Updated concept of the CBM dipole magnet

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Panda Solenoid Timelines. General Layout constraints and HOLD POINTS.
Advertisements

Interim Design Amy Eckerle Andrew Whittington Philip Witherspoon Team 16.
CEA DSM Irfu - Bernard GASTINEAU - R3B Technical Board Meeting -April 4, Reactions with Relativistic Radioactive ions Beams GSI Large Acceptance.
Guenther Rosner FAIR Design Study, PANDA 3, GSI, 19/1/06 1 PANDA3: Magnet design and integration of detectors Tasks & participants Progress Milestones.
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole Progress Report V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
CBM Superconducting Dipole Magnet
Short period wiggler prototype for the CLIC damping ring Alexey Bragin, Denis Gurov, Anatoly Utkin, Pavel Vobly Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
Task7: NUSTAR2 - Design and Prototype Construction of a Radiation-Resistant Magnet C. Mühle GSI Task leader: G. Moritz /GSI.
IHEP participation in SIS300 production UNILAC SIS 18 SIS 100/300 HESR Super FRS NESR CR RESR Institute for High Energy Physics Protvino, Russia FAIR meeting.
SCU Layout Concept - Minimal Segmentation Joel Fuerst (ANL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting Dec. 16, 2014.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
SC dipole magnet for CBM E.A.Matyushevskiy, P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Ivanov, E.I. Litvinenko, A.I. Malakhov JINR, Dubna CBM Collaboration.
Task7: NUSTAR2 - Design and Prototype Construction of a Radiation-Resistant Magnet C. Mühle GSI Task leader: G. Moritz /GSI.
1 WANG,Li/SINAP WANG Li, WANG ShuHua, LIU YiYong, SUN Sen, HU Xiao, YIN LiXin Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, CAS, Shanghai , China Shanghai.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
CEA DSM Dapnia DIRAC-Phase-1 Annual Report meeting Status of the R3B-GLAD Magnet DIRAC-Phase-1 Annual Report Meeting 26 September 2006 Bernard Gastineau.
SHMS Spectrometer Update Hall C 2008 Users Meeting Paul Brindza January 18, 2008.
22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH The Optimized Superconducting Dipole of SIS100 for Series Production ICEC26 March 9th, 2016 GSI Helmholtzzentrum.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
CBM Dipole Conceptional Design Review
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Magnet design and field calculations
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
The Status of the CBM Experiment
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Update on PANDA solenoid design
CBM magnet overview of the BINP work
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
Coil design the CBM magnet
Challenges of vacuum chambers with adjustable gap for SC undulators
BINP, Sergey Pivovarov, Panda magnet meeting at GSl, June 07, 2016
JLAB MEETING FDR – April 23-24th 2013
Status of the PANDA Magnet
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Cryostat design and heat loads
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
MQXF updates P. Ferracin October 9th, 2014.
I. Bogdanov, S. Kozub, V. Pokrovsky, L. Shirshov,
Structural analysis of the CBM magnet coil
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
Assembly, survey, alignment of the CBM Dipole Magnet
Gebhard Moritz CDR meeting April GSI Darmstadt
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
Status of the PANDA Solenoid Magnet Production in BINP
Design of the cryogenic system of the CBM magnet
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
Proposal for new coil design the CBM magnet
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Magnet design, field calculations
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics,
Presentation transcript:

Updated concept of the CBM dipole magnet Alexey Bragin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia April 2018 October 2010

Outline Main demands to the CBM magnet Schedule of the work Changes from CDR. Samurai magnet Scope of BINP work Interfaces with other CBM systems Status of the work

Design parameters of the CBM magnet to be realized Geometry - Opening angle: ±25° vertically, ± 30° horizontally from the target - Free aperture: 1.44 m vertically x 1.8 m horizontally, no conical geometry - Distance target- magnet core end: 1m (STS detector must fit in) - Total length: 1.5 m - Space upstream of the magnet: <1 m Magnetic field - Field integral within STS detector (along straight lines): 0.972 T*m -> max. Field ≈ 1 T, depending on the magnet length - Field integral variation over the whole opening angle along straight lines: ≤ 20% (± 10%) - Fringe field downstream < reasonable value of the order of 50 to 100 Gauss at a distance of 1.6 m from the target (RICH only) Operating conditions - Operates at both polarities - 100% duty cycle, 3 months/year, 20 years - No real time restriction on the ramp: 1 hour up ramp - Radiation damage (<10MG for organics): no problem - Radiation Energy deposit in the cryosystem: max. 1 W

Design parameters of the CBM magnet to be realized, continued Assembly - Field clamps dismountable for MUCH - Assembly in situ - Weight restriction: crane 30 tons (including lifting jacks) - Maximum floor load: 100 tons/m2 - beam height over the floor: 5.8 m Alignment - Position accuracy: ± 0.2 mm (too high precision?) - Orientation accuracy (roll): ± 0.5 mrad The requirements given above are mandatory. Remark: the free aperture was increased from 1.4m (TDR) to 1.44 m. However, the integral field was decreased in order to keep the nominal current the same as in the TDR. The CBM superconducting dipole will be designed as follows: • Warm iron yoke ( huge vertical and horizontal balks) • Warm round poles • Removable field clamps • cylindrical NbTi coils wound on cylindrical bobbin, cooled with LHe • Thermal shields cooled with Helium gas (50-80K) • Two independent cold masses and cryostats (now not independent) • Vertical forces transferred from the coil to the cryostat and finally to the yoke • Normal conducting leads

Schedule of the work, April 2018 1. Conceptual Design review, April 2018 items to be approved: - magnetic field calculations; - iron yoke design; - general conception of the coil design the support struts as separate elements of the coil to be approved in FDR stage after manufacturing and testing a dummy samples of several designs; - cooling conception of single cryostat based on thermosyphon method; - system of powering and energy extraction; 2. Preliminary Design Review, October 2018 - cryostat design including cold valves; - current leads design based on HTS incertions; - design of the support struts; - control system

Schedule of the work, April 2018, continued 3. Final Design Review, January-February 2019 - support struts tested; - all drawings will be finished; - manufacturing process presented; - quality assurance procedures to be presented; 4. Manufacturing stages - SC cable manufactured November 2018 – March 2019; - iron yoke (8 months after the contract signed) - technologies of coils impregnation tested - tools manufactured - coils manufactured - cryostat manufactured 5. Factory acceptance tests in BINP, October 2019 – January 2020 the cryostat will be modified to use LN2 instead of 50 K GHe and a cryocooler will be used for the current leads cooling. 6. Assembling December 2021 – March 2022 (1st scenario) 7. Cryogenics test in GSI during April – December, 2023

General view of the CBM magnet

The CBM magnet general view

New coil design – indirect cooling

Difference from Samurai design The SS case does not work as bondage. It shrinks less than the winding. The G-10 spacers are less rigid than stainless steel at least by a factor of 5. The winding is cooled via two narrow channels during down. Helium faces only G-10 Helium flow Aluminum foils do not help in cooling down – too thin

Difference from Samurai design, continued The cooling system of Samurai magnet is very different, it is based on the cryocoolers. CBM is cooled by forced flow. The total heat in-leak is very low. The cooling regime is in liquid single phase state.

Samurai calculations Principal stress in the coil 95 [MPa] 66 51 0o Support link 90o 0o Principal stress in the coil 95 [MPa] 7 51 66 29 Allowable tress=180MPa@RT? 25mm coil Al(3mm) Coil vessel (SUS316L) GFRP(25mm) 20mm 20mm Al(3mm) 20mm GFRP(5mm) Young’s modulus of the CBM magnet coil phi direction 73 GPa r direction 28 GPa y direction 28 GPa for copper f = 0.564, insulation f = 0.436 YM may be for copper 120 GPa, f~ 0.8 for insulator 7 GPa,

Design of the coil

Cooling of the CBM magnet Single cryostat cooling. Thermosyphon. Liquid helium at 4.5 K from the cryostat goes down to the coils Gaseous helium goes up due to gravitation. Coil design should not have gas pockets.

View of the thermosyphon cooling The cryostat is placed by the top side of the detector.

The Cryostat

Interfaces with other systems The RICH detector is placed close to the magnet. Stray magnetic field is reduced by the field clamps. field clamps

Interfaces with other systems The target will be placed near the center of the magnet.

Control system In further work BINP people responsible for the control systems should specify conditions demanded for FAIR. Typically BINP provides the required control systems as presented on these figures.

Assembling

Status of BINP work on the CBM magnet The design of the coil, cryostat and the cryogenics is being developed. The design of the CBM magnet was changed from TDR. The calculations of new design will be presented and discussed. The SC cable will be manufactured in November 2018 as first test part and finished in March 2019. Test place in BINP will be ready in the 2019. Subcontractor for manufacturing of the iron yoke is ready to work. The discussions will be going on the cryogenics design. Its design may be finished and approved by GSI later by 2020 and to be manufactured in 2022. PDR tasks may be discussed during this meeting.