Marine Environment Division International Maritime Organization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy efficiency – Including measures to limit GHG emissions Arsenio A. Dominguez Vice-Chairman, Marine Environment Protection Committee, IMO Panamas.
Advertisements

MARINTEK 1 Assessment of CO 2 emission performance of individual ships: The IMO CO 2 index Øyvind Buhaug MARINTEK.
IMO Symposium on a Sustainable Maritime
REDUCING GHG FROM SHIPS INTERTANKO Latin American Panel Cancun October 28/29, 2008.
Voluntary Training Program 2012 Climate change and shipping.
Virtual Arrival means reduced emission Greening Logistics European Parliament Brussels 28 April 2010 Manager Research and Projects.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES FOR IMO
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
NAMEPA 2014 World Maritime Day Observance Cozumel, Mexico Canada's Experience with the North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
In-session workshop on means to reach emission reduction targets (Kyoto AWG) Bangkok 1-3 April 2008 Topic 4: Greenhouse gases, sectors and source categories.
Latin American Panel September, 2010 Lima, Perú GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Peter M. Swift.
IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships Eivind S. Vagslid Head, Chemical and Air Pollution.
Developments in Green Ships Design/Technologies
LIGHTHOUSE – Maritime Energy Efficiency Professor Karin Andersson.
IMO GHG REGULATIONS Latin American Panel Cartagena, Columbia November 1, 2011.
Marine Environment Division International Maritime Organization
ASIAN PANEL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS ASIAN PANEL March 2, 2010 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Attracting Green Ships May About RightShip The Current Environment The Existing Vessel Design Index Accuracy of data Factoring in relative CO 2.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Leading the way; making a difference INTERTANKO Council November 15, 2012 UPDATE ON GHG MARKET BASED MEASURES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
1 DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Vincent Mages Climate Change Initiatives VP Lafarge Greenhouse gas mitigation in the cement.
An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships INTERTANKO ISTEC & Executive Committees Dubai, January 2009 Christian BREINHOLT Director.
International Maritime Organization and How it works.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
2.1 Reduction of GHG emissions Energy Efficiency Design Index Tripartite – September 2009 Pierre C. Sames Chairman IACS EG/ENV.
International Shipping and Climate Change Michael Sutton A/g Executive Director Infrastructure and Surface Transport Policy.
North American Panel 4 November 2010 Houston Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.
The Shipping Industry and Environmental Legislation
Leading the way; making a difference GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires.
Leading the way; making a difference MONITORING REPORTING & VERIFICATION (MRV) OF DATA TO ASSESS THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF SHIPS IN OPERATIONS (FUEL CONSUMPTION.
Dr. Haakon-Elizabeth Lindstad and Professor Gunnar. S. Eskeland
North American Panel 23 March 2009 Stamford, CT. Peter M. Swift.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Asian Panel 3 December 2010 Hong Kong Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.
Climate Challenge and the Tanker Industry Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental Manager Image Courtesy of NORDEN AS Maritime Cyprus 2009.
GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS - UPDATE - INTERTANKO Council 10 May 2011 Athens.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 7, 2009 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS.
Leading the way; making a difference The Tanker Industry Energy round-table forum Québec 15 June 2015 Erik Ranheim Senior Manager IT/Web, Research and.
COP 17, Durban, South Africa The Transport Sector in a Climate Constrained World Svend Søyland, Bellona Foundation and Clean Shipping Coalition.
To Satisfaction of the Administration Seminar on the Implementation of measures to ensure that safety standards are “to the Satisfaction of the Administration.
NAMA potential of Vietnam Vuong Xuan Hoa Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology and Environment Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Climate Change.
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
Urban Mobility Management and Emissions Measurement System Boile Maria 1,2 Afroditi Anagnostopoulou 1 Evangelia Papargyri 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology.
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 14, 2008
The Transport Sector in a Climate Constrained World
Shipping Industry Combating Climate Change
Energy Efficiency Design Index for Challenge Emissions (EEDI)
International Transport and the Paris Agreement
INTERTANKO OVERVIEW REPORT DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR
The Polar Code Rear Admiral Steven D. Poulin United States Coast Guard
International Maritime Organization
2.1 – GHG Emission Reductions
COASTAL STATE RESPONSIBILITY (IMO) – HYDROGRAPHY
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Climate Change
Sustaining the Industry’s Safety and Environmental Performance
POSIDONIA “YACHTING AND PASSENGER SHIPPING FORUM” ATHENS – 22/06/2011
Implementation of Marpol Annex VI
EU-RUSSIA Cooperation in Energy Efficiency
Regulating Arctic Shipping Unilateral, Regional and Global Approaches
OUR VISION World class seaport of choice
Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI Convention
EU plan: Supporting directives • The EU Renewable Energy Directive was adopted at the end of 2008 • EU Renewable Energy Directive.
IMO work to address GHG emissions from ships
IMSAS and the role of the SWPHC
[New HIS on ICTs and Climate Change]
IMO GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT 2020, IMPACTS TO MAJOR FLAGS AND MEASURES TO HELP SHIPOWNERS AND OPERATORS 2019.
Synergies between NDCs & SDGs; Integration into National Planning
Presentation transcript:

