Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Advertisements

BamA POTRA Domain Interacts with a Native Lipid Membrane Surface
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Lionel Costenaro, J. Günter Grossmann, Christine Ebel, Anthony Maxwell 
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e2 (November 2017)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Structure and Plasticity of Endophilin and Sorting Nexin 9
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e6 (January 2018)
Structure and Plasticity of Endophilin and Sorting Nexin 9
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
XLF Regulates Filament Architecture of the XRCC4·Ligase IV Complex
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
The Exomer Cargo Adaptor Features a Flexible Hinge Domain
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Deciphering the “Fuzzy” Interaction of FG Nucleoporins and Transport Factors Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering  Samuel Sparks, Deniz B. Temel, Michael.
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Structural Insights into the pH-Dependent Conformational Change and Collagen Recognition of the Human Mannose Receptor  Zhenzheng Hu, Xiangyi Shi, Bowen.
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Crystal Structure of Human Seryl-tRNA Synthetase and Ser-SA Complex Reveals a Molecular Lever Specific to Higher Eukaryotes  Xiaoling Xu, Yi Shi, Xiang-Lei.
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Conformational Plasticity of the Immunoglobulin Fc Domain in Solution
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Miklos Guttman, Patrick Weinkam, Andrej Sali, Kelly K. Lee  Structure 
XLF Regulates Filament Architecture of the XRCC4·Ligase IV Complex
An Efficient Null Model for Conformational Fluctuations in Proteins
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1492-1501 (November 2010) Structure and Flexibility of the Complete Periplasmic Domain of BamA: The Protein Insertion Machine of the Outer Membrane  Petia Zvezdanova Gatzeva-Topalova, Lisa Rosa Warner, Arthur Pardi, Marcelo Carlos Sousa  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1492-1501 (November 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2010 18, 1492-1501DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Crystal Structure of BamA POTRA4-5 (A) Overall structure of POTRA5 (green) and its superposition with the other four POTRA domains of BamA (gray). Unique features in POTRA3, a 10 amino acid insertion in L2 and a β-bulge in β2, are highlighted in yellow. Three amino acid deletions in L3 in both POTRA1 and POTRA5 are highlighted in red. (B) Superposition of the two molecules in the crystallographic asymmetric unit (chains A and B). For chain A POTRA4 is shown in salmon and POTRA5 in green. Chain B is shown in gray. In both cases, the POTRA4-5 fragment adopts an L-shaped conformation. (C) Interface between POTRA4 (salmon) and POTRA5 (green) shown with the Van der Waals surface semitransparent. Secondary structure elements are shown in cartoon representation, and interacting residues are shown as sticks with hydrogen bond interactions as red dotted lines. See also Table S1. Structure 2010 18, 1492-1501DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Solution NMR Structure of BamA POTRA4-5 (A) A representative subset of the starting pool of randomized structures used to fit the experimental RDCs. POTRA4 (salmon) domains of all structures are superimposed to show the extent of structural variability in the starting pool. (B) Family of low energy NMR structures (in gray) superimposed with the X-ray structure showing good agreement between solution and crystal structures. See also Figures S1 and S2. Structure 2010 18, 1492-1501DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Solution Small Angle X-ray Scattering Structure of BamA POTRA4-5 (A) Experimental (red) and theoretical (blue) scattering curves for BamA POTRA4-5. Theoretical scattering was computed using the crystal structure coordinates for chain A of POTRA4-5. (B) Comparison of the P(r) functions calculated from the experimental (red) and coordinate-derived (blue) scattering curves for BamA POTRA4-5. (C) Two views, related by a 90° rotation, of the averaged ab initio reconstruction of the BamA POTRA4-5 molecular envelope calculated by GASBOR from the SAXS data (semitransparent gray surface) superimposed on the crystal structure of POTRA4-5 (cartoon representation, POTRA4-salmon, POTRA5-green). See also Figure S3A. Structure 2010 18, 1492-1501DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Spliced Models of the Complete Periplasmic Domain of BamA Spliced models for the “extended” (A) and “bent” (B) conformations of the BamA periplasmic domain generated by superimposing POTRA4 from in the POTRA4-5 fragment with POTRA4 in the POTRA1-4 structures PDB ID: 3EFC (Gatzeva-Topalova et al., 2008) and PDB ID: 2QCZ (Kim et al., 2007), respectively. Structure 2010 18, 1492-1501DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Solution Small Angle X-ray Scattering Structure of BamA POTRA3-5 (A) Experimental (red) and theoretical scattering curves for BamA POTRA3-5. Theoretical scattering was computed using the spliced model for POTRA3-5. (B) Comparison of the P(r) functions calculated from the experimental (red) and theoretical (blue) scattering curves for the BamA POTRA3-5 fragment. (C) Two views, related by a 90° rotation, of the averaged ab initio reconstruction of the BamA POTRA3-5 molecular envelope calculated by GASBOR from the SAXS data (semitransparent gray surface) superimposed on the spliced model of POTRA3-5 (cartoon representation). See also Figure S3B. Structure 2010 18, 1492-1501DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 SAXS Analysis of the Periplasmic Domain of BamA (POTRA1-5) (A) Comparison of experimental (black) and theoretical scattering curves of POTRA1-5. Theoretical scattering curves were calculated based on the “extended” (inset, red) and “bent” (inset, blue) spliced models of BamA periplasmic domain. (B) Comparison of the P(r) functions calculated from the experimental scattering curve (black), the “extended” model (red) and the “bent” model (blue). None of the spliced models fully represents the solution structure of the BamA periplasmic domain. (C) Experimental scattering curve (black) compared to a theoretical scattering curve (green) computed from a “mixture” of the extended and bent conformations (present at 74% and 26%, respectively). The inset shows the P(r) functions calculated from the experimental (black) and theoretical (green) scattering curves. (D) Rg distributions for the initial pool of 10,000 randomized structures of POTRA1-5 used in the Ensemble Optimization Method (black), and the selected optimized ensemble of conformations (purple). The two vertical dashed lines represent the Rg values calculated from the “bent” (blue) and “extended” (red) spliced models of BamA periplasmic domain. See also Figure S3C. Structure 2010 18, 1492-1501DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 BamA and FhaC Structure Superpositions (A) Side and bottom view of FhaC superimposed on the extended conformation of BamA. POTRA5 from the periplasmic domain of BamA in the “extended” conformation was superimposed on POTRA2 of FhaC (in gray). (B) Side and bottom view of FhaC superimposed on the bent conformation of BamA. POTRA5 from the periplasmic domain of BamA in the “bent” conformation superimposed on POTRA2 of FhaC (in gray). The POTRA1 domain of FhaC is removed from the bottom views for clarity. Structure 2010 18, 1492-1501DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.08.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions