M. Rumman Hossain BIOL 506 Fall 2011 Class Presentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Methods to read out regulatory functions
Advertisements

Epigenetic Effects Are Inherited
Special Topics in Modern Genetics: Epigenetics
CTCF maintains differential methylation at the Igf2/H19 locus Christopher J. Schoenherr, John M. Levorse & Shirley M. Tilghman Nat Genet Jan;33(1):66-9.
Chapter 14 – The Human Genome
Epigenetics: Genomic imprinting. Genomic Imprinting Preferential expression (or repression) of one parental allele Epigenetic modification mechanism (CpG.
Wilhelm Engström Professor of General Pathology Uppsala
Chapter 15 Controls over Genes. When DNA Can’t Be Fixed? Changes in DNA are triggers for skin cancer, like the most deadly type– malignant melanoma Cancers:
CTCF and Imprinting Disorder Preeti Misra Sang-Gook Han.
Special Topics in Modern Genetics: Epigenetics Honors Genetics Ms. Susan Chabot.
Regulation of Gene Expression. You Must Know The functions of the three parts of an operon. The role of repressor genes in operons. The impact of DNA.
Gene Expression. Cell Differentiation Cell types are different because genes are expressed differently in them. Causes:  Changes in chromatin structure.
Eukaryotic Genomes  The Organization and Control of Eukaryotic Genomes.
Today: Genomic Imprinting and Epigenetics. haploid diploid X 23 in humans X 23 in humans X 23 in humans Inheritance = The interaction between genes inherited.
Today: some things Mendel did not tell us... Exam #3 T 12/2 in class, Final Sat. 12/6.
Trends Biomedical Science
 We need to look into cells for the answer  Analyzing chromsomes enables biologists to look at the human genome  Karyotype is a picture of chromosomes.
Biol 456/656 Molecular Epigenetics Lecture #5 Wed. Sept 2, 2015.
Chapter 19 The Organization & Control of Eukaryotic Genomes.
Molecules and mechanisms of epigenetics. Adult stem cells know their fate! For example: myoblasts can form muscle cells only. Hematopoetic cells only.
Epigenetics Abira Khan. What is Epigenetics?  Histone code: Modifications associated with transcriptional activation- primarily methylation and acetylation-would.
Different microarray applications Rita Holdhus Introduction to microarrays September 2010 microarray.no Aim of lecture: To get some basic knowledge about.
Gene Regulation, Part 2 Lecture 15 (cont.) Fall 2008.
P57(KIP2) and Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Shannon O’Leary.
Warm up  1. How is DNA packaged into Chromosomes?  2. What are pseudogenes?  3. Contrast DNA methylation to histone acetylation (remember the movie.
EPIGENETICS Textbook Fall 2013.
Gene Expression.
Patient VB Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.
Long Noncoding RNA in Prostate, Bladder, and Kidney Cancer
Final noon Thursday May 5
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Bryan K. Sun, Aimée M. Deaton, Jeannie T. Lee  Molecular Cell 
Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. doi: /nrendo
GENETICS A Conceptual Approach
How can a sense transgene generate
Today: Regulating Gene Expression.
Discordance between Genetic and Epigenetic Defects in Pseudohypoparathyroidism Type 1b Revealed by Inconsistent Loss of Maternal Imprinting at GNAS1 
Figure 3 The Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome locus at chromosome 11p15.5
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Addition of H19 ‘Loss of Methylation Testing’ for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS) Increases the Diagnostic Yield  Jochen K. Lennerz, Robert J. Timmerman,
Qing Cheng, Cheng Cheng, Kristine R. Crews, Raul C
Transcriptional Addiction in Cancer
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
Allele-Specific Methylome and Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Widespread Imprinting in the Human Placenta  Hirotaka Hamada, Hiroaki Okae, Hidehiro Toh,
Hannah K. Long, Sara L. Prescott, Joanna Wysocka  Cell 
Shi-Ling Chen, M. D. , M. Sc. , Xiao-Yun Shi, M. D. , M. Sc
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Imprinting at the SMPD1 Locus: Implications for Acid Sphingomyelinase–Deficient Niemann-Pick Disease  Calogera M. Simonaro, Jae-Ho Park, Efrat Eliyahu,
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
GENETICS A Conceptual Approach
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Presentation by: Hannah Mays UCF - BSC 4434 Professor Xiaoman Li
Imprinted Chromatin around DIRAS3 Regulates Alternative Splicing of GNG12-AS1, a Long Noncoding RNA  Malwina Niemczyk, Yoko Ito, Joanna Huddleston, Anna.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Imprinting of Human GRB10 and Its Mutations in Two Patients with Russell-Silver Syndrome  Hiroshi Yoshihashi, Katsuhiro Maeyama, Rika Kosaki, Tsutomu.
Anh Pham Conserved epigenomic signals in mice and humans reveal immune basis of Alzheimer’s disease.
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Epigenetics of Reprogramming to Induced Pluripotency
Genomic imprinting Current Biology
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Denes Hnisz, Daniel S. Day, Richard A. Young  Cell 
Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Human lincRNA Gene Expression
Epigenetics - you may see a videolectures here.
Symmetrical Dose-Dependent DNA-Methylation Profiles in Children with Deletion or Duplication of 7q11.23  Emma Strong, Darci T. Butcher, Rajat Singhania,
CTCF-Dependent Chromatin Insulator Is Linked to Epigenetic Remodeling
Georgina Berrozpe, Gene O. Bryant, Katherine Warpinski, Mark Ptashne 
Qing Cheng, Cheng Cheng, Kristine R. Crews, Raul C
Presentation transcript:

M. Rumman Hossain BIOL 506 Fall 2011 Class Presentation Dated: 21st November 2011

Outline for presentation Background information Objectives Results Discussion Future Research Q & A

Outline for presentation Background information Objectives Results Discussion Future Research Q & A

Background information (BWS) Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is an overgrowth syndrome which affects every child out of every 12000 births There are about three hundred children born with the disease annually in the US. BWS is characterized by increased risk of cancer along with other abnormal oversized growth defects; such as enlarged tongue and limbs (gigantism)

BWS Background (contd.) BWS affects many parts of the body. It is categorized as an overgrowth syndrome, which means that affected infants are considerably larger than normal (macrosomia) and continue to grow and gain weight at an unusual rate during childhood. Growth of the children begin to slow down by the time they are 8 years old. The disease is difficult to diagnose because most of the mutations that cause BWS are de novo. About 15% of the cases are due to familial causes; and research has correlated hypermethylation of the IGF2-H19 locus to be responsible in BWS and the early onset cancer caused by BWS.

Background information (SRS) Silver-Russell Syndrome (SRS)affects 1/3000 to 1/100,000 births. It is one of the two hundred forms of dwarfisms that has been known to exist. Babies with this condition have a low birth weight and often fail to grow and gain weight at the expected rate. Patients tend to grow up to about 4 ft 11 inches (for males), and 4 ft 7 inches (for females). SRS has been attributed to hypomethylation of the IGF2-H19 locus.

Background (Research) The IGF2-H19 locus is located in the telomeric cluster of 11p15.5 IGF2 (Insulin-like growth factor 2) is one of three protein hormones that share structural similarity to insulin. H19 is a gene that codes long noncoding RNA. In both BWS and SRS, the H19 gene is expressed primarily in one parental allele; this occurrence is classified as imprinting. Imprinting is controlled by the imprinting control region (ICR)

Research Background (contd.) The paternal copy of IGF2-H19 locus is methylated while the maternal copy remains unmethylated. Methylation is not allowed on the maternal allele due to binding by the repressor protein, CTCF.

Two types of BWS Along with hypermethylation at the IGF2-H19 locus, BWS has been observed to be caused by paternal uniparental disomy (pUPD), which causes abnormal methylation at both clusters.

Outline for presentation Background information Objectives Results Discussion Future Research Q & A

Objectives The authors were primarily interested in seeing how aberrant methylation patterns affects the overall chromatin structure and long range associations in the neighboring areas of the chromosome. They proceeded to analyze the following: Comparing histone marks at the IGF2-H19 ICR at both BWS and SRS cells CTCF and cohesin binding in BWS and SRS cells CTCF mediated chromatin conformation at the IGF2-H19 locus in normal and pUPD cells CTCF-mediated chromatin conformation in BWS and SRS cell lines with ICR DNA methylation defects

Establishment of patient cell line Patients with BWS and SRS have shown abnormal chromosomal methylations at 11p15.5 ICRs when DNA was taken from peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs). Epstein Barr virus (EBV) lymphoblastoid cell lines (EBV-LCLs), because they tend to maintain DNA methylation at the ICRs over multiple cell cycles, demonstrating that epigenetic methylation are maintained in these cells. The authors used eight BWS patients [five of whom had IGF2-H19 ICR hypermethylation (ICR-HM) and three had 11p15.5 paternal uniparental disomy (pUPD)], and four SRS patients with IGF2-H19 ICR hypomethylation.

