Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Actin Depletion Initiates Events Leading to Granule Secretion at the Immunological Synapse Alex T. Ritter, Yukako Asano, Jane C. Stinchcombe, N.M.G. Dieckmann,
Advertisements

Stability and Nuclear Dynamics of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient
Dongfang Liu, Mary E. Peterson, Eric O. Long  Immunity 
The Cilium Secretes Bioactive Ectosomes
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Vesicle Docking Is a Key Target of Local PI(4,5)P2 Metabolism in the Secretory Pathway of INS-1 Cells  Chen Ji, Fan Fan, Xuelin Lou  Cell Reports  Volume.
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Dynamics of Neutrophil Migration in Lymph Nodes during Infection
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
New Lamp Posts Allow for New Views of the Immunological Synapse
Dongfang Liu, Mary E. Peterson, Eric O. Long  Immunity 
Development and Migration of Plasma Cells in the Mouse Lymph Node
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Daniel Meyer, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Volker Scheuss  Neuron 
Janet H. Iwasa, R. Dyche Mullins  Current Biology 
Transiently Reorganized Microtubules Are Essential for Zippering during Dorsal Closure in Drosophila melanogaster  Ferenc Jankovics, Damian Brunner  Developmental.
Volume 91, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Key Interactions for Clathrin Coat Stability
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Single-Molecule Microscopy Reveals Plasma Membrane Microdomains Created by Protein-Protein Networks that Exclude or Trap Signaling Molecules in T Cells 
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
B Cells Acquire Particulate Antigen in a Macrophage-Rich Area at the Boundary between the Follicle and the Subcapsular Sinus of the Lymph Node  Yolanda.
Linda Balabanian, Christopher L. Berger, Adam G. Hendricks 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Zhang-Yi Liang, Mark Andrew Hallen, Sharyn Anne Endow  Current Biology 
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
The Origin of Phragmoplast Asymmetry
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Capping Protein Increases the Rate of Actin-Based Motility by Promoting Filament Nucleation by the Arp2/3 Complex  Orkun Akin, R. Dyche Mullins  Cell 
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Jane C. Stinchcombe, Giovanna Bossi, Sarah Booth, Gillian M. Griffiths 
Marko Kaksonen, Christopher P. Toret, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Self-Organization of MTOCs Replaces Centrosome Function during Acentrosomal Spindle Assembly in Live Mouse Oocytes  Melina Schuh, Jan Ellenberg  Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
The Strength of T Cell Receptor Signal Controls the Polarization of Cytotoxic Machinery to the Immunological Synapse  Misty R. Jenkins, Andy Tsun, Jane.
A New Model for Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Mouse Oocytes
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Kari Barlan, Wen Lu, Vladimir I. Gelfand  Current Biology 
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages e4 (September 2018)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Cytoskeletal Control of Antigen-Dependent T Cell Activation
Imaging Type VI Secretion-Mediated Bacterial Killing
Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Rac1 Localization and Lamellipodia Dynamics during Epithelial Cell-Cell Adhesion  Jason S. Ehrlich, Marc D.H. Hansen, W.James.
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics
Fig. 2. Immunocytochemical localization of NPC1 in alveolar type II cells. Isolated rat alveolar type II cells were fixed after 24 h in culture, double-labeled.
