GEF policies: progress and next steps

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Delivering as One Viet Nam Country-led Evaluation Kigali, 20 October 2009.
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
PRESENTATION ON MONDAY 7 TH AUGUST, 2006 BY SUDHIR VARMA FCA; CIA(USA) FOR THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS – INDIA, DELHI CHAPTER.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Core principles in the ASX CGC document. Which one do you think is the most important and least important? Presented by Casey Chan Ethics Governance &
 Capacity Development; National Systems / Global Fund Summary of the implementation capacities for National Programs and Global Fund Grants For HIV /TB.
UNITED NATIONS NORMS AND STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION UNITED NATIONS EVALUATION GROUP (UNEG) Maya Bachner WIPO IDEAS 1st BIENNIAL CONFERENCE, NEW DELHI, APRIL.
Tners Protected Areas Conservation Trust’s (PACT) Accreditation by the Adaptation Fund Board: Our Experience By Kerry Belisle (PACT) Dr. Colin Young (Government.
Protected Areas Conservation Trust’s (PACT) Accreditation to the Adaptation Fund Board: The Process and experience. By: Kerry Belisle (PACT)
GEF: Engagement with Indigenous Peoples Yoko Watanabe, GEF Secretariat Indigenous Peoples Focal Point & Lucy Mulenkei, GEF IPAG Chair 14 th UNPFII Side.
Purpose of the Standards
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Using Country Systems to Manage Climate Change Finance A Global Forum M onitoring Tracking quantity and quality of climate expenditure, accountability.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Regional Accreditation Workshop For Latin America & Caribbean Region Panama City, Panama th Nov, 2011.
OECD Guidelines on Insurer Governance
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
2008 New York - Member Forum Council for Responsible Jewellery Practices, Ltd. Overview of CRJP.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
2015 Safety Action Plan & Regulatory Strategy California Public Utilities Commission January 29, 2015.
PSC meeting - Beijing - October The INTOSAI Compliance Audit Guidelines Presentation of Exposure Drafts ISSAIs 4000, 4100 and 4200.
Guidelines for the Implementation of the Public Involvement Policy GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Windhoek, Namibia February 17-18, 2015.
Fourth Overall Performance Study (OPS4) Consultation with GEF Focal Points Accra, Ghana 9-11 July 2009.
KENYA TOWA Project Governance and Anticorruption Financial Management Issues Fiduciary Forum 2008.
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
Chapter 21 Internal, Operational, and Compliance Auditing McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
IRENA-ADFD Project Facility: Funds Available for Renewable Energy Projects in Developing Countries – November 2015 Seleha Lockwood Programme Officer, International.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.
1 Performance Auditing ICAS & IRAS Officers NAAA 21 Jan 2016.
MnSCU Audit Committee September 18, 2002 Discussion on the Role of the Audit Committee MnSCU Audit Committee September 18, 2002.
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy. 2  Result-Based Management (RBM) - setting goals and objectives, monitoring, learning and decision making 
December Why Program-for-Results (PforR)? Development Effectiveness and Client Demand – PforR responds to client demand that could not be fully.
Inter-American Development Bank BIMILACI 2007 QUALITY PROCUREMENT Third Party Review May 2007 Project Procurement Division.
Regional Accreditation Workshop For Asia and Eastern Europe Manila, Philippines th March, 2012.
Neeraj Kumar Negi Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office March 11 th 2015 Performance Measurement in GEF.
Evaluation Capacity Building at Country Level: GEF Focal Points 1 Osvaldo Néstor Feinstein AEA 2011 Conference GEF Evaluation Office Panel.
stakeholder engagement and gender mainstreaming
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Revising GEF’s M&E Policy
2017/8 NomCom Review: Status Update
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
Road map and outline of the revised evaluation policy of UNICEF
IESBA Meeting New York March 12-14, 2018
WORKSHOP 17th Sept 2008 EUROPEAN COMMISSION
MARKETING, PURCHASING AND PRODUCTION (7 - 9%)
Introduction to the training
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Response to Report on Local Government new risk management and internal audit framework for NSW councils.
GEF Project & Program Cycle & Key Policies GEF-7 National Dialogue
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
Environmental and Social Safeguards
The evaluation process
Practical Steps to Improve Coordination and Workflow
Informal document GRVA st GRVA, September 2018
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review
GEF Approaches Stakeholder Gender Equality & Environmental &
The GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy
Practical Steps to Improve Coordination and Workflow
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Good Governance and an Effective Board of Trustees
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Fiji, July 2019
Presentation transcript:

GEF policies: progress and next steps Roland Sundstrom Senior Policy Officer September 25, 2018

timeline Project and Program Cycle (June 2016) Monitoring Agencies’ Compliance (Oct 2016) Gender Equality (Nov 2017) Stakeholder Engagement (Nov 2017) Co-Financing (June 2018) Environmental and Social Safeguards (Dec 2018) Access to Information (Dec 2018) Minimum Fiduciary Standards (2019) Monitoring and Evaluation (2019) timeline

environmental and social safeguards: process IEO review (May 2017) GEFSEC plan (Nov 2017) Working Group (Feb 2018) Gap Analysis (March-April) 1st draft for input (June) 2nd draft for input (August) Sept 30: comments Oct: draft guidelines Dec: Council meeting

environmental and social safeguards: draft policy at a glance agency minimum standards portfolio monitor. and reporting projects and programs environmental and social safeguards: draft policy at a glance GEF Conflict Resolution Commissioner

environmental and social safeguards: comments agency minimum standards portfolio monitor. and reporting projects and programs environmental and social safeguards: comments application scope time frame no weakening of existing provisions GEF Conflict Resolution Commissioner

environmental and social safeguards: comments agency minimum standards portfolio monitor. and reporting projects and programs environmental and social safeguards: comments purpose scope timing Secretariat’s role GEF Conflict Resolution Commissioner

environmental and social safeguards: comments agency minimum standards portfolio monitor. and reporting projects and programs environmental and social safeguards: comments role capabilities GEF Conflict Resolution Commissioner

environmental and social safeguards: implementation guidelines for documentation, monitoring and reporting; compliance assessment assessment of agency compliance capture of data and information through GEF Portal sharing knowledge

For further details, please find the latest draft policy on the GEF website: http://www.thegef.org/events/consultations- updated-gef-policy-environmental-and-social-safeguards Please send any comments on the draft policy by September 30, 2018 to Mr. Roland Sundstrom (ksundstrom@thegef.org); Ms. Minna Kononen (mkononen@thegef.org); and Ms. Seo-Jeong Yoon (syoon@thegef.org)

minimum fiduciary standards Minimum Fiduciary Standards for GEF Agencies (2007) Pilot Accreditation of GEF Project Agencies (2011) all Agencies in compliance (2015) Secretariat’s plan (Nov 2017) AML-CFT (June 2018) review (ongoing) Findings, proposal to close immediate gaps on AML-CFT (Dec 2018) Complete, updated standards (2019) minimum fiduciary standards

minimum fiduciary standards: current policy objective: to strengthen the financial and programmatic accountability of the GEF core principles: professional standards, independence, transparency, monitoring and response, and value for money I. Project/Activity Processes and Oversight Criteria I.1 Project Appraisal Standards I.2 Procurement Processes I.3 Monitoring and Project-at-Risk Systems I.4 Evaluation Function II. Governance Framework Criteria II.1 External Financial Audit II.2 Financial Management, Control Framew. II.3 Financial Disclosure II.4 Code of Ethics II.5 Internal Audit II.6 Investigation Function II.7 Hotline & Whistleblower Protection

minimum fiduciary standards: AML-CFT “The Council requests the Secretariat […] close any immediate gaps related to [AML/CFT] in accordance with the [following] principles […]”: standard practices and procedures; United Nations Security Council decisions taken under Chapter VII of the UN Charter; and inform the Council if funds are not being used or have not been used for the implementation of a project or of any illegal or corrupt practice

minimum fiduciary standards: Agency responses Questionnaire sent out on Sept 13 minimum standards have catalyzed efforts to strengthen Agency systems Agencies have arrangements to monitor the effectiveness of their policies and systems, although some still have limited implementation experience many Agencies have in place a policy/ procedure/ standard practice/ approach on AML-CFT 2/3 of Agencies have not yet responded

minimum fiduciary standards: other areas for further consideration monitoring and reporting on implementation information on investigations related to GEF-financed projects implementation and execution functions risk-based approach? addressing the diversity of the GEF Partnership

minimum fiduciary standards: next steps complete questionnaire by Oct 5 follow-up interviews proposal on AML-CFT

assessing Agencies’ compliance Agency policies, procedures, systems and capabilities E&S safeguards fiduciary standards gender equality stakeholder engagement

assessing Agencies’ compliance: process questionnaire completed/ relevant sources of evidence provided by Agencies initial review by the Secretariat for availability and completeness of information expert review and recommendation Council review and decision

assessing Agencies’ compliance: next steps Fall 2018: draft guidelines for assessment on E&S safeguards, gender, stakeholder engagement Jan 2019: guidelines finalized, assessment process launched Fall of 2019: first report to Council 2020: assessment against revised fiduciary standards (TBD)

thank you ksundstrom@thegef.org Project and Program Cycle (June 2016) Monitoring Agencies’ Compliance (Oct 2016) Gender Equality (Nov 2017) Stakeholder Engagement (Nov 2017) Co-Financing (June 2018) Environmental and Social Safeguards (Dec 2018) Access to Information (Dec 2018) Minimum Fiduciary Standards (2019) Monitoring and Evaluation (2019) thank you ksundstrom@thegef.org