Regulation of amounts of various constituents in cigarette smoke.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nicotine and smoking: insights from the Health Survey for England
Advertisements

Tor Iversen Lecture 11: Economic incentives and the organization of private physician practice I.
Electronic Cigarettes By: Samantha Stapleton, Arielle Visalli, Brandon Junk, & Alex Herrera.
India: The Tax Treatment of Bidis Emil M. Sunley.
Tobacco Lesson 1. Tobacco has ____________ effects on almost all body systems. cigarette lungs cancer tobacco harmful crave oxygen.
Menthol and Tobacco Regulation
ADDITIONAL TESTS Ignition Propensity Testing Toxicity Assays.
Information on tobacco packages could encourage and help tobacco users to stop using tobacco or find least possible harmful ways of use for those unable.
Chapter 10: Hypothesis Testing
Ab Financial Incentives in Life Insurance (Preferred risk products) 16th European Congress on Obesity Geneva, Switzerland May 16, 2008 Dieter Gaubatz,
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 8 Tests of Hypotheses Based on a Single Sample.
By: Mike Kane, Christopher, Chris, & Alex Herrera.
1 Questions to the Subcommittee 1.What criteria do you recommend to TPSAC for selecting the initial list of H/PH constituents?
INTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLO FOR POME 105. Lesson 3: R H THEKISO:SENIOR PAT TIME LECTURER INE OF PRESENTATION 1.Epidemiologic measures of association 2.Study.
Slide Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. MM 207 Statistics Unit 1 Instructor Scranton.
Correlational versus Experimental. Study on Alcohol and Speech Researchers were quite interested in the effect of alcohol on speech. They obtained four.
10 facts on gender and tobacco World Health Organization.
What we need to know about smoking & tobacco addiction.
DATA-DRIVEN STATISTICAL RESEARCH -- By Xianghua Luo Why a statistician consultant need to do methodological research? –Help you do your consulting work.
The INTRODUCTION. Purpose: to convince the reader that your study will yield knowledge or knowhow that is new and useful.
Substance Use and Abuse Smoking. Smoking Tobacco: Who Smokes? Varies with age Gender differences Educational differences.
Le rôle de la réduction de dommages dans la lutte antitabac The role of harm reduction in tobacco control Lars M. Ramström Institute for Tobacco Studies.
Ch. 15 Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
FDA Regulation of Tobacco: What does it mean? When does it start? And what’s next?
Chapter 4: Atoms and Elements.  Recognize that all matter is composed of atoms.  Explain the early ideas that led to the current understanding of the.
R Programming Odds & Odds Ratios 1. Session 3 Overview 1.Odds 2.Odds Ratio (OR) 3.Confidence Intervals for OR’s 4.Inference based on OR’s 2.
Tests About a Population Proportion
Lung Cancer Molecular Pathology of Cancer Boot Camp January 4, 2012 Jennifer Rider, ScD.
Unit B1a 3.4 Smoking and Health Year 4N 29th November.
Health Info Public Health March 2015 Tobacco and youth.
Fit or Unfit ? One in Four British Women Smoke Smoking is the largest cause of preventable cancer deaths in Britain.
Stat 100 Jan. 25. To Do Read Chapter 5 Key Terms Observational Study = essentially a survey, investigator does not assign any tasks to participants Randomized.
Nicotine Dependence: Comparing Menthol and Non-Menthol Cigarette Smokers Qiang Li, MS Andrew Hyland, PhD Gary Giovino, MS, PhD Joseph Bauer, PhD Michael.
Preliminary Thoughts on Evaluating Harm Reduction Claims Based on the Mass SAB Experience 2003 National Conference on Tobacco or Health David Burns MD.
Section 7.4 ~ The Search for Causality Introduction to Probability and Statistics Ms. Young.
Categorical data 1 Single proportion and comparison of 2 proportions دکتر سید ابراهیم جباری فر( (Dr. jabarifar تاریخ : 1388 / 2010 دانشیار دانشگاه علوم.
Lecture PowerPoint Slides Basic Practice of Statistics 7 th Edition.
The effects of smoking tobacco By Clayton Simpson.
Exam 1 Review. Data referenced throughout review The Federal Trade Commission annually rates varieties of domestic cigarettes according to their tar,
Cutting tobacco’s death toll − an overview of different options Lars M. Ramström Institute for Tobacco Studies Stockholm, Sweden 5th Annual Conference.
Lars M. Ramström PhD Director, Institute for Tobacco Studies Stockholm, Sweden The Swedish experience the role.
The Role of Harm Reduction in Tobacco control – An Update of Pros and Cons Lars M. Ramström Institute for Tobacco Studies Stockholm, Sweden 53rd International.
Lecture PowerPoint Slides Basic Practice of Statistics 7 th Edition.
Slide Slide 1 Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Overview.
Mixed models. Concepts We are often interested in attributing the variability that is evident in data to the various categories, or classifications, of.
Who Smokes and Who Quits? (focus on social class) Elizabeth M. Barbeau, ScD, MPH Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard School of Pubic Health.
Chapter Part 1 Sampling Distribution Models for.
Food Balance sheet – Applications and uses James Geehan, Statistician FAO, Rome.
The Heart and Stroke Foundation South Africa Presented by: Zulfa Abrahams (Dietician)
Epidemiology of Tobacco Use and Cessation Gary A. Giovino, Ph.D., M.S. Roswell Park Cancer Institute Buffalo, New York Consumer Demand Round Table Washington,
Statistics Division Beijing, China 25 October, 2007 EC-FAO Food Security Information for Action Programme Side Event Food Security Statistics and Information.
Copyright © 2009 Cengage Learning 9.1 Chapter 9 Sampling Distributions ( 표본분포 )‏
 Tobacco is a product prepared from the leaves of the tobacco plant.  It is smoked in cigarettes, cigars, pipes and consumed as snuff, chewing tobacco.
TM Substance Use Transitions from Initial Use to Regular Use to Discontinuance Ralph S. Caraballo, Ph.D., MPH Office on Smoking and Health, CDC, Atlanta.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies 4.2Experiments.
11/6/03LSRO presentation Draft for discussion PM USA Mission Our goal is to be the most responsible, effective and respected developer, manufacturer and.
Case control & cohort studies
Strategies for regulation of cigarette emissions The WHO product regulatory approach Nigel Gray David Burns For TobReg Working Group 1 in Conjunction with.
Regulation of: - amounts of various constituents in cigarette smoke - information on packages regarding smoke constituents - smokefree tobacco products.
Welcome to the Unit 5 Seminar Kristin Webster
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
FDA Authority to Regulate Tobacco Products Tobacco Control Act
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Epidemiology 503 Confounding.
Results of the analysis in tobacco
برنامه مقدماتی آموزشی درمان وابستگی به دخانیات (دود)
A Lesson From the Zuni Indians: Heritability in Perspective
Trends in electronic cigarette use in England
Presentation transcript:

