Contracts Interpretation of Terms

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Validity and Formation of International Sales Contracts (I) I. What does the CISG govern II. The writing requirement III. Enforcement of illegal contract.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 17 Contracts: Writing, Electronic Forms, and Interpretation of.
Parol Evidence Rule in retrospect A PER issue is raised when a party seeks to prove – agreement that preceded writing or oral agreement from time of writing,
Commercial Law (Mgmt 348) Professor Charles H. Smith The Statute of Frauds-Writing Requirement (Chapter 15) Spring 2009.
Chapter 14 Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions
Parol Evidence Rule Contracts – Prof. Merges March 14, 2011.
Contract Law for Paralegals: Traditional and E-Contracts © 2009 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All rights reserved Writing and E-Commerce.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 14 Writing and Formality Chapter 14 Writing and Formality.
CHAPTERCHAPTER McGraw-Hill/Irwin©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Rules of Construction NINENINE.
Business Law Chapter 8: Contract Clauses. Introduction to Contract Clauses A contract clause is simply a statement contained in a contract. –Clause: A.
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
Chapter 16 Form of Contract Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany.
The Statute of Frauds - Certain types of contracts must be written to be enforceable.
The Statute of Frauds Chapter 6. The Statute of Frauds To be enforceable, the following types of contracts must be in writing and signed: Contracts involving.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
CHAPTER 14 INTERPRETATION OF THE CONTRACT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THIRD PERSONS DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles.
Construction Engineering 380 Contract Interpretation.
What is a contract? What is the objective theory of contracts? What is a contract? What is the objective theory of contracts? What are the four basic.
Chapter 11 Interpretation and Third Parties. I. Interpretation and Legislation.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 14 Contracts: Statute of Frauds Chapter 14 Contracts: Statute of Frauds.
Comprehensive Volume, 18 th Edition Chapter 17: Form of Paper and Electronic Contracts.
©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 15: Contracts—The Statute of Frauds.
Chapter 24 Nature and Forms of Sales Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 12 Contracts in Writing and Third- Party Contracts.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
3/2/2006Class 231 Class 23, Thursday, March 2 Announcements FridayEssay Midterm. 80 minutes. One fact pattern; one question. Today’s agenda Taylor v. State.
LAW FOR BUSINESS AND PERSONAL USE © SOUTH-WESTERN PUBLISHING Chapter 12Slide 1 How Are Contracts Interpreted? Describe how conflicting oral and written.
Chapter 18 Contracts in Writing Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Chapter 16: Contracts – The Writing Requirement and Electronic Records
The Interpretation of the Contract
STATUTE OF FRAUDS AND EQUITIBLE EXCEPTIONS
Chapter 10 Contracts: Nature and Terminology
Form of a Contract Chapter 12.
Contracts Defenses to Enforcement
Contract Damages and Remedies
Contract Damages and Remedies
George Mason School of Law
Acceptance – Termination/Revocation
Implied-in-Law Conditions and (contrary) Substantial Performance
Licensing Disputes and Audits
Contracts Rights in Third Parties
Professor Paul J. Carrier
UCC Article 2 Chapter 20 Sale of Goods.
Contract in Writing Required in Some Cases
Chapter 11: Nature and Terminology
Contracts Interpretation of Terms
Ways to Avoid Forfeiture, i.e., Not Apply the Law of Conditions
Contracts Defenses to Enforcement
Contracts Rights in Third Parties
Contracts Rights in Third Parties
Breach of Contract Issues
Contracts Defenses to Enforcement (continued)
Consideration - General
Contracts Rights in Third Parties
Consideration - Substitutes
Acceptance – U.C.C. Sale of Goods – Battle of the Forms
Professor Paul J. Carrier
Professor Paul J. Carrier
Implied-in-Law Terms for Sales of Goods – U.C.C.
Contract Damages and Remedies
Chapter 10 Contracts: Nature and Terminology
Sufficient Specificity of Essential Terms
Creation, Timing of Operation, and Mechanics
Contract Formation – Elements of Formation
Current intent (to accept)
Contracts Interpretation of Terms
STATUTE OF FRAUDS AND EQUITIBLE EXCEPTIONS
Chapter 14 Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions
Presentation transcript:

Contracts Interpretation of Terms Integration and the Parol Evidence Rule Plain Meaning test: if relatively clear or obvious, give a term that meaning (perhaps with e.g., a dictionary). Four Corners test: determine the meaning from other terms within the same document (Williston). Rules of Construction*: use general, legal truisms developed by courts, e.g. construction against the drafter. Holistic test: allow all evidence in, but weigh each for evidentiary value on balance (Corbin, Rest. 2d, U.C.C.). [Give to the Jury]: not a ‘test,’ but an option, esp. re: credibility of witnesses (and evidence) questioned]. The GOAL, not a ‘test,’ is to determine the intent of the parties, using these rules – here, whether a contract is complete, or may be supplemented by other things. One may use the same tests, but on the specific question “Is the contract final, or may other evidence be used to supplement it?” Existence of “entire agreement” or “merger” clauses are good aids for a finding of “fully integrated/do not use parol evidence” but they are not necessarily dispositive. There is partial integration (some parts of an agreement but not all) and also full integration (intent to be entire is to the entire contract). Exceptions: defenses to enforcement, preconditions, subsequent modifications It may prove helpful, though they mean the same thing, to refer to possible contract terms in this case as “parol evidence” (to prove integration or lack thereof) and to use “extrinsic evidence” for other interpretation questions (i.e., of ambiguous terms IN the contract). The Parol Evidence Rule: as to aspects of a contract that are intended to be the full and final expression (can be parts, or entire contract), courts will not admit prior or contemporaneous evidence (phone calls, emails, brochures, etc.) to supplement the contract. Otherwise, prior or contemporaneous, non-contradictory evidence may be used to supplement a contract’s terms. © 2018 Paul J. Carrier, Paul J Carrier, LLC Blue – Category Recognition; White – Specific Category; Yellow – “Black Letter” Rules (to be memorized); Green – Main Factual Issues – Analysis; Red – Upper-Level, Integrated Comprehension