Gaia Tomaž Zwitter Gaia: > 1.1 billion objects (V ≤ 20.9),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Star catalogue comparison a tool to improve asteroidal prediction accuracy Dave Herald, TTSO4, April 2010, Canberra.
Advertisements

Infrared Space Astrometry mission for the Galactic Bulge
GENIUS kick-off - November 2013 GENIUS kick-off meeting The Gaia context: DPAC & CU9 X. Luri.
1. absolute brightness - the brightness a star would have if it were 10 parsecs from Earth.
How to simulate the Gaia products Francesca Figueras Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Gaia simulators, GUMS and GOG F. Figueras (+UB team) GREAT ITN School : Galaxy modelling, Besançon October, 2012.
Exploring the Inner microarcseconds of AGN using the Space Interferometry Mission "SIM Lite" Ann E. Wehrle Principal Investigator, SIM AGN Key Project.
Asymmetric Planetary Nebulae IV La Palma, Canary Islands Water Fountains in Pre-Planetary Nebulae Mark Claussen, NRAO June 19, 2007 Hancock, New Hampshire.
Chapitre 3- Astrometry PHY6795O – Chapitres Choisis en Astrophysique Naines Brunes et Exoplanètes.
Open Clusters and Galactic Disk Observations with LAMOST Li CHEN Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, CAS CHEMISTRY, DYNAMICS AND STRUCTURE OF THE MILKY.
Internal motions in star clusters Gordon Drukier Dept. of Astronomy, Yale University Yale Astrometry Workshop — 21 July 2005 Gordon Drukier Dept. of Astronomy,
Structure of the Universe Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 23.
Compilation of stellar fundamental parameters from literature : high quality observations + primary methods Calibration stars for astrophysical parametrization.
Hen 2-90: The Planetary Nebula which looks like a YSO Raghvendra Sahai Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech 1.Discovered by Henize (1967), listed in Perek-Kohoutek.
Distances. Parallax Near objects appear to move more than far objects against a distant horizon. Trigonometric parallax is used to measure distance to.
February 14, 2006 Astronomy Chapter 18: Celestial Distances A Galaxy 150 Million Light Years From Earth.
Die Vermessung der Milchstraße: Hipparcos, Gaia, SIM Vorlesung von Ulrich Bastian ARI, Heidelberg Sommersemester 2004.
Distance Determination of the Hubble Constant H o by the use of Parallax and Cepheid Variable Stars presented by Michael McElwain and G. Richard Murphy.
Chapter 11 Surveying The Stars Surveying The Stars.
The GAIA photometry The GAIA mission, the next ESA Cornerstone 6 (launch ), will create a precise three dimensional map of about one billion.
11/12/03 5th COROT Week Detection and Photometric Monitoring of QSOs and AGN with COROT J. Surdej, J.-F. Claeskens, E. Gosset, J. Poels, P. Riaud, A. Smette,
Zacharias & Gaume: UCAC and URAT; Journees, Paris 2010 Sep 21 1 UCAC and URAT: optical astrometric catalog observing programs Norbert Zacharias Ralph Gaume.
The Origins Billion Star Survey K. Johnston, B. Dorland, R. Gaume, R. Olling,, (U.S. Naval Observatory), K. Seidelmann (University of Virginia), S. Seager.
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
High Precision Astrometry and Parallax from Spatial Scanning Part 2 Adam Riess and Stefano Casertano.
How Far Away Are The Stars?. Distances in the Solar System Kepler’s Third Law relates period and distance Defines a relative distance scale One accurate.
Apparent Magnitude (useful for describing how bright objects appear from the Earth) The original magnitude system of Hipparchus had: magnitude 1 – the.
The Nature of the Stars Chapter 19. Parallax.
