Interactions of Pleckstrin Homology Domains with Membranes: Adding Back the Bilayer via High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics  Eiji Yamamoto, Antreas C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Not Just an Oil Slick: How the Energetics of Protein-Membrane Interactions Impacts the Function and Organization of Transmembrane Proteins  Sayan Mondal,
Advertisements

Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between Staphylococcal Virulence Factor Sbi-IV and Complement C3d  Ronald D. Gorham, Wilson Rodriguez, Dimitrios.
Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Tyler Reddy, Mark S.P. Sansom  Structure 
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Rhomboid Protease Dynamics and Lipid Interactions
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Sonya M. Hanson, Simon Newstead, Kenton J. Swartz, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Molecular Simulation Approaches to Membrane Proteins
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Joe G. Greener, Ioannis Filippis, Michael J.E. Sternberg  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
XLF Regulates Filament Architecture of the XRCC4·Ligase IV Complex
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages e2 (July 2018)
Loredana Vaccaro, Kathryn A. Scott, Mark S.P. Sansom 
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Calcium Enhances Binding of Aβ Monomer to DMPC Lipid Bilayer
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages L07-L09 (January 2007)
Sundeep S. Deol, Peter J. Bond, Carmen Domene, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Grischa R. Meyer, Justin Gullingsrud, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac 
Crystal Structure of a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, MTMR2
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Recognition of the Regulatory Nascent Chain TnaC by the Ribosome
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Membrane Insertion of a Voltage Sensor Helix
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Chze Ling Wee, David Gavaghan, Mark S.P. Sansom  Biophysical Journal 
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Interactions of the Auxilin-1 PTEN-like Domain with Model Membranes Result in Nanoclustering of Phosphatidyl Inositol Phosphates  Antreas C. Kalli, Gareth.
Structures of monomeric and oligomeric forms of the Toxoplasma gondii perforin-like protein 1 by Tao Ni, Sophie I. Williams, Saša Rezelj, Gregor Anderluh,
Volume 109, Issue 10, Pages (November 2015)
XLF Regulates Filament Architecture of the XRCC4·Ligase IV Complex
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Interactions of Pleckstrin Homology Domains with Membranes: Adding Back the Bilayer via High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics  Eiji Yamamoto, Antreas C. Kalli, Kenji Yasuoka, Mark S.P. Sansom  Structure  Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 1421-1431 (August 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.06.002 Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Structure 2016 24, 1421-1431DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.06.002) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The PH Domain/Bilayer Simulation Pipeline (A) Snapshot of a selected simulation demonstrating the localization of the GRP1 PH domain to the lipid bilayer. The GRP1 PH domain is shown in yellow. PIP3 molecules are shown in green/red/bronze, and the POPC and POPS lipids are shown as silver lines (phosphorus atoms, blue). See also Figure S1. (B) Normalized density map of the GRP1 PH domain (zz component of rotational matrix versus distance). (C) Normalized average number of contacts between the GRP1 PH domain protein and PIPs shown for the 25 × 1 μs CG-MD simulations and for the 2 × 1 μs AT-MD simulations (see also Figure S1). The light blue colors represent the experimental contacts observed in the crystal structure. For normalization, the number of contacts of a residue with a lipid type was divided by the largest number of contacts that the same lipid type made with any residue in the protein. This means that the residue with the most frequent contacts will have the value of 1 and the residue with no contacts with a lipid type will have the value of 0. The position of the β1 and β2 strands is shown by blue and green arrows, respectively. Contacts were defined using cut-off distances of 0.7 and 0.4 nm, respectively for CG-MD and AT-MD simulations. The same analysis for the atomistic simulations of the PLC-δ1 PH and the β-spectrin PH domains is shown in Figure S2. Structure 2016 24, 1421-1431DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.06.002) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Normalized Density Maps for the 12 PH Domains, Other Than that of GRP1 For the density map of GRP1, see Figure 1C. The normalized density maps are shown as the zz component of the rotational matrix versus the z component of the distance between centers of mass of the protein and the bilayer. See also Figure S3 for convergence analysis and Figure S1 for the analysis of the orientation of the mutated form of the DAPP1 PH domain relative to the bilayer. Structure 2016 24, 1421-1431DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.06.002) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 PH/PIP Complexes Alignment of the PH/PIP complexes derived from our simulation approach (with PH domains in yellow and PIP molecules in cyan/red/bronze/silver) with the corresponding crystal structures (PH domains and PIP both in blue). Note that PIPs in the simulation snapshots are located at approximately the same sites on the PH domains as in the crystal structures. These complexes were obtained from the maxima in the density maps shown in Figure 2. See also Figure S7. Structure 2016 24, 1421-1431DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.06.002) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Normalized Average Number of Contacts between the PH Domains and PIPs Contacts were calculated using the whole ensemble (25 × 1 μs CG-MD simulations). For normalization, the number of contacts of a residue with a lipid type was divided by the largest number of contacts that the same lipid type made with any residue in the PH domain. The positions of the β1 to β6 stands are shown by blue, green, black, purple, orange, and pink arrows, respectively. See also Figures S5 and S6. Structure 2016 24, 1421-1431DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.06.002) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Binding of PIP Molecules to Both Canonical and Non-canonical Sites on the ASAP1 PH Domain (A–C) A simulation snapshot and the crystal structure are compared in (A) (the same format as in Figure 3 for other PH domains). (B) A snapshot of the PH/PIP2 complex derived from our CG simulations and then converted to an atomistic model, with the PH domain in yellow and the two bound PIP2 molecules (in cyan/red/bronze). (C) The crystal structure (PDB: 5C79) with the PH domain in blue and the two bound dibutyryl PIP molecules (in cyan/red/bronze/silver). See also Figure S2. Structure 2016 24, 1421-1431DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.06.002) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Conservation of the Interactions with PIP Lipids (A–C) Sequence alignment of the PH domains used in this study (A). Red indicates a high number of contacts, whereas white indicate no contacts. Structures of the GRP1 PH domain color-coded based on the number of contact with PIP2 (B) or PIP3 (C) (both averaged over 25 × 1 μs CG-MD simulations of the GRP1). Blue indicates no contacts, and red a high number of contacts. See also Figure S6. Structure 2016 24, 1421-1431DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.06.002) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions