Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joseph H. Chewning, Weiwei Zhang, David A. Randolph, C
Advertisements

Critical Roles of Lysosomal Acid Lipase in Myelopoiesis
Maintenance of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 Chemokine Signaling in Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Niches  Tatsuki Sugiyama, Hiroshi Kohara,
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Ectopic expression of HOXC6 blocks myeloid differentiation and predisposes to malignant transformation  Melanie Wurm, John Kowalski, Dirk Heckl, Xiao-Bing.
Prospective isolation and global gene expression analysis of the erythrocyte colony-forming unit (CFU-E)‏ by Grzegorz Terszowski, Claudia Waskow, Peter.
Graft-versus-Host Disease Causes Broad Suppression of Hematopoietic Primitive Cells and Blocks Megakaryocyte Differentiation in a Murine Model  Yan Lin,
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Francesca Ficara, Mark J. Murphy, Min Lin, Michael L. Cleary 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
A knock-in mouse strain facilitates dynamic tracking and enrichment of MEIS1 by Ping Xiang, Wei Wei, Nicole Hofs, Jack Clemans-Gibbon, Tobias Maetzig,
Cited2 Is an Essential Regulator of Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cells
by Kelly A. McGowan, Wendy W. Pang, Rashmi Bhardwaj, Marcelina G
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Leukemia and chromosomal instability in aged Fancc−/− mice
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Mark J. Kiel, Melih Acar, Glenn L. Radice, Sean J. Morrison 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (November 2018)
Juana Serrano-Lopez, Kalpana Nattamai, Nicholas A. Pease, Miranda S
Kenichi Miharada, Valgardur Sigurdsson, Stefan Karlsson  Cell Reports 
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (March 2016)
Ravindra Majeti, Christopher Y. Park, Irving L. Weissman 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Deletion of the Scl +19 enhancer increases the blood stem cell compartment without affecting the formation of mature blood lineages  Dominik Spensberger,
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Masayuki Yamashita, Eriko Nitta, Toshio Suda  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (January 2018)
Oncogenic N-Ras and Tet2 haploinsufficiency collaborate to dysregulate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by Xi Jin, Tingting Qin, Meiling Zhao, Nathanael.
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Potential Pitfalls of the Mx1-Cre System: Implications for Experimental Modeling of Normal and Malignant Hematopoiesis  Talia Velasco-Hernandez, Petter.
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
The nuclear receptor corepressor NCoR1 regulates hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis in vivo by Xiaoling Wan, Lulu Liu, Peipei Zhou, Xinhui Hui, Qiaomei He,
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Kiran Batta, Magdalena Florkowska, Valerie Kouskoff, Georges Lacaud 
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Deciphering the Innate Lymphoid Cell Transcriptional Program
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
by Yue Wei, Hong Zheng, Naran Bao, Shan Jiang, Carlos E
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Casey Brewer, Elizabeth Chu, Mike Chin, Rong Lu  Cell Reports 
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
SLAM Family Markers Resolve Functionally Distinct Subpopulations of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Multipotent Progenitors  Hideyuki Oguro, Lei Ding, Sean J.
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1692-1704 (November 2015) Combined Loss of Tet1 and Tet2 Promotes B Cell, but Not Myeloid Malignancies, in Mice  Zhigang Zhao, Li Chen, Meelad M. Dawlaty, Feng Pan, Ophelia Weeks, Yuan Zhou, Zeng Cao, Hui Shi, Jiapeng Wang, Li Lin, Shi Chen, Weiping Yuan, Zhaohui Qin, Hongyu Ni, Stephen D. Nimer, Feng-Chun Yang, Rudolf Jaenisch, Peng Jin, Mingjiang Xu  Cell Reports  Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1692-1704 (November 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.037 Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2015 13, 1692-1704DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.037) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Analyses of TET1 and TET2 Gene Expression in Human Acute B-Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients qRT-PCR analysis of TET1 (A) and TET2 (B) expression in peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells from B-ALL patients (n = 27) and PB CD19+ cells from  healthy controls (n = 9). Patients with concurrent TET1 and TET2 downregulation are marked with a blue dot (n = 9). The relative mRNA expression of each TET gene was determined using GAPDH as internal calibrator. The mRNA expression levels are reported as relative expression units to the respective TET expression in a B-ALL patient with the middle range TET1 or TET2 expression. Cell Reports 2015 13, 1692-1704DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.037) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Most of the DKO Mice Developed Lethal B-Lymphoid Malignancies (A) Most of the aged DKO mice exhibited elevated WBC and lymphocyte counts. WBC, neutrophil, monocyte, lymphocyte, and RBC counts were performed with 12- to 15-month-old DKO mice (n = 19) and age-matched WT (n = 13), Tet1−/− (n = 12), and Tet2−/− (n = 14) mice. