NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Advertisements

OCM BOCES Day 6 Principal Evaluator Training. 2 Nine Components.
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Teacher Evaluation Update
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Student Achievement Data Data by School Board of Education Presentation October 14,
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Holland Central School District 2014 State Assessment Results.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda: PARCC vs Marzano Configuration Discussion Marzano Moving Forward: Administrator/Supervisor/Teacher.
Teacher Appraisal System Updates by: Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Act 82 Boot Camp Day 1 July 29 th, 2015 Angela Kirby-Wehr, Educator Effectiveness.
Holland Central School District Opening Day September 3, 2013.
Student Achievement. AchieveNJ for Teachers Nothing impacts student learning in schools more than teachers. All New Jersey students deserve great teachers,
May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.
2011 – 2012 School Year. * Walk-Throughs * Observation(s) * Pre-/Post-Evaluation Form * Year-End Evaluation * Summative Score Report.
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated Professional Practices, Measures of Student Learning/ Outcomes- Calculating Scores & Translating SLOs/SOOs.
APPR Annual Professional Performance Review Legislation: 3012-d Board of Education Work Session November 9, 2015.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
New Teacher Induction.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Teacher Evaluation System
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
APPR Update School Year.
Literacy Across Disciplines (LAD)
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Training
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Leon LEADS Leon Evaluation And Development System
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
APPR Update School Year.
Valley Central School District
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
Georgia Department of Education
Implementing Race to the Top
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Jayhawkville Central High School
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Updates for Middle Level Liaisons Alexander Trikalinos, Office of Educator Quality and Professional Development.
TEACHNJ Act Tenure Law & Value Added Teacher Evaluation
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Central Square School District and CSTA
Annual Professional Performance Review APPR
Presentation transcript:

NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW Every Student, Every Day NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW October 17, 2018

Improved Student Learning Data Driven Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation These three research-based strategies will work together to have a positive impact on student learning. Common Core Learning Standards

Evaluation Process Laws and Regulations Negotiated in contracts 3012d Education Law Section 100.2(o) of Commissioner’s Regulations Negotiated in contracts NTA (Newer APPR, 1999 system) NPA NAA CSEA

Student Performance Category Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Teacher Evaluation (3012-d) 50 Student Performance Category Teacher Observation Category 100

APPR Subcomponents Student Performance Teacher Observation Overall percentage of students passing (65% or higher) the 5 Regents Exams required for graduation OR All new teachers will have 2 observations (Announced and/or Unannounced) utilizing Danielson 2011 (revised) Rubric Domains 1, 2, 3 and 4a SLOs based on Grade 8 Science State Assessment One observation by an administrator assigned to your building and one observation by an administrator not assigned to your building (independent evaluator) SLOs based on course specific Regents Exams SLOs based on Grade 3 ELA and Math State Assessments

Teacher Observation Category Building Administrator 90% Domain 1 20% Domain 2 Domain 3 50% Domain 4 10% Independent Evaluator 10% (Admin not assigned to building) Domain 1 20% Domain 2 Domain 3 50% Domain 4 10% The derived scores are weighted and combined to yield the overall observation score. That score will be somewhere between 0 and 4.0

Danielson 2011 4 Domains 22 Components – Elements/Critical Attributes Planning & Preparation The Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities 22 Components – Elements/Critical Attributes Intention: guide & develop practice Not as a “gotcha” rating system HINT: Read Green Book!!!!!!

Scoring Matrix for the Overall Rating Teacher Observation Category Highly Effective (H) Effective (E) Developing (D) Ineffective (I) Student Performance Category H E D I

Non-3012d System Fall Conference Observation Cycle Tenured, at least one every third year Non-tenured, at least twice per year Year-end summary/Conference Athletic Coaches – part of NTA contract Varsity Coaches play a role in whole program but do not evaluate Ironically, observed more than teachers NPA – Observations in February

Feedback Loops Walkthroughs Lesson Plan Collection