Volume 12, Issue 23, Pages (December 2002)
Marko Kaksonen, Yidi Sun, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Altered Peptide Ligands Induce Delayed CD8-T Cell Receptor Interaction—a Role for CD8 in Distinguishing Antigen Quality  Pia P. Yachi, Jeanette Ampudia,
XMAP215 Is a Processive Microtubule Polymerase
Presentation transcript:

Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 864-876 (May 2015) Actin Depletion Initiates Events Leading to Granule Secretion at the Immunological Synapse  Alex T. Ritter, Yukako Asano, Jane C. Stinchcombe, N.M.G. Dieckmann, Bi-Chang Chen, C. Gawden-Bone, Schuyler van Engelenburg, Wesley Legant, Liang Gao, Michael W. Davidson, Eric Betzig, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Gillian M. Griffiths  Immunity  Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 864-876 (May 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Immunity 2015 42, 864-876DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Actin Initially Accumulates at the Synapse and Quickly Clears to Form an F-Actin-Depleted Region Surrounded by an Actin-Rich Lamella (A) Maximum intensity projection (MIP) of a Lifeact-mApple-expressing CTL (green) interacting with a target (blue). Arrows point out the uropod as it retracts into the cell body over the course of target interaction (n = 15 cells, 8 independent experiments, i.e., from different mice). Scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) Time lapse of (i) MIP of confocal sections, (ii) a single confocal slice corresponding to the center of the synapse from the 488-nm channel, and (iii) en face view of a Lifeact-EGFP-expressing CTL interacting with an EL4 target cell expressing a farnesylated TagBFP2 (blue) (n = 15 cells, 3 independent experiments). Time 0:00 indicates the point of first contact with the target. (iv) Fluorescence-intensity plots quantify actin density along the synapse between the arrowheads shown in (ii). Scale bars represent 5 μm (i and ii) and 2 μm (iii). Time is shown as min:s. See also Movie S1. Immunity 2015 42, 864-876DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Lattice Light-Sheet Microscopy Reveals Actin Dynamics in Conjugating T Cells (A) Time-lapse MIP of coherent structured light-sheet images of (i) top views and (ii) side views of a migrating CTL expressing Lifeact-mEmerald. Green and magenta arrows highlight ruffles that translate up the dorsal surface of the cell (n = 9 cells, 3 independent experiments). (B) Time-lapse MIP of (i) lattice light-sheet images, (ii) a single slice corresponding to the center of the synapse from the 488-nm channel, and (iii) en face view of a Lifeact-mEmerald-expressing CTL (orange) interacting with an EL4-red target (cyan) (n = 10 cells, 3 independent experiments). (C) (i) MIP of a Lifeact-mEmerald-expressing CTL (orange) interacting with a target cell (cyan). (ii) Particles corresponding to visible actin structures were tracked in three dimensions over time. Dragon tails showing particle positions over the previous five frames are color coded to show particle velocity. (D) Mean velocity for each track was determined and collated into a histogram with a line of fit (red) (n = 123 tracks over 8 cells from 3 independent experiments). Scale bars represent 5 μm. Time is shown as min:s. See also Movie S2. Immunity 2015 42, 864-876DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Centrosome Migrates from the Uropod to the Center of the Actin-Deficient Zone (A) Time-lapse MIP images of a CTL expressing Lifeact-mApple and PACT-TagBFP (marked with a sphere) as it encountered an EL4-blue target cell. The track the centrosome took to the target is represented by a line pseudocolored to indicate particle velocity (n = 16 cells, 9 independent experiments). Scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) Graph of centrosome distance to synapse versus time for the dataset in (A). (C) Time lapse of (i) MIP images or (ii) en face view of a CTL expressing Lifeact-EGFP and PACT-mRFP as it encountered a target cell (red). The nuclei of both cells are labeled with Hoescht (blue). Scale bars represent 5 μm (i) and 3 μm (ii). Time is shown as min:s. See also Movie S3. Immunity 2015 42, 864-876DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cortical Actin Is Reduced at the Synapse when the Centrosome Is Docked (A and B) 3D structured-illumination images of a CTL that was fixed while interacting with glass coated with an antibody against CD3ε (A: n = 21 cells, 3 independent experiments) or CD25 (B: n = 24 cells, 3 independent experiments) and