Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1252r0 Submission November 2009 Inter Cluster Parameters of Living Room Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0323r1 Submission March 2009 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 TGad Channel Model Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0364r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Date: Authors: Antenna Array Gain from Measured Data for n/ac.
Doc.: IEEE /0090r0 SubmissionMartin Jacob, TU Braunschweig January 2010 Slide 1 Modeling the Dynamical Human Blockage for 60 GHz WLAN Channel.
Doc.: IEEE /0336r0 Submission March 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Conference Room Channel Model for 60 GHz WLAN Systems - Summary.
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
November 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 November 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0799r2 Submission June 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom Modifications to Simulation Scenarios and Calibration Process Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission September 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 SU-MIMO Configurations for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r0 January 2010 R. Kudo, K. Ishihara and Y. Takatori (NTT) Slide 1 Measured Channel Variation.
Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0133r0 Submission January 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Measurement results for OBSS in home network scenarios Date: September 2009.
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1028r0 September 2015 Shouxing Simon Qu, BlackBerry, Ltd..Slide 1 PDF of Spatial Angles Reflected from Ceiling in the Conference.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0112r2 Submission January, 2010 Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 1 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel.
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission November 2009 I. Siaud, Orange LabsSlide 1 Path Loss Models for TGad Channel Models: Antenna and Dispersion Impact.
Doc.: IEEE /0372r0 Submission March, 2010 Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku UniversitySlide 1 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise.
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1032r0 Slide 1 Simulation Scenario for OBSS in Home Network Date: Authors: September.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission January 2006 Ali Sadri (Intel Corporation)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Doc.: IEEE /0499r1 Submission May 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Simulation Scenario Floor Plans Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
Doc.: IEEE /0664r0 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
TGad Channel Model Requirements
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
Submission Title: [Resolving the Ambiguity in IMST Measurements]
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
On Tap Angular Spread and Kronecker Structure of WLAN Channel Models
Small-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
TGad March 2010 Closing Report
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Proposed TGac Channel Model Revisions (for r6)
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2009
Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
TGad Channel Model Update
Match 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: The THz Channel Model in Wireless Data Center.
TGad July 2009 Closing Report
Multi-User MIMO Channel Measurements
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Simultaneous Beam Training
TGad September 2009 Closing Report
TGad November 2009 Closing Report
TGad January 2010 Closing Report
Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
Joint Processing MU-MIMO
Channel Generation of aj (45GHz) Based on Channel Measurement
TGad March 2009 Closing Report
Submission Title: [Wireless Display Throughput Requirements]
TGad May 2009 Closing Report
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
January, 2010 [Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60GHz (Part 3)] Date: Authors: Hirokazu Sawada, Tohoku University.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Reuse of TGn Channel Model for SDMA in TGac
Proposed Addition to Evaluation Methodology
Simulation Scenario Floor Plans
TGad Task Group Document Open Items
Channel Generation of aj (45GHz) Based on Channel Measurement
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar 2016
Presentation transcript:

Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document July 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2009 Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document Date: 2009-07-15 Authors: Alexander Maltsev, Intel Alexander Maltsev, Intel

July 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2009 Abstract This presentation describes changes in the document “Channel models for 60 GHz WLAN systems,” (IEEE 802.11-09/0334) made from r2 (May 2009) to r3 (July 2009). Alexander Maltsev, Intel Alexander Maltsev, Intel

July 2009 Summary of Updates Two main updates were done in the r3 version of the “Channel models for 60 GHz WLAN systems” document relatively to the r2 version: Polarization impact modeling (new Sections 2.4, 3.4, 3.6). Conference room channel model for simulation of links between a STA on the table and the AP (new Sections 3.5, 3.6) Other sections of the document updated to include these new features. Alexander Maltsev, Intel

Polarization Impact Modeling (1 of 3) July 2009 Polarization Impact Modeling (1 of 3) It was demonstrated in [2], [3] that polarization impact is very strong for 60 GHz WLAN systems and that a mismatch in polarization characteristics of the transmit and receive antennas can result in a degradation of the received power by 10-20 dB. Support of polarization characteristics is included as one of the requirements for the TGad channel model [4] Polarization characteristics impact has to be accurately predicted for different signal propagation paths and for antennas with different types of polarization (linear, circular, adaptive polarization). Alexander Maltsev, Intel

