Evaluation criteria, process and Consequences of evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hierarchy of Courts.
Advertisements

Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation & Procedure Introduction To Litigation Litigation & Procedure Introduction.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 8 Courts and the Quest for Justice.
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
A narrow pathway between fences Seminar on free movement of same sex families in Europe European Parliament, 3 May 2011 Pál Szirányi – Permanent representation.
Ali Rıza ÇAM Reporter Judge in Ministry of Justice, Turkey Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice TURKISH JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
Chapter Eight Economic arbitraytion and economic lawsuits.
Courts and Tribunals Operation and control of the Courts and Tribunals as well as the legal status of professional Judges and Magistrates, who shall form.
Supreme Court Only 1 Have original & Appellate jurisdiction 12 US Courts of Appeals: Courts who Review cases on appeal from the districts. Also called.
Mr. Valanzano Business Law. Dispute Resolution Litigate – ________________________________________________ In some cases, people decided too quickly to.
JUDICIAL BRANCH THE UNITED STATES COURT SYSTEM. I. JURISDICTIONS A. Original Article III, section 2 B. Appellate.
The US Court System Objective 2.01.
Searches, Raids and Inspections in Japan by the JFTC Naohiko KOMURO Senior Planning Officer, Management and Planning Division, Investigation Bureau, General.
VIETNAM. Judiciary COURT Commercial ARBITRATION CRIMINAL CIVIL LABOUR ECONOMICAL ADMINISTRATIVE The Rule of Law.
Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch consists of the Supreme Court and the federal judges The Judicial Branch consists of the Supreme Court and the federal.
The Brussels II Regulation The Council Regulation no 2201/2003 concerning the jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgment in matrimonial.
American Law Court System and Procedures. HYbn5chttps:// HYbn5c
Jurisdiction 3: Original & Appellate. Major Classes of Jurisdiction Legislative jurisdiction –Congressional (Federal) –State –Municipal Executive Jurisdiction.
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY 1.CIVIL LIABILITY 2.CRIMINAL LIABLITY 3. DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY.
State Government Judicial Branch. VA Supreme Court 7 Justices (1 Chief and 6 Associates) Chosen by the General Assembly 12 year terms (8 years for lower.
I. Introduction A. Law definition B. Law in business.
High Level Judicial Forum Second Judicial Reform Project (JRP2) Judicial System of Armenia World Bank The Portuguese System for Judges’ evaluation Yerevan,
Legal Framework of Intellectual Property Protection during Exhibition The Intellectual Property Center of Shanghai University of Political Science and.
The Role of NGO’s in Environmental Litigation against Public Authorities Emperical and Normative Observations on Judicial Review and Access to Justice.
Evaluation of judges in Republic of Croatia Duro Sessa Justice of Supreme Court of Republic of Croatia President of Association of Croatian Judges.
The U.S. Legal System Module 1 NURS Summer II
Chapter 2: Court Systems and Jurisdiction
Judicial Procedures Review
Section 1.2.
Chapter Three: Federal Courts
Chapter 7 section 2 notes The Federal Court System
State Court System: Structure & Overview
The Federal Court System
Presentation on “ Juvenile Justice System in Cambodia” in The 1st Meeting of the ASEAN Juvenile Organizing Committee (Bangkok from 1st- 4th.
The Federal Court System
Objective 5.5 Describe the organization and jurisdiction of the Virginia Court system.
Table of Contents P.1- Vocabulary P.2- VA Court System Chart
The Judicial Branch SS.7.C.3.8: Analyze the structure, function, and processes of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
UNIT 8 THE HIERARCHY OF COURTS AND THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT
English for Lawyers 2 Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević
VIRGINIA JUDICIAL SYSTEM
I. The National Judiciary
Interprets, or explains the laws
CSM Management Model 2017.
The United States Court System
The Portuguese Judicial High Council:
Measuring quantitative indicators Courts performance
4-1 Dispute Resolution and the Courts
Judicial High Council (CSM) Contentious
The Portuguese Judicial System The Judicial High Council
The Role of the Federal Courts
Evaluation criteria, process and Consequences of evaluation
Judicial Branch.
Experiences and improvement plans
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL MISCOONDUCT.
Article III – The Judicial Branch
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
JUDICIAL REFORM IN PORTUGAL
Responsibility and accountability The role of judicial and administrative inspection bodies 4th april, 2018 – Rodolfo de Serpa.
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS WITHIN NATIONAL SYSTEMS PORTUGAL.
Reaching a Decision How do the various levels of the court system reach decisions? Why are appeals decisions handled differently than original jurisdiction.
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PROVING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, HEARING OF EVIDENCE.
Section 1.2.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Second Regional Conference Montenegro, Budva, November 2016
Disciplinary liability of judges in Romania
Article III – The Judicial Branch
Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act
Professional evaluation of judges
How Albania Judiciary measure performance of judges
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation criteria, process and Consequences of evaluation Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges Evaluation criteria, process and Consequences of evaluation LISBON, May 2018

