N-Player Games. A symmetric N-person game. 1)All players have same strategy sets 2)If you switch two players strategies, you switch their payoffs and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thursday, March 7 Duality 2 – The dual problem, in general – illustrating duality with 2-person 0-sum game theory Handouts: Lecture Notes.
Advertisements

Strategic competition among the few –Strategic competition is analysed using game theory Need to revise 2 person simultaneous move games and Nash equilibrium.
Private Information and Auctions. Auction Situations Private Value – Everybody knows their own value for the object – Nobody knows other peoples values.
Mixed Strategies.
Game Theory Lecture 4 Game Theory Lecture 4.
Reaching Agreements II. 2 What utility does a deal give an agent? Given encounter  T 1,T 2  in task domain  T,{1,2},c  We define the utility of a.
Some Problems from Chapt 13
EC941 - Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Lecture 4 1.
Nash’s Theorem Theorem (Nash, 1951): Every finite game (finite number of players, finite number of pure strategies) has at least one mixed-strategy Nash.
Game Theory Assignment For all of these games, P1 chooses between the columns, and P2 chooses between the rows.
Private Information and Auctions
Clicker Question-A Chicken Game 0, 0 0, 1 1, 0 -10, -10 Swerve Hang Tough Swerve Hang Tough Player 2 Pllayer 1 Does either player have a dominant strategy?
PlayerFirst choice Second Choice Third Choice Fourth Choice Fifth Choice Boromir FrodoNobodyLegolasGimli FrodoNobodyBoromirLegolas FrodoNobodyGimliBoromir.
Static Games and Cournot Competition
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 5 Mixed Strategy Equilibrium.
1 Chapter 14 – Game Theory 14.1 Nash Equilibrium 14.2 Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma 14.3 Sequential-Move Games and Strategic Moves.
Eponine Lupo.  Questions from last time  3 player games  Games larger than 2x2—rock, paper, scissors  Review/explain Nash Equilibrium  Nash Equilibrium.
MIT and James Orlin © Game Theory 2-person 0-sum (or constant sum) game theory 2-person game theory (e.g., prisoner’s dilemma)
EC3224 Autumn Lecture #04 Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium
Techniques for Dealing with Hard Problems Backtrack: –Systematically enumerates all potential solutions by continually trying to extend a partial solution.
EC941 - Game Theory Lecture 7 Prof. Francesco Squintani
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 4 Applications in Industrial Organization.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part I: Strategic Games
Nash Equilibrium: Theory. Strategic or Simultaneous-move Games Definition: A simultaneous-move game consists of: A set of players For each player, a set.
Econ 2610: Principles of Microeconomics Yogesh Uppal
Check your (Mis)understanding? Number 3.5 page 79 Answer Key claims that: For player 1 a strictly dominates c For player 2, y strictly dominates w and.
The Structure of Networks with emphasis on information and social networks T-214-SINE Summer 2011 Chapter 8 Ýmir Vigfússon.
Todd and Steven Divide the Estate Problem Bargaining over 100 pounds of gold Round 1: Todd makes offer of Division. Steven accepts or rejects. Round.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part II: Mixed and Correlated Strategies Bernhard Nebel.
Game Problems. Which number is closest to the circumference of the earth? A) 15,000 miles B) 25,000 miles C) 35,000 miles D) 45,000 miles E) 55,000 miles.
Yale lectures 3 and 4 review Iterative deletion of dominated strategies. Ex: two players choose positions on political spectrum. Endpoints become repeatedly.
Games of pure conflict two person constant sum. Two-person constant sum game Sometimes called zero-sum game. The sum of the players’ payoffs is the same,
Reviewing Bayes-Nash Equilibria Two Questions from the midterm.
Understanding Randomness
Static Games and Cournot Competition
Evolutionary Games The solution concepts that we have discussed in some detail include strategically dominant solutions equilibrium solutions Pareto optimal.
Developing Principles in Bargaining. Motivation Consider a purely distributive bargaining situation where impasse is costly to both sides How should we.
1 Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
Economics Experiment Are you interested in participating in an economics experiment where you will have chance to win a new iPod Touch (with video, wireless.
Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
Lecture Slides Dixit and Skeath Chapter 4
What tuition would UCSB have charged in order to get the most revenue from the students now in this class? 1.$45,000 2.$35,000 3.$22,500 4.$17,500 5.$10,000.
N-Player Games Econ 171. The Mugger Problem See Game Tree on the Blackboard How many different strategies are there for Simon? (Remember a strategy specifies.
QR 38, 2/22/07 Strategic form: dominant strategies I.Strategic form II.Finding Nash equilibria III.Strategic form games in IR.
Working Some Problems. Problem 3.10 Students 1 and 2 can each exert study levels {1,2,3,4,5}. Student 1’s exam score will be X+1.5 with effort level x.
The Structure of Networks with emphasis on information and social networks T-214-SINE Summer 2011 Chapter 8 Ýmir Vigfússon.
NOBEL WP Szept Stockholm Game Theory in Inter-domain Routing LÓJA Krisztina - SZIGETI János - CINKLER Tibor BME TMIT Budapest,
Standard and Extended Form Games A Lesson in Multiagent System Based on Jose Vidal’s book Fundamentals of Multiagent Systems Henry Hexmoor, SIUC.
Microeconomics Course E John Hey. Examinations Go to Read.
Chapter 9: Static Games and Cournot Competition 1 Static Games and Cournot Competition.
Mechanism Design without Money Lecture 3 1. A game You need to get from A to B Travelling on AX or YB takes 20 minutes Travelling on AY or XB takes n.
Network Congestion Games
Lecture 5 Introduction to Game theory. What is game theory? Game theory studies situations where players have strategic interactions; the payoff that.
Final Lecture. Problem 2, Chapter 13 Exploring the problem Note that c, x yields the highest total payoff of 7 for each player. Is this a Nash equilibrium?
Mixed Strategies and Repeated Games
Games of pure conflict two-person constant sum games.
Choose one of the numbers below. You will get 1 point if your number is the closest number to 3/4 of the average of the numbers chosen by all class members,
Games, Strategies, and Decision Making By Joseph Harrington, Jr. First Edition Chapter 4: Stable Play: Nash Equilibria in Discrete Games with Two or Three.
Signaling Game Problems. Signaling game. Two players– a sender and receiver. Sender knows his type. Receiver does not. It is not necessarily in the sender’s.
Oil Lease Auctions and the Winners’ Curse. Geologists’ estimates of value differ widely Company that makes highest estimate bids the highest. Often loses.
Game theory basics A Game describes situations of strategic interaction, where the payoff for one agent depends on its own actions as well as on the actions.
Working Some Problems.
Check your (Mis)understanding?
Games of pure conflict two person constant sum
Lecture 9 Static Games and the Cournot Model
Game Theory.
THE ECONOMY: THE CORE PROJECT
Game Theory: The Nash Equilibrium
Collaboration in Repeated Games
Presentation transcript:

