Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Maryam Sayadi, Seiichiro Tanizaki, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
(Un)Folding Mechanisms of the FBP28 WW Domain in Explicit Solvent Revealed by Multiple Rare Event Simulation Methods  Jarek Juraszek, Peter G. Bolhuis 
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Young Min Rhee, Vijay S. Pande  Biophysical Journal 
The Contribution of Entropy, Enthalpy, and Hydrophobic Desolvation to Cooperativity in Repeat-Protein Folding  Tural Aksel, Ananya Majumdar, Doug Barrick 
Folding Pathways of Prion and Doppel
Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Calculations to Assess the Possibility of Water Existence in Protein Nonpolar Cavities  Masataka Oikawa, Yoshiteru Yonetani 
Takako Takeda, Dmitri K. Klimov  Biophysical Journal 
The Binding Affinity of Ff Gene 5 Protein Depends on the Nearest-Neighbor Composition of the ssDNA Substrate  Tung-Chung Mou, Carla W. Gray, Donald M.
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Molecular Dynamics Simulations on SDF-1α: Binding with CXCR4 Receptor
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Spermine Condenses DNA, but Not RNA Duplexes
Structural and Dynamic Properties of the Human Prion Protein
Volume 96, Issue 10, Pages (May 2009)
Jamie M. Dettler, Robert Buscaglia, Vu H. Le, Edwin A. Lewis 
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Folding of the Protein Domain hbSBD
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Meng Qin, Jian Zhang, Wei Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Microsecond Unfolding Kinetics of Sheep Prion Protein Reveals an Intermediate that Correlates with Susceptibility to Classical Scrapie  Kai-Chun Chen,
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
De Novo Design of Foldable Proteins with Smooth Folding Funnel
Heleen Meuzelaar, Jocelyne Vreede, Sander Woutersen 
A Second Look at Mini-Protein Stability: Analysis of FSD-1 Using Circular Dichroism, Differential Scanning Calorimetry, and Simulations  Jianwen A. Feng,
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Binding of the Bacteriophage P22 N-Peptide to the boxB RNA Motif Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Ranjit P. Bahadur, Srinivasaraghavan Kannan,
The Arginine-Rich RNA-Binding Motif of HIV-1 Rev Is Intrinsically Disordered and Folds upon RRE Binding  Fabio Casu, Brendan M. Duggan, Mirko Hennig 
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Structural Refinement of a Key Tryptophan Residue in the BLUF Photoreceptor AppA by Ultraviolet Resonance Raman Spectroscopy  Masashi Unno, Sadato Kikuchi,
Sanjin Marion, Carmen San Martín, Antonio Šiber  Biophysical Journal 
Li Sun, Jeffrey K. Noel, Herbert Levine, José N. Onuchic 
Functional Role of Ribosomal Signatures
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Yuliang Zhang, Yuri L. Lyubchenko  Biophysical Journal 
Yuguang Mu, Lars Nordenskiöld, James P. Tam  Biophysical Journal 
Thermodynamic Characterization of the Unfolding of the Prion Protein
An Effective Solvent Theory Connecting the Underlying Mechanisms of Osmolytes and Denaturants for Protein Stability  Apichart Linhananta, Shirin Hadizadeh,
Translational Entropy and DNA Duplex Stability
Subdomain Interactions Foster the Design of Two Protein Pairs with ∼80% Sequence Identity but Different Folds  Lauren L. Porter, Yanan He, Yihong Chen,
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
A Mesoscale Model of DNA and Its Renaturation
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Transmuting α helices and β sheets
Two Latent and Two Hyperstable Polymeric Forms of Human Neuroserpin
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Arnoldus W.P. Vermeer, Willem Norde  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Pawel Gniewek, Andrzej Kolinski  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Predicting 3D Structure, Flexibility, and Stability of RNA Hairpins in Monovalent and Divalent Ion Solutions  Ya-Zhou Shi, Lei Jin, Feng-Hua Wang, Xiao-Long.
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Dependence of Protein Folding Stability and Dynamics on the Density and Composition of Macromolecular Crowders  Jeetain Mittal, Robert B. Best  Biophysical.
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Hydrophobic Core Formation and Dehydration in Protein Folding Studied by Generalized-Ensemble Simulations  Takao Yoda, Yuji Sugita, Yuko Okamoto  Biophysical.
Volume 94, Issue 12, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 93, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
Tadaomi Furuta, Yoshimi Fujitsuka, George Chikenji, Shoji Takada 
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages 1892-1901 (March 2009) Thermostability of the N-Terminal RNA-Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV Nucleocapsid Protein: Experiments and Numerical Simulations  Huey-Jen Fang, Yong-Zhong Chen, Mai Suan Li, Ming-Chya Wu, Chun-Ling Chang, Chung-ke Chang, Yen-lan Hsu, Tai-huang Huang, Hueih-Min Chen, Tian-Yow Tsong, Chin-Kun Hu  Biophysical Journal  Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages 1892-1901 (March 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045 Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A model of the overall structure of SARS-CoV NP. The RBD and DD are structural domains, and lines represents disordered segments. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 (a) Cartoon representation of the structure of the RBD. The Protein Data Bank accession code is 1SSK. There are five β-strands: β1(aa 56–59, numbered according to the full length of NP), β2(aa 108–114), β3(aa 85–91), β4(aa 131–134), and β5(aa 172–173). In the native state, these strands have 30, 49, 48, 24, and 11 contacts, respectively. (b) A schematic plot for four pairs of strands P13, P15, P23, and P24. Here P13, for example, means the pair between strands 1 and 3. In the native state, there exists only the interactions between strands of these pairs. The numbers of native contacts of these pairs are equal to 10, 6, 22, and 13, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Temperature dependence of the RBD partial heat capacity in a mixing buffer of glycine, sodium acetate, and sodium phosphate, with 100 mM sodium chloride, at pH 6.8 in the presence of 100 mM NaCl. The transition temperature TM is determined to be 48.74°C. The dashed line indicates the baseline curve and ΔCp ≈ 1.01 kcal/mol/K is the difference between extrapolations of the baseline at TM. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CD spectra of the RBD in a mixing buffer of glycine, sodium acetate, and sodium phosphate, at pH 7.0 in the presence of 100 mM NaCl. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Folding fractions of the RBD at pH 7.0 with respect to different temperature, determined by the CD spectra of Fig. 4 at λ = 208 nm, 212 nm, and 225 nm. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The peak intensity of the backbone amides in a 15N-edited HSQC spectrum as a function of temperature for β-sheet residues, L57, T58, Q59 (β1), I85, G86, Y87, Y88, R89, R90, A91 (β2), R108, W109, Y110, F111, Y112, Y113 (β3), I131, V132, W133, V134 (β4), and F172, Y173 (β5). Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Carbonyl shifts at three different temperatures, 298 K, 303 K, and 308 K, for β-sheet residues L57, T58, Q59 (β1), I85, G86, Y87, Y88, R89, R90, A91 (β2), R108, W109, Y110, F111, Y112, Y113 (β3), I131, V132, W133, V134 (β4), and F172, Y173 (β5). Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 (a) Temperature dependence of the specific heat obtained in the Gō model. We use the same temperature interval as in the experiment (Fig. 3). We have ΔCp ≈ 0.92 kcal/mol/K. (b) The temperature dependence of dfN/dT obtained from the experiments and simulations. This quantity was calculated using fN=1/{1+exp[−ΔHMT(1−TTM)]}, where ΔHM and TM are taken from Table 1. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 (a) Free energy as a function of the number of native contacts at T =TM. Typical snapshots are shown. (b) The distribution of RMSD for the denatured state (DS), transition state (TS), and folded state (FS) at T = TM. The average values of RMSD are 〈RMSD〉DS = 11.9 Å, 〈RMSD〉TS = 7.0 Å, and 〈RMSD〉FS = 3.3 Å. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 (a) Time dependence of the fraction of native contacts of five β-strands at T = 285 K. The definition of these strands is given in the caption of Fig. 2. (b) The same as in panel a, but for four pairs of β-strands (see Fig. 2 for definitions). Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 (a) Time dependence of the fraction of native contacts of five β-strands at T = 450 K. The definition of these strands is given in the caption of Fig. 2. Results were averaged over 100 trajectories. (b) The same as in panel a, but for four pairs of β-strands (see Fig. 2 for definitions). Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 1892-1901DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.045) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions