call completion services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An IMS testbed for SIP applications
Advertisements

1 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Location Conveyance in SIP draft-ietf-sipping-location-requirements-02.
August 2, 2005SIPPING WG IETF 63 ETSI TISPAN ISDN simulation services Roland Jesske Denis Alexeitsev Miguel Garcia-Martin.
Indication of support for keep- alive draft-holmberg-sip-keep-03 Christer Holmberg
SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-02 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
Communication Service Identifier Requirements on SIP draft-loreto-3gpp-ics-requirements.txt
July 13, 2006SIPPING WG IETF 66Slide # 1 ETSI TISPAN call completion services (draft-poetzl-sipping-call-completion-00) Roland
Remote Call/Device Control IETF82, Dispatch WG, Taipei November 15, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Cullen Jennings Alan Johnston.
Session-Independent Policies draft-ietf-sipping-session-indep-policy-01 Volker Hilt Gonzalo Camarillo
IETF 91 DISPATCH draft-jesske-dispatch-forking- answer-correlation-02 Roland Jesske.
SIPPING 5/6/02 Meetingdraft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-01.txt1 Open Issues in SIP Service Examples Recent Changes Added SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY using Dialog.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) By: Zhixin Chen.
July 30, 2010SIPREC WG1 SIP Call Control - Recording Extensions draft-johnston-siprec-cc-rec-00 Alan Johnston Andrew Hutton.
Event Notification in SIP SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY and an example service Adam Roach Ericsson Inc.
Jun Li DHCP Option for Access Network Information draft-lijun-dhc-clf-nass-option-01.
Peering Considerations for Directory Assistance and Operator Services - John Haluska Telcordia SPEERMINT, IETF 68 Prague, Czech Republic 20 March 2007.
November 21st, 2002 Media Transcoding Design Team (a.k.a. team for the deaf) SIPPING WG
A SIP Event Package for DTMF Event Monitoring draft-zebarth-sipping-dtmfad-00.txt IETF 58 Joe Zebarth, Vice Chair T1S1.7.
SIP INFO Event Framework (draft-kaplan-sip-info-events-00) Hadriel Kaplan Christer Holmberg 70th IETF, Vancouver, Canada.
IETF67 DIME WG Towards the specification of a Diameter Resource Control Application Dong Sun IETF 67, San Diego, Nov 2006 draft-sun-dime-diameter-resource-control-requirements-00.txt.
SIP working group IETF#70 Essential corrections Keith Drage.
SIP and SIPPING WGsMay, IETF Interim Meeting Orit levin Conferencing Requirements for SIP Based Applications.
Andrew Allen Communication Service Identifier.
IETF 69 SIPPING WG Meeting Mohammad Vakil Microsoft An Extension to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Events for Pausing and Resuming.
21-07-xxxx IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: xxxx Title: Subscription ID Scope Date Submitted: June, 14 th, 2007 Presented.
The mandate of this working group is to facilitate effective service interoperability utilizing SIP in heterogeneous network environments as noted below.
1 IETF 76 Hiroshima DISPATCH WG SIP Alert-Info URN draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-00 Denis Alexeitsev Laura Liess
SIP Extensions for Network-Asserted Caller Identity and Privacy within Trusted Networks Flemming Andreasen W. Marshall, K. K. Ramakrishnan,
SAML for SIP Hannes Tschofenig, Jon Peterson, James Polk, Douglas Sicker, Marcus Tegnander.
- 1 -P. Kyzivatdraft-sipping-gruu-reg-event-00 Reg Event Package Extensions draft-sipping-gruu-reg-event-00 IETF64 Nov-2005.
RFC3261 (Almost) Robert Sparks. SIPiT 10 2 Status of the New SIP RFC Passed IETF Last Call In the RFC Editor queue Author’s 48 hours review imminent IMPORTANT:
March 20, 2007BLISS BOF IETF-681 Requirements and Implementation Options for the Multiple Line Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol.
Diameter Overload DIME WG IETF 87 July, Starting Point DIAMETER_TOO_BUSY provides little guidance on what a Diameter client should do when it receives.
July 28, 2008BLISS WG IETF-721 The Multiple Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-johnston-bliss-mla-req-02 Alan Johnston.
IETF 70 – SIMPLE WG SIMPLE Problem Statement draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis-03 Avshalom Houri – IBM Tim Rang, Sriram Parameswar - Microsoft.
July 28, 2009BLISS WG IETF-751 Shared Appearance of a SIP AOR draft-ietf-bliss-shared-appearances-03 Alan Johnston Mohsen Soroushnejad Venkatesh Venkataramanan.
SIP Events: Changes and Open Issues IETF 50 / SIP Working Group Adam Roach
Slide #1 Nov 6 -11, 2005SIP WG IETF64 Feature Tags with SIP REFER draft-ietf-sip-refer-feature-param-00 Orit
March 20th, 2001 SIP WG meeting 50th IETF SIP WG meeting Overlap signalling handling
The “application” Profile Type (draft-channabasappa-sipping-app-profile-type-01) Sumanth Channabasappa Josh Littlefield Salvatore Loreto 70th IETF, Vancouver,
Partial Notifications IETF 56 SIMPLE WG draft-lonnfors-simple-presinfo-deliv-reqs-00 draft-lonnfors-simple-partial-notify-00 Mikko Lönnfors
SIP Overload Control draft-hilt-sipping-overload-00 Volker Hilt Daryl Malas Indra Widjaja
1 End-to-middle Security in SIP Kumiko Ono NTT Corporation March 1, 2004 draft-ietf-sipping-e2m-sec-reqs-01.txt draft-ono-sipping-end2middle-security-01.txt.
SIP PUBLISH draft-ietf-simple-publish-01 Aki Niemi
Andrew Allen ROUTING OUT OF DIALOG REQUESTS draft-allen-dispatch-routing-out-of-dialog-request-01 Dispatch IETF 92 March 23 rd 2015.
Subscription and Notification Issue Group Name: WG2 Source: Qi Yu, Mitch Tseng- Huawei Technologies, Co. LTD. Meeting Date: ~23 Agenda Item:
1 Implementation of IMS-based S-CSCF with Presence Service Jenq-Muh Hsu and Yi-Han Lin National Chung Cheng University Department of Computer Science &
SIPPING Working Group IETF 63
Volker Hilt SIP Session Policies Volker Hilt
Session-Independent Policies draft-ietf-sipping-session-indep-policy-02 Volker Hilt Jonathan Rosenberg Gonzalo.
End-to-middle Security in SIP
ETSI Test Specifications for IP-Based Protocols TTCN-3 User Conference May , Sophia Antipolis Anthony Wiles.
Kumiko Ono End-to-middle Security in SIP draft-ietf-sipping-e2m-sec-reqs-04 draft-ono-sipping-end2middle-security-03 Kumiko Ono.
SIP Configuration Issues: IETF 57, SIPPING
Session Initiation Protocol
Transcoding Framework
MLEF Without Capacity Admission Does Not Satisfy MLPP Requirements
Requirements and Implementation Options for the Multiple Line Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-johnston-bliss-mla-req-00.
Configuration Framework draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-06
A SIP Event Package for DTMF Event Monitoring
Jean-François Mulé CableLabs
Transcoding Framework
Overview of ETS in IPCablecom Networks
draft-rocky-sipping-calling-party-category-01 Report
STIR WG IETF-100 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-01) November, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das,
STIR WG IETF-99 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-00) July, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das, and An.
Event Notification in SIP SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY and an example service
3GPP and SIP-AAA requirements
SIP Session Timer Glare Handling
An Architecture for Media Recording using the Session Initiation Protocol draft-ietf-siprec-architecture Andy Hutton
Presentation transcript:

call completion services ETSI TISPAN call completion services (draft-poetzl-sipping-call-completion-00) Roland Jesske r.jesske@t-com.net Martin Huelsemann martin.huelsemann@t-com.net July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

European Telecommunications Standards Institute E T S I European Telecommunications Standards Institute http://portal.etsi.org T I S P A N NGN standardisation group in ETSI http://portal.etsi.org/tispan/TISPAN_ToR.asp July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

Communication Completion on Busy Subscriber (CCBS) Services in scope: Communication Completion on Busy Subscriber (CCBS) Communication Completion on no Reply (CCNR) July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-03 I-Ds related: draft-jesske-sipping-tispan-requirements-03 draft-poetzl-sipping-call-completion-00 July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

Call completion service on queue basis - uncoordinated call completion services might lead to the situation where the first user activating call completion might be the last user who’s call is completed - a sequential organised (FIFO) call completion service on a busy user can be realised by a network element capable to queue call completion requests - the first user who requests call completion is the first user who is informed that a call completion call is possible now - call completion calls have a higher priority than normal calls July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

General framework: - solutions should be based on existing SIP means (BCP) - solutions should be simple - solutions must be interoperable with existing PSTN call completion services July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

Open issues for call completion services: - Indication that a subscription to a call completion queue is possible - Capability of management of call completion queues - Prioritisation of call completion calls July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

Issue 1 Indication that a UA or application server on the terminating side is able to add requests from the originating side to a call completion queue. Proposed solution: Usage of the Allow-Events header in 486 Busy responses for CCBS and in 180 Ringing responses for CCNR. July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

Issue 2 Management of call completion queues between network elements Issue 2 Management of call completion queues between network elements. The queuing capability can be implemented in UAs as well as in application servers. After being added a user shall be able to suspend, resume or cancel his position in the call completion queue. Existing SIP means do not fulfil this requirement, e.g. the dialog event package informs about status of a dialog, needed is information about the status of a queue (‘dialog terminated’ unequal ‘ready for recall’) Proposed solution: Usage of SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY to subscribe to and manage a call completion queue and to receive notifications of changes in the status of the queue. Specification of two new event packages (CCBS and CCNR). July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

Issue 3 Prioritisation of call completion calls Issue 3 Prioritisation of call completion calls. Call completion calls must be distinguishable from new incoming calls in order to avoid queuing or blocking at the terminating side. Proposed solution: Definition of a private header which can transport a specific call completion indication: P-Service-Indication header July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

To do: adding of explanatory text and signalling flows To do: adding of explanatory text and signalling flows. Needed: reviewing, comments and discussion. July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

Backup July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

Call completion event package Defines several event header parameters, amongst others: - queue-operation (add, suspend, resume) - queue-state (request-queued, user-free-for-recall) - cancellation-reason (service-duration [max. time for service activation expired], CCSS-completed) - denial-reason (short-term-denial [e.g. max. number of requests queued], long-term-denial) - caller [uniquely identifies the user who has originated the call completion subscription] July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66

P-Service-Indication header - may be used by network elements in certain deployment scenarios to request a special processing of their SIP requests or responses - a UAC may include one or more P-Service-Indication header fields in a request - a UAS receiving a request including a P-Service-Indication header field may inspect it in order to apply service-specific features; a UAS may include one or more P-Service-Indication header fields in a response - a proxy receiving a request including a P-Service-Indication header filed may inspect it in order to process the message accordingly; a proxy may add or remove P-Service-Indication header fields July 13, 2006 SIPPING WG IETF 66