IMagyn050 YO39523/GOG-3015/ENGOT-ov39 Recruitment Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Taking Care of Tomorrows Patient Better than Today”… the Future is Now Set A1 – Title Slide David O’Malley, M.D.
Advertisements

Fabio Puglisi Dipartimento di Oncologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine Antiangiogenic Treatment Mediterranean School of Oncology.
Twenty Questions Subject: Flags of the world Twenty Questions
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
AVADO PFS Analysis (ITT Population) All P values vs. placebo Adapted from Miles et al. ASCO 2008, abstract LBA 1011.
GCIG Meeting 29th May 2009 The Implications of Primary Chemotherapy for Clinical Trials Iain McNeish Professor of Gynaecological Oncology Barts and the.
Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
, START UP MEETING FOR STAGE 2. Response Rates in Phase 3 Trials Chemotherapy Response rates % Liposomal doxorubicin Gemcitabine 5-9 Gemcitabine.
Definition of oxaliplatin sensitivity in pts with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with oxaliplatin-based therapy A. de Gramont, B. Chibaudel,
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer A Regulatory Perspective of End Points to Measure Safety and Efficacy of Drugs Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Bhupinder.
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
ITT populations EASTERN: n=216 WESTERN: n=234 Randomized to asenapine and received  1 treatment EASTERN: n=241 WESTERN: n=244 Randomized to olanzapine.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
OCEANS: A Randomized, Double- Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab (BEV) in Patients with Platinum-
SNDA Letrozole (Femara®) Indication: First-line therapy in post- menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Prior approval: Second-line therapy.
CALYPSO Trial: Carboplatin & Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) versus Carboplatin & Paclitaxel in Relapsed, Platinum- Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Pujade-Lauraine.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
Pazopanib in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A new galloping horse. Dr. Raafat Ragaie, MD,FRCR.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
1 LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Sequist LV et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27): Treatment-naïve Advanced NSCLC.
ESMO 2016 Nivolumab Data Study Ph Indication Line N Arms 1o EP ORR mDR
Blood-based biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: Tumor mutational burden in blood (bTMB) is associated with improved atezolizumab (atezo) efficacy in.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
IMagyn050 YO39523 / GOG-3015 / ENGOT-ov39
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
KEYNOTE-028: Pembrolizumab in PD-L1+, ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Management of metastatic and recurrent head and neck cancer
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Modena
LUX-Lung 6 clinical trial
LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Bevacizumab in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: OCEANS.
Lancet Oncol 2016;17(11): Updated Results from KEYNOTE-021 Cohort G: A Randomized, Phase 2 Study of Pemetrexed and Carboplatin (PC) with or without.
until tumour progression until tumour progression
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
Her2-positive breast cancer: updating current best practice
Activity Goals. Perspectives on PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer Has the Time Come for Individualized Care?
Participating groups:
Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
Lunedì 04 giugno Highlight a cura di Filippo de Marinis
Intervista a Filippo de Marinis
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
and the NSABP Investigators
IMagyn050 YO39523/GOG-3015/ENGOT-ov39 Recruitment Update
Presentation transcript:

IMagyn050 YO39523/GOG-3015/ENGOT-ov39 Recruitment Update 12 Jan 2018

Study Design in Primary Surgery Cohort Carboplatin AUC 6 q3wk Previously untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer Post-operative Stage III w/macroscopic residual disease, Stage IV ECOG PS 0-2 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q3wk Bev 15 mg/kg q3wk R 1:1 Bev 15 mg/kg X 16 cycles Placebo q3w X 22 cycles No cross-over Carboplatin AUC 6 q3wk Stratification variables Stage/debulking status ECOG PS PDL1 IC0 vs IC1+ Adjuvant/Neo-adjuvant Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q3wk Key points: Patient population are those NOT R0 (Stage 3 & Stage 4) ECOG PS 2 is allowed Bev starts Cycle 2 22 cycle duration is modeled after pivotal Phase 3 bev study (GOG218) Carbo AUC 6, not 5 Must be q3w Taxol, not ddTaxol (based on GOG262) PDL1 testing & results are for statistical purposes only. Results don’t gate entry into the study. Bev 15 mg/kg q3wk Bev 15 mg/kg X 16 cycles Atezo 1200 mg q3w X 22 cycles

Study Design in Neoadjuvant Cohort Previously untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer Stage III / IV, Unresectable advanced stage patients for neoadjuvant therapy ECOG PS 0-2 R 1:1 Carboplatin AUC 6 Bev 15 mg/kg X 16 cycles Placebo q3w X 22 cycles Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Bev 15 mg/kg Atezo 1200 mg q3w X 22 cycles No cross-over SURGERY Key Points: Reason for NACT must be disease-related (e.g., location/bulk of disease making patient unresectable to R0), based on Fagotti Interval surgery must be b/w C3 & D4 No bev C3 & C4 b/c of surgery

IMagyn050: Study Outcome Measures Efficacy SEE PROTOCOL SECTION 6.4 Co-Primary PFS time from randomization to PD or death from any cause, whichever occurs first ITT population PDL1+ population OS time from randomization to death from any cause Key Points Survival follow-up (OS) continues after Study drug discontinuation and after Progression/Recurrence (PFS) Including: After progression After AE-related treatment discontinuation After stopping Study drug for any reason After starting a new regimen upon progression Documentation: Patient discontinued from Study treatment

IMagyn050: Study Outcome Measures Efficacy SEE PROTOCOL SECTION 6.4 Secondary Objective Response (Primary Surgery patients): PR* or CR* in pts with measurable residual disease after primary surgery Duration of Response (Primary Surgery patients): time between first occurrence of CR/PR to time of PD* or death from any cause, whichever comes first Patient-reported Ovarian Cancer Abdominal Symptoms (Neoadjuvant patients): proportion of pts in each arm reporting clinically meaningful improvement in PR-abdominal pain/bloating (≥10 pt decrease from baseline score, EORTC QLQ-OV28) Patient-reported function & HRQoL: (1) Proportion of neoadjuvant pts in each arm reporting clinically meaningful in PR-function & HRQoL (≥10 pt decrease from baseline score, EORTC QLQ-C30); (2) (1) Proportion of primary surgery pts in each arm reporting improving, stable, or worsening PR-function & HRQoL Key points: Key Secondary Endpoint ORR & DOR are for primary surgery patients who have measureable disease; therefore, since measureable disease is not required for entry into the study, this will be a fraction of those patients who are in the primary surgery group, not all of them Abdominal symptoms: We are testing the hypothesis that there will be a greater proportion of pts getting a more efficacious NACT regimen reporting greater abdominal symptomatic relief compared to pts who aren’t getting the more efficacious regimen

IMagyn050 Recruitment Summary (as of 12 Jan 2018)

IMagyn050 Countries Summary (as of 12 Jan 2018) Site Activation Planned Actual Recruitment Planned Actual Australia 3 15 8 Austria 4 10 1 Belgium 38 Brazil 2 7 China 16 150 9 Czech Republic 5 17 Denmark 13 Finland France 39 Germany 20 65 Greece 37 Israel Italy 77 Japan 120 31 Norway 11 Poland 6 Russian Federation 33 South Korea Spain 35 Sweden Turkey USA 99 83 550 106 Region / Community Total Recruitment Planned Actual % of Goal GOG (US) 550 106 19.3% ENGOT (EU) 420 23 5.5% Chugai(Japan) 120 31 25.8% China 150 9 6.0% ROW 60 63 105.0%

Participating sites MITO

Participating sites MaNGO