Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Advertisements

Apaf-1, a Human Protein Homologous to C
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Dragony Fu, Kathleen Collins  Molecular Cell 
Arginine Methylation of STAT1 Modulates IFNα/β-Induced Transcription
Jin Yang, Hal P. Bogerd, P.Jeremy Wang, David C. Page, Bryan R. Cullen 
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Yingqun Huang, Renata Gattoni, James Stévenin, Joan A. Steitz 
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Shelley Chu, Ira Herskowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 117, Issue 3, Pages (April 2004)
Properties of H. volcanii tRNA Intron Endonuclease Reveal a Relationship between the Archaeal and Eucaryal tRNA Intron Processing Systems  Karen Kleman-Leyer,
Shinobu Chiba, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
The Cdk-Activating Kinase (CAK) from Budding Yeast
Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Mike Tyers  Current Biology 
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Naoko Kanda, Shinichi Watanabe  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Aberrant Nuclear Trafficking of La Protein Leads to Disordered Processing of Associated Precursor tRNAs  Robert V Intine, Miroslav Dundr, Tom Misteli,
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Michal Danin-Kreiselman, Chrissie Young Lee, Guillaume Chanfreau 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (May 2007)
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Stress-Induced Phosphorylation of S
Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein Blocks the 5′ Splice Site-Dependent Assembly of U2AF and the Prespliceosomal E Complex  Shalini Sharma, Arnold M.
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
RNA Helicase A Mediates Association of CBP with RNA Polymerase II
Jodi L. Vogel, Dawn A. Parsell, Susan Lindquist  Current Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Allele-Specific Suppression of a Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor Reveals a Physiological Role of UGGT in ER Quality Control  Hua Jin, Zhenyan Yan,
RNase III-Mediated Silencing of a Glucose-Dependent Repressor in Yeast
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
TNF Regulates the In Vivo Occupancy of Both Distal and Proximal Regulatory Regions of the MCP-1/JE Gene  Dongsheng Ping, Peter L. Jones, Jeremy M. Boss 
George Simos, Anke Sauer, Franco Fasiolo, Eduard C Hurt  Molecular Cell 
Rory Geyer, Susan Wee, Scott Anderson, John Yates, Dieter A. Wolf 
Volume 14, Issue 24, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Translation Initiation from the Ribosomal A Site or the P Site, Dependent on the Conformation of RNA Pseudoknot I in Dicistrovirus RNAs  Nobuhiko Kamoshita,
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
The Engagement of Sec61p in the ER Dislocation Process
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 339-348 (August 2000) Control of Transfer RNA Maturation by Phosphorylation of the Human La Antigen on Serine 366  Robert V.A. Intine, Amy L. Sakulich, Shashi B. Koduru, Ying Huang, Erik Pierstorff, John L. Goodier, Lon Phan, Richard J. Maraia  Molecular Cell  Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 339-348 (August 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00034-4

Figure 1 The Fission Yeast La Gene Encoding Sla1p Is Required for Accumulation of tRNASerUGAM Transcripts (A) A cloverleaf-like illustration of the intron-containing pre-tRNASerUGAM according to a representation in which anticodon nucleotides are base paired with intron nucleotides (Trotta and Abelson 1999). Nucleotides in the 5′ leader, 3′ trailer, and intron are in lower case. Three substitutions are shown in bold with underline (see text). (B–D) yAS99 (Sla1+) and yAS95 (Sla1−) were transformed with an integrating vector containing the tRNASerUGAM gene. After isolation in selective media, cells were grown in rich media (YES). Total RNAs from two Sla1+ and three Sla1− transformants are shown in this Northern blot. The same blot was hybridized and stripped sequentially with the probes indicated. Suppression of ade6-704, as revealed in a colorimetric plate assay (see below), is indicated below the lanes of (D). Identities of the species indicated to the left were determined by differential reactivity with oligonucleotide probes directed to the 5′ leader, 3′ trailer, and intron (not shown) (Van Horn et al. 1997). Molecular Cell 2000 6, 339-348DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00034-4)

Figure 2 Sla1p Restores tRNASerUGAM-Mediated Suppression to Sla1− Cells (A) Representations of Sla1p constructs and a summary of their activities in yAS110 as demonstrated in the plate assays shown in (B). Shaded blocks represent conserved domains corresponding to RRM-1 and RRM-2 of human La (Kenan 1995) (Goodier et al. 1997; Fan et al. 1998). Note that the RRM-1 region of yeast La has been referred to as the La motif (Sobel and Wolin 1999). The nuclear localization signal (NLS) is referred to in the text. (B) Suppression assays in the absence and presence of thiamin. (C) Immunoblot analysis of the Sla1p constructs shown in (A) and (B) above in the absence of thiamin (except for lane 4; see below). Equal amounts of total protein, verified by SDS/PAGE and staining (not shown), were loaded. Lane 1, yAS99 (Sla1+); lanes 2–8, yAS95 (Sla1− ) transformed with pREP4-derived plasmids; lane 2, vector alone; lane 3, Sla1p 1–298; lane 4, Sla1p 1–298 (+ thiamin); lane 5, Sla1p 52–298; lane 6, Sla1p 171–298; lane 7, Sla1p 1–251; lane 8, Sla1p 1–284. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 339-348DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00034-4)

Figure 3 A Distinct Activity of Human La Is Discernible in Fission Yeast (A) Suppression assay in yAS110 reveals differential activities of Sla1p and human (h)La. (B) Immunoblot of protein isolated from yAS110 transformed with pREP4-hLa 1–408 (lane 1) or pREP4 vector alone (lane 3); lane 2 contained HeLa extract as a control. (C) Northern blot analysis of cells transformed with vector alone (pREP4, lane 1), various Sla1 constructs (lanes 2–7), and hLa (lane 8) using a tRNASerUGAM-specific probe, MSer-UGA. Cells were grown in selective media. (D) The blot in (C) was reprobed for intron-containing tRNASerUGAM species. (E) The same blot was reprobed for intron-containing tRNALyscuu species. Suppression, as revealed in Figure 2, is summarized below the lanes. For (D) and (E), the nascent unprocessed precursors are indicated to the right. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 339-348DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00034-4)

Figure 4 RRM-3 and Other Motifs in the CTD of hLa Block tRNASerUGAM-Mediated Suppression (A) Extracts of S. pombe expressing mutant hLa proteins were examined by SDS/PAGE followed by staining (lower panel) and immunoblotting with antiserum specific for hLa (upper panel). (B) Results showing the activities of various constructs in the suppression assay. (C) The hLa proteins examined in this study are shown in schematized form with a summary of their suppression activities (indicated to the right). Positions of RRMs 1–3 are shown as are two potential nuclear localization signals (NLS). The SBM is represented by “+++”. Serine 366 is represented by an encircled S. An acidic region is represented by “− −.” Molecular Cell 2000 6, 339-348DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00034-4)

Figure 5 RRM-3 and Other Motifs in the CTD of hLa Impede Processing of Pre-tRNASerUGAM and Endogenous Pre-tRNAs (A) Northern blot with a probe that detects precursor and mature tRNASerUGAM species. Suppression of strain yAS110 is summarized below the lanes. (B) The blot in (A) was reprobed for pre-tRNALyscuu intron-containing species (upper) and mature tRNALyscuu (lower). The species indicated to the right were determined by their differential reactivity with oligo probes directed to the 5′ leader, 3′ trailer, and intron (not shown). Molecular Cell 2000 6, 339-348DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00034-4)

Figure 6 The SBM in the CTD of hLa Impedes a Rate-Limiting Step in tRNA Maturation (A) Predicted representations of the intron-containing pre-tRNASerUGAM (middle) and pre-tRNASerUGAM-G37:10 (right), according to a model in which anticodon nucleotides are base paired with intron nucleotides (Trotta and Abelson 1999). The parental species, pre-tRNASerUCA (left), is shown for comparison. Three tRNASerUGAM-specific nucleotides are shown as bold underlined text; intron sequences are shown in lower case except for the 37:10 position (arrowhead). The leaders and trailers are represented by solid lines. (B) Cells carrying tRNASerUGAM (strain yAS110, sectors 1–4) or tRNASerUGAM-G37:10 (strain ySK5, sectors 5–8) alleles were transformed with Sla1p, hLa 1–408, hLa Δ328–344, or pREP4, as indicated, and assayed for suppression. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 339-348DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00034-4)

Figure 7 Phosphorylation of hLa on Serine 366 Promotes tRNA Expression (A) In vivo suppressor activities of pREP4 alone (sector 1), Sla1p (sector 2), hLa-S366 (sector 3), hLa-A366 (sector 4), and hLa-G366 (sector 5) in cells carrying the tRNASerUGAM-G37:10 allele. (B) Northern blot analyses of RNA from cells harboring the tRNASerUGAM allele (lanes 1–4) or the tRNASerUGAM-G37:10 allele (lanes 5–8) and transformed with various constructs. Lanes 1 and 5, pREP4; lanes 2 and 6, Sla1p; lanes 3 and 7, hLa-S366; lanes 4 and 8, hLa-G366. The upper panel was probed with an oligonucleotide (Mser-UGA) that detects all species of tRNASerUGAM and tRNASerUGAM-G37:10 transcripts. After radiodecay, the probe was stripped, and the blot was reprobed with an oligonucleotide specific for the 5′ leader (lower panel). (C) One-dimensional isoelectric focusing (IEF) of a purified isoform of unphosphorylated hLa after in vitro phosphorylation with [32P-γ]ATP and CKII (lane 1) or after mock treatment (lane 2) as described in the text. Lanes 1* and 2* reveal immunodetection of the hLa proteins present in lanes 1 and 2 (see text). (D) IEF immunoblot analysis of HeLa nuclear extract, and extract prepared from S. pombe cells expressing hLa-S366 and hLa-G366 after mock or CIP treatment as indicated above the lanes. Bands are labeled as discussed in the text. Lanes 7–10 represent a parallel analysis of the samples in lanes 3–6 to show that the artifact between lanes 5 and 6 is not reproducible. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 339-348DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00034-4)