PROCEDURE (Article 17 of the Inspection Regulation) Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges Within the annual plan the inspections starts with a decision from the inspector. In that decision the inspector summons the judge for a first interview within 15 to 30 days. The inspector notifies the following: i) The inspections division in the CSM; ii) Court president; iii) Judicial Administrator. PROCEDURE (Article 17 of the Inspection Regulation)

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges Until 5 days before the date of the first interview the judge is allowed to deliver to the inspector a maximum of 10 judicial decisions and a memorandum of its work during that period. PROCEDURE

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The inspector will then visit the courts and look in to the elements described in article 16 of the inspections regulation: i) indiviual file of the judge; ii) professional curricula; iii) data that the CSM has concerning the courts in which the judge has served; iv) previous inspections and disciplinary proceedings; v) procedural goals; vi) actual case files handled by the judge; vii) decision archive; viii) planning meetings; ix) audio recordings of the hearings; x) contacts with relevant entities PROCEDURE

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges In a maximum of 45 days from the first interview the inspector summons the judge for a final interview. In a maximum of 30 days from the final interview the inspector drafts the inspections report and sends it to the council, proposing a grade. The report is notified to the judge and he/she has 10 days to answer, sending elements or requiring any further activities. The inspector has 30 days to perform any other activity or 10 days to answer the judge PROCEDURE

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges If a disciplinary proceeding is pending concerning facts that could influence the grade the CSM, after hearing the judge, might suspend the inspection until the disciplinary proceeding is finished (article 18 of the Regulation). The CSM may also suspend the grade when there is a doubt about the grade and the CSM decides to have a additional inspection PROCEDURE

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The report can conclude for one of the following grades (article 13): i)Very good; ii) Good with distinction; iii) Good; iv) Sufficient; v) Mediocre GRADES

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges The Report is listed for decision in the Permanent council with the exception of the mediocre which always goes directly for Plenary. If the judges wants to react he/she may: i) appeal from the Permanent to the Plenary; ii) Judicial appeal from the Plenary to the Supreme Court NEXT

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges Mediocre (article 34, 2 of the Judge’s Statute: i) suspension of service; ii) disciplinary proceeding. Judicial Movement. Specialized Courts. Promotion and Management positions. CONSEQUENCES

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges https://www.csm.org.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Movimento_2017_TReT1%C2%AA-FINAL-VparaPlenario.pdf

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges By jurisdiction Civil Criminal Labor Family and juvenile Commercial Investigation Civil Enforcement By level Central – Good With Distinction + 10 years Local – Good + 5 years Misdemeanors and administrative offences

Strengths and Limitations of the Portuguese System of the Evaluation of Judges Court Presidents – Appeal Court Judges or First Instance Court Judges with 15 year + Very Good For Appeal Court and Supreme Court open Competition PROMOTION

Thank you so much for your attention