Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solution structure of the constant region of nuclear envelope protein LAP2 reveals two LEM‐domain structures: one binds BAF and the other binds DNA by.
Advertisements

Hydration sites in purine·purine·pyrimidine and pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplexes in aqueous solution  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Structure of TAR RNA Complexed with a Tat-TAR Interaction Nanomolar Inhibitor that Was Identified by Computational Screening  Zhihua Du, Kenneth E Lind,
Mapping of the Interaction Interface of DNA Polymerase β with XRCC1
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Structure and Dynamics of the Membrane-Bound Form of Pf1 Coat Protein: Implications of Structural Rearrangement for Virus Assembly  Sang Ho Park, Francesca.
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
James J Chou, Honglin Li, Guy S Salvesen, Junying Yuan, Gerhard Wagner 
De Novo Design of Foldable Proteins with Smooth Folding Funnel
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Base excision repair enzyme family portrait: integrating the structure and chemistry of an entire DNA repair pathway  Sudip S Parikh, Clifford D Mol,
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
The Arginine-Rich RNA-Binding Motif of HIV-1 Rev Is Intrinsically Disordered and Folds upon RRE Binding  Fabio Casu, Brendan M. Duggan, Mirko Hennig 
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Solution Structure of the Cyclotide Palicourein
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Solution Structure of the Proapoptotic Molecule BID
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 919-930 (August 1999) Identification of the Archaeoglobus fulgidus endonuclease III DNA interaction surface using heteronuclear NMR methods  Alexander Shekhtman, Lynn McNaughton, Richard P Cunningham, Susan M Baxter  Structure  Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 919-930 (August 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80119-1

Figure 1 Fingerprint HSQC spectrum for free endonuclease III. (a) Complete [1H–15N]-HSQC heteronuclear correlation spectrum of [U-15N] Afu endonuclease III and (b) expanded view of the crowded region in the center of the HSQC spectrum. Gray crosspeaks are resonances folded in the nitrogen dimension. Resonances are labeled with assignments. Gradient-based WATERGATE water suppression [70] was incorporated into the pulse sequence. The spectrum was taken at 30°C on a 1 mM endonuclease III sample dissolved in 95% H2O/5% D2O, 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.6, 400 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT and 0.02% NaN3 under argon atmosphere. The HSQC spectrum resolves 167 backbone resonances out of 194 expected HSQC resonances, excluding prolines and the N-terminal methionine. Structure 1999 7, 919-930DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80119-1)

Figure 2 Summary of the through-bond connectivities, sequential amide–amide NOEs, and chemical-shift indices (CSI) identified for assignment of backbone resonances for Afu endonuclease III. Along the top, the location of the helices in Eco endonuclease III is indicated above the complete sequence of Afu endonuclease III, shown in one-lettter amino acid code. Four correlations, between the 15Ni nucleus and 13C nuclei in amino acids i and i-1, provided the basis for sequential assignments. Through-bond correlations involving 15Ni were identified in the following experiments: 13Cαi, HNCA; 13Cαi-1, HN(CO)CA and HNCA; 13COi, HN(CA)CO; 13COi-1, HNCO. Solid bars in each row indicate the presence of a crosspeak in the spectra for these correlations. The relative intensity of amide–amide NOE correlations is indicated by the height of the bar connecting residues i and i + 1 in the row labeled dNN. The consensus chemical-shift indices are based on the changes from random-coil values for both 13Cα and 13CO. These values are contained in the bottom row of the figure labeled CSI. A positive value is indicative of a helical backbone conformation. Structure 1999 7, 919-930DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80119-1)

Figure 3 Sequence alignment of four proteins of the endonuclease III family: Afu endonuclease III, Eco endonuclease III, Eco MutY, and Mth thymine DNA mismatch glycosylase (TDG). Single-letter amino acid codes are used. Amino acids completely conserved among endonuclease III protein family members are in red and similar residues are in blue. Diamonds mark well-conserved positions in the sequence that coincide with structural elements and sequence motifs identified in the Eco endonuclease III and MutY crystal structures. These include the helix B–helix C loop (Leu40–Asp46), pseudo helix-hairpin-helix (pHhH) (Ile78–Phe83), helix-hairpin-helix (Leu113–Leu128) motif, helix H (Thr140–Leu49), and the FCL (Cys189–Cys203) motif. Structure 1999 7, 919-930DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80119-1)

Figure 4 Fingerprint HSQC spectrum for DNA-bound endonuclease III. (a) Complete [1H–15N]-HSQC heteronuclear correlation spectrum of [U-15N] Afu endonuclease III bound to rAP ds13-mer (1:1 complex) and (b) expanded view of the crowded region in the center of the HSQC spectrum. Gray crosspeaks are resonances folded in the nitrogen dimension. Resonances are labeled with assignments. The spectrum was collected at 30°C on complex dissolved in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.6, 400 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT and 0.01% NaN3. Resonances are labeled with assignments. Several types of resonance changes due to complex formation can be observed in the spectrum: K68 (6.9 × 115.8 ppm) did not shift significantly; K89 (6.8 × 116.1 ppm) shifted significantly in the proton dimension (> 0.1 ppm); and N147 (7.7 × 115.0 ppm) shifted more than 0.5 ppm in the proton dimension upon complex formation. Structure 1999 7, 919-930DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80119-1)

Figure 5 Weighted minimal chemical-shift differences, min(Δppm), for backbone nuclei of Afu endonuclease III upon DNA binding plotted against residue number. The location of characteristic structural elements and sequence motifs of the endonuclease III protein family are noted at the top of the graph. The average min(Δppm) value (0.32 ppm) is shown by the dashed line. Gray bars with values of 0.02 ppm represent residues that are not significantly perturbed upon rAP-oligonucleotide binding. Blanks and gaps in the graph represent prolines and unassigned residues in the endonuclease III sequence. Structure 1999 7, 919-930DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80119-1)

Figure 6 Illustration of the homology modeled structure of Afu endonuclease III showing DNA-induced chemical-shift perturbations along the protein backbone. The backbone tube representation was created using the program SETOR [71]. Two views of the structure are shown, related by a 180° rotation about the vertical axis. (a) The front of endonuclease III, largely encompassing the interaction surface, and (b) the back of the protein. The color ramps have been selected so that residues with minimal chemical-shift perturbation less than the average, (min(Δppm)≤0.32 ppm, are colored blue; residues with perturbation between min(Δppm) = 0.32 ppm and one standard deviation from the corresponding mean value (min(Δppm) = 0.52 ppm) are colored green; and residues with min(Δppm) ≥0.52 ppm are colored red. Gray indicates prolines and unassigned residues. Yellow and red spheres represent sulfur and iron, respectively, in the characteristic [4Fe–4S] cluster. Structure 1999 7, 919-930DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80119-1)

Figure 7 A proposed model of DNA binding to Afu endonuclease III consistent with the interaction surface predicted by the chemical shift perturbation data and the calculated electrostatic surface potential. Electrostatic potential of the model of Afu endonuclease III was calculated using the program GRASP [72]. Regions of positive electrostatic potential are colored blue; negative surface charges are colored red. Positive surfaces span both lobes of the protein and are located in the catalytic cleft of the protein and at the surface formed by helix H. The cartoon model suggests a mode of DNA binding that places the DNA substrate in close proximity to Arg43 in the helix B–helix C loop and Arg144 and Arg148 contained in helix H. Structure 1999 7, 919-930DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80119-1)