Marine Environment Division International Maritime Organization IMO Environmental Activities - Focus on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships Copenhagen 8 December 2009 Karin Sjölin-Frudd Senior Adviser Marine Environment Division International Maritime Organization 1 1

IMO – the International Maritime Organization Safe, secure and efficient shipping on cleaner oceans IMO – the International Maritime Organization - is the United Nations specialized agency with responsibility for the safety and security of shipping and the prevention of marine pollution by ships. Member Governments use IMO to draw up internationally agreed standards that can be applied to all ships.   We sum up our objectives in our mission statement: Safe secure and efficient shipping on clean oceans 2

Global coverage 169 Member States All major ship owning nations All major coastal states IGOs and NGOs IMO now has 169 member states, and three Associate members which includes virtually all of the nations of the world with an interest in maritime affairs, be they involved in the shipping industry or coastal states with an interest in protecting their maritime environment. In addition, a number of inter-governmental and non—governmental organizations, representing a wide variety of interests ranging from industry sectors to environmental groups, have consultative status with the Organization and can attend meetings. Their input to the whole process of developing and refining international standards for shipping is greatly valued.   3

Application to real ships SOLAS 159 Parties 99.04% world tonnage Load lines 159 99.02% MARPOL 150 99.14% COLREGS 153 98.36% STCW 153 99.01% The important thing is the application of regulations to real ships. by adopting the consensus approach, the most important conventions covering maritime safety and the prevention of pollution are now applicable to almost 100 per cent of global tonnage. SOLAS – International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (1960 and amended 1974) MARPOL – International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (1973) COLREGS – Convention on the International Regulation for Preventing Collisions at Sea (1969 and 1972) STCW – International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (1978) 4

Application to real ships More than 50 IMO Conventions Hundreds of codes, guidelines and recommendations Almost every aspect of shipping covered: Design Construction Equipment Maintenance Crew Today there more than 50 IMO treaty instruments and hundred of other measures such as protocols, guidelines, recommended practices and so on. Between them, they influence almost every aspect of shipping and ship operation, including ship design, construction, equipment, maintenance and manning. 5

IMO’s role 51 treaty instruments 21 directly environment related 23 if environmental aspects of the Salvage and Wreck Removal Conventions are included

Summary of Second GHG Study (1/3) Carbon dioxide is the most important GHG emitted by ships International shipping: 2.7% of the global anthropogenic CO2 Absent regulations, ship emissions may grow significantly as a result of growth in shipping 7 7 7

SECOND IMO GHG STUDY 2009 IN 2007, INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING EMITTED: - 870 MILLION TONNES OF CO2; - 2.7% OF TOTAL GLOBAL CO2 EMISSIONS