stained with phalloidin-Alexa 488 (green) and an antibody against α-tubulin (red). The “XY” panels are MIP images of the bottom 0.22 μm of the cell. The “XZ” and “YZ” panels are 0.3-μm-thick slices through the center of the cell in each respective dimension. Scale bars represent 5 μm. (C) TIRF images of (i) a CTL expressing MAP Tau-EGFP (n = 17 cells, 5 independent experiments) and (ii) a CTL expressing Lifeact-mApple as they interacted with glass coated with an antibody against CD3ε. Images of merged channels are shown in (iii). Scale bar represents 3 μm. See also Movie S4. Immunity 2015 42, 864-876DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 cSMAC Formation Occurs in Two Stages, before and after Centrosome Polarization (A) MIP (i–iv) and single confocal slice (v–viii) of a migratory CTL expressing CD3ζ-EGFP (i and v), Lifeact-mApple (ii and vi), or PACT-TagBFP (iii and vii). Images of merged channels are also shown (iv and vii). Scale bars represent 5 μm. (B) Time-lapse MIP images (i) and reconstructed en face view (ii–iv) of confocal sections taken as a CTL expressing PACT-TagBFP (i), CD3ζ-EGFP (ii), or Lifeact-mApple (iii) encountered a target cell (blue). A merged en face view is shown in (iv). A white sphere marks the location of the PACT-TagBFP signal in (i). (v) Fluorescence-intensity plots of a line scan across the synapse of a single z slice at the center of the synapse show EGFP and mApple signal in green and red, respectively. Scale bars represent 5 μm (i) and 3 μm (ii–iv). (C) Time-lapse MIP images of a CTL expressing CD3ζ-EGFP and PACT-mRFP as it encountered a target cell (blue). Magenta arrows highlight EGFP signal disappearing from the distal part of the cell, and orange arrows indicate EGFP signal accumulating at the cell-cell interface. Scale bar represents 5 μm. Time is shown as min:s. (n = 32 cells, 15 independent experiments). See also Movie S5. Immunity 2015 42, 864-876DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Granules Cluster at the Centrosome before It Arrives at the Synapse (A) Time-lapse MIP images of a CTL expressing Lifeact-EGFP, CD63-mCherry, and PACT-TagBFP as it interacted with a target cell (blue). All channels are shown in (i). The EGFP signal has been removed in (ii), and a circle with a radius of 2 μm has been overlaid onto the centrosome as a reference. (B) Graph of the average distance between granules and the centrosome over time. The black vertical line indicates the average time it took the centrosome to reach the synapse in sample cells, and the gray box indicates the SE. Error bars represent the SE at each time point (n = 9 cells, 3 independent experiments). (C) (i) Time-lapse MIP images of a CTL expressing Lifeact-EGFP, CD63-mCherry, and MAPTau-TagBFP2 as it interacted with a target cell (blue) (n = 9 cells, 3 independent experiments). (ii) Particles localized to the mCherry signal from (i) are shown. A cyan sphere marks the location of the centrosome over time. Particles corresponding to granules are tracked, and tracks corresponding to the location of the particle for the previous four frames (dragon tails) are shown. Tracks are color coded according to time. Time is shown as min:s. Scale bars represent 5 μm. See also Movies S6 and S8 and Figure S1. Immunity 2015 42, 864-876DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Lytic Granule Secretion Occurs after Cortical Actin Reduction (A)Time-lapse TIRF images of a CTL expressing Lifeact-mApple (top) or Lamp1-EGFP (middle) as it interacted with glass coated with an antibody against CD3ε (n = 14 cells, 5 independent experiments). Images of merged channels are shown in the bottom frames. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) Kymograph of the movie shown in (A). Fluorescence intensity under a 5-pixel-thick line is measured over time. The position of the line (dashed white line) is shown in the lower right panel of (A). Signal corresponding to Lifeact-mApple is shown on top, signal corresponding to Lamp1-EGFP is shown in the middle, and merged signal is shown on the bottom. Scale bar represents 2 min. (C) Single confocal slices of a CTL expressing Lifeact-mApple along with the lipid binding domain of (i) Tubby (n = 190 cells, 4 independent experiments), (ii) AKT (n = 57 cells, 2 independent experiments), or (iii) a farnesylation sequence fused to EGFP (n = 150 cells, 3 independent experiments) as it interacted with an EL4-blue target cell. Scale bars represents 5 μm. See also Movies S7 and S9. Immunity 2015 42, 864-876DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions