Why Collect Outcome Data?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Advertisements

Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Highs and Lows on the Road to High Quality Data American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA November, 2011 Kathy Hebbeler and Lynne Kahn ECO at SRI International.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
Session 1: So What’s This All About? Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement Kansas Division for Early Childhood Annual Conference Feb. 23rd 2012.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Parent and National TA Perspectives on EC Outcomes Connie Hawkins, Region 2 PTAC Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn ECO at FPG and NECTAC.
Early Childhood Outcomes Workgroup Christina Kasprzak and Lynne Kahn ECO and NECTAC July 2009.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, NECTAC and ECO at FPG
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Incorporating Early Childhood into Longitudinal Data Systems:
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Orientation to Outcomes
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International AUCD Meeting Washington, DC
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Child Outcomes Data: A Critical Lever for Systems Change
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Review of Summary Statements for Target Setting on Indicators C3 and B7 Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 9,
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
IDEA Part C and Part B Section 619 National Child Outcomes Results for
OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes
Data on Child and Family Outcomes: Tools for Improving State Systems
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
The Basics of Quality Data and Target Setting
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
School Readiness and the Assessment of Children with Disabilities
Communicating to the Public about Child Outcomes Data
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
School Readiness and the Assessment of Children with Disabilities
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Goal of Early Intervention “…To enable young children to be active and successful participants during the early childhood years and in the future in a variety of settings – in their homes with their families, in child care, in preschool or school programs, and in the community.” (from Early Childhood Outcomes Center, http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/pdfs/eco_outcomes_4-13-05.pdf) Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Public Policy Context Age of accountability Accountability increasingly means looking at results, not just process Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is under increasing pressure to produce outcome data on children participating in early intervention and early childhood special education programs Early Childhood Outcomes Center

PART Review Findings for Part C and Part B Preschool Results not demonstrated Part C “While the program has met its goal relating to the number of children served, it has not collected information on how well the program is doing to improve the educational and developmental outcomes of infants and toddlers served.” Part B Preschool “The Department has no performance information on preschool children with disabilities served by this program.” Read more at ExpectMore.gov Depending on your audience, there may need to be further explanation about what PART, Part C, and Section 619 are (and how they are known in the state) and perhaps expansion of discussion and issues for a more general early childhood audience if information on outcomes is being collected by a broader group within the state. Early Childhood Outcomes Center

OSEP’s Response Required states to submit outcome data in their Annual Performance Report (APR) Funded the Early Childhood Outcomes Center to do research, make recommendations, and assist states Early Childhood Outcomes Center

The ECO Center’s Early Work Convened stakeholders to identify child and family outcome areas and develop outcome statements Received input from state Part C and 619 Coordinators, researchers, families, administrators, and the general public Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Result of Process: ECO Center Made Recommendations to OSEP Recommendations on: Child and family outcome statements (February 2005, revised April 2005) Categories of information that should be collected about these outcomes (May 2005) Read more at www.the-eco-center.org Early Childhood Outcomes Center

OSEP Reporting Requirements: Child Outcomes Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships) Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication [and early literacy]) Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs Elaborate on outcomes if group is not familiar with them. Outcome 1: getting along with others Outcome 2: children as learners Outcome 3: meeting their needs The early literacy portion is relevant for 619, not included in the Part C child outcome statements. Early Childhood Outcomes Center

OSEP Reporting Categories Percentage of children who: a. Did not improve functioning b. Improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers c. Improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it d. Improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers e. Maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers These are included primarily as an FYI to a provider audience who will not have to convert the ratings to the reporting categories themselves. Some audiences know about the old requirements and might notice they are different, but generally spending a minimal amount of time on the reporting categories is sufficient. 3 outcomes x 5 “measures” = 15 numbers Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Reporting Schedule Entry information (Age expected? Yes, No) Must be reported for children entering between July 1, 2005, and June 30, 2006 Due February 2007 Data in reporting categories at exit for all children who have been in the program for at least 6 months Must be reported for the year beginning July 1, 2006 Due February 2008 Repeat with next year’s data in 2009, etc. Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Why Collect Outcome Data? Federal government is the driving force behind the move to collect outcome data However, providing data for the federal government is not the only reason to collect outcome data Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Why Collect Outcome Data? Data on outcomes are important for state and local purposes. To document program effectiveness Increase in funding? To improve programs Identify strengths and weaknesses Allocate support resources, such as technical assistance And, ultimately to better serve children and families Early Childhood Outcomes Center