Aldo Dell'Oro INAF- Observatory of Turin Detailed analysis of the signal from asteroids by GAIA and their size estimation Besançon November 6-7, 2003.
Prospects for observing quasar jets with the Space Interferometry Mission Ann E. Wehrle Space Science Institute, La Canada Flintridge, CA, and Boulder,
CU5-DU13: Ground-based support observations for Gaia absolute photometric calibration BOLOGNA: C. Cacciari, G. Altavilla, M. Bellazzini, A. Bragaglia,
Geodetic VLBI Lecture 3 18 October Lecture plan 1. Quasars as astrophysical objects 2. Redshift 3. Spectral analysis 4. Super luminous relativistic.
Science of the Solar System with GAIA D. Hestroffer 1,2, V. Zappalà 2, D. Carollo 2, M. Gai 2, F. Mignard 3, P. Tanga 2 1/ IMCCE, Paris Observatory, France.
Extrasolar planets. Detection methods 1.Pulsar Timing Pulsars are rapidly rotating neutron stars, with extremely regular periods Anomalies in these periods.
Early science on exoplanets with Gaia A. Mora 1, L.M. Sarro 2, S. Els 3, R. Kohley 1 1 ESA-ESAC Gaia SOC. Madrid. Spain 2 UNED. Artificial Intelligence.
Geodetic VLBI Lecture 3 18 October Lecture plan 1. Quasars as astrophysical objects 2. Redshift 3. Spectral analysis 4. Super luminous relativistic.
Photometric Redshifts of objects in B field Sanhita Joshi ANGLES Workshop, Crete 07/04/2005.
Chapter 10 Measuring the Stars. Star Cluster NGC ,000 light-years away.
Object classification and physical parametrization with GAIA and other large surveys Coryn A.L. Bailer-Jones Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg.
FoV: 0.7 deg x 0.7 deg, pixel (10 µm x 30 µm): 0.059”(AL) x 0.177”(AC) 106 CCD 4500x1966 px (TDI) ~4.4 sec 0.93m 0.42m Skymapper.
The Gaia Challenge Coryn A.L. Bailer-Jones Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg acknowledgements: ESA, the Gaia scientific community and industrial.
Pisa, 4 May 2009 Alessandro Spagna A new kinematic survey (from GSC-II and SDSS-DR7) to study the stellar populations of the Milky Way Alessandro Spagna.
1 VLBA Orbits of Young Binary Stars Rosa M. Torres – CRyA, UNAM Laurent Loinard – CRyA, UNAM Amy Mioduszewski – DSOC, NRAO Luis F. Rodríguez – CRyA, UNAM.
The Gaia Galactic Survey Mission Coryn Bailer-Jones Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg 2 nd Heidelberg Astronomy Summer School September 2007.
Star Catalog Comparison 2016 IOTA Annual Meeting Steve Preston.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Gaia DR2/3: Serving Time Series, Spectra, SSOs in the VO
Takahiro Sumi (Princeton) Laurent Eyer (Geneva Obs.)
An ACS High-latitude Survey
Employment of AGIS for Nano-Jasmine
CASE-FOMBS Follow-up of One Million Bright Stars
Gaia A Stereoscopic Census of our Galaxy cosmos. esa
Institute of Cosmos Sciences - University of Barcelona
Towards a kinematic model of the Local Group as-Astrometry with VLBI
Classification of GAIA data
Gaia impact on asteroidal occultations
Chapter 12 Surveying The Stars.
Gaia impact on asteroidal occultations
Gaia DR1: a few warnings and caveats
Towards the ICRF3: Comparing USNO 2016A VLBI Global Solution to Gaia and ICRF2 Megan Johnson in collaboration with Julien Frouard, Alan Fey, Valeri Makarov,
UCAC U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog T.J. Rafferty
(National Astronomical Observatory of Japan)
Chapter 9 The Family of Stars.
TINYMO selection criteria:
Science of the Solar System with GAIA
Galactic and Extragalatic Astronomy AA 472/672
Celestial Distances A Galaxy 150 Million Light Years From Earth
Stellar Masses.
There and back again by Mikhail Lisakov MPIfR
Chapter 17 Measuring the Stars
Presentation transcript:

