Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of TAR RNA Complexed with a Tat-TAR Interaction Nanomolar Inhibitor that Was Identified by Computational Screening  Zhihua Du, Kenneth E Lind,
Advertisements

Mapping of the Interaction Interface of DNA Polymerase β with XRCC1
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2001)
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Solution Structure of ZASP PDZ Domain
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
The Arginine-Rich RNA-Binding Motif of HIV-1 Rev Is Intrinsically Disordered and Folds upon RRE Binding  Fabio Casu, Brendan M. Duggan, Mirko Hennig 
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of a Novel Globular Domain in RBM10 Containing OCRE, the Octamer Repeat Sequence Motif  Bryan T. Martin, Pedro Serrano,
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
The Ras-Byr2RBD Complex
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Solution Structure of the Cyclotide Palicourein
A Functional Proline Switch in Cytochrome P450cam
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Phosphate Recognition by the FYVE Domain
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages (September 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 1029-1041 (November 2001) Solution Structure of the Ras Binding Domain of the Protein Kinase Byr2 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe  Wolfram Gronwald, Fritz Huber, Petra Grünewald, Michael Spörner, Sabine Wohlgemuth, Christian Herrmann, Hans Robert Kalbitzer  Structure  Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 1029-1041 (November 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2

Figure 1 1H and 13C Chemical Shifts Relative to Their Random Coil Values 1H and 13C chemical shift differences (ppm), relative to their random coil values, of the Hα protons and Cα carbons, respectively [45] Structure 2001 9, 1029-1041DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2)

Figure 2 Schematic Representation of the Mixed β Sheet Structure of Byr2 Deduced from a Qualitative Analysis of the NMR Data The observed interstrand NOE connectivities between Hα and Hα protons, between HN and backbone protons, and hydrogen bonds are marked by solid, dotted, and broken arrows, respectively. Interstrand connectivities such as HN–Hβ NOEs, which define the β sheet even further, are not shown Structure 2001 9, 1029-1041DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2)

Figure 3 The Three-Dimensional Structure of Byr2RBD (a and b) Ribbon diagrams of Byr2RBD (71–165) in two different orientations that are rotated by 90° with respect to each other, indicating the mixed five-stranded β sheet (cyan) and the three α helices (red/yellow). (c) Superposition of the ten best NMR-derived structures showing the backbone residues (71–152). For reasons of clarity, the relatively unstructured region containing the last α helix is not shown Structure 2001 9, 1029-1041DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2)

Figure 4 Complex Formation of Byr2 with sp-Ras and h-Ras (a) 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC spectrum of the Ras binding domain of Byr2 measured at a 1H resonance frequency of 800 MHz and 298 K. The sample contained 0.73 mM Byr2 in buffer A (25 mM DTE, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM NaN3, 0.1 mM DSS, 200 mM deuterated glycine, and 20 mM phosphate buffer [pH 6.9]). The side chain of Trp162 is indicated by an asterisk. In the lower right part of the spectrum, folded signals originating from arginine side chains are labeled. (b) Complex formation between Byr2RBD and h-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp. An overlay of a section of the uncomplexed 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC spectrum of Byr2 (green) with the corresponding section of a spectrum recorded from a sample containing 0.58 mM Byr2RBD and 0.63 mM h-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp in buffer A (orange; molar ratio 1:1.1) is shown. Line shifts for the backbone amide resonances as observed for Asn79, Gly80, Thr82, Gly89, and Ser118 indicate possible interaction sites with h-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp or structural changes. (c) Here, the spectrum of Byr2 complexed with h-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp (green) shown in (b) is overlayed by a section of the 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC spectrum of 0.61 mM Byr2 complexed with 0.67 mM sp-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp (orange). In general, no major shift changes were found between the two spectra. However, small changes were found for residues such as Thr82, Gly89, and Ser118 Structure 2001 9, 1029-1041DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2)

