Carolina Mendoza-Puccini, MD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEND Standard for the Exchange of Nonclinical Data
Advertisements

Correspondence to Dr Rachel L Richesson, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 3650 Spectrum Boulevard, Suite 100,
EleMAP: An Online Tool for Harmonizing Data Elements using Standardized Metadata Registries and Biomedical Vocabularies Jyotishman Pathak, PhD 1 Janey.
Bay Area CDISC Implmentation Network – July 13, 2009 How a New CDISC Domain is Made Carey Smoak Team Leader CDISC SDTM Device Team.
NLM-Semantic Medline Data Science Data Publication Commons Dr. Brand Niemann Director and Senior Data Scientist/Data Journalist Semantic Community Data.
23 August 2015Michael Knoessl1 PhUSE 2008 Manchester / Michael Knoessl Implementing CDISC at Boehringer Ingelheim.
Future of MDR - ISO/IEC Metadata Registries (MDR) Larry Fitzwater, SC 32 WG 2 Convener Computer Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
1 Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group The Vision Toward Testing Ontology Tools in High Priority Health IT Applications October 5, 2005.
Accelerate Biomedical Discovery
MODULE B: Case Report Forms Jane Fendl & Denise Thwing April 7, Version: Final 07-Apr-2010.
Using the Open Metadata Registry (openMDR) to create Data Sharing Interfaces October 14 th, 2010 David Ervin & Rakesh Dhaval, Center for IT Innovations.
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.
Michael F. Huerta, Ph.D. Associate Director for Program Development National Library of Medicine, NIH BD2K CDE Webinar – September 8, 2015 Common Data.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FITBIR: A Platform for International.
Lisa A. Lang, MPP Assistant Director for Health Services Research Information Head, National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health.
Component 11/Unit 8b Data Dictionary Understanding and Development.
Integrating Services Research into CTN Clinical Trials: The Devil is in the Details Harold I Perl, PhD Center for the Clinical Trials Network National.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
AHRQ-USHIK: Best Practices & Lessons Learned HIT Standards Committee Vocabulary Task Force J. Michael Fitzmaurice Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
S&I Standards Organization Engagement & Communication Plan DRAFT Standards Support Team 1 September 2011.
Pediatric Terminology Harmonization Initiative Introduction October2014 National Cancer Institute EVS.
NHII 03 Standards and Vocabulary Group A CG Chute Mayo Clinic CG Chute Mayo Clinic This presentation does not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S.
A LexWiki-based Representation and Harmonization Framework for caDSR Common Data Elements Guoqian Jiang, Ph.D. Robert Freimuth, Ph.D. Harold Solbrig Mayo.
The NINDS Common Data Elements Project February 20, 2014 Wendy R. Galpern, MD, PhD NINDS / NIH American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics | 16.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.
Data Coordinating Center University of Washington Department of Biostatistics Elizabeth Brown, ScD Siiri Bennett, MD.
Submission Standards: The Big Picture Gary G. Walker Associate Director, Programming Standards, Global Data Solutions, Global Data Management.
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Data Management and Coordinating Center (RDCRN DMCC) Rosalie Holland LDN Investigator Meeting at WORLDSymposium.
​ Executive Summary Common Protocol Template (CPT)
FaceBase Consortium NIDCR Update Steve Scholnick, PhD TGRB/NIDCR/NIH.
REVISIONS DATE SLIDE CHANGE 11/22/10
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
NINDS CDE Team The Emmes Corporation
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Government Perspective on Additive Manufacturing Standards
ACE Presentation for Industry
Component 11 Configuring EHRs
Data Managers’ Forum What’s in it for us?
The International Plant Protection Convention
Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group
Common Data Elements: Data Standards for Clinical Data Collection
Networking and Health Information Exchange
ISARIC – INTERNATIONAL SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY INFECTION CONSORTIUM
Tennessee Longitudinal Data system (TLDS)
Interoperable data formats: SDMX
Introduction to TransCelerate
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Kevin A. Wilson, Michael Ham, Brenda Hair and Eugene Turner
September 7, 2018 Courtney Baird, MS
implementing NEW NIH Human subjects guidance
An ecosystem of contributions
Metadata in the modernization of statistical production at Statistics Canada Carmen Greenough June 2, 2014.
FaceBase Consortium: NIDCR Update 2018
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Common Protocol Template (CPT)
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
1915(i)& (k) Implementation Update
History and Evolution of CPT Releases
COUNTER Update February 2006.
RAMON Re-engineering An Update
A Case Study for Synergistically Implementing the Management of Open Data Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications.
Energy Statistics Compilers Manual
The role of metadata in census data dissemination
IRB Harmonization 2016 Review
1. SDMX: Background and purpose
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )
History and Evolution of CPT Releases
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Carolina Mendoza-Puccini, MD Common Data Elements In a Nutshell Carolina Mendoza-Puccini, MD Robin Conwit, MD NINDS

NINDS CDE Project What is the CDE Project? NINDS initiated the development of Common Data Elements (CDEs) as part of a project to develop data standards for clinical research in neuroscience. The CDEs are content standards that can be applied to various data collection models and are intended to be dynamic and may evolve over time. CDEs are not a database. The CDE project was started about 10 years ago in an effort to develop data standards. The CDEs are metadata and are not a clinical database; they are all available free of charge for use on a NINDS website. These data elements are dynamic and may evolve over time. There are specific guidelines and procedures for modifying or updating the CDEs and CRFs established by NIH.

Goals of the CDE Project Develop common definitions and standardize case report forms (CRFs) and other instruments Help investigators conduct clinical research through the development of these uniform formats by which clinical data can be systematically collected, analyzed and shared across the research community

CDEs and NINDS grants NIH-funded and other research studies use CDEs or are CDE- compatible FOA: PAR-18-420 (for NINDS Phase III /U01 Clinical Trials–CDEs Required) All clinical research studies should use CDEs Clinical research projects will be accelerated New investigators can build on consensus data elements Start-up of multi-center and international clinical research efforts will be streamlined

Definitions Data Element: Information that describes a piece of data to be collected in a study* Common Data Element (CDE): A data element that is common to multiple data sets across different studies* A CDE includes a name, precise definition, and semantic value with clear definitions and permissible values A CDE is consistent and harmonized across different datasets *National Library of Medicine Related Terms Data Standard - Agreed upon set of rules that allow information to be shared and processed in a uniform and consistent manner. This includes representations, formats, and definitions of data. Some CDEs have been mapped to existing data standards and vocabularies such as those listed in the Health Information Technology and Health Data Standards at NLM. Vocabulary - A database of concepts with their corresponding definitions and codes that may include relationships between concepts.

NINDS CDE Terminology : Classification General Core: required for all NINDS-funded studies Disease Core: required information applicable to any disease-specific study Supplemental–Highly Recommended: essential information for specified conditions, study types, or designs Supplemental: recommended but not required– use depends upon study design, protocol, or type of research Exploratory: under development or not yet validated

Current NINDS CDEs Over 20 Disease Areas, 18,000 CDEs & 1400 Instruments * Include Pediatric-specific recommendations

CDE Development: Process CDEs are identified, developed, and vetted by experts in the scientific community Collaborative involvement with other NIH institutes and federal agencies such as the National Library of Medicine, CDC, DoD Alignment with International Data Standards (ISO), Clinical Data Interchange Consortium (CDISC), whenever possible Insight from patient advocacy groups and industry NINDS provides continuous guidance, review, oversight, and updates A team of experts in the scientific community called a “CDE Working Group” is formed to identify and develop CDEs. From the first working group meeting, it typically takes approximately 12 to 18 months to identify and develop final recommendations. These draft recommendations are vetted by the entire working group before they are released for public review. After public review, the version 1.0 CDE standards are created and disseminated to the public via the website.  

CDE Development: Timeline Development Step Typical Timeframe NINDS identifies Working Group (WG) members and WG Chair(s) 2 - 4 weeks NINDS works with Chair(s) to divide WG into subgroups and to nominate subgroup Chair(s) Introductory meeting of WG at national conference or via web conference 1-2 hours Subgroups meet every 3 - 5 weeks via conference call to develop CDEs for assigned areas 6 - 9 months NINDS Review of all subgroups’ CDEs 1 month Subgroups revise CDEs based on feedback from NINDS review 1 - 2 months Public Review of WG’s CDEs 6 - 8 weeks Subgroups review CDEs based on feedback from Public Review Post version 1.0 of CDEs on the website Total 12 - 18 months

Potential Benefits of CDEs Reduce time/cost to develop data collection tools Increased efficiency not creating new Case Report Forms. Create a CRF in the CDE website and download into word, PDF or CSV. Reduce study start-up time and cost of overall trial Reduce time creating e-CRFS. Data dictionaries can be downloaded at the CDE website and uploaded into the electronic data collection system. Improve data quality/ Facilitate data collection Uniform data collected in a standardized manner across the studies. NINDS/NIH-compliant.

Potential Benefits of CDEs Facilitate data sharing/comparisons between studies and meta-analyses Datasets will have the same variable names, harmonization will be easier and will increase the opportunities of establishing collaboration among different labs/study teams Improve opportunities for validation of exploratory elements/instruments Validation of these elements/instruments to be used in future clinical trials (Clinical Trials Readiness?) Increase CDE awareness in the neuroscience community Publications, presentations and other ways to disseminate the usability of the CDEs in neuroscience studies

Accessing the NINDS CDEs NINDS CDE Website www.commondataelements.ninds.nih.gov Contact NINDS CDE project team NINDSCDE@emmes.com Carolina.mendoza-puccini@nih.gov Conwitr@ninds.nih.gov