Gaia Tomaž Zwitter Gaia: > 1.1 billion objects (V ≤ 20.9), positions accurate to between 5 and 400 μas, spatial resolution ~ 100 mas, blue and red SED at 50 - 200+ epochs over 5-9 years, RVs for objects brighter than V~15.5, spectroscopic parameters for the one brighter than V~12.5.

Gaia - first data release The first data release (September 2016): (Brown et al. 2016) positions, parallaxes (error ~0.3 mas) and proper motions (error ~1 mas/yr) for 2 million Hipparcos/Tycho-2 stars; positions (error ~10 mas) and G magnitudes (error < 0.03 mag) for 1.1 billion objects (V ≤ 20.9); (V = 1.02 G − 0.24 for V-I ~ 0.7) G-band light curves and characterization for ~3000 Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars around the south ecliptic pole. QSOs: (Lindegren et al. 2016, Mignard et al. 2016) 135,000 observed (from the list of Andrei et al. 2014); positions compared to VLBI reference frame; formal standard error for 2191 quasars (with 17.6 < V < 20.7) compared to ICRF2: 0.76 mas for 50% and 3.35 mas for 90% sources; alignement with the ICRF2 to better than 0.1 mas at epoch 2015.0, non-rotation to within 0.03 mas/yr; there are now 11,444 objects with VLBI positions, i.e. 3.5-times more than in ICRF2 (Petrov & Kovalev 2016).

Sky chart of 1,142,679,969 sources Brown et al. 2016

3 problems: damped throughput (ice), basic angle variation, stray-light. They are now solved or under control.

Focal plane: 3 main instruments Prusti et al. 2016

Positional accuracy errors after 5 yr mission Jester et al. 2005 Proft et al. 2016 Brown et al. 2016

Gaia: photometric accuracy 3 bands: white (G: 330-1050 nm), blue (BP: 330-680 nm), red (RP: 640-1050 nm), ~ 72 transits in 5 yrs (min 50, max 200+). errors for a single transit

Gaia QSOs: λ coverage by BP and RP spectra Proft et al. 2016, number of photons per 5 transits

Redshifts of QSOs with V ~ 20.2 after 5 yrs of mission Proft et al. 2016

Gaia QSOs: variability detection by sums of five transits z = 2.03 r' = 17.5 (Proft et al. 2016)

Offsets in Gaia vs. VLBI positions Kovalev et al. (2017) determined VLBI-jet direction for 2957 AGNs observed by Gaia. Position offsets along the jet require strong, extended parsec- scale optical jets. Small (<1 mas) offsets in direction opposite to the jet can be due to extended VLBI jet structure or a “core-shift” effect due to synchrothon opacity.

Gaia timeline Launch: 19 December 2013, The 1st data release: 14 September 2016: TGAS parallaxes & proper motions for Tycho stars, VLBI coordinate system match. The 2nd data release: April 2018: Five-parameter astrometric solutions for all sources with acceptable formal standard errors (>109 anticipated), and positions (α, δ) for sources for which parallaxes and proper motions cannot be derived. G and integrated GBP and GRP photometric fluxes and magnitudes for all sources. Median radial velocities for sources brighter than GRVS= 12 mag (V=12.8 for G0 V star, V=13.2 for K1 III star). For stars brighter than G = 17 mag estimates of the effective temperature and, where possible, line-of-sight extinction will be provided, based on the above photometric data. Photometric data for a sample of variable stars. Epoch astrometry for a pre-selected list of >10,000 asteroids. Mission duration: 2019, 2021, 2023? Final release with everything: 3 yrs later.

Gaia timeline In perspective (7 months from now): Parallax & proper motion accuracy of 70 μas implies 10% error at 1.3 kpc and 3% error at 400 pc. BP/RP: only integrated magnitudes, perhaps to be so at least to 2020 or 2022+. Parameters: Teff+reddening from BP/RP, logg from G & parallax. RVS: for V < 12, maybe V < 13, only average reported and for non-variable RVs, accuracy ~1-2 km/s. So ground based surveys valuable for: RVs, spectroscopic params, abundances. Why we need accurate RVs? Long period SB1s, vertically resolved atmospheres, cluster micro-dynamics, LSR.

On-going ground-based optical stellar spectroscopic surveys Goals: individual element abundances, radial velocities. Surveys: RAVE (www.rave-survey.org), LAMOST (www.lamost.org), Gaia-ESO (www.gaia-eso.eu), Galah (www.galah-survey.org), Apogee, FunnelWeb.

The 3 ground-based surveys

... it was:

... it is: (a bug in astro-py discovered)

shift applied: RVRAVE = RVGalah – 0.17 ± 0.03 km/s.

shift applied: RVHR21 = RVHR15N + 0.70 ± 0.05 km/s.

RV shifts between surveys RAVE = Galah – 0.17 ± 0.03 km/s HR15N = HR10 = Galah + 0.16 ± 0.06 km/s UVESU = Galah + 0.69 ± 0.05 km/s UVESL = HR21 = Galah + 0.86 ± 0.03 km/s Note how small are the errors. Next: stellar parameters

Fe abundance of Galah and RAVE

+ median, within □ 68% of objects.