Writing the IA Report: Analysis and Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Internal Assessment Your turn to experiment!.
Advertisements

CHAPTER TWELVE ANALYSING DATA I: QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS.
IB Psychology Internal Assessment Higher Level 20% of final grade
Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon Tests.
HL Psychology Internal Assessment
Choosing Statistical Procedures
Introduction to A2 research methods: We will look at the following concepts in a nut shell: Inferential tests & Significance Null hypothesis.
Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal.
CHAPTER 4 Research in Psychology: Methods & Design
Statistical Analysis Statistical Analysis
Statistics in psychology Describing and analyzing the data.
 For the IB Diploma Programme psychology course, the experimental method is defined as requiring: 1. The manipulation of one independent variable while.
IB Psychology Internal Assessment Guide - Introduction
Research Seminars in IT in Education (MIT6003) Quantitative Educational Research Design 2 Dr Jacky Pow.
1 Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. 2 Name of the game… Hypothesis testing Statistical method that uses sample data to evaluate a hypothesis.
PSYCHOLOGY IA THE RESULTS. RATIONALE/PURPOSE The results section is where you report the results that you have found from your experiment. The results.
Chapter 6: Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data
HL Psychology Internal Assessment
Internal assessment, Results, Discussion, and Format By Mr Daniel Hansson.
Chapter 13 Understanding research results: statistical inference.
Psych IA What to write and where. Introduction Identify your area of study State why your area of study is important and interesting to our world Identify.
IB Psychology Internal Assessment. The Task  Replicate an experiment that manipulates an Independent Variable  Write a report conforming to IB guidelines.
Some Terminology experiment vs. correlational study IV vs. DV descriptive vs. inferential statistics sample vs. population statistic vs. parameter H 0.
Research methods. Recap: last session 1.Outline the difference between descriptive statistics and inferential statistics? 2.The null hypothesis predicts.
Statistics & Evidence-Based Practice
Statistics in psychology
Inferential Statistics
Data measurement, probability and Spearman’s Rho
Practice As part of a program to reducing smoking, a national organization ran an advertising campaign to convince people to quit or reduce their smoking.
Results, Descriptive and Inferential
NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS
Part Four ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION OF DATA
Statistical tests for quantitative variables
Practical Investigation - Experiment
CHAPTER 4 Research in Psychology: Methods & Design
Research Methodology Lecture No :25 (Hypothesis Testing – Difference in Groups)
Data analysis Research methods.
IB Psychology Internal Assessment.
Statistics in psychology
Statistics in psychology
Understanding Results
IB Psychology Internal Assessment.
Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data
Parametric vs Non-Parametric
Learning Aims By the end of this session you are going to totally ‘get’ levels of significance and why we do statistical tests!
Data measurement, probability and statistical tests
Inferential Statistics
Inferential statistics,
Georgi Iskrov, MBA, MPH, PhD Department of Social Medicine
Parametric and non parametric tests
Introduction to Statistics
1.3 Data Recording, Analysis and Presentation
STATISTICS Topic 1 IB Biology Miss Werba.
Statistics.
Non – Parametric Test Dr. Anshul Singh Thapa.
Writing the IA Report: Introduction and Evaluation
Analysing your own research
IB Psychology SL: Internal Assessment
Data measurement, probability and statistical tests
Research Question What are you investigating?
Chapter Nine: Using Statistics to Answer Questions
Research Methods: Data analysis and reporting investigations.
Descriptive Statistics
Suitability Test Wednesday, 22 May 2019.
Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data
InferentIal StatIstIcs
Georgi Iskrov, MBA, MPH, PhD Department of Social Medicine
PSYCHOLOGY AND STATISTICS
Introductory Statistics
Examine Relationships
Presentation transcript:

Writing the IA Report: Analysis and Evaluation IB Diploma Psychology

Analysis: What you need to do. Display your data with a table and graph Provide the raw data and the calculations in the appendices Use descriptive statistics to highlight the variability of your data (mean, median or mode) and the spread of data (Range or SD). Use inferential statistics to draw a conclusion about your Research Hypothesis. Your Analysis (6 marks)

Analysis: How to Reach the Top Mark Band Descriptive and inferential statistics are appropriate and accurate The graph is correctly displayed and addresses the hypothesis The statistical findings are interpreted with regard to the data and linked to the hypothesis Grade of 5-6

Analysis: How to Reach the Top Mark Band Descriptive statistics are appropriate and accurate State one measure of central tendency (mean median or mode) State one measure or spread (range of SD) Explain why your measures are appropriate for the data you have collected Explain what the tests show Resources: Scales of measurement Central Tendency

Analysis: How to Reach the Top Mark Band Inferential statistics are appropriate and accurate State the test you used and why it was appropriate Provide raw data and screenshots in the appendices State the results Reject the null hypothesis or not Accept the Research hypothesis or not State the level of significance Resources: http://vassarstats.net

Analysis: Determining appropriate statistics Median and Range Mann-Whitney U Test Ordinal Data Independent Measures Signed Ranks Test Repeated Measures Mean and SD Interval or Ratio Mean and SD Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test You will need to explain you decisions about what descriptive and inferential statistics you to analyse the data. The decision about the measure of central tendency is related to the type of data your have. The decision about the spread is generally linked to the measure of central tendency you used. If you have used the median as you measure of CT then the range is the most appropriate measure of spread. If you are able to calculate a mean then the SD is the most appropriate measure of spread. One of our teachers who is an IA examiner provide this general rule: If an independent samples design was used, then the Mann Whitney U test can be applied to test the significance of the difference between two conditions. If a repeated measures design was used, then the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test: can be applied to test the significance of the difference between the two conditions.  If in doubt about whether to use the t-test or the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, you can use the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test for any test of difference of two dependent groups. The Chi-Squared test is used for nominal data in an independent samples design.  The thinking behind the use of the Mann Whitney U test and not the more “powerful” t-test is that your data is not fully meeting the requirements for the t-test as your target population is unlikely to be normally distributed and your sample is probably small. You may have outliers which indicates that you data is not suitable for a parametric test. . You need to state in your report that you are assuming your data does not meet the requirement of the t-test therefore the Mann-Whitney U test was used.

Analysis: Statistical Calculations http://www.holah.karoo.net/stats.htm This site is helpful in choosing the appropriate test, put in your data, and the site does it for you. Make sure you check the correct box for one­  or two-­tailed hypothesis. http://easycalculation.com/  ­ Free online calculation of your statistics.  http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/  ­ Useful site for choosing the right statistical test. http://vassarstats.net/textbook/ Click on ‘Ordinal Data’ to find the Wilcoxon and Mann­ Whitney tests. You will need to explain why you use the tests. The decision about the measure of central tendency is related to the type of data your have. The decision about the spread is generally linked to the measure of central tendency you used. . If you have used the median as you measure of CT then the range is the most appropriate measure of spread. If you are able to calculate a mean then the SD is the most appropriate measure of spread. One of our teachers who is an IA examiner provide this general rule: If an independent samples design was used, then the Mann Whitney U test can be applied to test the significance of the difference between two conditions. If a repeated measures design was used, then the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test: can be applied to test the significance of the difference between the two conditions.  If in doubt about whether to use the t-test or the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, you can use the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test for any test of difference of two dependent groups. The Chi-Squared test is used for nominal data in an independent samples design.  The thinking behind the use of the Mann Whitney U test and not the more “powerful” t-test is that your data is not fully meeting the requirements for the t-test as your target population is unlikely to be normally distributed and your sample is small and there is the presence of outliers. You need to state in your report that you are assuming your data does not meet the requirement of the t-test therefore the Mann-Whitney U test was used.

Evaluation: What you need to do Relate your results to the results of the original study/theory/model cited in the Introduction (and remember to cite them again). State and explain the strengths and limitations of your design, sampling, procedures, and overall methods. Suggest and justify modifications that are explicitly linked to the limitations. Provide a conclusion. Your Evaluation (6 marks)

Evaluation: How to Reach the Top Mark Band The findings are discussed with reference to the background study, theory or model Strengths and limitations of the design, sample and procedures are stated and explain an relevant to the investigation Modifications are explicitly linked to the limitations of the students investigations and fully justified. Grade of 5-6

Evaluation: How to Reach the Top Mark Band The findings are discussed with reference to the background study, theory or model Do your results support or refute the findings of the original study? Explain why or why not?

Evaluation: How to Reach the Top Mark Band Strengths and limitations of the design, sample and procedures are stated and explained and relevant to the investigation. Identify and explain strengths and limitations. Remember a mistake on your part is not a limitation. Identify confounding variables and how you tried to control for them. Was your random allocation or counterbalancing effective? Explain why or why not? How ecologically valid was your study? Did your sampling enable you to generalize your findings?

Evaluation: How to Reach the Top Mark Band Strengths and limitations of the design, sample and procedures are stated and explain an relevant to the investigation Key term: Participant variability Experimenter bias Expectancy effect (demand characteristics) Control

Evaluation: How to Reach the Top Mark Band Modifications are explicitly linked to the limitations of the students investigations and fully justified. Aim for three or four modifications that are directly linked to your limitations.

Evaluation: How to Reach the Top Mark Band Modifications are explicitly linked to the limitations of the student’s investigations and fully justified. What could you control more effectively? How could you improve the procedures? How could you deal with the expectancy effect? Who could you make you study more ecologically valid? How could you improve the generalizability of the study?