The GIFTS Fast Model: Clouds, Aerosols, Surface Emissivity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Advertisements

 nm)  nm) PurposeSpatial Resolution (km) Ozone, SO 2, UV8 3251Ozone8 3403Aerosols, UV, and Volcanic Ash8 3883Aerosols, Clouds, UV and Volcanic.
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
Constraining aerosol sources using MODIS backscattered radiances Easan Drury - G2
Radiative Transfer Model Vijay Natraj. Welcome-2 Why RADIANT? Standard methods for multiple scattering RT calculations are: Standard methods for multiple.
Atmospheric scatterers
Page 1 Vijay Natraj Polarization November 9, 2007.
Radiative Transfer Model Vijay Natraj. Welcome-2 Why RADIANT? The optical depth sensitivity of doubling The optical depth sensitivity of doubling The.
Card 1. MODTRAN Card deck/Tape5_Edit Tutorial Explanation of Parameters & Options.
A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.
Radiant 2.0: An Introduction Mick Christi OCO Science Meeting March 2004.
METO 621 Lesson 15. Prototype Problem #1 Semi-infinite slab.
Retrieval of thermal infrared cooling rates from EOS instruments Daniel Feldman Thursday IR meeting January 13, 2005.
University of Wisconsin - Madison (UW) University of Hawaii (UH) Texas A& M (TAMU) University of Colorado at Boulder (CU) University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Assess cloud impact using v6 cloud products Update Task reports with new results + v6 shown here. Update code to include processnig L1 PCs + variable.
University of Wisconsin - Madison (UW) University of Hawaii (UH) Texas A& M (TAMU) University of Colorado at Boulder (CU) University of Alabama in Huntsville.
A discussion of Radiative Transfer Models Thomas J. Kleespies NOAA/NESDIS.
00/XXXX1 RTTOV-7: A satellite radiance simulator for the new millennium What is RTTOV Latest developments from RTTOV-6 to 7 Validation results for RTTOV-7.
EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA.
1 Atmospheric Radiation – Lecture 9 PHY Lecture 10 Infrared radiation in a cloudy atmosphere: approximations.
IGARSS 2011, July 24-29, Vancouver, Canada 1 A PRINCIPAL COMPONENT-BASED RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION TO HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING Xu.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
© Crown copyright Met Office Radiation scheme for Earth’s atmosphere …and what might not work for exoplanets James Manners 6/12/11.
As components of the GOES-R ABI Air Quality products, a multi-channel algorithm similar to MODIS/VIIRS for NOAA’s next generation geostationary satellite.
Cloud optical properties: modeling and sensitivity study Ping Yang Texas A&M University May 28,2003 Madison, Wisconsin.
1 CIMSS/SSEC Effort on the Fast IR Cloudy Forward Model Development A Fast Parameterized Single Layer Infrared Cloudy Forward Model Status and Features.
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 1. Scattering Phase Function Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert Loughman.
Radiative transfer in the thermal infrared and the surface source term
Daily observation of dust aerosols infrared optical depth and altitude from IASI and AIRS and comparison with other satellite instruments Christoforos.
CIMSS Forward Model Capability to Support GOES-R Measurement Simulations Tom Greenwald, Hung-Lung (Allen) Huang, Dave Tobin, Ping Yang*, Leslie Moy, Erik.
Aerosol Characterization Using the SeaWiFS Sensor and Surface Data E. M. Robinson and R. B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Within dr, L changes (dL) from… sources due to scattering & emission losses due to scattering & absorption Spectral Radiance, L(, ,  ) - W m -2 sr -1.
D. J. Posselt, J. E. Davies, E. R. Olson3 rd MURI Spring Workshop28-29 May 2003 Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets Derek J. Posselt, Jim E. Davies,
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
MDTERP MarylanD TErrestial Radiation Package A Narrow-Band Longwave Radiation Model with a Graphical User Interface Robert G. Ellingson and Ezra Takara.
Joint AMWG/CVWG Workshop March 6-7, 2003 Improvements in Radiation Processes Bill Collins Andrew Conley, David Fillmore, Julia.
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
1 Atmospheric Radiation – Lecture 13 PHY Lecture 13 Remote sensing using emitted IR radiation.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Initial trade-off: Height-resolved.
1 UW MURI Physical Modeling For Processing Hyperspectral Data – Non-UW Co-Is’ Progress Allen Huang, PI Co-Is: Paul L. HIGP, Univ. of Hawaii Ping Y., Univ.
(A) Future of Radiation Parameterizations in CAM Bill Collins National Center for Atmospheric Research
1 Hyperspectral IR Cloudy Fast Forward Model J. E. Davies, X. Wang, E. R. Olson, J. A. Otkin, H-L. Huang, Ping Yang #, Heli Wei #, Jianguo Niu # and David.
METR Advanced Atmospheric Radiation Dave Turner Lecture 7.
© Crown copyright Met Office OBR conference 2012 Stephan Havemann, Jean-Claude Thelen, Anthony J. Baran, Jonathan P. Taylor The Havemann-Taylor Fast Radiative.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC.
1 Synthetic Hyperspectral Radiances for Retrieval Algorithm Development J. E. Davies, J. A. Otkin, E. R. Olson, X. Wang, H-L. Huang, Ping Yang # and Jianguo.
Slide 1 Robin Hogan, APRIL-CLARA-DORSY meeting 2016 ©ECMWF Towards a fast shortwave radiance forward model for exploiting MSI measurements Robin Hogan.
Visible vicarious calibration using RTM
What is atmospheric radiative transfer?
Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface (I)
Coulson’s tabulated values Coulson’s tabulated values
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
Meteorological Satellite Center Japan Meteorological Agency
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
Ralf Bennartz Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
GIFTS-IOMI Clear Sky Forward Model
Component decomposition of IASI measurements
Computing cloudy radiances
Clear Sky Forward Model & Its Adjoint Model
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Computing cloudy radiances
+ = Climate Responses to Biomass Burning Aerosols over South Africa
GIFTS/IOMI Cloudy/Aerosol Forward Model Development
A Unified Radiative Transfer Model: Microwave to Infrared
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
Studying the cloud radiative effect using a new, 35yr spanning dataset of cloud properties and radiative fluxes inferred from global satellite observations.
Comparison of Simulated Top of Atmosphere Radiance Datasets
Presentation transcript:

The GIFTS Fast Model: Clouds, Aerosols, Surface Emissivity James E. Davies ABSTRACT The GIFTS fast radiative transfer model is evolving to include the radiative effects of clouds, aerosols and surface spectral emissivity. It does have some complexity, mainly in the domain of user choices (fixed ; spectral ; representative of land (or ocean) class; randomly or geographically selected; angular dependence). Once provided with an interface to these choices, and, where applicable, alternate processing paths in the fast radiative transfer code, the next task is to ensure that the verification code (by which the fidelity of the fast model is judged) has sufficient flexibility to test the fast model. The same general issues arise with clouds and aerosols. This presentation gives an update on the status of the GIFTS fast model and foreshadows some of the challenges ahead.

http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/gifts/noaa/

Radiative Transfer Approximation

TRUTH and FAST models TRUTH FAST BACK END Monochromatic tables Gases: Line strengths/widths e.g. HITRAN database Surfaces: Emissivity by land class and geometry e.g. UCSB and P. Lucey tables Clouds: Single scattering properties by crystal habit and size dist. e.g. LBLDIS tables Aerosols: Single scattering properties by mineral and size dist. e.g. I. Sokolik tables PRE-PROC Parameterize and channel-weight RT MODEL Interpolate monochromatic data TRUTH FAST POST-PROC Apply instrument effects (spectral and spatial integration) FRONT END “TRUTH” Radiances: For selected instrument channels “FAST” Radiances: For all instrument channels Channel Radiances Channel Radiances

Split atmosphere above cloud-top improves “TRUTH” accuracy (LBLDIS now at v1.7) Need only execute DISORT to cloud top. Separately compute monochromatic radiances and transmittances above cloud top with LBLRTM. Interpolate DISORT output to LBLRTM TOA output resolution and compute “pseudo” monochromatic TOA radiances. Spectrally reduce to hyperspectral instrument channels.

Comparison across entire band vs chirp

TOA Radiance Temperature RMSE Improved consistency between FAST model R/T coefficients and verification model single scattering property tables leads to improvements in the RMSE radiance temperature differences

Surface emissivity and its impact

Aerosol Ensemble Optical Properties

UW GIFTS/HES CCH (clear, cloud, haze) Radiative Transfer Modeling

Next version ToDo List Solar radiation in the SMW band Inclusion of aerosol effects on simulated TOA radiances