Topological quantum computing ▬ Toric code

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Henry Haselgrove School of Physical Sciences University of Queensland
Advertisements

Protected edge modes without symmetry Michael Levin University of Maryland.
Identifying universal phases for measurement-based quantum computing Stephen Bartlett in collaboration with Andrew Doherty (UQ)
Sergey Bravyi, IBM Watson Center Robert Raussendorf, Perimeter Institute Perugia July 16, 2007 Exactly solvable models of statistical physics: applications.
Exploring Topological Phases With Quantum Walks $$ NSF, AFOSR MURI, DARPA, ARO Harvard-MIT Takuya Kitagawa, Erez Berg, Mark Rudner Eugene Demler Harvard.
Anyon and Topological Quantum Computation Beijing Normal university
Funded by NSF, Harvard-MIT CUA, AFOSR, DARPA, MURI Takuya Kitagawa Harvard University Mark Rudner Harvard University Erez Berg Harvard University Yutaka.
Non-Abelian Anyon Interferometry Collaborators:Parsa Bonderson, Microsoft Station Q Alexei Kitaev, Caltech Joost Slingerland, DIAS Kirill Shtengel, UC.
Twist liquids and gauging anyonic symmetries
Fractional topological insulators
Jordan-Wigner Transformation and Topological characterization of quantum phase transitions in the Kitaev model Guang-Ming Zhang (Tsinghua Univ) Xiaoyong.
Revealing anyonic statistics by multiphoton entanglement Jiannis K. Pachos Witlef Wieczorek Christian Schmid Nikolai Kiesel Reinhold Pohlner Harald Weinfurter.
On the energy landscape of 3D spin Hamiltonians with topological order Sergey Bravyi (IBM) Jeongwan Haah (Caltech) FRG Workshop, Cambridge, MA May 18,
Schrödinger’s Elephants & Quantum Slide Rules A.M. Zagoskin (FRS RIKEN & UBC) S. Savel’ev (FRS RIKEN & Loughborough U.) F. Nori (FRS RIKEN & U. of Michigan)
In Search of a Magic Bottle of Error-Be-Gone Dave Bacon Caltech Department of Physics Institute for Quantum Information Decoherence errosol.
Topological Insulators and Beyond
Study of Quantum Phase Transition in Topological phases in U(1) x U(1) System using Monte-Carlo Simulation Presenter : Jong Yeon Lee.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Quantum Information Group School of Physics and Astronomy Spectrum of the non-abelian phase in Kitaev's honeycomb.
6. Second Quantization and Quantum Field Theory
Superglasses and the nature of disorder-induced SI transition
Simulation for the feature of non-Abelian anyons in quantum double model using quantum state preparation Jinhua Aug 14, 2012 Zheng-Wei Zhou( 周正威) Key Lab.
Anatoli Polkovnikov Krishnendu Sengupta Subir Sachdev Steve Girvin Dynamics of Mott insulators in strong potential gradients Transparencies online at
A Novel Algebraic Approach to Quantum and Classical Dualities Emilio Cobanera Department of Physics - Indiana University DESY Theory Workshop 2010 Gerardo.
Quantum Glassiness and Topological Overprotection Quantum Glassiness and Topological Overprotection Claudio Chamon DMR PRL 05, cond-mat/
1 The Topological approach to building a quantum computer. Michael H. Freedman Theory Group Microsoft Research.
Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions
CENTER FOR EXOTIC QUANTUM SYSTEMS CEQS Preskill 1983 Kitaev 2002 Refael 2005 Motrunich 2006 Fisher 2009 Historically, Caltech physics has focused on the.
Ady Stern (Weizmann) Papers: Stern & Halperin , PRL
A Monomial matrix formalism to describe quantum many-body states Maarten Van den Nest Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics Montreal, October 19 th 2011.
Discrete R-symmetry anomalies in heterotic orbifold models Hiroshi Ohki Takeshi Araki Kang-Sin Choi Tatsuo Kobayashi Jisuke Kubo (Kyoto univ.) (Kanazawa.
A simple nearest-neighbour two-body Hamiltonian system for which the ground state is a universal resource for quantum computation Stephen Bartlett Terry.
Entangling Quantum Virtual Subsytems Paolo Zanardi ISI Foundation February Universita’di Milano.
Entanglement and Topological order in 1D & 2D cluster states
F Matrix: F F F F F Pentagon Fusion rules: 1x1 = 0+1; 1x0 = 0x1 = 1; 0x0 = 0 Fibonacci anyon with topological “charge” 1.
Topological Quantum Computing
Hidden topological order in one-dimensional Bose Insulators Ehud Altman Department of Condensed Matter Physics The Weizmann Institute of Science With:
The Puzzling Boundaries of Topological Quantum Matter Michael Levin Collaborators: Chien-Hung Lin (University of Chicago) Chenjie Wang (University of Chicago)
Entanglement and Topological order in self-dual cluster states Vlatko Vedral University of Oxford, UK & National University of Singapore.
Entanglement Entropy In Gauge Theories Sandip Trivedi Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
Gauge independence of Abelian dual Meissner effect in pure SU(2) QCD Katsuya Ishiguro Y.Mori, T.Sekido, T.Suzuki Kanazawa-univ & RIKEN Joint Meeting of.
1 The 5/2 Edge IPAM meeting on Topological Quantum Computing February 26- March 2, 2007 MPA Fisher, with Paul Fendley and Chetan Nayak Motivation: FQHE:
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Dept. ECM, UB 16 de maig de 2009 Intoduction to topological order and topologial quantum computation.
Systems of Identical Particles
Quantum Mechanical Models for Near Extremal Black Holes
Local convertibility in a quantum quench
From fractionalized topological insulators to fractionalized Majoranas
STRING THEORY AND M-THEORY: A Modern Introduction
Information-Theoretical Analysis of the Topological Entanglement Entropy and Multipartite correlations Kohtaro Kato (The University of Tokyo) based on.
Stabilizer codes and a self-correcting quantum memory
Quantum phase transitions in Kitaev spin models
On MPS and PEPS… David Pérez-García. Near Chiemsee
Quantum One.
Topological Order and its Quantum Phase Transition
Chapter 4 Two-Level Systems.
Quantum Two.
Charging and noise as probes of non-abelian quantum Hall states
Non- Abelian Quantum Hall States:
QM2 Concept test 8.1 We have three non-interacting particles in a one-dimensional infinite square well. The energy of the three particle system is
Quantum mechanics II Winter 2012
QM1 Concept test 1.1 Consider an ensemble of hydrogen atoms all in the ground state. Choose all of the following statements that are correct. If you make.
Quantum Computing: the Majorana Fermion Solution
SOC Fermi Gas in 1D Optical Lattice —Exotic pairing states and Topological properties 中科院物理研究所 胡海平 Collaborators : Chen Cheng, Yucheng Wang, Hong-Gang.
Spectra and decays of hybrid charmonia
LECTURE 15.
QM2 Concept test 3.1 Choose all of the following statements that are correct about bosons. (1) The spin of a boson is an integer. (2) The overall wavefunction.
Topological Magnon Bands in AFM limit of Shastry-Sutherland Lattice
QM2 Concept test 8.1 We have three non-interacting particles in a one-dimensional infinite square well. The energy of the three particle system is
in collaboration with Andrew Doherty (UQ)
QM2 Concept Test 10.1 Consider the Hamiltonian
Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions
Presentation transcript:

