OSR-Evanston Standard Research Agreement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative Intellectual Property
Advertisements

The Federal Technology Transfer Process: Licenses and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements ADVANCED LICENSING INSTITUTE AT.
LAPSI 4th Thematic Seminar Muenster, January 27, 2011 Should the information held by research institutions be included in the EU Directive on PSI Re-use?
Negotiating Technology License Agreements Tamara Nanayakkara.
VCOM Conflict of Interest Policy Overview of Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research December 4, 2013.
In Pursuit of Signature: Its a Team Effort! Presented by Patricia Pfister and Lane Campbell Office for Sponsored Research-Evanston August 6, 2012.
FUNDAMENTALS OF CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
WHAT TO EXPECT IN AN EXTERNAL AUDIT OR INVESTIGATION An Overview of External Audit and Investigative Processes Performed by Outside Entities at UCSD.
Clinical Trial Agreements
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Contracting & Research Services (CRS)
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Research Contracts and IP Services TRAINING WORKSHOPS ON HORIZON 2020 – 27 NOV 2014 The Grant Agreement Roger Wallace – Research Contracts & IP Services.
Office of Research Administration Grant and Contract Services (GCS)
Contract Negotiation Thomas E. Walsh, Ph.D. Director, Sponsored Research & Compliance, University of Florida Research Administration Training Series November.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Contract Negotiation Basics for Sponsored Programs
1 SUBAWARDS: CONTRACTING FOR SPECIAL CASES AND COMPLEXITIES April 28, 2008 NCURA Region VI & VII 2008 – Portland, OR Panelists: Derrick Lin, Senior Contract.
UCLA Office of Intellectual Property & Industry Sponsored Research (OIP-ISR) Contracting with Industry: Bridging the Gap between Industry and Universities.
Key Issues in Collaborations with Industry
Industrial Partnerships & Technology Transfer Keeping Your Name Out Of The Gossip Columns Of Nature and Science BC Cancer AgencyJ. D. Litster March 24,
Successfully Negotiating and Administering Industry Projects John Hanold Senior Associate Director Office of Sponsored Programs Barbara Suchanec Director.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
“Behind the Scene ” Research Administration Day 2015 Research Services Office Together we make it happen Research Administration Day May 27, 2015 Roles.
INDUSTRY SPONSORED RESEARCH David Erem University of Kentucky Office of Sponsored Programs.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
“Today, the Department of Veterans Affairs takes credit for the work our researchers did in the past and will do in the future.” Anthony J. Principi Secretary.
Innovative Medicines Initiative Financial and IPR aspects Magali Poinot Legal Manager Info Day Bucharest, 10 December 2012.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
NOVEMBER 13, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION XI OF APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Research Sponsored by Industry – Putting an Agreement in.
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
University Negotiations with Industry Bobby C. McQuiston The University of Texas at Austin.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Strategic Alliances How to Structure, Negotiate, and Implement Successful Alliances February 11, 2003 Debra J. Dorfman Copyright © 2003 by Hale and Dorr.
Heather Gallant, Coordinator, Business Development, Contracts, Technology Transfer ext 7521 Contracts, Contracts,
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
Safeguarding Research Data Policy and Implementation Challenges Miguel Soldi February 24, 2006 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM.
BUSINESS AFFAIRS – CONTRACTS TRAINING PROCESSING CONTRACTS THROUGH WSU’s OFFICE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRS.
Intellectual Property Know-How for University Research Administrators Gregory C. Slack Director of Research and Technology Transfer.
Getting to “Yes” in University IP Licensing: Mock Negotiation Workshop October 25, 2012 Presented by Jim Singer Brienne Terril.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Key Legal Considerations for Agencies Wake Forest Business School Charlotte Campus June 12, 2013.
ip4inno Module 4C IP Licensing Name of SpeakerVenue & Date.
FYAP WORKSHOP MAY 5, 2016 The Award Process (Negotiation & Acceptance) Russ Lentz Associate Director, Sponsored Research Administration.
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
Technology Transfer Office
Lecture 28 Intellectual Property(Cont’d)
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
Clinical Trial Contracts Office -What’s the Hold Up?
Partnering with Business and Industry
Export Controls – Export Provisions in Research Agreements
Industry Funded Research - Process for Contracts
Agreements OSR Symposium
All the Things I Didn’t Know I Needed to Know When My Award Came
California State University, Fresno
Presentation transcript:

OSR-Evanston Standard Research Agreement OSR-Evanston Quarterly Network Tuesday, November 19, 2013 Ben Frey Senior Contract and Grant Officer Office for Sponsored Research, Evanston Campus

Why have a Standard Research Agreement? A predictable starting point for negotiations offering terms favorable to the University Helps set sponsor expectations about the business and legal framework of a nonprofit, tax-exempt educational institution working in the public interest Sponsors commonly request them And sign them! It is negotiable…to a degree

Research Agreement Components Statement of Work Budget Research agreement It is important that each component “talks” to the others!

