Tat Competes with CIITA for the Binding to P-TEFb and Blocks the Expression of MHC Class II Genes in HIV Infection  Satoshi Kanazawa, Takashi Okamoto,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Advertisements

UVB Increases Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) Expression1  Christoph Marschall, Toshiko Nobutoh, Evelyn Braungart, Kathrin Douwes,
The Role of Transcription Factor PU
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Human mRNA Export Machinery Recruited to the 5′ End of mRNA
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Acquisition of Oncogenic Potential by RAR Chimeras in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia through Formation of Homodimers  Richard J Lin, Ronald M Evans  Molecular.
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Slicing-Independent RISC Activation Requires the Argonaute PAZ Domain
CDK11 in TREX/THOC Regulates HIV mRNA 3′ End Processing
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Colin Kwok, Bernd B. Zeisig, Shuo Dong, Chi Wai Eric So  Cancer Cell 
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
The TRIM Family Protein KAP1 Inhibits HIV-1 Integration
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Yingqun Huang, Joan A. Steitz  Molecular Cell 
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
Site α Is Crucial for Two Routes of IFNγ-Induced MHC Class I Transactivation: The ISRE-Mediated Route and a Novel Pathway Involving CIITA  Sam J.P Gobin,
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
RNA Helicase A Mediates Association of CBP with RNA Polymerase II
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Christy J. Fryer, J.Brandon White, Katherine A. Jones  Molecular Cell 
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
VP16 and Ubiquitin Current Biology
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Presentation transcript:

Tat Competes with CIITA for the Binding to P-TEFb and Blocks the Expression of MHC Class II Genes in HIV Infection  Satoshi Kanazawa, Takashi Okamoto, B.Matija Peterlin  Immunity  Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 61-70 (January 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80159-4

Figure 1 HIV-1 and Tat Block the Expression of MHC II Determinants (A) HIV-1YU2 infection decreases the expression of MHC II determinants on THP-1 cells. THP-1 cells were infected with the macrophage-tropic HIV-1YU2 and monitored for 8 days. On day 9, cells were incubated with anti-MHC I (HLA-A, -B, and -C) and MHC II (HLA-DR) antibodies and examined by FACS. The left-hand panel contains cells stained with the anti-MHC I antibody (MHC I). The right-hand panel contains cells stained with the anti-MHC II antibody (MHC II). Relative fluorescence intensities are as follows: white areas under solid lines, uninfected THP-1 cells; gray areas under solid lines, infected THP-1 cells; white area under the dashed line, unstained cells. Unstained cells are presented only in the right-hand panel (MHC II). (B) Tat blocks the induction of MHC II determinants by IFNγ in HeLa cells. HeLa cells expressing Tat or the empty plasmid vector were incubated with IFNγ for 3 days. On day 4, cells were stained with anti-MHC I (HLA-A, -B, and -C) and MHC II (HLA-DP) antibodies and examined by FACS. Right- and left-hand panels are as above (MHC I and MHC II). Relative fluorescence intensities are as follows: white areas under bold lines, HeLa cells, which expressed the empty plasmid vector, treated with IFNγ; gray areas under solid lines, HeLa cells, which expressed Tat (HeLa.Tat), treated with IFNγ; white areas under solid lines, HeLa cells, which were not treated with IFNγ; white area under the dashed line, unstained HeLa cells. Unstained HeLa cells are presented only in the right-hand panel (MHC II). Immunity 2000 12, 61-70DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80159-4)

Figure 2 Tat Blocks the Activation of the DRA Promoter by CIITA and the Presentation of Superantigen by B Cells to T Cells (A) Tat blocks the activation of the DRA promoter by CIITA in cells. The DRA promoter linked to the CAT reporter gene was coexpressed with CIITA and increasing amounts of Tat and mutant TatC30G proteins in COS cells. Amounts of cotransfected plasmids are presented above the bar graph. Amounts of expressed proteins, which were assessed by Western blotting, are given below the bar graph. Experiments are representative of three independent transfections, which were performed in duplicate. Error bars give standard errors of the mean. (B) Tat blocks the presentation of superantigen by B cells to T cells. RM3 cells coexpressed CIITA and Tat at a ratio of 1:3 for 3 days. On day 4, they were incubated with SED and combined with Jurkat cells, which contained the NFAT-luciferase plasmid reporter. Luciferase activity was determined 16 hr later. The diagram on the left describes the superantigen assay. Levels of HLA-DR and DP on RM3 cells that coexpressed CIITA and Tat are presented above the bar graph, with those of RM3 cells that expressed only CIITA set to 100. Coexpressed proteins are indicated below the bar graph. White and black bars represent experiment without SED and with SED, respectively. Experiments are representative of three independent transfections, which were performed in duplicate. Error bars give standard errors of the mean. Immunity 2000 12, 61-70DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80159-4)

Figure 3 The Cyclin Box in the Cyclin T1 Binds to N-Terminal Sequences in CIITA In Vitro (A) CIITA binds to the cyclin box in the cyclin T1. Hybrid GST-cyclin T1 proteins were expressed in E. coli and purified by affinity chromatography. CIITA was transcribed and translated in vitro using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Presented above the pull downs is a diagrammatic representation of the cyclin T1, deletion mutants of the cyclin T1, and proteins used in binding studies. In the cyclin T1, N-terminal 250 residues contain two repeated cyclin boxes, followed by TRM and C-terminal PEST motifs. The arrow points to the CIITA band in the autoradiograph. The first eight lanes represent pull downs, and lane 9 shows 25% of the input CIITA. In the lower panel are presented GST and GST fusion proteins (GST-chimeras) used in the binding reactions. They were visualized by Coomassie staining of the SDS-polyacrylamide gel. (B) Cyclin T1 binds to N-terminal sequences in CIITA. Interacting proteins were isolated and visualized as in (A). Presented above the pull down is a diagrammatic representation of CIITA, deletion mutants of CIITA, and proteins used in binding studies. The activation domain in CIITA (AD) is followed by the proline/serine/threonine-rich (P/S/T) region, a putative GTP-binding site (GTP), and the C-terminal nuclear localization signal (NLS). Twenty-five percent of input proteins (CIITA and mutant CIITA proteins) are given in the lower autoradiograph. Immunity 2000 12, 61-70DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80159-4)

Figure 4 CIITA Can Activate Transcription When Tethered Artificially to RNA Full-length and N-terminal sequences in CIITA were linked to Rev and tested for their ability to activate HIV-1 transcription via the RRE. Rev, hybrid RevCDK9, and RevTat proteins were used as controls. The activity of the plasmid target (pRRESCAT) alone or when coexpressed with Rev alone is given as one (white bars). Coexpression of pRRESCAT with different plasmid effectors are presented as follows: the hybrid RevCIITA, mutant RevCIITA(1–322), and RevCIITA(323–1130) proteins, black bars; the hybrid RevCDK9 protein, hatched bar; the hybrid RevTat protein, striped bar. Amounts of cotransfected plasmids are presented above the bar graph. Below the bar graph is presented a schematic of the experiment. SLIIB refers to the high-affinity binding site for Rev on the RRE. Although only one Rev is drawn, Rev is known to multimerize on the SLIIB. Experiments are representative of three independent transfections, which were performed in duplicate. Error bars give standard errors of the mean. Immunity 2000 12, 61-70DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80159-4)

Figure 5 CIITA Interacts with the Cyclin T1 and Dominant-Negative CDK9 Blocks the Activity of CIITA in Cells (A) CIITA interacts with the cyclin T1 in cells. CIITA and the cyclin T1 were coexpressed in COS cells. Anti-cyclin T1 immunoprecipitations were followed by Western blotting with antibodies against HA, which was present on both CIITA and cyclin T1 (lanes 1–4). Five percent of total lysates are also presented in lanes 5–8 (input). Coexpressed proteins are given above the Western blot. Arrows point to CIITA and cyclin T1 bands. (B) Dominant-negative CDK9 blocks the activation of the DRA promoter by CIITA in cells. CIITA and increasing amounts of the DNCDK9 protein were coexpressed in COS cells. Coexpressed proteins are presented above the bar graph. Western blots of coexpressed proteins are below the bar graph. Bars represent the relative activity from the DRA promoter by the following proteins: white bar, none; black bar, CIITA; striped bars, increasing amounts of the DNCDK9 protein. Experiments are representative of three independent transfections, which were performed in duplicate. Error bars give standard errors of the mean. Immunity 2000 12, 61-70DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80159-4)

Figure 6 Tat Competes for the Binding of CIITA to the Cyclin T In Vitro The hybrid GST-cyclin T1 protein was expressed in E. coli. CIITA and Tat were transcribed and translated using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate. CIITA and the hybrid GST-cyclin T1 protein were incubated with a 10-fold excess of Tat. Whereas lanes 1–3 contain proteins in the pull down, lanes 4 and 5 contain 25% of input proteins. Proteins that were incubated together are given above the autoradiograph. Immunity 2000 12, 61-70DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80159-4)

Figure 7 A Model for the Inhibition of CTIIA by Tat for the Binding to P-TEFb (A) In uninfected cells, RFX and NFY complexes (RFX::NFY) recruit CIITA to MHC II promoters (step 1). Together with other interacting proteins, P-TEFb activates the expression of MHC II genes. P-TEFb phosphorylates the C-terminal domain of RNAP II (step 2), leading to efficient elongation of transcription (step 3). (B) In cells that are infected by HIV-1, Tat is synthesized. Since Tat and CIITA bind to the same surface in the cyclin T1, Tat blocks the ability of CIITA to activate the transcription of MHC II genes (step 4). Antigen processing and presentation are impaired. The interaction between Tat, cyclin T1, and TAR increases rates of elongation of HIV-1 transcription (step 5). Immunity 2000 12, 61-70DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80159-4)