Regulation of amounts of various constituents in cigarette smoke

To be meaningful from health point of view, regulation of smoke constituents should relate, not to machine yield, but to smokers intake, taking into account the interaction between the smoker and the product.

Jarvis MJ, Boreham R, Primatesta P, Feyerabend C, Bryant A. Nicotine yield from machine-smoked cigarettes and nicotine intakes in smokers: evidence from a representative population survey. J Natl Cancer Inst Jan 17;93(2):134-8.

InI2001, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) published Monograph 13

Monograph 13 concluded: Measurements of tar and nicotine yields using the FTC method do not offer smokers meaningful information on the amount of tar and nicotine they will receive from a cigarette. and therefore asked for: Measurement of constituent yields in a manner that more closely resembles the way smokers actually consume cigarettes.

But, there is no such thing as the (one and only) way smokers actually consume cigarettes because: Different smokers use different ways to smoke the same cigarette Each individual smoker uses different ways to smoke different cigarettes

What is it that determines an individual smokers intake ? Nicotine: His personal need for nicotine (that governs the way he smokes in order to get the amount he needs). This intake is NOT essentially brand-related. Any other substance, for example Tar: The amount of Tar that in the smoke of the brand accompanies the smokers personal intake of nicotine. This intake IS brand-related, since it is influenced by the smoke composition (expressed by the proportion between the amount of Tar and the amount of Nicotine, the Tar/Nicotine (T/N) ratio, for the brand).

Is the T/N ratio (or an other such ratio) a fixed brand characteristic? The smoke composition does vary to some extent depending on the way the cigarette is smoked. However, the variation among all smokers except some very few, is small enough to be unimportant for brand comparison purposes. Consequently, an acceptable T/N ratio could be derived from the machine yield measures.

EXAMPLE A smokers intake of tar = machine yield of tar = his nicotine intake × machine yield of nicotine Amount of nicotine Tar/Nicotine ratio determined by determined by the smoker brand properties

Example of brand comparison

Example of rule in an intake-related regulation of cigarette smoke constituents. T/N ratio <10 (and, optionally, Machine yield of tar <12 mg Machine yield of nicotine <1.4 mg)

Example of brand comparison

Summary Regulation of amounts of smoke constituents A smokers intake of nicotine is about the same from all cigarettes and can therefore not be effectively influenced by limits for machine yield of nicotine. A smokers intake of other smoke constituents can be reduced by setting limits for the ratio between yield of certain substances and the yield of nicotine.

Regulation of information on packages regarding smoke constituents

Health-related purpose of consumer info on cigarette packages: To help the smoker minimize his intake of harmful smoke constituents. Therefore, info should be related to potential INTAKE. Consequently, machine yield figures are meaningless.

Machine yield figures on packages are even MISLEADING, since their appearence gives the FALSE impression that: - nicotine intake were determined by cigarette properties and differing widely between different brands but independent of how you smoke. - low figures for a substance, e.g. tar, would indicate low intake of that substance i.e. This is a mild cigarette.

Instead, smokers should be aware... - that they are themselves influencing their intake by the way they smoke - that the self-determined intake of nicotine is about the same from all cigarettes - that the intake of other substances is influenced also by cigarette properties (yield ratio to nicotine)

Possible model for a meaningful and truthful info box on packages: Nicotine delivery from one of these cigarettes - to a smoking machine (ISO standard): 0.6 mg - to a smoker: 0.1 – 2.0 mg depending on how it is smoked Every milligram of nicotine is accompanied by: Tar: 8 mg Carbon monoxide: 9 mg

Summary Regulation of information on packages Machine yield figures as displayed by current EU (and other) regulations are not only meaningless but misleading. Smokers should be informed that their intake of… - nicotine can be varied in a wide range by themselves depending on the way they smoke, but not very much by the choice of cigarette brand. - other substances is influenced by cigarette properties (brand-specific amount of various substances per unit of nicotine) so that choice of brand may help reduce intake of other substances.

Regulation of smokefree tobacco products

Mean nitrosamine content of moist snuff products from various sources based on dry weight

Summary Regulation of smokefree products Regulations must recognize the very large differences in toxicity between different smokefree products and aim at eliminating from the market those who carry serious health risks rahter than those who do not. There are examples of standards that can serve as models for designing meaningful regulations.