Starting Questions What kind of sponsor is it? Industry Is federal or state funding involved? (Not always obvious!) International Has Northwestern dealt with the sponsor in the past? Will Northwestern be able to publish the research results? Who owns the results, deliverables, and inventions? Is this fundamental, unclassified research, suitable for Northwestern?

Overarching Goals Facilitate successful relationships with a range of sponsors University currently focusing on corporate-funded sponsored research Disseminate results Own intellectual property and use for academic/research purposes Leverage IP in commercial market (INVO helps here) Limit University liability Mitigate costs and risk in future disputes

Standard Research Agreement Terms Funding/Payment Intellectual Property Confidentiality Publication Termination Indemnification / Liability Publicity Notice Miscellaneous

Funding Terms Cost-Reimbursable (preferred) Fixed-Price Best suited for open-ended, hypothesis-driven research Northwestern is paid on the basis of invoices representing financial information (expenditures) Least risky contract type for Northwestern Fixed-Price More like commercial transaction Northwestern is paid on the basis of invoices representing technical information (deliverables) 50% up front, 40% upon milestone, remainder when we complete Risk of exceeding budget to provide deliverables (such as re-performance obligations, etc.)

Freedom to Publish Northwestern subscribes to the principles of academic freedom stated by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Professors entitled to full freedom in research and in the publication of results, subject to the adequate performance of their academic duties Freedom to publish serves the scientific community as a whole, as well as the public Northwestern’s need to publish can present challenges in working with industry, but not usually insurmountable

Publication Terms Unrestricted right to publish methods, data, and results of research in academic and scholarly publications Research results cannot be designated sponsor “confidential information” Reasonable period for sponsor to review materials before publication (≤90 days) Sponsor cannot edit or influence results Distinction between publication/publicity

Confidentiality Terms It is necessary sometimes for confidential information to be exchanged as part of the performance of a research project Scope of the confidential information provided should not be overly broad Must be marked in writing as confidential when disclosed, or shortly thereafter Finite period for disclosing and protecting confidential information Sponsor may review intended publications for a limited time period to ensure no confidential information is being released Occasionally, parties enter into a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) in advance of the research agreement

Intellectual Property Terms Northwestern is the sole owner of the inventions Northwestern personnel solely create Sponsor is the sole owner of the inventions sponsor personnel solely create Northwestern and Sponsor are joint owners of the inventions jointly created by Northwestern and Sponsor personnel Each party presumed to own its own background IP

Intellectual Property Terms Northwestern (INVO) handles patent prosecution for Northwestern and joint inventions Generally, if a sponsor wants a patent filed, it pays the relevant fees Otherwise, Northwestern can file a patent application at its own expense Flexibility on who handles/pays for prosecution

Intellectual Property Terms In exchange for funding research, sponsors commonly expect/receive a non-exclusive, royalty-free (“NERF”) license Option to negotiate exclusive royalty-bearing license NU license may set geographic or field-of-use restrictions Northwestern MUST retain license rights to use inventions for research and educational purposes May have rights under Bayh-Dole Act

Termination Terms Each party should be able to terminate freely (“for convenience”) with reasonable notice Sponsor pays non-cancelable obligations (often personnel costs The termination of a sponsored research project is uncommon

Liability Terms Work done on a reasonable efforts or best efforts basis Northwestern makes no representations or warranties about the work done under the project; research results are provided “as-is” Northwestern’s liability limited to the value of the research agreement Sponsor indemnifies Northwestern for either party’s actions other than Northwestern’s gross negligence At minimum, Northwestern should not be liable for Sponsor’s actions

Export Control Terms Northwestern conducts research openly; no sensitive or classified work The ability to publish freely underpins this As do the University’s non-discrimination policies Increasing work under government contracts, international collaborations and industry sponsorship can more often raise export control issues Fundamental Research Exclusion Coordination with new Office for Export Controls Compliance (OECC), led by Lane Campbell, Director

Other Terms Governing law: Illinois state law or leave unspecified Dispute resolution: Arbitration preferred Jurisdiction: Illinois or leave unspecified

How Flexible Is This Agreement? Not intended to cover all circumstances and projects Starting point for negotiations; the sponsor may also have their preferred (or inflexible) terms Publication terms are largely non-negotiable, except for logistics IP terms may be more flexible and will depend on the statement of work, technology and business issues Legal terms reflect Northwestern’s nonprofit status; disclaimer of warranty and limitation of liability very important Opportunities must be weighed with risks Agreement risks may require PI, department chair and dean’s office approval/guarantee

Tips for Agreement Processing Agreements are most easily processed by OSR when we were involved at the proposal stage Please forward the statement of work and budget to OSR along with your agreement request or draft Feel free to flag any issues of concern to OSR InfoEd agreement screens and GM055s can provide updated information on the status of your agreement

Questions?