N-Player Games

A symmetric N-person game. 1)All players have same strategy sets 2)If you switch two players strategies, you switch their payoffs and leave other players payoffs unchanged. Special case of symmetric gameYour payoff depends on what you do and the sum of the actions taken by others. Symmetric N-person games

Clicker Game Choose an integer from 1 to 5. Where X is the average of the numbers chosen by class members, Your payoff will be 1 if your number is the closest number to (3/4) X. Otherwise it will be 0. Press A for 1, B for 2, C for 3, D for 4, E for 5.

Iterated Deletion of Dominated Strategies Would a smart player choose 5? If you believe that everybody in the class is smart, would you ever choose 4? If you believe that everybody in the class is smart and believes everybody else is smart, what would you conclude? What if you take this another step?

A commuting game. You have two ways to commute from home to work. – The short way by narrow road – The long way by freeway Commute time by freeway is always 30 minutes. Commute time by narrow road depends on how many others take narrow road.

Your choice If N people go short way, it takes 21+N/2 minutes to make the trip. Freeway always takes 30 minutes You hate commuting and want to minimize travel time. Choose your route using Clickers. Well do this repeatedly, simulating commuter days.

Your score You will get more points, the less your total time spent commuting. You must choose one way or the other. If you dont click either option, you will be assessed 1 hour commuting time for that day.

Payments We will repeat this experiment 6 times (a 6- day work week). Your score will be 150 minus the total amount of time you spend commuting. I will randomly choose one of the persons with the highest score (least time spent commuting) and give that person a prize of $10.

This time I will travel by the A) Short way B) Freeway

Nash equilibrium In Nash equilibrium for this game, nobody would want to change strategies. This will happen if 30=21+N/2, which implies that N=18. So the Nash equilibrium is for 18 persons to use the short way and everybody to spend 30 minutes commuting. Is this efficient? What would be efficient?