Summary of Second GHG Study (2/3) Future CO2 emissions for the shipping sector does not harmonise with global need for reduction (policies are needed for the 2° target) 9 9 9

Summary of Second GHG Study (3/3) A significant potential for reduction of GHG through technical and operational measures exits The number of emission reduction options promoted varies between policy options Market-based instruments are the most environmentally effective and cost-effective instruments A mandatory EEDI is a cost-effective instrument to improve the efficiency of new ships 10 10 10

Assessment of Emissions Reduction Potential DESIGN (New ships) Saving of CO2/tonne-mile Combined Concept, speed & capability 2% to 50% 10% to 50% 25% to 75% Hull and superstructure 2% to 20% Power and propulsion systems 5% to 15% Low-carbon fuels Renewable energy 1% to 10% Exhaust gas CO2 reduction 0% OPERATION (All ships) Fleet management, logistics & incentives 5% to 50% Voyage optimization Energy management 11 11 11

Outcome of MEPC 59 MEPC 59 agreed on a package of technical and operational measures MEPC 59 agreed on a work plan to continue developing market-based mechanisms After COP 15: Regulatory action by MEPC 60 (March 2010) and MEPC 61 (September 2010) As per slide.

Technical and operational measures agreed at MEPC 59 Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for new ships – MEPC.1/Circ.681 Voluntary verification of the EEDI – MEPC.1/Circ.682 Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) – MEPC.1/Circ.683 Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (EEOI) – MEPC.1/Circ.684 As per slide.

TECHNICAL MEASURES ENERGY EFFICIENCY DESIGN INDEX FOR NEW SHIPS (EEDI) - WILL ENABLE SHIP DESIGNERS AND BUILDERS TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT INTRINSICALLY EFFICIENT SHIPS - WILL ENCOURAGE SHIP OWNERS TO INVEST IN ENERGY-EFFICIENCY TECHNOLOGIES

Energy Efficiency Design Index Cost: Emissions of CO2 Benefit: Cargo capacity & transport work Complex formula to accommodate most ship types and sizes The Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) provides a figure, expressed in grams of CO2 per tonne mile, that measures the attainable energy efficiency of a specific ship design. It enables the designer to optimize the various parameters at his disposal and provides an energy rating for the ship before it is built. The Index will, therefore, stimulate technical development of all the components influencing fuel efficiency. Through the application of this Index, ships in the near future will have to be designed and constructed intrinsically energy-efficient. The formulation of the Index is rather complex, in that it tries to accommodate a wide range of ship types and sizes. The formula, which I cannot show in the slide because of size and complex structure, may still suffer some modifications before it is agreed by the MEPC in July. 15 15

OPERATIONAL MEASURES: SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEEMP) – ONBOARD MANAGEMENT TOOL INCORPORATING: GUIDANCE ON BEST PRACTICES (SLOWER STEAMING; FASTER TURNAROUND; SPECIAL HULL PAINTS; HEAT RECOVERY SYSTEMS; ETC. ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPERATIONAL INDICATOR (ENABLES SHIPOWNER TO MEASURE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED EFFICIENCY PRACTICES)

Operational Measures cont. Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan Onboard management tool to include: Improved voyage planning (Weather routeing/Just in time) Speed and power optimization Optimized ship handling (ballast/use of rudder and autopilot) Improved fleet management Improved cargo handling Energy management The Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan is being developed, with invaluable input from the shipping industry, as a practical tool to increase the energy efficiency of ships in operation. The Plan’s purpose is to encourage the ship operator to apply the many fuel-saving practices currently available, often referred to as “low hanging fruit”, ready for picking. The most obvious include: - Improved voyage planning (Weather routeing/Just in time); - Speed and power optimization; - Optimized ship handling (ballast/use of rudder and autopilot); - Improved fleet management; - Improved cargo handling; and - Onboard energy management (e.g. engine heat recovery), to name but a few. 17 17

