdensome Provisions of FDA Modernization Act of 1997: Concept & Principles; Draft Guidance for FDA & Industry (5/3/2001)

IDE Regulation Reference Documents & Links (www.fda.gov/cdrh) FDA Guidance for Financial Disclosure by Clinical Investigators FDA Guidance for IRBs & Clinical Investigators FDA Guidance for Monitoring Clinical Investigations FDA/ORA Compliance Program Guidance for Bioresearch Monitoring of Clinical Investigations FDA CDRH Device Advice