Figure 5 Ras Interaction Sites in Different Ras Binding Domains Sequence alignment of Byr2 (65–180), c-Raf (human; 50–168), Rlf (mouse; 645–766), Rgl (mouse; 644–766), and RalGDS (human; 794–914). The alignment was performed with the program XALIGN and corrected at a few points manually. The secondary structure elements indicated are all taken directly from the analysis of the three-dimensional structure of Byr2RBD. (a) Residues of Byr2RBD for which chemical shift perturbations Δδ > 50 Hz were observed upon complex formation with either h-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp or sp-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp are colored yellow. Residues for which differences between the two complexes were observed are colored red. Residues in Rgl [5], RalGDS [7], and Rlf [6] for which substantial chemical shift pertubations (Δδ > 50 Hz for Rgl and RalGDS and Δδ > 25 Hz for Rlf) were observed upon complex formation with h-Ras are colored yellow, as well. Please note that for Rlf, only regions of shifting residues and not individual amino acids were reported [6]. Residues in RalGDS that were involved in complex formation in the crystal structure are colored blue [8]. Residues in c-Raf for which changes in signal intensity upon complex formation were monitored are colored yellow [4]. For c-Raf, residues participating in complex formation with Rap (E30D, K31E) in the crystal structure are shown in blue [46]. (b) Residues that are conserved in all molecules are highlighted in red; identical residues with respect to Byr2RBD are colored in green; identities in the other proteins except Byr2RBD are marked in light blue; and in cases where for two different residues identical partners are found they are highlighted in dark and light blue. With respect to Byr2RBD (65–180), 16% of the residues of c-Raf, 15% of the residues of Rlf and Rgl, and 14% of the residues of RalGDS are identical Structure 2001 9, 1029-1041DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2)

Figure 6 Putative Ras Interaction Sites in Byr2RBD On the left side, space-filling models of Byr2RBD are shown, while on the right side, ribbon diagrams in the same orientation are displayed to make the identification of certain parts of the molecule easier. (a) Display of the binding surface of Byr2RBD. Residues for which shift changes Δδ larger than 50 Hz were observed upon complex formation with h-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp are shown in orange. Residues for which large chemical shift changes were observed, but where some ambiguity existed about the exact size of the chemical shift change and which (in addition) were surrounded by other residues for which shift changes >50 Hz without any ambiguity were observed are colored in yellow. (b) The orientation shown is rotated by 180° with respect to (a). (c) Residues for which chemical shift changes were observed between complex formation of Byr2RBD with h-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp or with sp-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp are color-coded red Structure 2001 9, 1029-1041DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2)

Figure 7 Binding Kinetics of Ras and Byr2RBD In stopped-flow experiments, Ras in complex with mant-GppNHp is mixed with Byr2RBD at a minimum of a 5-fold molar excess. The observed rate constant is plotted versus the Byr2RBD concentration, and a hyperbolic curve is fitted to the data Structure 2001 9, 1029-1041DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2)

Figure 8 31P-NMR Spectra of Ras•GppNHp in the Presence and Absence of Byr2RBD The bottom spectrum was recorded at 278 K from a sample containing 1.5 mM h-Ras (wt) protein (1–189) in 40 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 10 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTE, and 0.1 mM DSS. From bottom to top, Byr2RBD was added in increasing amounts; the corresponding molar ratio of Byr2RBD to Ras protein is indicated. In the fully saturated state, the resonances for the α-, β-, and γ-phosphate groups were observed at −11.56 ppm, −3.36 ppm, and −0.35 ppm, respectively Structure 2001 9, 1029-1041DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2)

Figure 9 Electrostatic Surface Potentials at the Binding Interfaces of h-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp and Byr2RBD (a) h-Ras•Mg2+•GppNHp, (b) Byr2RBD. The electrostatic potentials were calculated with the program MOLMOL [43]. It can be easily seen that the binding surface of h-Ras is mainly negatively charged (red), while the corresponding binding surface of Byr2RBD is mainly positively charged (blue) Structure 2001 9, 1029-1041DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00671-2)