Topological quantum computing ▬ Toric code Duanlu Zhou Institute of Physics, CAS July 2007, Shanxi

Outline Motivation The system Ground states Excited states Topological protection Discussion

Motivation Make quantum computation robust in the presence of local perturbations. (Avoid error). Characterize many-body states beyond the picture of order parameter. Today I will give a detailed analyses of the toric code model (simple, but containing rich physics).

The system Periodic boundary condition s p Torus Edge: 8*6+8*6=96 (2 N_1 N_2) Vertex: 8*6=48 (N_1 N_2) Plaquette: 8*6=48 (N_1 N_2) An edge (NOT a vertex) denotes a qubit (a ½ spin) , described by A. Kitaev, quant-ph/9707021, Annals of physics 303, 2 (2003).

Vertex operator and plaquette operator For each vertex s, For each plaquette p, The properties of the vertex operator and plaquette operator: Eigenvalues: +1 or -1 These operators have common eigenvectors.

The Hamiltonian The ground states satisfy Note that for any set S of vertexes and any set P of plaquettes, The stabilizer group The number of the generators of the stabilizer group is 94. (2 N_1 N_2 -2)

The geometric picture The subgroup Reducible loop

Winding number =2 independent? Irreducible loop Winding number =2 independent?

Dual lattice lattice dual lattice vertex plaquette plaquette vertex

Irreducible loop on dual lattice

Properties of irreducible loop operators The generator of a new stabilizer group: The 4-fold degenerate ground states:

Operations among ground states Local spin flip Any operator on the subspace of ground states can be expanded as Except 1, the length of all the terms is not less than min{N_1,N_2}.

Excited states “Electric charge” type “magnetic flux” type Always creates pairs of excitation for both types Excited energy spectrum Degeneracy 2 4

How to create excitations? --- open string operator 1 2 The same effect A pair of “electric charges” are excited.

How to move excitation? 2 1 3 Similarly, we can excite and move “magnetic flux” type of excitation by the open string operator on the dual lattice.

Statistical properties of excitation --- Braiding 2+1 dimension

Braiding of electric charge 5 3 1 2 4 Note that “Electric charge” type excitations are bosons.

Electric charge go around magnetic flux 3 2 1 Note that

Fusion rules (Splitting rules) a b c

Braiding of composite excitation 5 3 1 2 4 Composite excitations are fermions.

Topological protection Energy gap between ground states and excited states ensures that perturbation has effects on the subspace of ground states. Any local perturbation has little effect on the subspace of ground states.

Discussions Boundary condition of the toric code model Abelian and non-abelian anyons Non-abelian anyons are necessary to process universal quantum computation. Possible physical realizations: Quantum Hall system Kitaev model 2 (beyond)

Edge state s p The topological excitation types can be obtained by measuring the edge states.

Summary We analyze the toric code model in detail. Especially, we emphasize some basic concepts in topological quantum computation.

Thank you!