Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
The Structure of a Bcl-xL/Bim Fragment Complex
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
The Structure of a Bcl-xL/Bim Fragment Complex
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Substrate Recognition Mechanism of Atypical Protein Kinase Cs Revealed by the Structure of PKCι in Complex with a Substrate Peptide from Par-3  Chihao.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Structure of DDB1 in Complex with a Paramyxovirus V Protein: Viral Hijack of a Propeller Cluster in Ubiquitin Ligase  Ti Li, Xiujuan Chen, Kenneth C.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Rab35/ACAP2 and Rab35/RUSC2 Complex Structures Reveal Molecular Basis for Effector Recognition by Rab35 GTPase  Lin Lin, Yingdong Shi, Mengli Wang, Chao.
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 1602-1611 (September 2013) Crystal Structures of Botulinum Neurotoxin DC in Complex with Its Protein Receptors Synaptotagmin I and II  Ronnie Per-Arne Berntsson, Lisheng Peng, Linda Marie Svensson, Min Dong, Pål Stenmark  Structure  Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 1602-1611 (September 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.06.026 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of the BoNT/DC-HC ⋅ Syt Complex (A) Cartoon representation of the overall structure of BoNT/DC-HC bound with the Syt-II peptide containing the toxin binding site. The bound Syt-II peptide (orange) forms an α helix and docks to the C-terminal region of BoNT/DC-HCC. The residues involved in the GBS and GBL are shown in green and red, respectively. (B and C) Enlargement of the Syt-II (B) and of the Syt-I (C) binding sites. Electron density for Syt is shown in light blue mesh (SigmaA-weighted 2FO – FC map, contoured at 1 σ), with the modeled Syt-II and Syt-I (orange and teal, respectively). The start and end of each peptide is marked in the figure. The remaining residues of Syt-II and Syt-I are disordered and are not visible in the structure. Structure 2013 21, 1602-1611DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.06.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Interactions between BoNT/DC and Syt-I/II (A) A close-up view of the binding interface between BoNT/DC (gray) and Syt-II (orange). All directly interacting residues are shown as sticks. Violet residues at the Syt binding site were selected for mutagenesis studies as described in (E). (B) Close-up view of the binding interface between BoNT/DC and Syt-I (teal), with the same coloring as in (A). E45, marked with a red star, is the only residue that is different between human and rat Syt-I. E45 is, as seen here, not involved in the binding to the toxin. (C) Surface representation of the Syt-II binding site of BoNT/DC (gray), with bound Syt II (orange) and the hydrophobic residues of BoNT/DC that form the Syt-II binding site shown in green. (D) Comparison of Syt-I and Syt-II bound to BoNT/DC, as seen when superimposing only the BoNT/DC protein chains upon each other. The hydrophobic face of the amphipathic Syt helices, as seen from the BoNT/DC binding site, with the three differences in the binding region between Syt-I and Syt-II highlighted. The other differences between the two isoforms are located in the hydrophilic face of the helix that facing away from the binding site and are not involved in the binding to BoNT/DC. (E) Upper panel: mutated BoNT/DC-HC were used to pull down native Syt-I/II from rat brain detergent (Triton X-100) extracts. Wild-type (WT) BoNT/DC-HC and GST protein were assayed in parallel as controls. Bound Syt-I/II were detected via immunoblot using their specific antibodies. GST-tagged BoNT/DC-HCs used in pull-down assays were visualized by Coomassie blue staining to indicate equal loading. Lower panel: binding of Syt-I/II to BoNT/DC-HC mutants was quantified and normalized to the amount of binding to WT BoNT/DC-HC. The error bars represent the SEM. See also Figure S2 for a sequence alignment of Syt isoforms. See also Figure S1 for (1) CD spectra illustrating that the mutations in BoNT/DC-HC does not induce any major structural changes and (2) for a schematic overview of the two binding sites. Structure 2013 21, 1602-1611DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.06.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 BoNT/DC Utilizes a Different Syt-II Binding Site Compared to BoNT/B (A) The structure comparison between BoNT/DC (gray) ⋅ Syt-II (orange) complex and BoNT/B (green) ⋅ Syt-II (yellow). The right panel is an enlarged view of the Syt-II binding sites in BoNT/DC (gray) and BoNT/B (green), with Syt-II peptide bound to BoNT/DC labeled in orange and Syt-II peptide bound to BoNT/B labeled in yellow. The N- and C-terminal residues of the toxin binding site in Syt-II are marked. The Syt-II binding sites in BoNT/DC and BoNT/B are rotated approximately 90° from each other. The C-terminal ends of Syt-II (E57 in BoNT/DC ⋅ Syt-II and K60 in BoNT/B ⋅ Syt-II) are in close vicinity of each other. (B) Schematic overview of the interactions between BoNT/DC and BoNT/B to Syt-II. Solid lines represent hydrophobic contacts, dotted black lines represent hydrogen bonds, and red dashed lines represent salt bridges. Syt-II residues are color coded: cyan indicates binding to BoNT/DC only, green indicates binding to BoNT/B only, and red indicates residues contribute to binding of both BoNT/DC and B. See also Figure S2 for a sequence comparison between Syt isoforms from different species. Structure 2013 21, 1602-1611DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.06.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 BoNT/DC Comparison with BoNT/C (A) Surface representation of BoNT/DC (left panel) and BoNT/C (right panel), with hydrophilic surface in blue and hydrophobic in green. The Syt-II recognition sequence bound to BoNT/DC is shown in both figures. It is clear that Syt-II cannot bind to BoNT/C, due to a lack of the important hydrophobic patch found in BoNT/DC, as well as steric clashes. (B) Superimposing BoNT/C-HC (cyan) ⋅ sialic acid complex with BoNT/DC-HC (gray) ⋅ Syt-II (orange) complex. The ganglioside GT1b (green) was also modeled onto established ganglioside binding site (GBS) based on the previously determined BoNT/A-GT1b structure (PDB code: 2VU9). The biologically relevant sialic acid moiety, cocrystallized together with BoNT/C, is shown in blue. The ganglioside binding loop (GBL) is shown in red. (C) Close-up view of the Sia-1 sites in BoNT/C (cyan) and BoNT/DC (gray). Conserved residues in BoNT/DC are marked in the figure, and possible hydrogen bonds between the sialic acid and BoNT/DC are shown as dashed lines. The Sia-1 site is highly conserved between BoNT/C and BoNT/DC. See also Figure S3 for a structure-based sequence alignment of BoNT/DC-HC and BoNT/C-HC. Structure 2013 21, 1602-1611DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.06.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A Model of BoNT/DC Binding to Its Neuronal Receptors BoNT/DC-HC (gray) and the Syt-II peptide (orange) come from data presented here. The ganglioside binding loop (GBL) is shown in red. The rest of the BoNT structure, HN (purple) and light chain (pink), is modeled onto the DC structure using the previously determined BoNT/B structure (PDB code: 2NP0). The ganglioside (green) is modeled based on the BoNT/A-GT1b structure (PDB code: 2VU9), and the potential second ganglioside (blue) is superimposed to the sialic acid moiety in the Sia-1 site of BoNT/C (PDB code: 3R4S). The transmembrane section of Syt-II is shown as a yellow box. Structure 2013 21, 1602-1611DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.06.026) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions