Investigational Approaches to Antiretroviral Therapy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
20th International AIDS Conference; July 20-25, 2014; Melbourne, Australia DTG-Based Regimens Are Active in INI-Naive Patients With a History of NRTI Resistance.
Advertisements

Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS , prodrug of BMS (attachment inhibitor) - AI Study.
Switch to ATV/r + RAL  HARNESS Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 N = 72 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid  Design Randomisation 2: 1 Open-label.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
TITAN = TMC114/r In Treatment-experienced pAtients Naïve to lopinavir
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Switching ARVs in Virologically Suppressed Patients.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
SAILING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment- experienced INI-naïve patients DK/DLG/0041/14c September 2015.
Results From DUET-1 and DUET-2: ETR Plus DRV/RTV Associated With High Rates of Viral Suppression in Treatment-Experienced Patients This program is supported.
FLAMINGO Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects SE/HIV/0023/14c January 2014.
VIKING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects SE/HIV/0023/14b January 2014.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
#AIDS2016 Dolutegravir (DTG) plus Rilpivirine (RPV) in Suppressed Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected Patients A. Díaz, J.L. Casado, F.
PPD Global Feasibility Services
Novel Antiretroviral Studies and Strategies
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Treatment-Naïve Adults
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Monotherapy or Dual Therapy in Switch Studies: Which is the Best Regimen? Dr. Jose R
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Darunavir/r versus Other PIs in Treatment Experienced POWER 1 and 2
Intensification with INSTI
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Antiretroviral Updates: New Treatments for HIV
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Next Generation Capsid Inhibitor: GS–CA1
Why Dolutegravir? Daniel R. Kuritzkes, M.D.
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Intensification with INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
HIV Replication at
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Investigational Approaches to Antiretroviral Therapy
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Investigational Approaches to Antiretroviral Therapy
DTG + 3TC vs DTG + TDF/FTC GEMINI.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

Investigational Approaches to Antiretroviral Therapy Eric S. Daar, MD Professor of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, California FORMATTED: 04/26/17 Chicago, Illinois: May 10, 2017

Financial Relationships With Commercial Entities Dr Daar has received research and grant support from Gilead Sciences, Inc, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare. He has also received consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Janssen Therapeutics, Merck, Teva, and ViiV Healthcare. (Updated 04/26/17)

Learning Objectives After attending this presentation, learners will be able to: Summarize treatments being investigated for HIV-infected persons with viremia Describe treatments being investigated for those with virologic suppression on antiretroviral therapy

Investigational Treatment Strategies

PADDLE (Pilot Antiretroviral Design with Dolutegravir LamivudinE) Cahn P, et al 21st International AIDS Conference 2016, Durban, South Africa, Abstract FRAB0104LB

ANRS 167 LamiDol Study: DTG/3TC Maintenance Inclusion Criteria CD4 nadir>200 cells/uL No h/o VF and suppressed >2 yrs Baseline Characteristics Time on ART (4.0 yrs) CD4 743 cells/uL Third agent: NNRTI (56%); PI (23%); INSTI (21%) Primary end-point: Proportion therapeutic success* at wk 56 of DTG + 3TC *no VF, interruption, LTFU or death Joly V, et al. 24th CROI 2017, Abst 458

Confirmed virologic withdrawal 2 per arm One DTG + RPV had K101K/E No INSTI resistance

Investigational Drugs/Formulations

Once-Daily Raltegravir Baseline Characteristics Median HIV RNA 4.6 log/mL (28% >100,000 c/mL) Median CD4 380/416 cells/uL Cahn P, et al 21st International AIDS Conference 2016, Durban, South Africa, Abstract FRAB0103LB.

AE

Bictegravir vs. Dolutegravir for First-Line Therapy Baseline Characteristics Median HIV RNA= 4.4-5 log10/mL (15-21% >100,000 c/mL) Median CD4= 441/455 cells/uL Sax PE, et al. 24th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2017; Seattle, WA. Abstract 41. Sax PE, et al. Lancet HIV. 2017; 4:e154-160.

Doravirine vs. Darunavir/ritonavir for First-Line Therapy Baseline Characteristics Median HIV RNA 4.4 log10 c/mL (19-22% >100,000 c/mL) Median CD4 412-433 cells/uL 87-88% TDF/FTC Molin J-M, et al. 24th CROI 2017, Abst 45LB

Virologic Failure and Resistance Non PDVF patients D/C with noncompliance at week 24: V106I, H221Y, F227C and M184V with high level DOR resistance Rash at week 2 with 2.8- fold increase (from 2.2 fold at baseline)

LATTE 2 Margolis D, et al. 21st International AIDS Conference 2016, Durban, South Africa, Abstract THAB0206LB

PDVF Q8wk (2); Q4wk (0); Daily (1) Only resistance in single Q8wk patient: NNRTI- K103N, E138G and K238T; INSTI- Q148R (5.8 FC to CAB)

TMB-301: Ibalizumab in Patients with Multidrug Resistance Baseline Characteristics Mean VL= 100,287 c/mL Mean CD4= 150 cells/uL Fostemsavir in OBR= 43% Resistance: NRTI (93%); NNRTI (93%); PI (88%); INSTI (68%) Ibalizumab: humanized mAb to CD4 receptor that blocks HIV entry into CD4+ T-cells FDA breakthrough and orphan drug designations Single-arm, open-label phase III trial Primary endpoint: ≥ 0.5 log10 HIV-1 RNA decrease at Day 14 53% with resistance to all drugs from ≥ 3 classes; 68% with INSTI resistance; 43% required investigational agent fostemsavir in OBR Pts with HIV-1 RNA > 1000 copies/mL; on ART ≥ 6 mos, on stable ART ≥ 8 wks; resistant to ≥ 1 ARV from 3 classes, sensitive to ≥ 1 ARV for OBR (N = 40) Wk 25 Ibalizumab 2000 mg IV Day 7 (loading dose) Continue Failing ART Days 0-14 800 mg IV Day 21, Q2W (maintenance dose) Switch to OBR Day 14 Primary Endpoint: Control Period: Day 0-7 Lewis S, et al. CROI 2017. Abstract 449LB.

9 pts reported 17 serious AEs Virologic Outcome[1] Ibalizumab + OBR Day 14 ≥ 0.5 log10 HIV-1 RNA decrease, % 83* ≥ 1.0 log10 HIV-1 RNA decrease, % 60 Mean HIV-1 RNA decrease, log10 1.1 Wk 24 55 ≥ 2.0 log10 HIV-1 RNA decrease, % 48 HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, % 43 HIV-1 RNA < 200 copies/mL, % 50 Mean HIV-1 RNA decrease from BL, log10 1.6 9 pts reported 17 serious AEs 1 drug-related SAE (IRIS) resulted in discontinuation 9 other pts discontinued Death (n = 4; liver failure, Kaposi sarcoma; end-stage AIDS, lymphoma) Consent withdrawal (n = 3) Lost to follow-up (n = 2) No cases of anti-ibalizumab antibodies Phase III TMB-311 study ongoing; extension for pts from TMB-301; accepting new pts[2] *Primary endpoint; P < .0001 vs 3% at end of control period. 1. Lewis S, et al. CROI 2017. Abstract 449LB. 2. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02707861.

Randomized, active-controlled, phase IIb study, blinded to dose Fostemsavir: attachment inhibitor prodrug; proposed MOA: binding HIV-1 gp120 prevents viral attachment and entry into host CD4+ cells Randomized, active-controlled, phase IIb study, blinded to dose Primary endpoint: HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Wk 24 Fostemsavir 600 mg QD* + RAL + TDF (n = 51) HIV-infected pts with exposure HIV-1 RNA ≥ 1000 c/mL; CD4+ ≥ 50 cells/mm3; virus susceptible to RAL, TDF, ATV, and fostemsavir IC50 < 100 nM (N = 254) Wk 48 Wk 24: 1̊ endpoint ATV/RTV 300/100 mg QD + RAL + TDF Fostemsavir 1200 mg QD + RAL + TDF (n = 50) Fostemsavir 400 mg BID* + RAL + TDF Fostemsavir 800 mg BID* + RAL + TDF (n = 49) Wk 96 Granados-Reyes ER, et al. HIV Glasgow 2016. Abstract O335A. Llamoso C, et al. HIV Glasgow 2016. Abstract O335B. *Fostemsavir dose changed to 1200 mg QD from Wk 48 to Wk 96.

At Wk 96, 90% of pts had HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL in both fostemsavir and ATV/RTV arms in observed analysis[1] No significant differences in virologic efficacy regardless of race, sex, age, BL HIV-1 RNA, BL CD4+ cell count, or IC50 subgroups[1] Fostemsavir generally well tolerated, with higher rates of grade 2-4 TEAEs (37% vs 9%) and d/c for AEs (10% vs 3%) for ATV/RTV arm vs fostemsavir arm[2] Phase III trial of fostemsavir in heavily treatment–experienced pts ongoing[3] Wk 49 Placebo Pts with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 c/mL on current regimen; ≤ 2 classes of active approved ARVs left to compose OBR due to resistance, intolerance, or contraindications Fostemsavir + OBR Day 8* Fostemsavir As above but with no active approved ARV options remaining *1° endpoint: mean log10 HIV RNA change from BL. 1. Granados-Reyes ER, et al. HIV Glasgow 2016. Abstract O335A. 2. Llamoso C, et al. HIV Glasgow 2016. Abstract O335B. 3. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02362503.

Thank you for your Attention Questions?