450 GeV Preliminary Commissioning: Measurement Programme

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical beam losses during Commissioning & Initial Operation Guillaume Robert-Demolaize (CERN and Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble) with R. Assmann, S.
Advertisements

Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
LHC Technical Committee, 23/05/20071 LHC Commissioning Phases Squeeze presented by Massimo Giovannozzi on behalf of the LHCCWG Particular thanks to S.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
R. Assmann - LTC Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann with W. Venturini and V. Kain LTC Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
June 2006LHCCWG / J. Wenninger1 Orbit response measurements and analysis J. Wenninger AB-OP Principle Software status Example from SPS ring and lines Potential.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
Saturday 11.9 ● From Friday – Minimum required crossing angle is 100  rad in 2010 – Plenty of aperture at triplets: > 13  (n1 > 10) – Can stay with 170.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
APEX RUN-11 APEX Schedule May 11, 2011 Injection 12am8am BBA Minty, Jordan, Liu, Rob, Rob, Kevin, … Spin Flipper Bai, Pablo, Oddo, Craig, Kevin IPM calibration.
Threading / LTC/ JW1 How difficult is threading at the LHC ? When MADX meets the control system … J. Wenninger AB-OP &
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
Alignment and beam-based correction
Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann 25 August 2011
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Wire tests at injection energy
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
LHC Commissioning with Beam
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
update on SPS impedance localization
Low Emittance Tuning Tests at the Diamond Light Source (Rutherford Labs) Dec R. Bartolini, S. Liuzzo, P. Raimondi SuperB XV Meeting Caltech, CA,
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
MD Report 24 June 2012 Machine coordinators: Barbara Holzer, Mike Lamont MD Coordinators: Ralph Assmann, Giulia Papotti, Frank Zimmermann MD#2 News & Plan.
Monday h00: Ramp 10 A/s (chromaticity, crossing angle non-closure, beta-beating): At 7m and 3.5m, put in one by one crossing angles, calculated.
3rd ATF2 Project Meeting, December 18-20, 2006
LHC Commissioning Phases
Thursday morning – optics correction
Sector Test - General objectives
Alice solenoid – orbit distortion
Nonlinear Field Quality Checks
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
Planning at 5 o’clock meeting Friday
450 GeV Initial Commissioning with Pilot Beam - Beam Instrumentation
Global aperture measurements at 450 GeV with 170 mrad crossing angle
LHC Closed Orbit For Beam 2
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
Orbit response measurements and analysis
Quadrupole error localization using Response Fits
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Optics Measurements in the PSB
MD Planning Fri – Sat (1. – 2.7.)
Beam dynamics requirements on MQT
Another Immortal Fill….
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Multipole Limit Survey of Large-beta Dipoles
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Presentation transcript:

450 GeV Preliminary Commissioning: Measurement Programme polarities apertures basic optics checks thanks to Rhodri Jones, Stefano Redaelli, Ralph Steinhagen Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

“additional aims” on LHC-commissioning web page https://lhc-commissioning.web.cern.ch/lhc-commissioning/ measurement program with pilots low intensity, polarities & aperture (1st pass) linear optics checks trajectory vs. kick, phase advance, BPM & corrector polarity, + dispersion tunes, orbit, chromaticity, coupling time estimate (lhc-commissioning web): 4 days per ring → 8 days with beam in total Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

flow chart from Mike Lamont Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

from lhc-commissioning web site Q ← coupling correction 1st pass Q’ orbit corrector & BPM polarity linear optics check ← coupling correction 2nd pass aperture scan Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

expected static errors parameter error origin tune <0.4 quad errors, dipole field, x-orbit coupling <0.2 from a2, quad rolls, y-orbit at sx off-momentum (d=2x10-3) beta beat < 21% quad errors, orbit at sext’s chromaticity Q’ < 320 b3 Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

BPM resolution Nominal resolution (5 μm) for single bunch: intensity > 2-3x1010 charges per bunch global orbit: 43 pilot bunches E.B. Holzer, J.-J. Gras, O.R. Jones, Chamonix XV workshop Resolution (rms) Pilot bunch Trajectory (single shot) 200 μm Orbit (224 turn average) 20 μm Nominal intensity bunch Trajectory (single shot, single bunch) 50 μm Trajectory (average of all bunches) 5 μm Orbit (average of all bunches over 224 turns) Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

initial adjustments set tunes to nominal or alternative WP nominal WP requires coupling correction - from tune response to two orthogonal skew-quad families - or using multi-turn BPM readings if we use alternative WP need to switch later correct chromaticity - maximize decoherence time (fast) - radial steering smoothen orbit; IR3, IR7 (cleaning), IR6 (dump) and injection region critical *S. Fartoukh, LCC 23/10/2002 Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

tune measurement – raw data Q’=50 Q’=-50 x turns Q’=20 Q’=2 HEADTAIL, coupling k~0.05, broadband impedance, detuning w. ampl., space charge, Nb= 3x1010 Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

tune measurement – spectrum Q’=50 Q’=-50 Q’=20 Q’=2 peak yields same tune value 0.2813+/-0.0003 in all 4 cases Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

BPM & corrector polarities already partially checked during threading (Jorg Wenninger) 530 x 2 orbit correctors per ring; excite each to Dx,y +500 mm (qcor~5 mrad << 1.2 mrad (max.)) 1056 x 2 BPMs per ring time required ~10-30 s per corrector → estimate ~4-9 h per ring for polarity, calibration, side-benefit: redundant data for linear optics check in addition: 3 interlock BPMs in IP6 for MP (bump to check BPM position w.r.t. TCDQ) BPMs at TDI Ralph Steinhagen Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

what is a bad BPM? wrong polarity wrong plane large noise (spray?) wrong location nonlinearity? large orbit offset? calibration error … other discussion triggered by Peter Limon & Oliver Bruning in Chamonix@Divonne Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

basic optics checks process orbit-response data from corrector tests (5-20 mm resolution) to get b & coupling take multi-turn BPM data for harmonic analysis (50-200 mm resolution, fast) to get f, b & coupling possibly K modulation at a few critical locations (wire scanners, SL monitor, IP6,…) radial steering for measuring dispersion (expect few cm or % resolution) & Q’ & off-momentum b (multi-turn BPMs) coupling correction change of working point? estimated minimum time ~3-5 h / ring Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

finding local sources of b beat fit against model / inversion of “quadrupole response matrix” e.g., from measured phase beating: may not be trivial, especially for distributed errors simultaneous fit of data from both rings in short + constraints Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

Example 1, SPS: comparing measurement & prediction phase beating induced by a single quadrupole QE604 in the SPS; red: measurement, blue: model prediction (J. Klem, 2000) from phase of harmonic analysis Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

Example 2, SPS: result of fit using SVD pseudo-inversion SPS test with quadrupole QE603, DQ~0.05, varying weight l for DK in SVD solution weight low – many quadrupoles excited to get perfect fit reasonable weight correct quadrupole is ~identified for proper weight l C. Carli, G. Arduini, F.Z., EPAC04 weight high – all quadrupole changes a small Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

aperture determine global transverse aperture using pairs of orthogonal correctors (minimum 8 measurements with beam loss, per ring); center beam inside aperture for each corrector momentum aperture by radial steering until beam loss (2 measurements) determine center frequency? (radial steering & sextupoles); important to compare both rings in case of problem local closed bumps or sliding bumps across IRs or arcs estimated minimum time ~2-3 hours / ring Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

y aperture ~14s x aperture ~14s limited at VMAJI/B limited at VSSB in IR2, 3, 7 (&8) x aperture ~14s limited at VSSB & VMAII/B in all SSS apertures for ideal optics d aperture ~0.008 limited at VSSB & VMAII/B in IR2, 3, 7 (&8) from mixture of MAD-X optics database and aperture model setup for collimation studies (Stefano Redaelli) Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

conclusions initial measurements can be done in 8 days (2 rings) readiness of procedures & software critical up-to-date MAD-X or SIXTRACK model for “flight simulations”? measured field errors, apertures, & realistic relative misalignments (including spool-pieces etc.) Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

appendix Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006

apertures for ideal optics – role of dispersion horizontal aperture / total beam size correlation between xb & d aperture similar to picture of Ax/sx,b on slide 18 Frank Zimmermann, Initial Measurement Program at 450 GeV, LHCCWG 05.04.2006