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (B) May-Giemsa-stained PB smears prepared from a representative moribund DKO mouse and age-matched WT, Tet1−/− and Tet2−/− mice. Bar, 20 μm. (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of WT (n = 25), Tet1−/− (n = 13), Tet2−/− (n = 20), and DKO (n = 19) mice up to 650 days. (D) The gross morphologies of spleen, liver, and lymph nodes from a representative moribund DKO and an age-matched WT mouse. (E) Flow cytometric analysis of B cell lineage (B220/IgM) in PB, BM, and spleen of representative moribund DKO (#G3-53 and #G2-53) and age-matched WT mice. The numbers indicate the percentages of cells in each cell population. (F) H&E-stained histological sections of femurs, spleen, liver, and lymph node (bar, 100 μm) from representative moribund DKO (#G3-53 and #G2-53) and age-matched WT mice. (G) Liver sections from a representative moribund DKO (#G3-53) and WT mouse were immunostained using anti-B220 or CD43 antibodies. (H) The D-J rearrangement of the IgH gene in splenic cells from DKO (n = 6) and WT mice. Cell Reports 2015 13, 1692-1704DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.037) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The B Cell Malignancy in DKO Mice Is Transplantable to Secondary Recipients (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of sub-lethally irradiated recipients (six mice/donor) transplanted with spleen cells (1 × 106) from a WT mouse or a DKO mouse with B cell malignancy (G2-53). (B–D) May-Giemsa-stained PB smear (B), flow cytometric analyses on B cell lineage (C), and H&E-stained histological sections (D, bar: 100 μm) of femurs, spleen, liver, lymph node, kidney, and lung from a representative recipient mouse receiving spleen cells from a WT mouse or a DKO mouse with B cell malignancy. Neoplastic lymphocytic infiltrates were identified in each of the organs. Infiltrating patterns and cell morphology were similar to those observed in the donor DKO mice. These data demonstrate that the recipients receiving spleen cells from the DKO mouse with B cell malignancy developed a disease similar to their donor mouse. Cell Reports 2015 13, 1692-1704DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.037) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Frequencies of HSC, Myeloid, and Lymphoid Progenitor Compartments, as well as Various B Cell Sub-populations in DKO Mice (A) Flow cytometric analysis of Sca-1+c-Kit+ and Sca-1-c-Kit+ cell populations in the total BM cells of representative WT, Tet1−/−, Tet2−/−, and DKO mice (7 weeks old). (B) Quantitation of the percentage of Sca-1+c-Kit+ cells in the BM of each mouse genotype (mean ± SD, four to five mice/genotype). (C) Colony-formation assay of LSK cells sorted from each genotype of BM cells in methylcellulose medium (500 cells/plate). Colonies were passaged every 7 days for three sequential platings (P1-4). Data are representative of three experiments. (D) Flow cytometric analysis of common lymphoid progenitors (CLP, Lin−IL-7R+CD135+c-kitlowSca-1low) and B-lymphocyte progenitors (BLP, Lin−IL-7R+CD135+Ly6D+c-kitlowSca-1low) in the BM of representative WT and DKO mice. (E and F) Quantitation of the percentage of CLP (E) and BLP (F) in the total BM cells of each mouse genotype (mean ± SD, five to six mice/genotype). (G) Flow cytometric analysis of Pro-B (B220+IgM−CD19+CD43+), Pre-B (B220+IgM−CD19+CD43−), Immature-B (B220+IgM+), and Mature-B (B220+IgMlow) cell populations in the BM cells of representative WT, Tet1−/−, Tet2−/−, and DKO mice (7 weeks old). (H) Quantitation of the percentage of Pro-B, Pre-B, Immature-B, and Mature-B cells in the total BM cells of each genotype of mice (mean ± SD, four to seven mice/genotype). (I) Pre-B colony-formation assays of BM cells from each mouse genotype. Colonies were scored after 12–14 days of culture. Data are representative of three experiments. (J) Schematic overview of the effects of Tet1 and/or Tet2 deletion on B cell development/maturation. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2015 13, 1692-1704DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.037) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Hematopoietic Repopulating Capacity of DKO HSCs (A) Schematic depiction of the competitive transplantation scheme. CD45.2+ BM cells from Tet1f/f;Tet2f/f, Tet2f/f;MxCre, and Tet1f/f;Tet2f/f;MxCre mice were mixed with CD45.1+ competitor cells at a ratio of 1:1 (1 × 106 cells each) and transplanted into lethally irradiated F1 recipients. Recipients were injected with pI:pC 4 weeks after transplantation to induce MxCre-mediated Tet1/2 deletion in the CD45.2+ donor cells. (B) The kinetics of the CD45.2+ cell chimerism in the PB of mice receiving each genotype of BM cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD from four to seven animals/genotype. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of PB cells from representative recipients of each group at 0 or 24 weeks after pI:pC injection. (D) The lineage distribution within the PB CD45.2+ cells of each group of recipients 24 weeks after pI:pC injection (mean ± SD from four to seven animals/genotype). (E and F) The CD45.2+ cell chimerism in the BM of mice receiving each genotype of BM cells 24 weeks after pI:pC injection (mean ± SD, three to five animals/genotype). (G–I) Flow cytometric analysis of LSK (G), GMP/MEP/CMP (H), and CLP (I) frequencies within the BM CD45.2+ cells of each group of recipients 24 weeks after pI:pC injection representative. (J) Spleen size of representative mice receiving Tet1f/f;Tet2f/f, Tet2f/f;MxCre, or Tet1f/f;Tet2f/f;MxCre BM cells 24 weeks after pI:pC injection. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Reports 2015 13, 1692-1704DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.037) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Distinct DhMRs/DMRs and Their Lack of Correlation with Gene Expression in Tet2−/− and DKO LK Cells LK cells were sorted from the BM of WT, Tet2−/−, and DKO mice (5–8 weeks old) and were analyzed for their 5mC and 5hmC profiling. (A) Dynamic change of normalized 5hmC/5mC read counts ratio between Mutant (Tet2−/− and DKO) and WT cells in genome-wide DhMRs/DMRs. Chromosome circular map shows genome-wide dynamic change of normalized 5hmC/5mC read counts ratio between Mutant and WT cells in genome-wide DhMRs/DMRs. The outer track represents the normalized 5hmC read counts ratio between Mutant and WT cells in DhMRs. The inner track represents the normalized 5mC read counts ratio between Mutant and WT cells in DMRs. The orange color bar represents the normalized 5hmC/5mC read counts ratio in WT-specific DhMRs/DMRs. The green color bar represents the normalized 5hmC/5mC read counts ratio in Mutant-specific DhMRs/DMRs. (B) Significant overlap between DhMRs of Tet2−/− and DKO LK cells. Venn diagram shows a significant overlap between the DhMRs identified in DKO versus WT cells and the DhMRs identified in Tet2−/− versus WT cells. (C) Lack of overlap between DhMRs and DMRs for DKO LK cells. Venn diagram shows a lack of overlap between DhMRs and DMRs identified in DKO versus WT cells. (D) Venn diagram shows the overlap between the HSC/leukemogenesis related gene bodies and DhMRs identified in DKO versus WT. A significant 250 out of 654 HSC/leukemogenesis related genes are overlapped with the DhMRs. (E) The ratio of FPKM value of gene expression between Mutant (Tet2−/−, DKO) and WT is plotted against the ratio of normalized 5hmC read counts between Mutant (Tet2−/−, DKO) and WT. The lack of linear trend and significant deviation from the diagonal line suggest a lack of correlation between gene expression and 5hmC changes between Mutant (Tet2−/−, DKO) and WT. (F) The ratio of FPKM value of gene expression between Mutant (Tet2−/−, DKO) and WT is plotted against the ratio of normalized 5mC read counts between Mutant (Tet2−/−, DKO) and WT. The lack of linear trend and significant deviation from the diagonal line suggest a lack of correlation between gene expression and 5hmC changes between Mutant (Tet2−/−, DKO) and WT. Cell Reports 2015 13, 1692-1704DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.037) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 B-ALL DKO B220+ Cells Had Altered Expression of Genes Implicated in Human B Cell Malignancies (A) Heatmap of differentially expressed genes implicated in B cell development in preleukemic DKO B220+ cells as compared to WT B220+ cells (FDR <0.05, fold change >2, Log transformed data are presented). (B) Heatmap of differentially expressed genes in B-ALL DKO B220+ cells that are dysregulated in human B cell malignancies as compared to preleukemic DKO B220+ cells (FDR <0.05, fold change > 2, Log transformed data are presented). (C) Pie chart depicting the overlap of TET1-bound genes and TET2-bound genes within differentially expressed genes in B-ALL DKO B220+ cells as compared to preleukemic DKO B220+ cells. See Table S4 for a full list of differentially expressed genes and Table S5 for overlapping genes from RNA-seq and TET1/TET2 ChIP-seq data. Cell Reports 2015 13, 1692-1704DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.037) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions