Arsenic in the Soils, USGS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 EPAs 2008 Report on the Environment Denice M. Shaw, PhD U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental.
Advertisements

ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT IN AN ICS STRUCTURE. EU Mission Statement The Environmental Unit is established to provide technical and scientific expertise and capabilities.
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
Defining The Environment & Environmental Health 1.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Risk Assessment.
Copyright 2002 Marc Rigas Issues in Exposure Assessment Marc L. Rigas, Ph.D. National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: Chapter 4 O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry,
Environmental Health Unit: Lesson 1 - Introduction Objective: TSWBAT identify issues of how the environment affects our personal health on a daily basis.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment I (7th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
June 16-19, USEPA Cancer Guidelines: Mode of Carcinogenic Action 1 ICABR – Impacts of the Bioeconomy on Agricultural Sustainability, the Environment.
1 Uncertainty in Ecological Risk Assessments Larry Tannenbaum, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM)
What is Urban Ecology? Notes. Social Factors Interactions between humans Interactions between humans and their environment Health of people Government.
Randall Wentsel, Ph.D. 7 September, Background  Problems  PBT process is based on principles developed for organic substances that do not apply.
IMPROVING SITE CHARACTERIZATION Rhode Island’s Perspective IMPROVING SITE CHARACTERIZATION Rhode Island’s Perspective Overview by Leo Hellested, P.E. Chief.
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS.
Community Health Risk Assessment An Assessment of Risk Related to the Oil and Gas Industry in Garfield County Teresa A. Coons, PhD Senior Scientist Saccomanno.
Dr. Manfred Wentz Director, Hohenstein Institutes (USA) Head, Oeko-Tex Certification Body (USA) AAFA – Environmental Committee Meeting November 10, 2008.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to other receptors.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
Brownfields Health Risks & Remediation Diogo Cadima Topic ‘A’ Term Project CET 413.
From:
Assessing the Public Health Impacts of Contaminated Sites Rick Kreutzer, M.D. California Department of Health Services.
Environmental Processes Partitioning of pollutants 3.iii Sorption in living media (bioavailability)
Introducing Students to Environmental Justice: A North Carolina Case Study Sarah Yelton, MS UNC Superfund Research Program July 18, 2012.
Copyright © 2002 University of Maryland School of Nursing. All rights reserved. Comparison of Pharmacology and Toxicology This material was developed at.
1 Selecting Materials for Understanding the Human Health and Ecological Risks of Nanomaterials Considerations and Approach Justin Teeguarden, PhD., DABT.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Containing Toxicity with Policy Natural Disaster.
DOE ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP Natural Resource Trusteeship John J. Bascietto
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
The Superfund ERA Process. What is Superfund? Superfund was created on December 11, 1980 when Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Public Health Assessment Process Jack Hanley, M.P.H. Environmental Health Scientist Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Porewater: NJDEP Site Remediation Program regulatory perspective
Recommendations for Developing Effective Risk Management Policies for Contaminated Site Cleanup An Overview of Risk Management Concepts and How Risk Management.
Risk Assessment.
BROWNFIELDS: “Financial and Technical Support for Redevelopment” HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS COALITION Presented to: TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE.
REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED LAND IN SOUTH AFRICA Part 8 of the Waste Act Ms Mishelle Govender Chemicals and Waste Management.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety Stephanie Simstad The Ohio State University Extension Clermont County AFCEE, 2002.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
Strategic Planning for Contaminated Sediment Projects: Setting the Course for Proper Project Execution Howard L. Cumberland Geosyntec Consultants October.
EPA Superfund Program Risk Initiatives in Indian Country Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country March 14-16, 2000 Lakewood, CO James Konz U.S. EPA.
Contamination What is it? Where does it come from? How does it affect us?
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Why is Coal Ash of Concern and how to assess potential impacts?
East St. Louis “Biosolid” Lead Remediation Project Project Sponsor: Southwestern Illinois RC&D, Inc. Funding Provided by: USDA-NRCS Technical Assistance:
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
CDR Tarah S. Somers Commander US PHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry May 2016 Environmental Health Nurse Agency for Toxic Substances and.
Brownfields 2011 Philadelphia, PA – April 5, 2011 Vanessa Steigerwald-Dick, Ohio EPA Amy Yersavich, Ohio EPA Urban Gardens on Brownfields: Making Them.
Ecology Human Activities 7/9/2016 SB4d1 Standard  Students will assess the dependence of all organisms on one another and the flow of energy and matter.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services William A. Suk, Ph.D., M.P.H. Director, Superfund Research Program Chief, Hazardous.
C.P.Martinez and L.M. Porticos
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Decontamination Preparedness and Assessment Strategy
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
Environmental Chemistry Branch -
THE DOSE MAKES THE POISON
Ecological Revitalization at Mining Sites
Pollinator Protection and National Policy
Warmup 10/22/12 As the population of Durham increases…
UNC Superfund Research Program
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
Brownfield Corrective Action with Revised RRS
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Presentation transcript:

Arsenic in the Soils, USGS http://www.usgs.gov/blogs/features/slidedeck2/soil-geochemistry-maps/arsenic/

How much of this soil arsenic is available to move into the biosphere?

Bioaccessible arsenic is the amount of arsenic that is free to move from the soil into the body of a living organism, typically through ingestion. The extent to which Arsenic is bioaccessible depends on the soil type, pH, presence of other metals, etc. The chemistry of the various forms of arsenic in the environment determines the mobility of each. Contaminated soil at a Superfund site can contain different forms of Arsenic Porewater Soil particle Arsenic (two forms in this example) Two metals that are commonly encountered in soils at hazardous waste sites are arsenic and lead and ingestion of contaminated soils is a human health concern at these sites. While these metals can be harmful to humans if ingested, they are not always present in the soil in a form that can cause harm to humans or wildlife. The extent to which soils contaminated with these metals is cleaned-up depends in part on the extent to which these metals are available to move from the environment into the body of a human or animal. The extent to which a chemical is available to move into the body of a human or animal and be absorbed is referred to as bioaccessibility.

“The current regulatory paradigm for characterizing the level of contamination in soils and sediments generally does not include measures of the actual bioavailability of these contaminants to human or ecological receptors.” SERDP & ESTCP Expert Panel Workshop on Research & Development Needs for Understanding & Assessing the Bioavailability of Contaminants in Soils & Sediments (2008)

If soil is eaten and taken in the stomach, the type and amount of arsenic determines the extent to which arsenic is bioavailable and thus able to be absorbed by the body. In this scenario the “red” form of arsenic is absorbed by the body and the “brown” form is not; it will be eliminated from the body through feces. Various factors (“bioavailabilty processes”) can impact the amount of contaminant able to be absorbed. Bioavailability processes refer to the individual physical, chemical, and biological interactions that determine the exposure to chemicals associated with soils and sediments. NRC, 2003. These processes modify the amount of chemical in soil or sediment that is actually absorbed and available to cause a biological response. NRC, 2003. Bioavailability is a measure of how much of a contaminant is absorbed when people are exposed to that contaminant through inhalation, skin contact or food intake (EPA definition).

Bioavailability Processes The individual physical, chemical, and biological interactions that determine the exposure of plants and animals to chemicals associated with soils and sediments. These processes modify the amount of chemical in soil or sediment that is actually absorbed and available to cause a biological response. National Research Council, 2003.

USEPA Bioavailability Research (Bradham et al) Evaluate arsenic bioaccessibility, bioavailability and speciation Test soils affected by urban and historical land use activities and compare to three standard reference materials Measure total arsenic in soil and biological samples using instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division Methods Development and Applications Branch Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (the gold standard for total arsenic analysis in soil, which is important for us to have an accurate comparison of the bioaccessibility measurements with the mice excrement). 

To assess the bioavailability of Arsenic from soil at a specific Superfund site and more accurately determine the risk to human health, scientists use a mouse model to study and predict the amount of arsenic that is bioavailable to humans at this particular site.

Mice studies enable scientists to calculate the relative bioavailability of soil arsenic at a specific Superfund site which can inform the clean up process and result in a less expensive approach that is still protective of human health.

Barber Apple Orchard NPL Site 25 to 38 percent of the arsenic in soil from the Barber Orchard NPL site was determined to be bioavailable and not the 100% assumed and used in the risk assessment. http://www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/sites/npl/northcarolina/baronc.html

Evaluating Risk “Incorporating bioavailability considerations in the calculation of risk can: optimize the extent of cleanup required to be protective, improve site decision-making, and can be an important factor in balancing the risks caused by remedial action with the risks addressed by remedial action.” -Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC) http://www.itrcweb.org/Training?topicID=4 Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC)