Making Sense of Arguments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy 148 Chapter 3 (part 2).
Advertisements

The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 More Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Other Info on Making Arguments
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument English 102 Argumentation.
Deduction and Induction
For Friday, read chapter 2, sections 1-2 (pp ). As nongraded homework, do the problems on p. 19. Graded homework #1 is due at the beginning of class.
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Basic Argumentation.
Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
Logic in Everyday Life.
Deductive vs. Inductive Logic This course is about deductive logic. But it is important to know something about inductive logic.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
Logic. What is logic? Logic (from the Ancient Greek: λογική, logike) is the use and study of valid reasoning. The study of logic features most prominently.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
Argument Diagramming Part II PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 1, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
The construction of a formal argument
Philosophy 148 Inductive Reasoning. Inductive reasoning – common misconceptions: - “The process of deriving general principles from particular facts or.
Understanding the Persuasive Techniques in Developing Arguments How a speech can soothe and inspire a grieving population.
Philosophy 104 Chapter 8 Notes (Part 1). Induction vs Deduction Fogelin and Sinnott-Armstrong describe the difference between induction and deduction.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
Text Table of Contents #5: Evaluating the Argument.
Jamie S. Burton PHI 103 Gloria Zuniga y Postigo April 21, 2014.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Part One: Assessing the Inference, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Deductive reasoning.
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)
1.1 Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
a valid argument with true premises.
Author’s Viewpoint and Strength of an Argument
Chapter 1: Good and Bad Reasoning
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Chapter 9: Successful Paragraphs
Philosophy : Thinkers, Theories and Questions Chapter 2
Overview Philosophy & logic.
Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Logic, Philosophical Tools Quiz Review…20 minutes 10/31
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Arguments.
Inductive and Deductive Logic
The Power of Critical Thinking
Argumentation Strategies
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Avoiding Ungrounded Assumptions
Presentation transcript:

Making Sense of Arguments Chapter 3 Making Sense of Arguments

Deductive Arguments A deductive argument is intended to provide conclusive support for its conclusion. A deductive argument that succeeds in providing conclusive support for its premise is said to be valid. A valid argument is such that if its premises are true, its conclusion must be true. A deductively valid argument with true premises is said to be sound.

Inductive Arguments An inductive argument is intended to provide probable support for its conclusion. An inductive argument that succeeds in providing probable support for its conclusion is said to be strong. A strong argument is such that if its premises are true, its conclusion is probably true. An inductively strong argument with true premises is said to be cogent.

Judging Arguments Telling (1) whether an argument is deductive or inductive and (2) whether it gives good reasons for accepting the conclusion Step 1. Find the argument’s conclusion and then its premises. Step 2. Ask: Is it the case that if the premises are true the conclusion must be true? Step 3. Ask: Is it the case that if the premises are true, its conclusion is probably true? Step 4. Ask: Is the argument intended to offer conclusive or probable support for its conclusion but fails to do so?

Finding Implicit Premises Step 1. Search for a credible premise that would make the argument valid. Choose the supplied premise that (a) is most plausible and (b) fits best with the author’s intent. Step 2. Search for a credible premise that would make the argument as strong as possible. Choose the supplied premise that fulfills stipulations a and b above. Step 3. Evaluate the reconstituted argument.

Valid Conditional Argument Forms Hypothetical Syllogism If p, then q. If q, then r. Therefore, if p, then r. Example: If Ajax steals the money, he will go to jail. If Ajax goes to jail, his family will suffer. Therefore, if Ajax steals the money, his family will suffer.

Diagramming Arguments: Step by Step 1. Underline all premise or conclusion indicator words such as “since,” “therefore,” and “because.” Then number the statements. 2. Find the conclusion and draw a wavy line under it. 3. Locate the premises and underline them. 4. Cross out all extraneous material—redundancies, irrelevant sentences, questions, exclamations. 5. Draw the diagram, connecting premises and conclusions with arrows showing logical connections. Include both dependent and independent premises.

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions Necessary Conditions: the conditions (or features) that a thing must have in order to be that thing. Sufficient Conditions: conditions that guarantee that something exists or is a certain kind of thing.