Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 143, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines from Adult Rat Cells
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors  Kazutoshi Takahashi, Shinya Yamanaka  Cell 
Hypoxia Enhances the Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Establishment of Endoderm Progenitors by SOX Transcription Factor Expression in Human Embryonic Stem Cells  Cheryle A. Séguin, Jonathan S. Draper, Andras.
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Comparative gene expression profiling of adult mouse ovary-derived oogonial stem cells supports a distinct cellular identity  Anthony N. Imudia, M.D.,
Patient-Specific Naturally Gene-Reverted Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa  Jakub Tolar, John A. McGrath, Lily.
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Robert Blelloch, Monica Venere, Jonathan Yen, Miguel Ramalho-Santos 
Reprogramming of T Cells from Human Peripheral Blood
Induction of Pluripotency in Adult Unipotent Germline Stem Cells
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Oct4-Induced Pluripotency in Adult Neural Stem Cells
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Wnt Signaling Promotes Reprogramming of Somatic Cells to Pluripotency
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Human Cord Blood
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Jamie A. Hackett, Toshihiro Kobayashi, Sabine Dietmann, M. Azim Surani 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Germline Competent Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Rat Blastocysts
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Epigenetic Memory and Preferential Lineage-Specific Differentiation in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from Human Pancreatic Islet Beta Cells 
Isolation of Epiblast Stem Cells from Preimplantation Mouse Embryos
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
H1foo Has a Pivotal Role in Qualifying Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Jakub Tolar, Lily Xia, Megan J. Riddle, Chris J. Lees, Cindy R
Naive and Primed Pluripotent States
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors
Pax6 Is a Human Neuroectoderm Cell Fate Determinant
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Derivation of Mouse Haploid Trophoblast Stem Cells
Periodic Activation of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Enhances Somatic Cell Reprogramming Mediated by Cell Fusion  Frederic Lluis, Elisa Pedone, Stefano Pepe,
Global Splicing Pattern Reversion during Somatic Cell Reprogramming
Presentation transcript:

Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 381-384 (May 2009) Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using Recombinant Proteins  Hongyan Zhou, Shili Wu, Jin Young Joo, Saiyong Zhu, Dong Wook Han, Tongxiang Lin, Sunia Trauger, Geoffery Bien, Susan Yao, Yong Zhu, Gary Siuzdak, Hans R. Schöler, Lingxun Duan, Sheng Ding  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 381-384 (May 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.04.005 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Generation of Protein-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells by Recombinant Reprogramming Proteins (A) Timeline of protein-induced pluripotent stem cell (piPSC) generation. (B) Oct4-GFP+ piPSC colonies were initially observed around day 30–35. Representative phase contrast image (left) and fluorescence image (right) are shown. (C) Oct4-GFP+ piPSCs sustain long-term and homogenous self-renewal under conventional mESC growth condition. (D) The long-term expanded piPSCs grow as compact and domed colonies that express strong ALP, a typical pluripotency marker. (E) piPSCs express other typical pluripotency markers, examined by immunofluorescence, including SSEA-1 (red), Sox2 (red), Oct4 (red), and Nanog (red). DAPI staining was performed to visualize the nuclei (blue), and the images were merged. (F) RT-PCR analysis of endogenous pluripotency gene expression in piPSCs. (G) Methylation analysis of Oct4 and Nanog promoters by bisulfite genomic sequencing. Open and closed circles indicate unmethylated and methylated CpGs, respectively. (H) Scatter plots comparing global gene expression patterns between piPSCs with murine ESCs, and between piPSCs and OG2-MEFs. The positions of the pluripotency genes Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2 are shown by arrows. Black lines indicate the linear equivalent and two-fold changes in gene expression levels between the samples. Cell Stem Cell 2009 4, 381-384DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.04.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 In Vitro and In Vivo Pluripotency of piPSCs (A) piPSCs can effectively differentiate in vitro into cells in the three germ layers, including neural progenitor cells (Pax6+), characteristic neurons (TUJ1+), mature cardiomyocytes (CT3+), definitive endoderm cells (Sox17+), pancreatic cells (Pdx1+), and hepatic cells (ALB+). Images were merged with DAPI (blue) staining. (B) RT-PCR analysis of in vitro differentiation of piPSCs. (C) piPSCs incorporate into the ICM of the blastocytes after aggregation with eight-cell embryos (left). Chimeric fetuses (13.5 dpc, middle) were obtained after transfer of the piPSC aggregated embryos into pseudopregnant mice. piPSCs contributed to the germline cells (Oct4-GFP positive) in isolated genital ridge tissue from chimeric fetuses (found in 3 out of 17 fetuses, right). (D) GFP genotyping confirmed piPSC contribution to multiple three germ layer tissues in chimeric fetuses, including heart, liver, brain, tail, and gonad tissues. A representative genomic PCR of GFP was shown for embryo 9 that also contains piPSC germline contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2009 4, 381-384DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2009.04.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions