Assignment Design Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.
Advertisements

Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
Using Rubrics to Enhance Learning Connie Schroeder, Ph.D. Center for Instructional and Professional Development University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Introducing Assessment
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
TNE Program Assessment Forum April 19 th, Glad you’re here!  Who’s Who… Design Team Representatives Program Assessment Team.
Course and Syllabus Development Presented by Claire Major Assistant Professor, Higher Education Administration.
HE 520: Higher Education Laws and Regulations Unit One Seminar Pre-Seminar Welcome to HE 520: Higher Education Laws and Regulations, Unit One Seminar Seminar.
Educator’s view of the assessment tool. Contents Getting started Getting around – creating assessments – assigning assessments – marking assessments Interpreting.
“Developing Faculty Capabilities to Support Integrative Learning A Session Led by: L. Dee Fink, Ph.D. International Consultant in Higher Education AAC&U.
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES Departmental Workshop Wayne State University English Department January 11, 2012.
HE 545: Teaching and Learning Online Unit Seven Seminar Pre-Seminar Welcome to HE 545: Teaching and Learning Online, Unit Seven Seminar Seminar will begin.
Doing Assessment as if Deep Learning Matters Most Assessing and Promoting High-Impact Practices Tom Angelo Inaugural Conference on Learning and Assessment.
Good teaching for diverse learners
Critical Information Literacy
Learning Assessment Techniques
Writing Course and Module-Level Objectives
What Is This Intentional Learning Thing?
Anthony Williams, Maria Northcote, Jason Morton and John Seddon
Critical thinking for assignments to get a better grade
Using Victorian Curriculum to plan F-6 Dance and Drama learning
Evaluating Student-Teachers Using Student Outcomes
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Sept 29, 2017: Assessment Workshop
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
SECTION 3 Grading Criteria
Annotated Bibliography
Joyce Bahhouth Bladen Community College
What is Good Assessment? A Liberal Education Core Example
Assessment of Student Learning
The General Education Core in CLAS
Performance Assessment Development
Bridging the gap through collaboration:
The Year of Core Instruction
Writing Tasks and Prompts
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
Creating Meaningful Information Literacy Assignments for an Introductory Agriculture Course Marianne Stowell Bracke Purdue University Libraries
Writing for “Innovations in Family Medicine Education”
The IBCC Reflective Project
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Understanding Assignments
Faculty Instructional Rubric
BUS 642 Possible Is Everything/snaptutorial.com
EDU 675Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 675 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
BUS 642 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 675 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Your Inquiry Project
Peer Reviewed Journal Articles in the Community College Classroom
The purposes of grading student work
Student writing and learning
Annie Bélanger September 2016
Sit by institution or program size Self-define small, medium, or large
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners Literacy
ASSIGNMENTS MATTER Assignment Design Workshop Sponsored by the
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
Leanne Havis, Ph.D., Neumann University
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Jeanie Behrend, FAST Coordinator Janine Quisenberry, FAST Assistant
International Studies Charter School
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Pedagogical Practice, Shift, and Professional Growth in Online Courses
Designing and delivering a learner centred curriculum
Designing the PACS 2 RESEARCH PAPER Assignment
Curriculum Coordinator: Janet Parcell Mitchell January 2016
Designing a teaching session
Analysis: Clarity of Scholarly Question Style & Scholarly Relevance
Test Construction: The Elements
Presentation transcript:

Assignment Design Workshop Dr. Sarah L. Strout Assistant Vice President of Assessment and Planning Worcester State University Sponsored by the Department of Higher Education

Outline Why assignment design matters What makes an effective assignment Paired work Discussion

Thought Experiment Imagine you are student in a course and these are your instructions for your final project. What is good about these instructions and what is missing and/or problematic? You’ll produce a minimum 6 page research paper on a popular culture phenomenon of your choosing. Your paper must be a critical analysis of your chosen topic, based in the appropriate theory and methodology, with summary and description kept to a bare minimum. Your research should be supported with a minimum of 3 scholarly sources (only one of which can be an assigned course reading) and 2 popular or primary sources.

Why Assignment Design Matters Students do better when assignment instructions are clear and rubrics are shared with them TILT (Transparency in Learning and Teaching) found transparency enhanced the success of first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented college students in multiple ways at statistically significant levels, with a medium-to- large sized magnitude of effect.

Inclusive Assignments Poorly written and ambiguous student learning outcomes make it difficult for students to understand what is expected of them and thus, demonstrate their learning. Assessment approaches should allow for multiple ways for students to demonstrate mastery, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Clearly defined rubrics allow students to see exactly what is expected of them, and help instructors avoid bias when assessing student work. Instructions for student work should include as much information as possible, so that students do not need to ‘read between the lines.’

Inclusive Assignments, cont. Do not assume that students have entered your course or program with specific skills already developed. Writing, critical thinking, and information literacy skills (just to name a few) may not have been emphasized in the students’ high-school education. Disaggregating assessment data when possible allows faculty to develop interventions to help struggling students. Avoid comparing students against peers. Having a standard judgement (for example, a rubric) allows instructors to compare students against a pre-determined standard. When students do not perform well on assignments, ask them why. It may be that the instructions were not as clear as the instructor thought, or the students did not understand a concept and need review.

What Makes an Effective Assignment (NILOA) Intentional Clear to students Explicit about evaluation Engaging Responsive Reflective Linked to/aligned with other assignments

Assignment Design Steps For each step, please consider the answers for this assignment and keep note of your answers.

Step 1: What outcomes are you assessing? How many outcomes can you effectively assess in this assignment? What are the most important outcomes for this assignment? How do these outcomes relate to the major, general education, or institution- wide outcomes? Are the outcomes written in a way that students would understand what is expected of them?

Step 2: Who are your students What level students are in this course? Are the students all majors, mostly majors, mostly non-majors? Has this course or other courses prepared students to demonstrate competency on these outcomes?

Step 3: Assignment Assessment Do you have a rubric or scoring guide? Does the rubric include each of the outcomes you are assessing? Is there a description for each outcome what performance would look like at each level (e.g. not competent, competent, highly competent)? Are those descriptions clear and written in a way that a student would understand?

Step 4: Assignment Instructions Are the instructions clear, concise, and written at a level the student would understand? Do the instructions include: The purpose of the assignment? The outcomes being measured? A rubric or scoring guide? Details about length, sources, style, formatting etc? Frequently asked questions?

Paired work (30 min each- 60 min total) Introduce your assignment to your partner (for context and purpose) Discuss and give feedback on the outcomes for the assignment Discuss and give feedback on the rubric/scoring for the assignment Discuss and give feedback on the instructions for the assignment See handout for suggested questions Write a brief summary of feedback Switch to the other partner *try to look at the assignment from the student’s perspective

Group Discussion What surprised you about this exercise? What was most helpful? What is something you learned that you can share with your colleagues? What are your next steps?

Resources NILOA Assignment Library: https://www.assignmentlibrary.org/ TILT: https://www.unlv.edu/provost/teachingandlearning Hutchings- Aligning Outcomes and Educational Practices http://learningoutcomesassessment.org/documents/Occasional%20Paper% 2026.pdf