Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
James J Chou, Honglin Li, Guy S Salvesen, Junying Yuan, Gerhard Wagner 
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Engineered Domain Swapping as an On/Off Switch for Protein Function
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Structure and Mechanism of Imidazoleglycerol-Phosphate Dehydratase
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1849-1858 (December 2005) The Structure of the Human ERCC1/XPF Interaction Domains Reveals a Complementary Role for the Two Proteins in Nucleotide Excision Repair  Konstantinos Tripsianes, Gert Folkers, Eiso AB, Devashish Das, Hanny Odijk, Nicolaas G.J. Jaspers, Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers, Robert Kaptein, Rolf Boelens  Structure  Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1849-1858 (December 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.08.014 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Refolding of the ERCC1/XPF Complex The figure shows the 15N-1H HSQC spectrum of the ERCC1/XPF complex (blue) and the 15N-1H HSQC spectrum of 15N-labeled ERCC1 (red) refolded in the presence of unlabeled XPF. The overlay of the crosspeaks of ERCC1 in the two spectra confirms that the refolded complex forms the native conformation (for more details, see Experimental Procedures). Structure 2005 13, 1849-1858DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Three-Dimensional Structure of the C-Terminal Domains of the Human ERCC1/XPF Complex (A) Backbone stereoview of the ensemble of the final 20 structural conformers. ERCC1 is colored blue, XPF is colored green, and the hairpins in both subunits are brown. (B) Cartoon representation of the lowest-energy model. The purple sphere depicts the center of the pseudo-2-fold symmetry axis. Helices are denoted with Greek letters, from α to ɛ for ERCC1 and from α′ to ɛ′ for XPF, while hairpins are indicated as h1, h2, and h1′. Also shown are Phe residues at the C termini of each subunit. Phe293 of ERCC1 is colored orange, and Phe894 of XPF is colored yellow. (C) ERCC1 and XPF are superimposed, showing the overall fold similarity. Color conventions are as in (B). Structure 2005 13, 1849-1858DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Protein-Protein Interactions along the C-Terminal Domains of ERCC1 and XPF (A) View of the central interacting core. Helices α in the front, helices γ at the back, and the tips of helices ɛ that run perpendicularly build up the interacting surface. Residues participating in contacts are depicted in stick representation. The backbone of ERCC1 is shown in blue, XPF is shown in green, and interacting amino acids from either side are shown in orange and yellow, respectively. Intermolecular hydrogen bonds are indicated with black dotted lines. (B) Top view of the central core. For the sake of clarity, helices ɛ have been removed. (C and D) (C) The tight hydrophobic packing of ERCC1 Phe293 to its XPF cavity and (D) the same for Phe894 of XPF in the hydrophobic pocket of ERCC1. In (B), (C), and (D), amino acids are numbered according to the native sequences. Structure 2005 13, 1849-1858DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 DNA Binding by the ERCC1/XPF Complex (A) Domain organization of the ERCC1/XPF complex. (B) Sequence alignment of selected (HhH)2 domains from the three kingdoms. Hydrophobic residues are highlighted in cyan, Gly that belong to hairpin motifs are highlighted in orange, and the aromatic residues at the end of the domains are highlighted in green. The observed secondary elements of ERCC1 are indicated above the sequences. (C) Normalized chemical shift changes upon DNA titration versus the ERCC1 and XPF sequences. Missing bars indicate either Pro residues or unresolved chemical shifts due to peak overlap. (D) Two views of surface representation rotated by 180° and colored according to their electrostatic surface potential at ±8 kB T/e for positive (blue) or negative (red) charge potential by using the program GRASP (Nicholls, 1993). (E) Observed chemical shift changes on the protein surface and model for the interaction of ERCC1/XPF with DNA by fitting ERCC1 on the archaeal (HhH)2 domain. The blue parts denote shifting residues in both representations, and the intensity of the color corresponds to the absolute shift value (cut-off value of 0.1). Structure 2005 13, 1849-1858DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions