Lesson 4 - 3 Using Studies Wisely.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Advertisements

Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Lesson Establishing Causation. Knowledge Objectives Identify the three ways in which the association between two variables can be explained. Define.
{ Chapter 4: Designing Studies 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies 4.2Experiments.
Warm-Up.
+ Chapter 4 Designing Studies 4.1Samples and Surveys 4.2Experiments 4.3Using Studies Wisely.
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 4: Designing Studies Section 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
AP STATISTICS LESSON 4 – 2 ( DAY 1 ) Cautions About Correlation and Regression.
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 4: Designing Studies Section 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies 4.2Experiments.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies 4.2Experiments.
Activity! Get your heart beating! Are standing pulse rates generally higher than sitting pulse rates? We will preform two experiments to try to answer.
Section 4.3 Using Studies Wisely By: Michelle Rondilla & Alexander Hasson Period 4.
+ Chapter 4: Designing Studies Section 4.3b Using Studies Wisely.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
2.7 The Question of Causation
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Cautions About Correlation and Regression
4.3: Using Studies Wisely.
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Pull 3 pennies and record their average
Statistical Reasoning December 8, 2015 Chapter 6.2
Do Now On google classroom.
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Does Association Imply Causation?
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
AP Statistics Section 4.3 By Suji Balfe, Julie Baldauf & Matthew Carey
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Section 6.2 Establishing Causation
Introduction to Producing Data
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Presentation transcript:

Lesson 4 - 3 Using Studies Wisely

Objectives Explain the concept of sampling variability when making an inference about a population and how sample size affects sampling variability Explain the meaning of statistically significant in the context of an experiment and use simulation to determine if the results of an experiment are statistically significant Identify when it is appropriate to make an inference about a population and when it is appropriate to make an inference about cause and effect Evaluate if a statistical study has been carried out in an ethical manner

Vocabulary Sampling variability – different random samples of the same size from the same population produce different estimates Statistically significant – observed results of a study are too unusual to be explained by chance alone

Observational Studies Draws inferences about the possible effect of a treatment on subjects, where the assignment of subjects into a treated group versus a control group is outside the control of the investigator Observational studies infer possible causes (basis of future experiments), but cannot determine cause and effect Experiments may be beyond the control of the investigator for a variety of reasons: A randomized experiment would violate ethical standards The investigator may simply lack the requisite influence A randomized experiment may be impractical From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Experiments Method of investigating causal relationships (cause and effect) among variables, or to test a hypothesis Often the experimenter is interested in the effect of some process or intervention (the "treatment") on some objects (the "experimental units"), which may be people, parts of people, groups of people, plants, animals, etc. A controlled experiment generally compares the results obtained from an experimental sample against a control sample, which is practically identical to the experimental sample except for the one aspect whose effect is being tested (the independent variable). From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scope of Inference What type of inference can be made from a particular study? The answer depends on the design of the study. Well-designed experiments randomly assign individuals to treatment groups. However, most experiments don’t select experimental units at random from the larger population. That limits such experiments to inference about cause and effect. Observational studies don’t randomly assign individuals to groups, which rules out inference about cause and effect. Observational studies that use random sampling can make inferences about the population.

Challenges of Establishing Causation A well-designed experiment tells us that changes in the explanatory variable cause changes in the response variable. Lack of realism can limit our ability to apply the conclusions of an experiment to the settings of greatest interest. In some cases it isn’t practical or ethical to do an experiment. Consider these questions: Does texting while driving increase the risk of having an accident? Does going to church regularly help people live longer? Does smoking cause lung cancer? It is sometimes possible to build a strong case for causation in the absence of experiments by considering data from observational studies.

When we Can’t do an Experiment Use the following criteria for establishing causation. The association is strong. The association is consistent. Larger values of the explanatory variable are associated with stronger responses. The alleged cause precedes the effect in time. The alleged cause is plausible. Discuss how each of these criteria apply to the observational studies of the relationship between smoking and lung cancer.

Data Ethics Complex issues of data ethics arise when we collect data from people. Here are some basic standards of data ethics that must be obeyed by all studies that gather data from human subjects, both observational studies and experiments. Basic Data Ethics All planned studies must be reviewed in advance by an institutional review board charged with protecting the safety and well-being of the subjects. All individuals who are subjects in a study must give their informed consent before data are collected. All individual data must be kept confidential. Only statistical summaries for groups of subjects may be made public.

Summary and Homework Summary Homework Probs 93, 99, 103 Inference about the population requires that the individuals taking part in a study be randomly selected from the larger population. A well-designed experiment that randomly assigns treatments to experimental units allows inference about cause-and-effect. Lack of realism in an experiment can prevent us from generalizing its results. In the absence of an experiment, good evidence of causation requires a strong association that appears consistently in many studies, a clear explanation for the alleged causal link, and careful examination of possible lurking variables. Studies involving humans must be screened in advance by an institutional review board. All participants must give their informed consent, and any information about the individuals must be kept confidential. Homework Probs 93, 99, 103