Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Munirathinam Sundaramoorthy, James Terner, Thomas L Poulos  Structure 
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
The open conformation of a Pseudomonas lipase
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
The 1.85 Å Structure of Vaccinia Protein VP39: A Bifunctional Enzyme That Participates in the Modification of Both mRNA Ends  Alec E Hodel, Paul D Gershon,
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Crystal Structure at 2.8 Å of an FcRn/Heterodimeric Fc Complex
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages (November 1996)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Munirathinam Sundaramoorthy, James Terner, Thomas L Poulos  Structure 
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
Quentin Vicens, Eric Westhof  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Crystal Structure of Carnitine Acetyltransferase and Implications for the Catalytic Mechanism and Fatty Acid Transport  Gerwald Jogl, Liang Tong  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1995)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal structures of reduced, oxidized, and mutated human thioredoxins: evidence for a regulatory homodimer  Andrzej Weichsel, John R Gasdaska, Garth.
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
T Barrett, CG Suresh, SP Tolley, EJ Dodson, MA Hughes  Structure 
The crystal structure of an intact human Max–DNA complex: new insights into mechanisms of transcriptional control  P Brownlie, TA Ceska, M Lamers, C Romier,
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages (September 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
The crystal structure of peanut peroxidase
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Andrey V Kajava, Gilbert Vassart, Shoshana J Wodak  Structure 
Tertiary structure of an immunoglobulin-like domain from the giant muscle protein titin: a new member of the I set  Mark Pfuhl, Annalisa Pastore  Structure 
The crystal structure of peanut peroxidase
Luhua Lai, Hisao Yokota, Li-Wei Hung, Rosalind Kim, Sung-Hou Kim 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages 1333-1340 (December 1995) Two conformations of the integrin A-domain (I-domain): a pathway for activation?  Jie-Oh Lee, Laurie Anne Bankston, M.Amin Arnaout and Robert C Liddington  Structure  Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages 1333-1340 (December 1995) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4

Figure 1 . (a) Primary sequence of the CR3 I-domain, with secondary structure assignments. Residue numbering is according to the intact protein. MIDAS residues are shown in bold. Lower-case letters denote residues invisible in the electron-density map. The last six residues are derived from the cloning vector. (b) Stereo electron-density map (2Fo–Fc) of the Mn2+ coordination site, contoured at 1.7σ. The two phenylalanine residues (F275 and F302) which become buried in the Mn2+ form are shown. Water molecules are indicated by crosses. For clarity, only density within 2 å of the selected atoms is displayed. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 1 . (a) Primary sequence of the CR3 I-domain, with secondary structure assignments. Residue numbering is according to the intact protein. MIDAS residues are shown in bold. Lower-case letters denote residues invisible in the electron-density map. The last six residues are derived from the cloning vector. (b) Stereo electron-density map (2Fo–Fc) of the Mn2+ coordination site, contoured at 1.7σ. The two phenylalanine residues (F275 and F302) which become buried in the Mn2+ form are shown. Water molecules are indicated by crosses. For clarity, only density within 2 å of the selected atoms is displayed. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 2 . (a) Rms difference by residue (main chain) between Mg2+ and Mn2+ I-domains. (Domains were superimposed on residues 132–140, 167–241 and 245–265 with an rms difference of 0.46 å.) Secondary structure elements for the Mn2+ form are indicated along the horizontal axis. The positions of crystal contacts (interatomic distances <4 å) for Mg2+ (open triangles) and Mn2+ (filled triangles) forms are also marked. (b) Comparison of main-chain temperature factors in the Mg2+ (thick line) and Mn2+ (thin line) I-domains. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 2 . (a) Rms difference by residue (main chain) between Mg2+ and Mn2+ I-domains. (Domains were superimposed on residues 132–140, 167–241 and 245–265 with an rms difference of 0.46 å.) Secondary structure elements for the Mn2+ form are indicated along the horizontal axis. The positions of crystal contacts (interatomic distances <4 å) for Mg2+ (open triangles) and Mn2+ (filled triangles) forms are also marked. (b) Comparison of main-chain temperature factors in the Mg2+ (thick line) and Mn2+ (thin line) I-domains. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 3 . Structural comparisons of the Mg2+ and Mn2+ I-domains. (a) The MIDAS motif in the Mg2+ form. (b) The MIDAS motif in the Mn2+ form. The colour code is oxygen atoms (red), carbon (black), schematic backbone (grey) and the glutamate from a neighbouring molecule (gold). Water molecules are labelled w1–w3. Selected hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed red lines. (c) Stereo Cα plot comparing Mg2+ (red) and Mn2+ (blue) I-domains. Regions of large change are shown with thicker lines. The metal ions are shown as spheres. The N and C termini and occasional residues are labelled. (d) Stereo close-up comparison of the Mg2+ (red) and the Mn2+ (blue) forms: Cα plot, together with selected side chains (metal-coordinating residues and the two buried phenylalanines), and the main chain for residues 242–243. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 3 . Structural comparisons of the Mg2+ and Mn2+ I-domains. (a) The MIDAS motif in the Mg2+ form. (b) The MIDAS motif in the Mn2+ form. The colour code is oxygen atoms (red), carbon (black), schematic backbone (grey) and the glutamate from a neighbouring molecule (gold). Water molecules are labelled w1–w3. Selected hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed red lines. (c) Stereo Cα plot comparing Mg2+ (red) and Mn2+ (blue) I-domains. Regions of large change are shown with thicker lines. The metal ions are shown as spheres. The N and C termini and occasional residues are labelled. (d) Stereo close-up comparison of the Mg2+ (red) and the Mn2+ (blue) forms: Cα plot, together with selected side chains (metal-coordinating residues and the two buried phenylalanines), and the main chain for residues 242–243. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 3 . Structural comparisons of the Mg2+ and Mn2+ I-domains. (a) The MIDAS motif in the Mg2+ form. (b) The MIDAS motif in the Mn2+ form. The colour code is oxygen atoms (red), carbon (black), schematic backbone (grey) and the glutamate from a neighbouring molecule (gold). Water molecules are labelled w1–w3. Selected hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed red lines. (c) Stereo Cα plot comparing Mg2+ (red) and Mn2+ (blue) I-domains. Regions of large change are shown with thicker lines. The metal ions are shown as spheres. The N and C termini and occasional residues are labelled. (d) Stereo close-up comparison of the Mg2+ (red) and the Mn2+ (blue) forms: Cα plot, together with selected side chains (metal-coordinating residues and the two buried phenylalanines), and the main chain for residues 242–243. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 3 . Structural comparisons of the Mg2+ and Mn2+ I-domains. (a) The MIDAS motif in the Mg2+ form. (b) The MIDAS motif in the Mn2+ form. The colour code is oxygen atoms (red), carbon (black), schematic backbone (grey) and the glutamate from a neighbouring molecule (gold). Water molecules are labelled w1–w3. Selected hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed red lines. (c) Stereo Cα plot comparing Mg2+ (red) and Mn2+ (blue) I-domains. Regions of large change are shown with thicker lines. The metal ions are shown as spheres. The N and C termini and occasional residues are labelled. (d) Stereo close-up comparison of the Mg2+ (red) and the Mn2+ (blue) forms: Cα plot, together with selected side chains (metal-coordinating residues and the two buried phenylalanines), and the main chain for residues 242–243. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 4 . Schematic diagram of the Mn2+ I-domain (grey). Major conformational differences are shown in red (Mg2+) and blue (Mn2+). β strands are labelled A–F and helices 1–7. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 5 . Comparison of structural changes in (a) the MIDAS motif and (b) the p21ras–GTP complex. Movements of the metal-coordinating residues are indicated (see text). Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)

Figure 6 . Solvent-accessible surface of (a) the Mg2+ and (b) the Mn2+ I-domain, with surface charge calculated by GRASP [39]: negatively charged regions in red, positive in blue. The view is perpendicular to that shown in Figure 4. Structure 1995 3, 1333-1340DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00271-4)