Outline for presentation Background information Objectives Results Discussion Future Research Q & A

Comparing histone marks at the IGF2-H19 ICR The DNA that was extracted after chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was used to do allele-specific and quantitative testing, for which they utilized H3K9me3, H4K20me3, H3K27me3, H3K4me2 and H3K9ac antibodies. The DNA from the three fractions (I), input, (M), non-specific IgG control and (C), specific antibody-bound were amplified by using PCR and then digested with the polymorphic HhaI enzyme to distinguish the paternal ICR alleles. After restriction enzyme digestion, the 128 bp PCR products were segmented into two co-migrating 64 bp fragments. Finally the RT-qPCR was performed on the histone marks in control, BWS and SRS EBV-LCLs.

Analysis of histone marks Box plots to show maximum, third quartile, median, first quartile and minimum values for each group of samples. In case of BWS, the gain of methylation is associated with acquirement of H3K9me3 and H4K20me3 marks and the loss of H3K27me3, H3K4me2 and H3K9ac on the maternal allele. In case of SRS, the loss of DNA methylation is correlated with the loss of H3K9me3 and H4K20me3 and the gain of H3K27me3, H3K4me2 and H3K9ac marks on the paternal allele

CTCF and cohesin binding Allele-specific ChIP was used to demonstrate that CTCF and the cohesin subunits RAD21 and SMC3 were specifically associated with maternal allele which was non-methylated in the control cells.

CTCF and cohesin RT-qPCR RT-qPCR was used to show that CTCF and cohesin binding was reduced in all hypermethylated BWS cells along with pUPD cells, however, increased in SRS cells. CTCF and cohesin are absent in both parental allele in BWS and present in both alleles in case of SRS.

Neonate fibroblast cell line (HS27) was used as the normal cell line Neonate fibroblast cell line (HS27) was used as the normal cell line. The HS27 cell line consists of two important SNPs within the CTCF DS which allowed the authors to determine parental-specific interactions to the CTCF DS loops by sequencing the products from Figure 3C

Overall looping pattern

Looping profile of BWS-pUPD Looping profile of a single patient with BWS-pUPD using CTCF DS as the anchor in Fig. 4B and ICR as anchor in 4C. There is a stronger interaction between CTCF DS and the CCD or the CTCF AD, while there is a weaker interaction between CTCF DS and the ICR and enhancer. Confirms that CTCF DS interacts with the ICR from the maternal chromosome and with the CTCF AD and CCD from the paternal chromosome.

Looping profile of BWS-HM Looping profile of a single patient with BWS-pUPD using CTCF DS as the anchor in Fig. 4B and ICR as anchor in 4C. With CTCF DS as the anchor, there is strong interaction between CTCF DS and the CCD compared with the control With ICR as the anchor, weaker interaction between ICR and the CTCF DS.

Looping profile of SRS Looping profile with the CTCF DS as anchor exhibits strong interaction within SRS cells with CTCF DS and the ICR. When the ICR is the anchor, there is also strong interaction between ICR and CTCF DS. These findings tell us that higher order chromatin conformation of the IGF2-H19 locus is connected with DNA methylation and histone mark formation.

Outline for presentation Background information Objectives Results Discussion Future Research Q & A

Discussion/Conclusion Histone modifications at the IGF2-H19 ICR are present in humans on a parent of origin basis. H3K4me2 and H3K9ac marks are present on the non-methylated maternal allele and the H3K9me3 and H4K20me3 marks are present on the methylated paternal allele. CTCF binds to cohesin at locations other than the ICR is not dependent on the methylation state of the ICR. The long range interactions within the IGF2-H19 locus are dependent on the asymmetric histone marks and DNA methylation. Localized changes at the genetic level within a small area can lead to diseases in humans.

Outline for presentation Background information Objectives Results Discussion Future Research Q & A

Future Research Cells from a larger patient body can used to determine whether findings from this paper are relevant to a wider population. Some of the patient samples for this study did not possess any mutations at 11p15.5. They would be a good target to test for the effects of mutations and aberrant methylation of the different CTCF binding sites, and how those mutations and aberrations affect expression of the IGF2-H19 locus. The control cells for a lot of the experiments in this paper used HS27 to represent normal cells, and the EBV-LCLs from BWS and SRS patients for the cells under scrutiny. Since mutations at the IGF2-H19 locus has been linked to tumors in BWS patients, future research using actual cells from families with BWS and SRS would also provide interesting information about the IGF2-H19 locus.

Outline for presentation Background information Objectives Results Discussion Future Research Q & A

Questions