Operational Measures cont. Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator An efficiency indicator for all ships (new and existing) obtained from fuel consumption, voyage (miles) and cargo data (tonnes) Cargo Onboard x (Distance traveled) Fuel Consumption in Operation = Actual Fuel Consumption Index The Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (EEOI) enables operators to measure the fuel efficiency of a ship in operation. Expressed in grams of CO2 per tonne mile, the indicator enables comparison between individual ships and thereby facilitates adoption of appropriate measures to reduce energy consumption. More importantly, the Indicator makes it possible for operators and crews to monitor the effectiveness of any new measures applied in accordance with the Ship Energy Management Plan. The Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator has been implemented on a trial basis since 2005 and the outcome and experience obtained from hundreds of trials will enable the MEPC in July to adopt a mature and robust tool to gage the operational efficiency of individual ships. 18 18

Objective of the EEOI Evaluation of any changes made to the ship Measuring energy-efficiency at each voyage Evaluation of operational performance by owners or operators Continued monitoring of individual ship Evaluation of any changes made to the ship or its operation MEPC has developed Guidelines for voluntary use of the ship Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (MEPC.1/Circ.684) to establish a consistent approach for measuring ships energy-efficiency at each voyage or over a certain period of time, which will assist shipowners and ship operators in the evaluation of the operational performance of their fleet. As the amount of CO2 emitted from ships is directly related to the consumption of bunker fuel oil, the EEOI can also provide useful information on a ship’s performance with regard to fuel efficiency. The EEOI enables continued monitoring of individual ships in operation and thereby the results of any changes made to the ship or its operation. The effect of retrofitting a new and more efficient propeller would be reflected in the EEOI value and the emissions reduction could be quantified. The effect on emissions by changes in operations, such as introduction of just in time planning or a sophisticated weather routing system, will also be shown in the EEOI value.

EEOI coverage Can be applied to almost all ships (new and existing ships) Also be applied to passenger ships Cannot be applied to ships not engaged in transport work e.g. research vessel or tug boat The EEOI can be applied to almost all ships (new and existing) including passenger ships, however it cannot be applied to ships that are not engaged in transport work, such as service and research vessels, tug boats or FPSO, as it is transport work that is the input value together with emissions (fuel consumed).

Status of EEOI ・EEOI has been implemented on a trial basis since 2005 ・MEPC 59 agreed the revision of EEOI ・Voluntary use by owner and operators ・Collect information on the outcome and  experiences in applying the EEOI The Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator has been implemented on a trial basis since 2005 and the outcome and experience obtained from hundreds of trials will enable the MEPC in July to adopt a mature and robust tool to gage the operational efficiency of individual ships. The EEOI is circulated to encourage shipowners and ship operators to use it on a voluntary basis and to collect information on the outcome and experiences in applying the EEOI.

3. MARKET-BASED MECHANISM TO SUPPLEMENT TECHNICAL AND OPPERATIONAL REDUCTION MEASURES BY OFFSETTING EMISSIONS IN OTHER AREAS. CURRENT PROPOSALS: INTERNATIONAL GHG EMISSIONS CONTRIBUTION FUND GLOBAL EMISSION TRADING SCHEME TRADING WITH EFFICIENCY CREDITS (USING EEDI) MOST REVENUES TO BE USED FOR CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

IMO OBJECTIVES: Copenhagen - Outcome THAT UNFCCC PARTIES CONTINUE ENTRUSTING IMO WITH THE REGULATION OF GHG EMISSIONS FROM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING; AND THAT THE SUBSEQUENT IMO REGULATORY REGIME BE APPLIED TO ALL SHIPS, REGARDLESS OF THE FLAG THEY FLY.

Welcome to visit our exhibition booth at the Bella Centre for more material and information I thank you for your attention. www.imo.org 24 24

Thank you for your attention! I thank you for your attention. For more information please see: www.imo.org 25 25