K0 beam line for the E391a experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NA60 results on charm and intermediate mass dimuon production in In-In 158 GeV/A collisions R. Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon) on behalf of the NA60 collaboration.
Advertisements

03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
VELO Testbeam 2006 Tracking and Triggering Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO Testbeam and Software Review 09/05/2005 List of tasks 1)L0 trigger.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
High p T  0 Production in p+p, Au+Au, and d+Au Stefan Bathe UC Riverside for the Collaboration Topics in Heavy Ion Collisions McGill University, Montreal,
Measurement of Gas Bremsstrahlung at the Pohang Light Source Hyosang Lee Seoul National University, Q2C Pusan National University, HANUL HNP2011.
Status of E391a Search for K L    decay G.Y.Lim IPNS, 32nd ICHEP 19 th August 2004 Beijing.
Jet Calibration Experience in CDF Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool -CDF calorimeter -Relative Calibrations -Absolute Calibration -Multiple Interactions.
The new K L     experiment (KOTO) at J-PARC Hiroaki Watanabe for the J-PARC E14 KOTO collaboration KEK, IPNS.
Measurement of K L    decay G.Y.Lim IPNS,KEK. Why K L →    ? Flavor Changing Neutral Current Br(K L   o  ) = 6  1 ・ Im(V td V ts ) 2 X 2 (x.
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
A. Zelenski a, G. Atoian a *, A. Bogdanov b, D.Raparia a, M.Runtso b, D. Steski a, V. Zajic a a Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA b.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Current estimation of the background level Ken Sakashita ( Osaka University ) for the E391a collaboration 1.Overview/Motivation 2.4  data analysis 3.2.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Status of E14 G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK. E14 Experiment Step-by-step approach to precise measurement of Br( K L    ) KEK-PS E391a J-PARC E14 (Step-1) J-PARC.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
26 June 2007Reflection on bent crystals W. Scandale 1/22 OBSERVATION OF PROTON REFLECTION ON BENT SILICON CRYSTALS AT THE CERN-SPS Walter Scandale CERN.
Current Status of E14 Experiment at J-PARC 정명신, 김용주 1, 우종관 1, 고재우 1, 임계엽 2, 김은주 3, 안정근 4, 이효상 5 한양대학교, 1 제주대학교, 2 KEK, 3 전북대학교, 4 부산대학교, 5 서울대학교.
PoGOLiteMC_ ppt 1 Updated MC Study of PoGOLite Trigger Rate/BG January 30, 2007 Tsunefumi Mizuno (Hiroshima Univ.)
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised.
6:th IWORID, Glasgow, Scotland, July 2004 Energy Dependence in Dental Imaging with Medipix 2 Börje Norlin & Christer Fröjdh Mid Sweden University.
Status of ULE-HPGe Experiment for WIMP Search in YangYang
or getting rid of the give-away particles in a test-beam environment
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
Elena Bruna Yale University
KOPIO meeting, T. Nomura (Kyoto U.)
Jing Liu Kavli IPMU, University of Tokyo 8 Apr. 2013, Tuebingen
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Nick Markov, UCONN Valery Kubarovsky, JLAB
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Preliminary Study of 214Bi Background in 100Mo foils
Fermi LAT Limits on High-Energy Gamma Lines from WIMP Annihilation
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump
Shielded Button Measurement/ECLOUD Simulation Comparison for 5
Conventional Neutrino Beams Day 2
NA61 and NA49 Collaboration Meeting May 14-19, 2012, Budapest
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
The NA60 experiment Reproducing in the lab the early Universe conditions: a plasma of deconfined quarks and gluons (QGP) Third generation experiment which.
PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III
 Results from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
Mitja Majerle NPI CAS Řež, Czech Republic
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
VEPP-2000 plans for the study of the nucleon form factors
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Tatsuya Chujo for the PHENIX collaboration
HADRONIC INTERACTION MODELS AND DPMJET-CHARM MODEL
CMS ECAL Endcaps: Fluence/Dose (500 fb-1)
Testing Geant4 with a simplified calorimeter setup
Measurements of some J/ and c decays at BES
Kazuya Aoki For the PHENIX Collaborations. Kyoto Univ. / RIKEN
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
G4GeneralParticleSource Class:
Identified Charged Hadron
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
KEK-PS E391a Run3データを用いたKL→π0νν解析の現状
Search for the onset of baryon anomaly at RHIC-PHENIX
Measurement of KL  p0nn decay
Masahiro Konno (Univ. of Tsukuba) for the PHENIX Collaboration Contact
Understanding of the E391a Detector using KL decay
Strangeness Production in p+A Collisions at √s = 41.6 GeV
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Heavy Quarkonium production in p-Pb collisions at LHCb
Presentation transcript:

K0 beam line for the E391a experiment May 27, 2005 Takao Inagaki (KEK)

Location

Collimation scheme

KL spectrum and n andγprofiles

Telescope for the profile measurement

Profiles (meas. vs MC*)

Sizable vacuum effect

Detectors for energy spectra SLSD (+ lead glass) Cerberus

γspectra measured by SLSD+lead glass

Neutron and γ spectra by Cerberus

C4: suppressor of thermal neutron flux

Profiles and spectra of the halo Measured by Cerberus

Decay vertex distribution for 2γsample at trigger bias

How are the halo neutrons generated? Scattering at C2 + Hadronic Shower at C6 Main source of lower-energy tail events ~ 25 % events Multiple Scattering Main source of higher-energy edge events

Summary The profiles and spectra including the absorber effects were rather well reproduced by a MC simulation using GEANT(G-FULKA) code. Beam-line design becomes science from art. Further improvement: ・ suppress the second step scattering   ・ decrease n/KL ratio

Supplement

How are the halo neutrons generated? It consists of two kinds of source. From first look of e391 data, we have to reduce halo!!!

How are the halo neutrons generated? Multiple Scattering, 1st scattering is in the Pb absorber. No. of event is rather large. ~ 20 % of halo events Scattering at Vacuum window.

Summary for halo-neutrons Source of halo neutrons: 1. Multiple scattering typical case (a) C2C6halo (b) Pb abs  C6  halo (20%) 2. Hadronic shower at C6 (ex, C2C6shower) ( 25 %) Possible way: 1. Position of trimming collimator relative to Pb abs. 2. Active veto-counter at C6. Test of New Collimation Scheme…