An efficient solution would minimize total commuting costs. Suppose that the class has C members. Let x be the number of people who use short road and C-x the number who use the freeway. Total commuting costs are (C-x)30+x(21+x/2)= 30C-9x+x 2 /2. When are they minimized? Hint: Use calculus.

Widening the short road What would happen if the local government spent some money and doubled the capacity of the short road. Then the time it would take to drive on the short road when N people use it would be 21+N/4 instead of 21+N/2. What would the new equilibrium be? Is anybody better off?

What if tolls were charged? Suppose that all people value their time at v per minute. What is the equilibrium outcome with a toll of T? To equalize costs going the two ways, set 30v=(21+X/2)v+T. This implies 30=21+X/2+T/v and X=18-2(T/v). If you want efficient use of the road, you would have X=9. Then 9=18-2(T/v) so 9=2(T/v) and T=(9/2)v. So, for example if if v=$1/4$, then a toll of T=$9/8=$1.125 would get you 9 users.

Another congestion game There are 4 restaurants to choose from, A, B, C, and D. You think they are all equally good, but you prefer to go to one that is less crowded. Your payoff is 50-N where N is the number of people who go to the restaurant that you choose. Which restaurant do you choose? A) Restaurant A B) Restaurant B C) Restaurant C D) Restaurant D

A Coordination game There are 4 possible parties that you could attend. One is on Picasso Road, one is on Trigo, one is on Sabado Tarde, and one is on Del Playa. Your payoff is equal to the total number of people who choose the same party that you do. Which party do you choose? A) Picasso B) Sabado Tarde C) Trigo D) Del Playa

A Coordination game There are 4 possible parties that you could attend. One is on Picasso Road, one is on Trigo, one is on Sabado Tarde, and one is on Del Playa. Your payoff is equal to the total number of people who choose the same party that you do. Which party do you choose? A) Picasso B) Sabado Tarde C) Trigo D) Del Playa

Modified Coordination Game Your payoff from attending the party at X is the number of people who choose this party plus Y(X) where Y(X) is written on the blackboard. Which party do you attend? A) Picasso B) Sabado Tarde C) Trigo D) Del Playa

What about Nash equilibrium in these coordination games? More than one Nash equilibrium. Some equilibria may be better than others. No guarantee that the best one happens.

Weakest Link Games Example: Airline Security Game- A weakest link game N playersStrategy set for any player is a list of possible levels of security {1,2,3,4, 5, 6, 7} action. Player is action choice denoted s i Weakest link version. Payoff to player i is min{s 1,s_ 2,…,s N }-10 s i.

Nash equilibria for Airline Security Weakest Link game No Nash equilibrium has any player choosing higher level of s i than any other player. Why? Any level of security is a Nash equilibrium. Some equilibria better for all airlines than others. Explain.

Best shot Games Example: Airline Security Game- A best shot version N playersStrategy set for any player is a list of possible levels of security {1,2,3,4, 5, 6, 7} action. Player is action choice denoted s i Weakest link version. Payoff to player i is max{s 1,s_ 2,…,s N }-10s i.

Equilibria Cant have two players choosing more than the minimum. Cant have all players choosing minimum. What are the equilibria?

Average Effort Games Example: Airline Security Game- A best shot version N playersStrategy set for any player is a list of possible levels of security {1,2,3,4, 5, 6, 7} action. Player is action choice denoted s i Weakest link version. Payoff to player i is 20(s 1 +s_ 2 +s N )/N-10s i. What are the Nash equilibria if N>2? If N=1?

Evolutionary theory of Sex Ratios Why do almost all mammals have essentially equal numbers of sons and daughters? Every child that is born has exactly one mother and one father. Let C be the number of children born in the next generation. Let N m be the number of adult males and N f the number of adult females. The average number of children for each male is C/N m and the average number of children for each female is C/N f The rarer sex will have more children on average. If one sex is more rare, then mutations that make you have babies of that sex will prosper.

Sex with Clickers Pretend that you are going to have a child and that you seek to maximize your number of descendants. You can choose to have either a boy or a girl. Where B is the total number of boys chosen and G the number of girls, the expected payoffs are 100/B for having a boy and 100/G for having a girl. Press A for Boy Press B for Girl