Polarization Impact Modeling (2 of 3) July 2009 Polarization Impact Modeling (2 of 3) The methodology for polarization impact modeling was proposed in [5]. This approach was applied to the conference room channel model. The used methodology allows to account for cross-polarization coupling because of the geometrical depolarization and due to cross- polarization coupling at the reflections. Polarization impact was modeled at the cluster level and all rays within one cluster were assumed to have the same polarization characteristics. In the developed channel model, channel clusters correspond to different first and second order reflected signal paths. The polarization does not change at the free space propagation but changes at the reflection. The reflection characteristics depend on the material type and the incident angle. Hence, it is reasonable to assume the same polarization characteristics for all closely spaced rays inside one cluster and introduce polarization characteristics at the cluster level. Alexander Maltsev, Intel

Polarization Impact Modeling (3 of 3) July 2009 Polarization Impact Modeling (3 of 3) A 2x2 polarization matrix H is generated for each signal cluster. The elements of H have a meaning of transmission coefficients between two orthogonal E vector orientations at the TX and RX antennas. Statistical models were developed for generation of the H matrices for different types of clusters (e.g. first order reflections from walls, second order reflections from walls, etc.). The statistical models were developed by obtaining empirical distributions with the ray-tracing and then making approximations of these distributions. Two next slides show examples of the statistical models developed for H. More details on the used approach and complete description of the developed statistical models are given in the updated document [1]. Alexander Maltsev, Intel

Distributions of elements of the polarization matrix H July 2009 Example of Statistical Model for Polarization Matrix H of First Order Reflections from Walls Distributions of elements of the polarization matrix H The distributions for |H11| and |H22| are log-normal distributions (i.e. have Gaussian distributions in decibel scale) with the mean = -10 dB and standard deviation = 4 dB. H11 always has a negative sign and H22 always has a positive sign. Non-diagonal cross-coupling elements are two equally probable values ± 0.1 in linear scale (-20 dB in log scale). Alexander Maltsev, Intel

Distributions of elements of the polarization matrix H July 2009 Example of Statistical Model for Polarization Matrix H of Second Order Reflections from Walls Distributions of elements of the polarization matrix H Solid curves show distributions obtained by ray-tracing, dashed curves show proposed approximations. For the components H11, H22, the proposed approximations provide very close matching to the simulated distributions and dashed curves are not plotted For the second order reflections from walls, cross-polarization both due to cross-polarization at the reflection and due to geometrical depolarization happens. Alexander Maltsev, Intel

Conference Room Scenario from EVM July 2009 Conference Room Scenario from EVM The simulation scenario for the conference room channel model from the EVM [6] includes two types of links: Links between two STAs on the table (the STA-STA sub-scenario) Links between a STA on the table and the AP (the STA-AP sub-scenario) The conference room channel model presented in the r2 of the document uses many assumptions specific to the STA-STA sub-scenario and thus cannot address the STA-AP sub-scenario. A statistical channel model for the STA-AP sub-scenario has been developed and included in the r3 of the document. Alexander Maltsev, Intel

3D Model for STA-AP Sub-scenario July 2009 3D Model for STA-AP Sub-scenario There are three type of clusters for the STA-AP sub-scenario: LOS, first order reflections from walls (4 clusters), second order reflections from walls (8 clusters) Alexander Maltsev, Intel

Channel model for STA-AP Sub-scenario July 2009 Channel model for STA-AP Sub-scenario The approach used to develop a channel model for the STA-AP sub-scenario is similar to the approach previously used for the STA-STA sub-scenario. Statistical models for inter cluster parameters were calculated by approximating empirical distributions obtained from ray-tracing. Polarization impact models were developed. The same statistical models of the intra cluster parameters as in the STA-STA scenario were used. A detailed description of the channel model for the STA-AP scenario is provided in the updated document [1]. Alexander Maltsev, Intel

Current Status of the Conference Room Channel Model July 2009 Current Status of the Conference Room Channel Model At the present moment, the channel model for the conference room has the following main features: STA-STA and STA-AP sub-scenarios sufficient to address requirements of the EVM for the conference room environment Support of beamforming algorithms with steerable directional antennas Support of polarization characteristics Matlab/C implementation of the conference room channel model with all features was completed and contributed to the TGad. The main TBD feature is support of people motion with blocking of signal paths (channel dynamics). Alexander Maltsev, Intel

July 2009 References IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0334r3. Channel models for 60 GHz WLAN systems, A. Maltsev et al, July, 2009. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0552r0. Experimental investigation of polarization impact on 60 GHz WLAN systems, A. Maltsev et al, May 11, 2009. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0721r1. Propagation measurements and considerations in conference room, living room, and cubicle environments. Part 1, H. Sawada et al, July 2, 2008. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0323r0. TGad channel model requirements, V. Erceg et al, March 10, 2009. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0431r0. Polarization model for 60 GHz, A. Maltsev et al, April 2, 2009. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0096r6. TGad evaluation methodology, E. Perahia, May, 2009. Alexander Maltsev, Intel